MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cepko, C L
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cepko, C L
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, P A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1981 October; 1(10): 919-931

Sequential transcription-translation of simian virus 40 by using mammalian cell extracts.

C L Cepko, U Hansen, H Handa and P A Sharp

ABSTRACT

Ribonucleic acids (RNAs) transcribed in vitro by using the whole-cell extract system of Manley et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:3855-3859, 1980) were tested for their efficiency and fidelity in directing protein synthesis in reticulocyte lysates. Simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), cleaved by various restriction endonucleases, was used as the template. Successful translation of the small tumor antigen t, as well as the capsid proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3, was detected by immunoprecipitation analysis. Although no synthesis of large T antigen was detected, use of this technology allows detection of large T synthesis resulting from the correct splicing of as little as 0.2% of the in vitro RNA transcripts, making it ideal for use as an in vitro splicing assay. Transcripts synthesized in vitro were used as messages at least as efficiently as were viral messenger RNA's (mRNA's) synthesized in vivo; and in the case of small t, there was more efficient translation of small t mRNA synthesized in vitro than of small t mRNA synthesized in vivo. The transcripts that served as mRNA's for the various polypeptides were identified by using the following two criteria. (i) The sensitivity of synthesis of a given protein to digestion of the template DNA with restriction enzymes allowed the localization of the promoter and coding regions. (ii) Translation of size-fractionated RNA allowed confirmation of the transcript-mRNA assignments. With these techniques we found that VP2, VP3 and, in some cases, VP1 synthesis resulted from the initiation of translation at internal AUG codons. In fact, families of polypeptides were produced by initiation of translation at AUG codons within sequences coding for VP1 and T, presumably as a result of transcription initiation events that generated 5' ends immediately upstream from these AUGs. Application of this technology for the identification of coding regions within cloned DNA fragments is discussed.


Mol Cell Biol. 1981 October; 1(10): 919-931







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.