This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pu, W T Articles by Struhl, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pu, W T Articles by Struhl, K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1991 October; 11(10): 4918-4926

Highly conserved residues in the bZIP domain of yeast GCN4 are not essential for DNA binding.

Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

ABSTRACT

Yeast GCN4 and the Jun oncoprotein are transcriptional activators that bind DNA via a bZIP domain consisting of a leucine zipper dimerization element and an adjacent basic region that directly contacts DNA. Two highly conserved alanines (Ala-238 and Ala-239 in GCN4) and an invariant asparagine (Asn-235) in the basic region have been proposed to play important roles in DNA sequence recognition by bZIP proteins. Surprisingly, these conserved residues can be functionally replaced in GCN4 and in a derivative containing the Jun basic region (Jun-GCN4). The ability of an amino acid to functionally substitute for Asn-235 does not correlate with its preference for assuming the N-cap position of an alpha helix. This finding argues against the proposal of the scissors grip model that the invariant asparagine forms an N cap that permits the basic region to bend sharply and wrap around the DNA. In contrast to a prediction of the induced fork model, the pattern of functional substitutions of the conserved alanines together with the results of uracil interference experiments suggests that Ala-238 and Ala-239 do not make base-specific DNA contacts. Finally, the Jun-GCN4 chimeric proteins appear much more active in vivo than expected from their DNA-binding properties in vitro. The mechanistic and evolutionary implications of these results are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Narendra, U., Zhu, L., Li, B., Wilken, J., Weiss, M. A. (2002). Sex-specific Gene Regulation. THE DOUBLESEX DM MOTIF IS A BIPARTITE DNA-BINDING DOMAIN. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 43463-43473 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jin, Y., Zhong, H., Vershon, A. K. (1999). The Yeast a1 and alpha 2 Homeodomain Proteins Do Not Contribute Equally to Heterodimeric DNA Binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 585-593 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Granato, M, Schnabel, H, Schnabel, R (1994). Genesis of an organ: molecular analysis of the pha-1 gene. Development 120: 3005-3017 [Abstract]  
• Cuenoud, B, Schepartz, A (1993). Altered specificity of DNA-binding proteins with transition metal dimerization domains. Science 259: 510-513 [Abstract]  
• Oliviero, S, Robinson, G S, Struhl, K, Spiegelman, B M (1992). Yeast GCN4 as a probe for oncogenesis by AP-1 transcription factors: transcriptional activation through AP-1 sites is not sufficient for cellular transformation.. Genes Dev. 6: 1799-1809 [Abstract]