MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrissey, L M
Right arrow Articles by Kirkegaard, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrissey, L M
Right arrow Articles by Kirkegaard, K
Mol Cell Biol. 1991 July; 11(7): 3719-3725

Regulation of a double-stranded RNA modification activity in human cells.

L M Morrissey and K Kirkegaard

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.

ABSTRACT

A double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-specific modification activity from Xenopus oocytes and human cells dsRNA modifier) converts adenosine residues present in dsRNA to inosines. The function of the dsRNA modifier is unknown, although it has been suggested that it may be part of the cellular antiviral response. We investigated the relationship between the activity of the dsRNA modifier, viral infection, and the antiviral response in human cells induced by poly(rI)-poly(rC) [poly(I.C)] treatment. We found, unexpectedly, that treatment of HeLa cells with poly(I.C) or other dsRNA molecules resulted in the dramatic inhibition of the dsRNA modifier. Mixing experiments, reconstruction experiments, and pretreatment of extracts with RNases indicated that inhibition of the dsRNA modifier did not result from the continued presence of a soluble inhibitor such as dsRNA) in the in vitro modification reactions. Treatment of cells with cyclohexamide or dactinomycin simultaneously with the poly(I.C) demonstrated that in vivo inhibition of the dsRNA modifier did not require new transcription or translation. The dsRNA modification activity was also substantially inhibited in cells infected with poliovirus and was slightly inhibited in cells infected with adenovirus. The inhibition of the dsRNA modifier during the antiviral state is thus not consistent with an antiviral function, and instead suggests another cellular function for dsRNA modification.


Mol Cell Biol. 1991 July; 11(7): 3719-3725







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.