MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masson, N
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masson, N
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K A
Mol Cell Biol. 1992 March; 12(3): 1096-1106

Cyclic AMP response element-binding protein and the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A are present in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells but are unable to activate the somatostatin promoter.

N Masson, M Ellis, S Goodbourn and K A Lee

Gene Activation Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT

The cyclic AMP (cAMP) response elements (CREs) of the somatostatin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) promoters contain binding sites for CRE-binding protein (CREB) that are essential for cAMP-regulated transcription. Using F9 embryonal carcinoma cells, we show that the somatostatin and VIP promoters exhibit a differentiation-dependent cAMP response, demonstrating that these promoters are regulated by transcription factors that become active during differentiation. Lack of cAMP responsiveness of the somatostatin promoter in undifferentiated cells is not due to the absence of known positive-acting factors (the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A [cPKA] and CREB) or a general inhibition of protein kinase A activity. Since overexpression of exogenous cPKA and CREB is sufficient to activate the somatostatin promoter in undifferentiated cells, these findings suggest that a negative factor(s) represses endogenous cPKA and CREB. In contrast to their effects on somatostatin, exogenous CREB and cPKA do not activate the VIP promoter. Thus, despite coregulation during differentiation and the ability to bind CREB, the somatostatin and VIP promoters are not coordinately activated by CREB in undifferentiated F9 cells.


Mol Cell Biol. 1992 March; 12(3): 1096-1106




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.