This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, J
Right arrow Articles by Dang, C V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, J
Right arrow Articles by Dang, C V

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1992 July; 12(7): 3130-3137

Activation domains of L-Myc and c-Myc determine their transforming potencies in rat embryo cells.

J Barrett, M J Birrer, G J Kato, H Dosaka-Akita and C V Dang

Hematology Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

ABSTRACT

Members of the Myc family of proteins share a number of protein motifs that are found in regulators of gene transcription. Conserved stretches of amino acids found in the N-terminal transcriptional activation domain of c-Myc are required for cotransforming activity. Most of the Myc proteins contain the basic helix-loop-helix zipper (bHLH-Zip) DNA-binding motif which is also required for the cotransforming activity of c-Myc. L-Myc, the product of a myc family gene that is highly amplified in many human lung carcinomas, was found to cotransform primary rat embryo cells with an activated ras gene. However, L-Myc cotransforming activity was only 1 to 10% of that of c-Myc (M. J. Birrer, S. Segal, J. S. DeGreve, F. Kaye, E. A. Sausville, and J. D. Minna, Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2668-2673, 1988). We sought to determine whether functional differences between c-Myc and L-Myc in either the N-terminal or the C-terminal domain could account for the relatively diminished L-Myc cotransforming activity. Although the N-terminal domain of L-Myc could activate transcription when fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain, the activity was only 5% of that of a comparable c-Myc domain. We next determined that the interaction of the C-terminal bHLH-Zip region of L-Myc or c-Myc with that of a Myc partner protein, Max, was equivalent in transfected cells. A Max expression vector was found to augment the cotransforming activity of L-Myc as well as that of c-Myc. In addition, a bacterially synthesized DNA-binding domain of L-Myc, like that o c-Myc, heterodimerizes with purified Max protein to bind the core DNA sequence CACGTG. To determine the region of L-Myc responsible for its relatively diminished cotransforming activity, we constructed chimeras containing exons 2 (constituting activation domains) and 3 (constituting DNA-binding domains) of c-Myc fused to those of L-Myc. The cotransforming potencies of these chimeras were compared with those of full-length L-Myc of c-Myc in rat embryo cells. The relative cotransforming activities suggest that the potencies of the activation domains determine the cotransforming efficiencies for c-Myc and L-Myc. This correlation supports the hypothesis that the Myc proteins function in neoplastic cotransformation as transcription factors.

Mol Cell Biol. 1992 July; 12(7): 3130-3137




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gostissa, M., Ranganath, S., Bianco, J. M., Alt, F. W. (2009). Chromosomal location targets different MYC family gene members for oncogenic translocations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 2265-2270 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • He, Z., Cho, Y.-Y., Liu, G., Ma, W.-Y., Bode, A. M., Dong, Z. (2003). p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Regulation of JB6 Cl41 Cell Transformation Promoted by Epidermal Growth Factor. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 26435-26442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nikiforov, M. A., Chandriani, S., Park, J., Kotenko, I., Matheos, D., Johnsson, A., McMahon, S. B., Cole, M. D. (2002). TRRAP-Dependent and TRRAP-Independent Transcriptional Activation by Myc Family Oncoproteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 5054-5063 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wood, L. J., Mukherjee, M., Dolde, C. E., Xu, Y., Maher, J. F., Bunton, T. E., Williams, J. B., Resar, L. M. S. (2000). HMG-I/Y, a New c-Myc Target Gene and Potential Oncogene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 5490-5502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Malynn, B. A., de Alboran, I. M., O'Hagan, R. C., Bronson, R., Davidson, L., DePinho, R. A., Alt, F. W. (2000). N-myc can functionally replace c-myc in murine development, cellular growth, and differentiation. Genes Dev. 14: 1390-1399 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boyd, K. E., Farnham, P. J. (1999). Identification of Target Genes of Oncogenic Transcription Factors. Exp. Biol. Med. 222: 9-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith-Sørensen, B., Hijmans, E. M., Beijersbergen, R. L., Bernards, R. (1996). Functional Analysis of Burkitt's Lymphoma Mutant c-Myc Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 5513-5518 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moens, C., Stanton, B., Parada, L., Rossant, J (1993). Defects in heart and lung development in compound heterozygotes for two different targeted mutations at the N-myc locus. Development 119: 485-499 [Abstract]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»