MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwer, B
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwer, B
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, C
Mol Cell Biol. 1992 August; 12(8): 3540-3547

A dominant negative mutation in a spliceosomal ATPase affects ATP hydrolysis but not binding to the spliceosome.

B Schwer and C Guthrie

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0448.

ABSTRACT

PRP16 is an RNA-dependent ATPase required for the second catalytic step of splicing in vitro. A dominant suppressor of a branchpoint mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the prp16-1 allele, contains a Tyr to Asp change in the nucleotide-binding site consensus sequence. We now find that cells harboring the prp16-1 allele have a general growth defect that is exacerbated at cold temperatures. The mutant is dominant over the wild-type gene when overexpressed. Purified Prp16-1 protein binds to the spliceosome with apparently wild-type affinity; however, it only weakly complements the second-step block in a PRP16-depleted extract. Analysis of purified Prp16-1 revealed that the rate of ATP hydrolysis is greatly reduced. These results can account for the dominant negative growth phenotype and argue that the ATPase activity of PRP16 is essential for its role in splicing. Moreover, since PRP16 is a member of the DEAD/H box families, these findings have important implications for a large class of proteins.

Mol Cell Biol. 1992 August; 12(8): 3540-3547




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.