MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farabaugh, P J
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farabaugh, P J
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1993 April; 13(4): 2081-2090

Three downstream sites repress transcription of a Ty2 retrotransposon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

P J Farabaugh, A Vimaladithan, S Türkel, R Johnson and H Zhao

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Catonsville 21228.

ABSTRACT

Transcription of Ty1 and Ty2 retrotransposons of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is modulated by multiple downstream regulatory sites. Both transposon families include a positively acting site within the transcribed region which resembles a higher eukaryotic enhancer. We have demonstrated the existence of a repression site distal to the enhancer of the Ty2-917 element. Here we describe experiments investigating the internal structure of this site. We show that this 200-bp region includes three distinct repression sites which we term DRSI (downstream repression site I), DRSII, and DRSIII. Individually each site causes almost twofold repression, and together the sites repress eightfold. Unexpectedly, when the entire region encompassing the DRS sites is moved outside the transcription unit, it acts as a qualitatively positively acting element. In this context the DRS sites still repress transcription, since eliminating them increases transcription further. That the region can activate transcription implies that it includes activation sites in addition to the three repression sites. The change from qualitatively negatively acting to positively acting must reflect a change in the relative effects of the multiple positive and negative sites; when moved outside the transcription unit, the activators predominate. Importantly, DRSII and DRSIII repress transcription autonomously when inserted upstream of a heterologous promoter activated by the transcriptional activator GCN4, showing that they are indeed transcriptional repression sites.


Mol Cell Biol. 1993 April; 13(4): 2081-2090




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.