This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Richard, M Articles by Chartrand, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Richard, M Articles by Chartrand, P

Integration of a vector containing a repetitive LINE-1 element in the human genome.

Canadian Red Cross Society, Montreal, Quebec.

ABSTRACT

Mammalian cells contain numerous nonallelic repeated sequences, such as multicopy genes, gene families, and repeated elements. One common feature of nonallelic repeated sequences is that they are homeologous (not perfectly identical). Our laboratory has been studying recombination between homeologous sequences by using LINE-1 (L1) elements as substrates. We showed previously that an exogenous L1 element could readily acquire endogenous L1 sequences by nonreciprocal homologous recombination. In the study presented here, we have investigated the propensity of exogenous L1 elements to be involved in a reciprocal process, namely, crossing-overs. This would result in the integration of the exogenous L1 element into an endogenous L1 element. Of over 400 distinct integration events analyzed, only 2% involved homologous recombination between exogenous and endogenous L1 elements. These homologous recombination events were imprecise, with the integrated vector being flanked by one homologous and one illegitimate junction. This type of structure is not consistent with classical crossing-overs that would result in two homologous junctions but rather is consistent with one-sided homologous recombination followed by illegitimate integration. Contrary to what has been found for reciprocal homologous integration, the degree of homology between the exogenous and endogenous L1 elements did not seem to play an important role in the choice of recombination partners. These results suggest that although exogenous and endogenous L1 elements are capable of homologous recombination, this seldom leads to crossing-overs. This observation could have implications for the stability of mammalian genomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Neafsey, D. E., Blumenstiel, J. P., Hartl, D. L. (2004). Different Regulatory Mechanisms Underlie Similar Transposable Element Profiles in Pufferfish and Fruitflies. Mol Biol Evol 21: 2310-2318 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• D'Anjou, H., Chabot, C., Chartrand, P. (2004). Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 6136-6143 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Villemure, J.-F., Abaji, C., Cousineau, I., Belmaaza, A. (2003). MSH2-deficient Human Cells Exhibit a Defect in the Accurate Termination of Homology-directed Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Cancer Res. 63: 3334-3339 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McCulloch, R. D., Read, L. R., Baker, M. D. (2003). Strand Invasion and DNA Synthesis From the Two 3' Ends of a Double-Strand Break in Mammalian Cells. Genetics 163: 1439-1447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boissinot, S., Entezam, A., Furano, A. V. (2001). Selection Against Deleterious LINE-1-Containing Loci in the Human Lineage. Mol Biol Evol 18: 926-935 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tremblay, A., Jasin, M., Chartrand, P. (2000). A Double-Strand Break in a Chromosomal LINE Element Can Be Repaired by Gene Conversion with Various Endogenous LINE Elements in Mouse Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 54-60 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Paques, F., Haber, J. E. (1999). Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 349-404 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Watson, J E, Slorach, E M, Maule, J, Lawson, D, Porteous, D J, Brookes, A J (1995). Human repeat-mediated integration of selectable markers into somatic cell hybrids.. Genome Res. 5: 444-452 [Abstract]