This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ohashi, Y Articles by Carey, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ohashi, Y Articles by Carey, M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1994 April; 14(4): 2731-2739

Modulating the potency of an activator in a yeast in vitro transcription system.

Y Ohashi, J M Brickman, E Furman, B Middleton and M Carey

Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles 90024-1737.

ABSTRACT

The intrinsic stimulatory potential or potency of a eukaryotic gene activator is controlled by the interaction between the activation domain and the transcriptional machinery. To further understand this interaction, we undertook a biochemical study to identify parameters that could be used to modulate activator potency. We considered how varying the number of activation domains, their flexibility, and the number of promoter sites affects potency in a yeast nuclear extract. The effects of GAL4 derivatives bearing either one, two, or four herpes simplex virus VP16 activation domains (amino acids 413 to 454) were measured on DNA templates containing one or two GAL4 sites in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae nuclear extract. We found that multimerized VP16 activation domains acted synergistically to increase the potency of the activators. The spacing between the activation domains was critical, such that the increased flexibility imparted by a protein linker contributed to increased activator potency. With highly potent activators, the levels of transcription stimulated on a single site were saturating, whereas the stimulatory effect of weaker activators increased with the number of sites. We discuss how these biochemical studies relate to the mechanism of gene activation and synergy in a yeast in vitro system.

---

Mol Cell Biol. 1994 April; 14(4): 2731-2739

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rallis, C., Del Buono, J., Logan, M. P. O. (2005). Tbx3 can alter limb position along the rostrocaudal axis of the developing embryo. Development 132: 1961-1970 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hori, R. T., Xu, S., Hu, X., Pyo, S. (2004). TFIIB-facilitated recruitment of preinitiation complexes by a TAF-independent mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 3856-3863 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rallis, C., Bruneau, B. G., Del Buono, J., Seidman, C. E., Seidman, J. G., Nissim, S., Tabin, C. J., Logan, M. P. O. (2003). Tbx5 is required for forelimb bud formation and continued outgrowth. Development 130: 2741-2751 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Petruccelli, S., Dai, S., Carcamo, R., Yin, Y., Chen, S., Beachy, R. N. (2001). Transcription factor RF2a alters expression of the rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter in transgenic tobacco plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.121186398v1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brickman, J., Jones, C., Clements, M, Smith, J., Beddington, R. (2000). Hex is a transcriptional repressor that contributes to anterior identity and suppresses Spemann organiser function. Development 127: 2303-2315 [Abstract]  
• Natesan, S., Molinari, E., Rivera, V. M., Rickles, R. J., Gilman, M. (1999). A general strategy to enhance the potency of chimeric transcriptional activators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 13898-13903 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yen, Y.-M., Wong, B., Johnson, R. C. (1998). Determinants of DNA Binding and Bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae High Mobility Group Protein NHP6A That Are Important for Its Biological Activities. ROLE OF THE UNIQUE N TERMINUS AND PUTATIVE INTERCALATING METHIONINE. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 4424-4435 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Paull, T T, Carey, M, Johnson, R C (1996). Yeast HMG proteins NHP6A/B potentiate promoter-specific transcriptional activation in vivo and assembly of preinitiation complexes in vitro.. Genes Dev. 10: 2769-2781 [Abstract]  
• Chang, W., Zhou, W., Theill, L. E., Baxter, J. D., Schaufele, F. (1996). An Activation Function in Pit-1 Required Selectively for Synergistic Transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 17733-17738 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lu, X., Ansari, A. Z., Ptashne, M. (2000). An artificial transcriptional activating region with unusual properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1988-1992 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Petruccelli, S., Dai, S., Carcamo, R., Yin, Y., Chen, S., Beachy, R. N. (2001). Transcription factor RF2a alters expression of the rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter in transgenic tobacco plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 7635-7640 [Abstract] [Full Text]