This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanes, S D Articles by Brent, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanes, S D Articles by Brent, R

Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen.

Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

ABSTRACT

We examined DNA site recognition by Bicoid and its importance for pattern formation in developing Drosophila embryos. Using altered DNA specificity Bicoid mutants and appropriate reporter genes, we show that Bicoid distinguishes among related DNA-binding sites in vivo by a specific contact between amino acid 9 of its recognition alpha-helix (lysine 50 of the homeodomain) and bp 7 of the site. This result is consistent with our earlier results using Saccharomyces cerevisiae but differs from that predicted by crystallographic analysis of another homeodomain-DNA interaction. Our results also demonstrate that Bicoid binds directly to those genes whose transcription it regulates and that the amino acid 9 contact is necessary for Bicoid to direct anterior pattern formation. In both Drosophila embryos and yeast cells, Bicoid requires multiple binding sites to activate transcription of target genes. We find that the distance between binding sites is critical for Bicoid activation but that, unexpectedly, this critical distance differs between Drosophila and S. cerevisiae. This result suggests that Bicoid activation in Drosophila might require an ancillary protein(s) not present in S. cerevisiae.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kulkarni, M. M., Arnosti, D. N. (2005). cis-Regulatory Logic of Short-Range Transcriptional Repression in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 3411-3420 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• MacArthur, S., Brookfield, J. F. Y. (2004). Expected Rates and Modes of Evolution of Enhancer Sequences. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1064-1073 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wray, G. A., Hahn, M. W., Abouheif, E., Balhoff, J. P., Pizer, M., Rockman, M. V., Romano, L. A. (2003). The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 20: 1377-1419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lines, M. A., Kozlowski, K., Walter, M. A. (2002). Molecular genetics of Axenfeld-Rieger malformations. Hum Mol Genet 11: 1177-1187 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhao, C., Dave, V., Yang, F., Scarborough, T., Ma, J. (2000). Target Selectivity of Bicoid Is Dependent on Nonconsensus Site Recognition and Protein-Protein Interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 8112-8123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Dave, V., Zhao, C., Yang, F., Tung, C.-S., Ma, J. (2000). Reprogrammable Recognition Codes in Bicoid Homeodomain-DNA Interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7673-7684 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carr, A., Biggin, M. D. (2000). Accessibility of transcriptionally inactive genes is specifically reduced at homeoprotein-DNA binding sites in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 2839-2846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Balasubramanian, B., Morse, R. H. (1999). Binding of Gal4p and Bicoid to Nucleosomal Sites in Yeast in the Absence of Replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 2977-2985 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hewitt, G., Strunk, B., Margulies, C, Priputin, T, Wang, X., Amey, R, Pabst, B., Kosman, D, Reinitz, J, Arnosti, D. (1999). Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126: 1201-1210 [Abstract]  
• Blaschke, R. J., Monaghan, A. P., Schiller, S., Schechinger, B., Rao, E., Padilla-Nash, H., Ried, T., Rappold, G. A. (1998). SHOT, a SHOX-related homeobox gene, is implicated in craniofacial, brain, heart, and limb development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 2406-2411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gao, Q, Finkelstein, R (1998). Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen. Development 125: 4185-4193 [Abstract]  
• Ludwig, M., Patel, N., Kreitman, M (1998). Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development 125: 949-958 [Abstract]  
• Zhong, H., Vershon, A. K. (1997). The Yeast Homeodomain Protein MATalpha 2 Shows Extended DNA binding Specificity in Complex with Mcm1. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 8402-8409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bellaiche, Y, Bandyopadhyay, R, Desplan, C, Dostatni, N (1996). Neither the homeodomain nor the activation domain of Bicoid is specifically required for its down-regulation by the Torso receptor tyrosine kinase cascade. Development 122: 3499-3508 [Abstract]  
• Arnosti, D., Barolo, S, Levine, M, Small, S (1996). The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 122: 205-214 [Abstract]  
• Subramaniam, V., Jovin, T. M., Rivera-Pomar, R. V. (2001). Aromatic Amino Acids Are Critical for Stability of the Bicoid Homeodomain. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 21506-21511 [Abstract] [Full Text]