MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J
Right arrow Articles by Falck-Pedersen, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J
Right arrow Articles by Falck-Pedersen, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1994 July; 14(7): 4682-4693

Sequence elements upstream of the 3' cleavage site confer substrate strength to the adenovirus L1 and L3 polyadenylation sites.

J Prescott and E Falck-Pedersen

Department of Microbiology, W. R. Hearst Research Foundation, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York 10021.

ABSTRACT

The adenovirus major late transcription unit is a well-characterized transcription unit which relies heavily on alternative pre-mRNA processing to generate distinct populations of mRNA during the early and late stages of viral infection. In the early stage of infection, two major late transcription unit mRNA transcripts are generated through use of the first (L1) of five available poly(A) sites (L1 through L5). This contrasts with the late stage of infection when as many as 45 distinct mRNAs are generated, with each of the five poly(A) sites being used. In previous work characterizing elements involved in alternative poly(A) site use, we showed that the L1 poly(A) site is processed less efficiently than the L3 poly(A) site both in vitro and in vivo. Because of the dramatic difference in processing efficiency and the role processing efficiency plays in production of steady-state levels of mRNA, we have identified the sequence elements that account for the differences in L1 and L3 poly(A) site processing efficiency. We have found that the element most likely to be responsible for poly(A) site strength, the GU/U-rich downstream element, plays a minor role in the different processing efficiencies observed for the L1 and L3 poly(A) sites. The sequence element most responsible for inefficient processing of the L1 poly(A) site includes the L1 AAUAAA consensus sequence and those sequences which immediately surround the consensus hexanucleotide. This region of the L1 poly(A) site contributes to an inability to form a stable processing complex with the downstream GU/U-rich element. In contrast to the L1 element, the L3 poly(A) site has a consensus hexanucleotide and surrounding sequences which can form a stable processing complex in cooperation with the downstream GU/U-rich element. The L3 poly(A) site is also aided by the presence of sequences upstream of the hexanucleotide which facilitate processing efficiency. The sequence UUCUUUUU, present in the L3 upstream region, is shown to enhance processing efficiency as well as stable complex formation (shown by increased binding of the 64-kDa cleavage stimulatory factor subunit) and acts as a binding site for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C proteins.


Mol Cell Biol. 1994 July; 14(7): 4682-4693




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.