This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Connelly, S Articles by Filipowicz, W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Connelly, S Articles by Filipowicz, W

Small nuclear RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III in monocot plants share three promoter elements and use a strategy to regulate gene expression different from that used by their dicot plant counterparts.

Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

ABSTRACT

RNA polymerase (Pol) II- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of dicotyledonous plants contain two essential upstream promoter elements, the USE and TATA. The USE is a highly conserved plant snRNA gene-specific element, and its distance from the -30 TATA box, corresponding to approximately three and four helical DNA turns in Pol III and Pol II genes, respectively, is crucial for determining RNA Pol specificity of transcription. Sequences upstream of the USE play no role in snRNA gene transcription in dicot plants. Here we show that for expression of snRNA genes in maize, a monocotyledonous plant, the USE and TATA elements are essential, but not sufficient, for transcription. Efficient expression of both Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA genes in transfected maize protoplasts requires an additional element(s) positioned upstream of the USE. This element, named MSP (for monocot-specific promoter; consensus, RGCCCR), is present in one to three copies in monocot snRNA genes and is interchangeable between Pol II- and Pol III-specific genes. The efficiency of snRNA gene expression in maize protoplast is determined primarily by the strength of the MSP element(s); this contrasts with the situation in protoplasts of a dicot plant, Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, where promoter strength is a function of the quality of the USE element. Interestingly, the organization of monocot Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters closely resembles those of equivalent vertebrate promoters. The data are discussed in the context of the coevolution of Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters within many eukaryotic organisms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wang, M.-B., Helliwell, C. A., Wu, L.-M., Waterhouse, P. M., Peacock, W. J., Dennis, E. S. (2008). Hairpin RNAs derived from RNA polymerase II and polymerase III promoter-directed transgenes are processed differently in plants. RNA 14: 903-913 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fleurdepine, S., Deragon, J.-M., Devic, M., Guilleminot, J., Bousquet-Antonelli, C. (2007). A bona fide La protein is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 3306-3321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Luo, H., Gilinger, G., Mukherjee, D., Bellofatto, V. (1999). Transcription Initiation at the TATA-less Spliced Leader RNA Gene Promoter Requires at Least Two DNA-binding Proteins and a Tripartite Architecture That Includes an Initiator Element. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 31947-31954 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Luo, H., Bellofatto, V. (1997). Characterization of Two Protein Activities That Interact at the Promoter of the Trypanosomatid Spliced Leader RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 33344-33352 [Abstract] [Full Text]