This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanna-Rose, W. Articles by Hansen, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanna-Rose, W. Articles by Hansen, U.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol. Cell. Biol., 08 1997, 4820-4829, Vol 17, No. 8
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Two evolutionarily conserved repression domains in the Drosophila Kruppel protein differ in activator specificity

W Hanna-Rose, JD Licht and U Hansen
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

To identify biologically functional regions in the product of the Drosophila melanogaster gene Kruppel, we cloned the Kruppel homolog from Drosophila virilis. Both the previously identified amino (N)- terminal repression region and the DNA-binding region of the D. virilis Kruppel protein are greater than 96% identical to those of the D. melanogaster Kruppel protein, demonstrating a selective pressure to maintain the integrity of each region during 60 million to 80 million years of evolution. An additional region in the carboxyl (C) terminus of Kruppel that was most highly conserved was examined further. A 42- amino-acid stretch within the conserved C-terminal region also encoded a transferable repression domain. The short, C-terminal repression region is a composite of three subregions of distinct amino acid composition, each containing a high proportion of either basic, proline, or acidic residues. Mutagenesis experiments demonstrated, unexpectedly, that the acidic residues contribute to repression function. Both the N-terminal and C-terminal repression regions were tested for the ability to affect transcription mediated by a variety of activator proteins. The N-terminal repression region was able to inhibit transcription in the presence of multiple activators. However, the C-terminal repression region inhibited transcription by only a subset of the activator proteins. The different activator specificities of the two regions suggest that they repress transcription by different mechanisms and may play distinct biological roles during Drosophila development.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rushton, P. J., Bokowiec, M. T., Han, S., Zhang, H., Brannock, J. F., Chen, X., Laudeman, T. W., Timko, M. P. (2008). Tobacco Transcription Factors: Novel Insights into Transcriptional Regulation in the Solanaceae. Plant Physiol. 147: 280-295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Odenwald, W. F., Rasband, W., Kuzin, A., Brody, T. (2005). EVOPRINTER, a multigenomic comparative tool for rapid identification of functionally important DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 14700-14705 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Otteson, D. C., Liu, Y., Lai, H., Wang, C., Gray, S., Jain, M. K., Zack, D. J. (2004). Kruppel-like Factor 15, a Zinc-Finger Transcriptional Regulator, Represses the Rhodopsin and Interphotoreceptor Retinoid-Binding Protein Promoters. IOVS 45: 2522-2530 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Badciong, J. C., Otto, J. M., Waring, G. L. (2001). The Functions of the Multiproduct and Rapidly Evolving dec-1 Eggshell Gene Are Conserved Between Evolutionarily Distant Species of Drosophila. Genetics 159: 1089-1102 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ryu, J.-R., Olson, L. K., Arnosti, D. N. (2001). Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.231394998v1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Keller, S. A., Mao, Y., Struffi, P., Margulies, C., Yurk, C. E., Anderson, A. R., Amey, R. L., Moore, S., Ebels, J. M., Foley, K., Corado, M., Arnosti, D. N. (2000). dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7247-7258 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Postigo, A. A., Dean, D. C. (1999). Independent Repressor Domains in ZEB Regulate Muscle and T-Cell Differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 7961-7971 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• He, M.-l., Wen, L., Campbell, C. E., Wu, J. Y., Rao, Y. (1999). Transcription repression by Xenopus ET and its human ortholog TBX3, a gene involved in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 10212-10217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nibu, Y., Zhang, H., Levine, M. (1998). Interaction of Short-Range Repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the Embryo. Science 280: 101-104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yin, Z, Xu, X., Frasch, M (1997). Regulation of the twist target gene tinman by modular cis-regulatory elements during early mesoderm development. Development 124: 4971-4982 [Abstract]  
• Ryu, J.-R., Olson, L. K., Arnosti, D. N. (2001). Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12960-12965 [Abstract] [Full Text]