This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, G.
Right arrow Articles by Martinson, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, G.
Right arrow Articles by Martinson, H. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol. Cell. Biol., Jan 1998, 276-289, Vol 18, No. 1
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology

Poly(A)-driven and poly(A)-assisted termination: two different modes of poly(A)-dependent transcription termination

G Yeung, LM Choi, LC Chao, NJ Park, D Liu, A Jamil and HG Martinson
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at Los Angeles, 90095-1569, USA.

We mapped the elements that mediate termination of transcription downstream of the chicken betaH- and betaA-globin gene poly(A) sites. We found no unique element and no segment of 3'-flanking DNA to be significantly more effective than any other. When we replaced the native 3'-flanking DNA with bacterial DNA, it too supported transcription termination. Termination in the bacterial DNA depended on a functional poly(A) signal, which apparently compelled termination to occur in the downstream DNA with little regard for its sequence. We also studied premature termination by poorly processive polymerases close to the promoter. The rate of premature termination varied for different DNA sequences. However, the efficiencies of poly(A)-driven termination and promoter-proximal premature termination varied similarly on different DNAs, suggesting that poly(A)-driven termination functions by returning the transcription complex to a form which resembles a prior state of low processivity. The poly(A)-driven termination described here differs dramatically from the poly(A)- assisted termination previously described for the simian virus 40 (SV40) early transcription unit. In the SV40 early transcription unit, essentially no termination occurs downstream of the poly(A) site unless a special termination element is present. The difference between the betaH-globin and SV40 modes of termination is governed by sequences in the upstream DNA. For maximum efficiency, the betaH-globin poly(A) signal required the assistance of upstream enhancing sequences. Moreover, the SV40 early poly(A) signal also drove termination in betaH- globin style when it was placed in a betaH-globin sequence context. These studies were facilitated by a rapid, improved method of run-on transcription analysis, based on the use of a vector containing two G- free cassettes.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nag, A., Narsinh, K., Kazerouninia, A., Martinson, H. G. (2006). The conserved AAUAAA hexamer of the poly(A) signal can act alone to trigger a stable decrease in RNA polymerase II transcription velocity. RNA 12: 1534-1544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nasim, M. T., Trembath, R. C. (2005). A dual-light reporter system to determine the efficiency of protein-protein interactions in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 33: e66-e66 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Park, N. J., Tsao, D. C., Martinson, H. G. (2004). The Two Steps of Poly(A)-Dependent Termination, Pausing and Release, Can Be Uncoupled by Truncation of the RNA Polymerase II Carboxyl-Terminal Repeat Domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 4092-4103 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, S. J., Martinson, H. G. (2003). Poly(A)-dependent Transcription Termination: CONTINUED COMMUNICATION OF THE POLY(A) SIGNAL WITH THE POLYMERASE IS REQUIRED LONG AFTER EXTRUSION IN VIVO. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 41691-41701 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Steinmetz, E. J., Brow, D. A. (2003). Ssu72 Protein Mediates Both Poly(A)-Coupled and Poly(A)-Independent Termination of RNA Polymerase II Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 6339-6349 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shen, L., Spector, D. J. (2003). Local Character of Readthrough Activation in Adenovirus Type 5 Early Region 1 Transcription Control. J. Virol. 77: 9266-9277 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zarudnaya, M. I., Kolomiets, I. M., Potyahaylo, A. L., Hovorun, D. M. (2003). Downstream elements of mammalian pre-mRNA polyadenylation signals: primary, secondary and higher-order structures. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 1375-1386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Orozco, I. J., Kim, S. J., Martinson, H. G. (2002). The Poly(A) Signal, without the Assistance of Any Downstream Element, Directs RNA Polymerase II to Pause in Vivo and Then to Release Stochastically from the Template. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 42899-42911 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peterson, M. L., Bertolino, S., Davis, F. (2002). An RNA Polymerase Pause Site Is Associated with the Immunoglobulin {micro}s Poly(A) Site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 5606-5615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tran, D. P., Kim, S. J., Park, N. J., Jew, T. M., Martinson, H. G. (2001). Mechanism of Poly(A) Signal Transduction to RNA Polymerase II In Vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 7495-7508 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chao, L. C., Jamil, A., Kim, S. J., Huang, L., Martinson, H. G. (1999). Assembly of the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Apparatus Requires About 10 Seconds In Vivo and Is Faster for Strong than for Weak Poly(A) Sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 5588-5600 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, M., Qiu, P., Abuodeh, R., Chen, J., Yuan, D. (1999). Differential regulation of transcription termination occurring at two different sites on the µ–{delta} gene complex. Int Immunol 11: 813-824 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»