This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noskov, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sugino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noskov, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sugino, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol, August 1998, p. 4914-4923, Vol. 18, No. 8
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

The RFC2 Gene, Encoding the Third-Largest Subunit of the Replication Factor C Complex, Is Required for an S-Phase Checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Vladimir N. Noskov, Hiroyuki Araki,dagger and Akio Sugino*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received 25 March 1998/Returned for modification 8 May 1998/Accepted 20 May 1998

Replication factor C (RF-C), an auxiliary factor for DNA polymerases delta  and varepsilon , is a multiprotein complex consisting of five different polypeptides. It recognizes a primer on a template DNA, binds to a primer terminus, and helps load proliferating cell nuclear antigen onto the DNA template. The RFC2 gene encodes the third-largest subunit of the RF-C complex. To elucidate the role of this subunit in DNA metabolism, we isolated a thermosensitive mutation (rfc2-1) in the RFC2 gene. It was shown that mutant cells having the rfc2-1 mutation exhibit (i) temperature-sensitive cell growth; (ii) defects in the integrity of chromosomal DNA at restrictive temperatures; (iii) progression through cell cycle without definitive terminal morphology and rapid loss of cell viability at restrictive temperatures; (iv) sensitivity to hydroxyurea, methyl methanesulfonate, and UV light; and (v) increased rate of spontaneous mitotic recombination and chromosome loss. These phenotypes of the mutant suggest that the RFC2 gene product is required not only for chromosomal DNA replication but also for a cell cycle checkpoint. It was also shown that the rfc2-1 mutation is synthetically lethal with either the cdc44-1 or rfc5-1 mutation and that the restrictive temperature of rfc2-1 mutant cells can be lowered by combining either with the cdc2-2 or pol2-11 mutation. Finally, it was shown that the temperature-sensitive cell growth phenotype and checkpoint defect of the rfc2-1 mutation can be suppressed by a multicopy plasmid containing the RFC5 gene. These results suggest that the RFC2 gene product interacts with the CDC44/RFC1 and RFC5 gene products in the RF-C complex and with both DNA polymerases delta  and varepsilon  during chromosomal DNA replication.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Phone: 81-6-879-8331. Fax: 81-6-877-3584. E-mail: asugino{at}biken.osaka-u.ac.jp.

dagger Present address: Department of Microbial Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1-111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.

Mol Cell Biol, August 1998, p. 4914-4923, Vol. 18, No. 8
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Junghans, P., Kaehne, T., Beyer, M., Metges, C. C., Schwerin, M. (2004). Dietary Protein-Related Changes in Hepatic Transcription Correspond to Modifications in Hepatic Protein Expression in Growing Pigs. J. Nutr. 134: 43-47 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kenna, M. A., Skibbens, R. V. (2003). Mechanical Link between Cohesion Establishment and DNA Replication: Ctf7p/Eco1p, a Cohesion Establishment Factor, Associates with Three Different Replication Factor C Complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 2999-3007 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Labib, K., Kearsey, S. E., Diffley, J. F.X. (2001). MCM2-7 Proteins Are Essential Components of Prereplicative Complexes that Accumulate Cooperatively in the Nucleus during G1-phase and Are Required to Establish, But Not Maintain, the S-phase Checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 3658-3667 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krause, S. A., Loupart, M.-L., Vass, S., Schoenfelder, S., Harrison, S., Heck, M. M. S. (2001). Loss of Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control in Drosophila Rfc4 Mutants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 5156-5168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, H.-S., Brill, S. J. (2001). Rfc4 Interacts with Rpal and Is Required for Both DNA Replication and DNA Damage Checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3725-3737 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kai, M., Tanaka, H., Wang, T. S.-F. (2001). Fission Yeast Rad17 Associates with Chromatin in Response to Aberrant Genomic Structures. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3289-3301 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hanna, J. S., Kroll, E. S., Lundblad, V., Spencer, F. A. (2001). Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 Are Required for Sister Chromatid Cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3144-3158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Longhese, M. P., Paciotti, V., Neecke, H., Lucchini, G. (2000). Checkpoint Proteins Influence Telomeric Silencing and Length Maintenance in Budding Yeast. Genetics 155: 1577-1591 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, Y., Cortez, D., Yazdi, P., Neff, N., Elledge, S. J., Qin, J. (2000). BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes Dev. 14: 927-939 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kiely, J., Haase, S. B., Russell, P., Leatherwood, J. (2000). Functions of Fission Yeast Orp2 in DNA Replication and Checkpoint Control. Genetics 154: 599-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • FOSS, E.J. (2000). Is Rad9p Upstream or Downstream from Mec1p?. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 65: 347-352 [Abstract]  
  • Amin, N. S., Tuffo, K. M., Holm, C. (1999). Dominant Mutations in Three Different Subunits of Replication Factor C Suppress Replication Defects in Yeast PCNA Mutants. Genetics 153: 1617-1628 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shimada, M., Okuzaki, D., Tanaka, S., Tougan, T., Tamai, K. K., Shimoda, C., Nojima, H. (1999). Replication Factor C3 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a Small Subunit of Replication Factor C Complex, Plays a Role in Both Replication and Damage Checkpoints. Mol. Biol. Cell 10: 3991-4003 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Merrill, B. J., Holm, C. (1999). A Requirement for Recombinational Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Caused by DNA Replication Defects of mec1 Mutants. Genetics 153: 595-605 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schmidt, S. L. G., Pautz, A. L., Burgers, P. M. J. (2001). ATP Utilization by Yeast Replication Factor C. IV. RFC ATP-BINDING MUTANTS SHOW DEFECTS IN DNA REPLICATION, DNA REPAIR, AND CHECKPOINT REGULATION. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 34792-34800 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»