This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inbar, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kupiec, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inbar, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kupiec, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4134-4142, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Homology Search and Choice of Homologous Partner during Mitotic Recombination

Ori Inbar and Martin Kupiec*

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel

Received 20 January 1999/Returned for modification 17 February 1999/Accepted 8 March 1999

Homologous recombination is an important DNA repair mechanism in vegetative cells. During the repair of double-strand breaks, genetic information is transferred between the interacting DNA sequences (gene conversion). This event is often accompanied by a reciprocal exchange between the homologous molecules, resulting in crossing over. The repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination with repeated sequences dispersed throughout the genome might result in chromosomal aberrations or in the inactivation of genes. It is therefore important to understand how the suitable homologous partner for recombination is chosen. We have developed a system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that can monitor the fate of a chromosomal double-strand break without the need to select for recombinants. The broken chromosome is efficiently repaired by recombination with one of two potential partners located elsewhere in the genome. One of the partners has homology to the broken ends of the chromosome, whereas the other is homologous to sequences distant from the break. Surprisingly, a large proportion of the repair is carried out by recombination involving the sequences distant from the broken ends. This repair is very efficient, despite the fact that it requires the processing of a large chromosomal region flanking the break. Our results imply that the homology search involves extensive regions of the broken chromosome and is not carried out exclusively by sequences adjacent to the double-strand break. We show that the mechanism that governs the choice of homologous partners is affected by the length and sequence divergence of the interacting partners, as well as by mutations in the mismatch repair genes. We present a model to explain how the suitable homologous partner is chosen during recombinational repair. The model provides a mechanism that may guard the integrity of the genome by preventing recombination between dispersed repeated sequences.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel. Phone: 972-3-640-9031. Fax: 972-3-640-9407. E-Mail: martin{at}ccsg.tau.ac.il.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4134-4142, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kikuchi, K., Abdel-Aziz, H. I., Taniguchi, Y., Yamazoe, M., Takeda, S., Hirota, K. (2009). Bloom DNA Helicase Facilitates Homologous Recombination between Diverged Homologous Sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 26360-26367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Agmon, N., Pur, S., Liefshitz, B., Kupiec, M. (2009). Analysis of repair mechanism choice during homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 5081-5092 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Glover, L., McCulloch, R., Horn, D. (2008). Sequence homology and microhomology dominate chromosomal double-strand break repair in African trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 2608-2618 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Omilian, A. R., Cristescu, M. E. A., Dudycha, J. L., Lynch, M. (2006). Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of Daphnia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 18638-18643 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicholson, A., Fabbri, R. M., Reeves, J. W., Crouse, G. F. (2006). The Effects of Mismatch Repair and RAD1 Genes on Interchromosomal Crossover Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173: 647-659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schildkraut, E., Miller, C. A., Nickoloff, J. A. (2006). Transcription of a Donor Enhances Its Use during Double-Strand Break-Induced Gene Conversion in Human Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 3098-3105 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • D'Anjou, H., Chabot, C., Chartrand, P. (2004). Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 6136-6143 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Egli, D., Hafen, E., Schaffner, W. (2004). An Efficient Method to Generate Chromosomal Rearrangements by Targeted DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res 14: 1382-1393 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Storici, F., Durham, C. L., Gordenin, D. A., Resnick, M. A. (2003). Chromosomal site-specific double-strand breaks are efficiently targeted for repair by oligonucleotides in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 14994-14999 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aylon, Y., Kupiec, M. (2003). The Checkpoint Protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Involved in Processing Double-Strand Break Ends and in Recombination Partner Choice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 6585-6596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aylon, Y., Liefshitz, B., Bitan-Banin, G., Kupiec, M. (2003). Molecular Dissection of Mitotic Recombination in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 1403-1417 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McEachern, M. J., Underwood, D. H., Blackburn, E. H. (2002). Dynamics of Telomeric DNA Turnover in Yeast. Genetics 160: 63-73 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, J., Read, L. R., Baker, M. D. (2001). The Mechanism of Mammalian Gene Replacement Is Consistent with the Formation of Long Regions of Heteroduplex DNA Associated with Two Crossing-Over Events. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 501-510 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Evans, E., Alani, E. (2000). Roles for Mismatch Repair Factors in Regulating Genetic Recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7839-7844 [Full Text]  
  • Inbar, O., Liefshitz, B., Bitan, G., Kupiec, M. (2000). The Relationship between Homology Length and Crossing Over during the Repair of a Broken Chromosome. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 30833-30838 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»