MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mertz, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mertz, J. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1982 December; 2(12): 1595-1607
Copyright © 1982, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Template Structural Requirements for Transcription In Vivo by RNA Polymerase II

Timothy J. Miller{dagger} and Janet E. Mertz

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

ABSTRACT

Purified simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA is reconstituted into chromatin and transcribed by endogenous RNA polymerase II when microinjected into nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. We have correlated the kinetics of chromatin reconstitution with that of accumulation of virus-specific RNA in this system. A delay of approximately 3 h was found in the appearance of appreciable numbers of both fully supercoiled molecules and transcriptionally active templates. SV40 minichromosomes, isolated from virus-infected monkey cells with 0.2 M NaCl, also exhibited this lag in onset of transcriptional activity when microinjected into oocytes. These findings indicate that neither purified SV40 DNA nor SV40 DNA containing a full complement of nucleosomes can function as a template for transcription in vivo before association with appropriate cellular nonhistone chromosomal factors has taken place. In addition, the gradual degradation of linear SV40 DNA in oocytes was not sufficient to account for the fact that it was much less transcriptionally active than circular SV40 DNA. Taken together, these results indicate that the conformational state of the DNA can affect its ability to function as a template for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerase II. In contrast, transcription by RNA polymerase III of purified, circularized cloned DNAs encoding genes for 5S rRNA was detectable long before the injected DNAs had time to reconstitute into chromatin. Therefore, the template structural requirements for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerases II and III are different.


FOOTNOTES

{dagger} Present address: Norden Laboratory, Lincoln, NE 68521.


Mol Cell Biol. 1982 December; 2(12): 1595-1607
Copyright © 1982, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.