MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonda, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonda, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1982 June; 2(6): 617-624

Transcripts from the Cellular Homologs of Retroviral Oncogenes: Distribution Among Chicken Tissues

Thomas J. Gonda, Diana K. Sheiness and J. Michael Bishop

1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

ABSTRACT

The oncogenes (v-onc genes) of rapidly transforming retroviruses have homologs (c-onc genes) in the genomes of normal cells. In this study, we characterized and quantitated transcription from four c-onc genes, c-myb, c-myc, c-erb, and c-src, in a variety of chicken cells and tissues. Electrophoretic analysis of polyadenylated RNA, followed by transfer to nitrocellulose and hybridization to cloned onc probes showed that c-myb, c-myc, and c-src each give rise to a single mature transcript, whereas c-erb gives rise to multiple transcripts (B. Vennstrom and J. M. Bishop, Cell, in press) which vary in abundance among different cells and tissues. Transcription from c-myb, c-myc, c-erb, and c-src was quantitated by a "dot-blot" hybridization assay. We found that c-myc, c-erb, and c-src transcription could be detected in nearly all cells and tissues examined, whereas c-myb transcription was detected only in some hemopoietic cells; these cells, however, belong to several different lineages. Thus, in no case was expression of a c-onc gene restricted to a single cell lineage. There appeared to be a correlation between levels of c-myb expression and hemopoietic activity of the tissues and cells examined, which suggests that c-myb may be expressed primarily in immature hemopoietic cells. An examination of c-onc RNA levels in target cells and tissues for viruses carrying the corresponding v-onc genes revealed no obvious correlation, direct or inverse, between susceptibility to transformation by a given v-onc gene and expression of the homologous c-onc gene.


Mol Cell Biol. 1982 June; 2(6): 617-624




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.