This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kophengnavong, T.
Right arrow Articles by Blackwell, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kophengnavong, T.
Right arrow Articles by Blackwell, T. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 261-272, Vol. 20, No. 1
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Establishment of Distinct MyoD, E2A, and Twist DNA Binding Specificities by Different Basic Region-DNA Conformations

Thiphaphone Kophengnavong, Jennifer E. Michnowicz, and T. Keith Blackwell*

Center for Blood Research and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Received 23 July 1999/Returned for modification 1 September 1999/Accepted 23 September 1999

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins perform a wide variety of biological functions. Most bHLH proteins recognize the consensus DNA sequence CAN NTG (the E-box consensus sequence is underlined) but acquire further functional specificity by preferring distinct internal and flanking bases. In addition, induction of myogenesis by MyoD-related bHLH proteins depends on myogenic basic region (BR) and BR-HLH junction residues that are not essential for binding to a muscle-specific site, implying that their BRs may be involved in other critical interactions. We have investigated whether the myogenic residues influence DNA sequence recognition and how MyoD, Twist, and their E2A partner proteins prefer distinct CAN NTG sites. In MyoD, the myogenic BR residues establish specificity for particular CAN NTG sites indirectly, by influencing the conformation through which the BR helix binds DNA. An analysis of DNA binding by BR and junction mutants suggests that an appropriate BR-DNA conformation is necessary but not sufficient for myogenesis, supporting the model that additional interactions with this region are important. The sequence specificities of E2A and Twist proteins require the corresponding BR residues. In addition, mechanisms that position the BR allow E2A to prefer distinct half-sites as a heterodimer with MyoD or Twist, indicating that the E2A BR can be directed toward different targets by dimerization with different partners. Our findings indicate that E2A and its partner bHLH proteins bind to CAN NTG sites by adopting particular preferred BR-DNA conformations, from which they derive differences in sequence recognition that can be important for functional specificity.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Blood Research and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 278-3150. Fax: (617) 278-3131. E-mail: blackwell{at}cbr.med.harvard.edu.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 261-272, Vol. 20, No. 1
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Heuberger, J., Birchmeier, W. (2010). Interplay of Cadherin-Mediated Cell Adhesion and Canonical Wnt Signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a002915-a002915 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lei, H., Liu, J., Fukushige, T., Fire, A., Krause, M. (2009). Caudal-like PAL-1 directly activates the bodywall muscle module regulator hlh-1 in C. elegans to initiate the embryonic muscle gene regulatory network. Development 136: 1241-1249 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yang, Z., MacQuarrie, K. L., Analau, E., Tyler, A. E., Dilworth, F. J., Cao, Y., Diede, S. J., Tapscott, S. J. (2009). MyoD and E-protein heterodimers switch rhabdomyosarcoma cells from an arrested myoblast phase to a differentiated state. Genes Dev. 23: 694-707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Melicharek, D., Shah, A., DiStefano, G., Gangemi, A. J., Orapallo, A., Vrailas-Mortimer, A. D., Marenda, D. R. (2008). Identification of Novel Regulators of atonal Expression in the Developing Drosophila Retina. Genetics 180: 2095-2110 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Powell, L. M., Deaton, A. M., Wear, M. A., Jarman, A. P. (2008). Specificity of Atonal and Scute bHLH factors: analysis of cognate E box binding sites and the influence of Senseless. GENES CELLS 13: 915-929 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dubois, L., Enriquez, J., Daburon, V., Crozet, F., Lebreton, G., Crozatier, M., Vincent, A. (2007). collier transcription in a single Drosophila muscle lineage: the combinatorial control of muscle identity. Development 134: 4347-4355 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Laursen, K. B., Mielke, E., Iannaccone, P., Fuchtbauer, E.-M. (2007). Mechanism of Transcriptional Activation by the Proto-oncogene Twist1. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 34623-34633 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Heidt, A. B., Rojas, A., Harris, I. S., Black, B. L. (2007). Determinants of Myogenic Specificity within MyoD Are Required for Noncanonical E Box Binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27: 5910-5920 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Powell, L. M., zur Lage, P. I., Prentice, D. R. A., Senthinathan, B., Jarman, A. P. (2004). The Proneural Proteins Atonal and Scute Regulate Neural Target Genes through Different E-Box Binding Sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 9517-9526 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nguyen, Q.-G. V., Buskin, J. N., Himeda, C. L., Shield, M. A., Hauschka, S. D. (2003). Differences in the Function of Three Conserved E-boxes of the Muscle Creatine Kinase Gene in Cultured Myocytes and in Transgenic Mouse Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 46494-46505 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, J. E. III, Cronmiller, C. (2001). The Drosophila daughterless gene autoregulates and is controlled by both positive and negative cis regulation. Development 128: 4705-4714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lindon, C., Albagli, O., Domeyne, P., Montarras, D., Pinset, C. (2000). Constitutive Instability of Muscle Regulatory Factor Myf5 Is Distinct from Its Mitosis-Specific Disappearance, Which Requires a D-Box-Like Motif Overlapping the Basic Domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 8923-8932 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Marshall, P., Chartrand, N., Worton, R. G. (2001). The Mouse Dystrophin Enhancer Is Regulated by MyoD, E-box-binding Factors, and by the Serum Response Factor. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 20719-20726 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»