Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2000, p. 3396-3406, Vol. 20, No. 10
Centre de Recherche de Biochimie
Macromoléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique UPR-1086, 34293 Montpellier, France
Received 15 September 1999/Returned for modification 4 November
1999/Accepted 7 February 2000
Src-like adapter protein (Slap) is a recently identified protein
that negatively regulates mitogenesis in murine fibroblasts (S. Roche,
G. Alonso, A. Kazlausakas, V. M. Dixit, S. A. Courtneidge, and A. Pandey, Curr. Biol. 8:975-978, 1998) and comprises an SH3 and
SH2 domain with striking identity to the corresponding Src domains. In
light of this, we sought to investigate whether Slap could be an
antagonist of all Src functions. Like Src, Slap was found to be
myristylated in vivo and largely colocalized with Src when coexpressed
in Cos7 cells. Microinjection of a Slap-expressing construct into
quiescent NIH 3T3 cells inhibited platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF)-induced DNA synthesis, and the inhibition was rescued by the
transcription factor c-Myc but not by c-Jun/c-Fos expression. Fyn (or
Src) overexpression overrides the G1/S block induced by
both SrcK
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Slap Negatively Regulates Src Mitogenic Function
but Does Not Revert Src-Induced Cell Morphology Changes
and a Slap mutant with a deletion of its C terminus
(Slap
C), but not the block induced by Slap or Slap
SH3, implying
that the C terminus is a noncompetitive inhibitor of Src mitogenic
function. Furthermore, a chimeric adapter comprising Src
K fused to
the Slap C terminus (Src/SlapC) also inhibited Src function during the
PDGF response in a noncompetitive manner, as Src coexpression could not
rescue PDGF signaling. Slap, however, did not reverse deregulated
Src-induced cell transformation, as it was unable to inhibit
depolymerization of actin stress fibers while still being able to
inhibit SrcY527F-induced DNA synthesis. This was attributed to a
distinct Slap SH3 binding specificity, since the chimeric Slap/SrcSH3
molecule, in which the Slap SH3 was replaced by the Src SH3 sequence,
substantially restored stress fiber formation. Indeed, three amino
acids important for ligand binding in Src SH3 were replaced in the Slap
SH3 sequence; Slap SH3 did not bind to the Src SH3 partners p85
,
Shc, and Sam68 in vitro, and the chimeric tyrosine kinase Slap/SrcK,
composed of Slap
C fused to the SH2 linker kinase sequence of Src,
was not regulated in vivo. Furthermore, the Src SH3 domain is required for signaling during mitogenesis and since Slap/SrcK behaved as a
dominant negative in the PDGF mitogenic response when microinjected into quiescent fibroblasts. We conclude that Slap is a negative regulator of Src during mitogenesis involving both the SH2 and the C
terminus domains in a noncompetitive manner, but it does not regulate
all Src function due to specific SH3 binding substrates.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: CRBM, CNRS
UPR-1086, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France. Phone:
(33) 467 61 33 73. Fax: (33) 467 52 15 59. E-mail:
roche{at}crbm.cnrs-mop.fr.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»