MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T. S.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T. S.-F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2000, p. 7853-7866, Vol. 20, No. 21
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Analysis of Fission Yeast Primase Defines the Checkpoint Responses to Aberrant S Phase Initiation

Siyuan Tan and Teresa S.-F. Wang*

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5324

Received 17 April 2000/Returned for modification 30 May 2000/Accepted 4 August 2000

To investigate the checkpoint response to aberrant initiation, we analyzed the cell cycle checkpoint response induced by mutations of Schizosaccharomyces pombe DNA primase. DNA primase has two subunits, Spp1 and Spp2 (S. pombe primases 1 and 2). Spp1 is the catalytic subunit that synthesizes the RNA primer, which is then extended by DNA polymerase alpha  (Polalpha ) to synthesize an initiation DNA structure, and this catalytic function of Polalpha is a prerequisite for generating the S-M phase checkpoint. Here we show that Spp2 is required for coupling the function of Spp1 to Polalpha . Thermosensitive mutations of spp2+ destabilize the Polalpha -primase complex, resulting in an allele-specific S phase checkpoint defect. The mutant exhibiting a more severe checkpoint defect also has a higher extent of Polalpha -primase complex instability and deficiency in the hydroxyurea-induced Cds1-mediated intra-S phase checkpoint response. However, this mutant is able to activate the Cds1 response to S phase arrest induced by temperature. These findings suggest that the Cds1 response to the S-phase arrest signal(s) induced by a initiation mutant is different from that induced by hydroxyurea. Interestingly, a polalpha ts mutant with a defective S-M phase checkpoint and an spp2 mutant with an intact checkpoint have a similar Polalpha -primase complex stability, and the Cds1 response induced by hydroxyurea or by the mutant arrests at the restrictive temperature. Thus, the Cds1-mediated intra-S phase checkpoint response induced by hydroxyurea can also be distinguished from the S-M phase checkpoint response that requires the initiation DNA synthesis by Polalpha .

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5324. Phone: (650) 725-4907. Fax: (650) 725-6902. E-mail: twang{at}cmgm.stanford.edu.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2000, p. 7853-7866, Vol. 20, No. 21
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.