This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Brill, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Brill, S. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2001, p. 3725-3737, Vol. 21, No. 11
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.11.3725-3737.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Rfc4 Interacts with Rpa1 and Is Required for Both DNA Replication and DNA Damage Checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Hee-Sook Kim and Steven J. Brill*

Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

Received 28 December 2000/Returned for modification 1 February 2001/Accepted 28 March 2001

The large subunit of replication protein A (Rpa1) consists of three single-stranded DNA binding domains and an N-terminal domain (Rpa1N) of unknown function. To determine the essential role of this domain we searched for mutations that require wild-type Rpa1N for viability in yeast. A mutation in RFC4, encoding a small subunit of replication factor C (RFC), was found to display allele-specific interactions with mutations in the gene encoding Rpa1 (RFA1). Mutations that map to Rpa1N and confer sensitivity to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea, such as rfa1-t11, are lethal in combination with rfc4-2. The rfc4-2 mutant itself is sensitive to hydroxyurea, and like rfc2 and rfc5 strains, it exhibits defects in the DNA replication block and intra-S checkpoints. RFC4 and the DNA damage checkpoint gene RAD24 were found to be epistatic with respect to DNA damage sensitivity. We show that the rfc4-2 mutant is defective in the G1/S DNA damage checkpoint response and that both the rfc4-2 and rfa1-t11 strains are defective in the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. Thus, in addition to its essential role as part of the clamp loader in DNA replication, Rfc4 plays a role as a sensor in multiple DNA checkpoint pathways. Our results suggest that a physical interaction between Rfc4 and Rpa1N is required for both roles.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, 679 Hoes La., CABM, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Phone: (732) 235-4197. Fax: (732) 235-4880. E-mail: brill{at}mbcl.rutgers.edu.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2001, p. 3725-3737, Vol. 21, No. 11
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.11.3725-3737.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Binz, S. K., Wold, M. S. (2008). Regulatory Functions of the N-terminal Domain of the 70-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A (RPA). J. Biol. Chem. 283: 21559-21570 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haring, S. J., Mason, A. C., Binz, S. K., Wold, M. S. (2008). Cellular Functions of Human RPA1: MULTIPLE ROLES OF DOMAINS IN REPLICATION, REPAIR, AND CHECKPOINTS. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 19095-19111 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tomida, J., Masuda, Y., Hiroaki, H., Ishikawa, T., Song, I., Tsurimoto, T., Tateishi, S., Shiomi, T., Kamei, Y., Kim, J., Kamiya, K., Vaziri, C., Ohmori, H., Todo, T. (2008). DNA Damage-induced Ubiquitylation of RFC2 Subunit of Replication Factor C Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 9071-9079 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grandin, N., Charbonneau, M. (2007). Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 822-838 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Crest, J., Oxnard, N., Ji, J.-Y., Schubiger, G. (2007). Onset of the DNA Replication Checkpoint in the Early Drosophila Embryo. Genetics 175: 567-584 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Herzberg, K., Bashkirov, V. I., Rolfsmeier, M., Haghnazari, E., McDonald, W. H., Anderson, S., Bashkirova, E. V., Yates, J. R. III, Heyer, W.-D. (2006). Phosphorylation of Rad55 on Serines 2, 8, and 14 Is Required for Efficient Homologous Recombination in the Recovery of Stalled Replication Forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 8396-8409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Majka, J., Binz, S. K., Wold, M. S., Burgers, P. M. J. (2006). Replication Protein A Directs Loading of the DNA Damage Checkpoint Clamp to 5'-DNA Junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 27855-27861 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fanning, E., Klimovich, V., Nager, A. R. (2006). A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 4126-4137 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, S.-M., Kumagai, A., Lee, J., Dunphy, W. G. (2005). Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) in Xenopus Egg Extracts Requires Binding of ATRIP to ATR but Not the Stable DNA-binding or Coiled-coil Domains of ATRIP. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 38355-38364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bylund, G. O., Burgers, P. M. J. (2005). Replication Protein A-Directed Unloading of PCNA by the Ctf18 Cohesion Establishment Complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 5445-5455 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cortez, D. (2005). Unwind and slow down: checkpoint activation by helicase and polymerase uncoupling. Genes Dev. 19: 1007-1012 [Full Text]  
  • O'Connell, M. J., Cimprich, K. A. (2005). G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on?. J. Cell Sci. 118: 1-6 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zou, L., Liu, D., Elledge, S. J. (2003). Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 13827-13832 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Binz, S. K., Lao, Y., Lowry, D. F., Wold, M. S. (2003). The Phosphorylation Domain of the 32-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A (RPA) Modulates RPA-DNA Interactions: EVIDENCE FOR AN INTERSUBUNIT INTERACTION. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 35584-35591 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bae, K.-H., Kim, H.-S., Bae, S.-H., Kang, H.-Y., Brill, S., Seo, Y.-S. (2003). Bimodal interaction between replication-protein A and Dna2 is critical for Dna2 function both in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3006-3015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zou, L., Elledge, S. J. (2003). Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes. Science 300: 1542-1548 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anderson, L. A., Perkins, N. D. (2003). Regulation of RelA (p65) Function by the Large Subunit of Replication Factor C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 721-732 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shimada, K., Pasero, P., Gasser, S. M. (2002). ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev. 16: 3236-3252 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Soustelle, C., Vedel, M., Kolodner, R., Nicolas, A. (2002). Replication Protein A Is Required for Meiotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161: 535-547 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Myung, K., Kolodner, R. D. (2002). Inaugural Article: Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomycescerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 4500-4507 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bastin-Shanower, S. A., Brill, S. J. (2001). Functional Analysis of the Four DNA Binding Domains of Replication Protein A. THE ROLE OF RPA2 IN ssDNA BINDING. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 36446-36453 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Myung, K., Kolodner, R. D. (2002). Inaugural Article: Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomycescerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 4500-4507 [Abstract] [Full Text]