This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7682-7695, Vol. 21, No. 22
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7682-7695.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Nucleosomes Are Translationally Positioned on the Active Allele and Rotationally Positioned on the Inactive Allele of the HPRT Promoter

Chien Chen1,2 and Thomas P. Yang1,2,3,*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,1 Center for Mammalian Genetics,2 and Division of Pediatric Genetics,3 University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610

Received 8 June 2001/Returned for modification 29 July 2001/Accepted 20 August 2001

Differential chromatin structure is one of the hallmarks distinguishing active and inactive genes. For the X-linked human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (HPRT), this difference in chromatin structure is evident in the differential general DNase I sensitivity and hypersensitivity of the promoter regions on active versus inactive X chromosomes. Here we characterize the nucleosomal organization responsible for the differential chromatin structure of the active and inactive HPRT promoters. The micrococcal nuclease digestion pattern of chromatin from the active allele in permeabilized cells reveals an ordered array of translationally positioned nucleosomes in the promoter region except over a 350-bp region that is either nucleosome free or contains structurally altered nucleosomes. This 350-bp region includes the entire minimal promoter and all of the multiple transcription initiation sites of the HPRT gene. It also encompasses all of the transcription factor binding sites identified by either dimethyl sulfate or DNase I in vivo footprinting of the active allele. In contrast, analysis of the inactive HPRT promoter reveals no hypersensitivity to either DNase I or a micrococcal nuclease and no translational positioning of nucleosomes. Although nucleosomes on the inactive promoter are not translationally positioned, high-resolution DNase I cleavage analysis of permeabilized cells indicates that nucleosomes are rotationally positioned over a region of at least 210 bp on the inactive promoter, which coincides with the 350-bp nuclease-hypersensitive region on the active allele, including the entire minimal promoter. This rotational positioning of nucleosomes is not observed on the active promoter. These results suggest a model in which the silencing of the HPRT promoter during X chromosome inactivation involves remodeling a transcriptionally competent, translationally positioned nucleosomal array into a transcriptionally repressed architecture consisting of rotationally but not translationally positioned nucleosomal arrays.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Box 100245 JHMHC, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd., Gainesville, FL 32610. Phone: (352) 392-6472. Fax: (352) 392-2953. E-mail: yang{at}cmg.health.ufl.edu.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2001, p. 7682-7695, Vol. 21, No. 22
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7682-7695.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kapoor-Vazirani, P., Kagey, J. D., Powell, D. R., Vertino, P. M. (2008). Role of hMOF-Dependent Histone H4 Lysine 16 Acetylation in the Maintenance of TMS1/ASC Gene Activity. Cancer Res. 68: 6810-6821 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Luykx, P., Bajic, I. V., Khuri, S. (2006). NXSensor web tool for evaluating DNA for nucleosome exclusion sequences and accessibility to binding factors.. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W560-W565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rodriguez-Jato, S., Nicholls, R. D., Driscoll, D. J., Yang, T. P. (2005). Characterization of cis- and trans-acting elements in the imprinted human SNURF-SNRPN locus. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 4740-4753 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chen, L., Peng, Z., Bateman, E. (2004). In vivo interactions of the Acanthamoeba TBP gene promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1251-1260 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kang, S.-H. L., Mione Kiefer, C., Yang, T. P. (2003). Role of the Promoter in Maintaining Transcriptionally Active Chromatin Structure and DNA Methylation Patterns In Vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 4150-4161 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Braastad, C. D., Han, Z., Hendrickson, E. A. (2003). Constitutive DNase I Hypersensitivity of p53-Regulated Promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 8261-8268 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thomas, R. M., Haleem, K., Siddique, A. B., Simmons, W. J., Sen, N., Zhang, D.-J., Tsiagbe, V. K. (2003). Regulation of Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus env Transcriptional Activator Initiated Mammary Tumor Virus Superantigen Transcripts in Lymphomas of SJL/J Mice: Role of Ikaros, Demethylation, and Chromatin Structural Change in the Transcriptional Activation of Mammary Tumor Virus Superantigen . J. Immunol. 170: 218-227 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»