This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 1207-1217, Vol. 21, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1207-1217.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Wild-Type Circadian Rhythmicity Is Dependent on Closely Spaced E Boxes in the Drosophila timeless Promoter

Michael J. McDonald,1 Michael Rosbash,*,1,2 and Patrick Emery1,2

Department of Biology, National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing,1 and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brandeis University,2 Waltham, Massachusetts 02454

Received 3 October 2000/Returned for modification 7 November 2000/Accepted 15 November 2000

Transcriptional regulation plays an important role in Drosophila melanogaster circadian rhythms. The period promoter has been well studied, but the timeless promoter has not been analyzed in detail. Mutagenesis of the canonical E box in the timeless promoter reduces but does not eliminate timeless mRNA cycling or locomotor activity rhythms. This is because there are at least two other cis-acting elements close to the canonical E box, which can also be transactivated by the circadian transcription factor dCLOCK. These E-box-like sequences cooperate with the canonical E-box element to promote high-amplitude transcription, which is necessary for wild-type rhythmicity.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02454. Phone: (781) 736-3160. Fax: (781) 736-3164. E-mail: rosbash{at}brandeis.edu.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2001, p. 1207-1217, Vol. 21, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1207-1217.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Taylor, P., Hardin, P. E. (2008). Rhythmic E-Box Binding by CLK-CYC Controls Daily Cycles in per and tim Transcription and Chromatin Modifications. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28: 4642-4652 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Matsumoto, A., Ukai-Tadenuma, M., Yamada, R. G., Houl, J., Uno, K. D., Kasukawa, T., Dauwalder, B., Itoh, T. Q., Takahashi, K., Ueda, R., Hardin, P. E., Tanimura, T., Ueda, H. R. (2007). A functional genomics strategy reveals clockwork orange as a transcriptional regulator in the Drosophila circadian clock. Genes Dev. 21: 1687-1700 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kadener, S., Stoleru, D., McDonald, M., Nawathean, P., Rosbash, M. (2007). Clockwork Orange is a transcriptional repressor and a new Drosophila circadian pacemaker component. Genes Dev. 21: 1675-1686 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bayele, H. K., McArdle, H., Srai, S. K.S. (2006). Cis and trans regulation of hepcidin expression by upstream stimulatory factor. Blood 108: 4237-4245 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chen, W.-F., Majercak, J., Edery, I. (2006). Clock-Gated Photic Stimulation of Timeless Expression at Cold Temperatures and Seasonal Adaptation in Drosophila. J Biol Rhythms 21: 256-271 [Abstract]  
  • Yu, W., Zheng, H., Houl, J. H., Dauwalder, B., Hardin, P. E. (2006). PER-dependent rhythms in CLK phosphorylation and E-box binding regulate circadian transcription.. Genes Dev. 20: 723-733 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wagner, A. (2005). Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 11775-11780 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leclerc, G. M., Boockfor, F. R. (2005). Pulses of Prolactin Promoter Activity Depend on a Noncanonical E-Box that Can Bind the Circadian Proteins CLOCK and BMAL1. Endocrinology 146: 2782-2790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hardin, P. E. (2004). Transcription Regulation within the Circadian Clock: The E-box and Beyond. J Biol Rhythms 19: 348-360 [Abstract]  
  • Vallone, D., Gondi, S. B., Whitmore, D., Foulkes, N. S. (2004). E-box function in a period gene repressed by light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 4106-4111 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Forger, D. B., Peskin, C. S. (2003). A detailed predictive model of the mammalian circadian clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 14806-14811 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Froehlich, A. C., Loros, J. J., Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Rhythmic binding of a WHITE COLLAR-containing complex to the frequency promoter is inhibited by FREQUENCY. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5914-5919 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Michael, T. P., McClung, C. R. (2002). Phase-Specific Circadian Clock Regulatory Elements in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130: 627-638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Munoz, E., Brewer, M., Baler, R. (2002). Circadian Transcription. THINKING OUTSIDE THE E-BOX. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 36009-36017 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stanewsky, R., Lynch, K. S., Brandes, C., Hall, J. C. (2002). Mapping of Elements Involved in Regulating Normal Temporal period and timeless RNA Expression Patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Rhythms 17: 293-306 [Abstract]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»