Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2001, p. 1603-1612, Vol. 21, No. 5
Department of Biology, Technion, Technion
City, Haifa 32000, Israel
Received 6 June 2000/Returned for modification 19 July
2000/Accepted 8 December 2000
The choice between meiosis and alternative developmental pathways
in budding yeast depends on the expression and activity of
transcriptional activator Ime1. The transcription of IME1
is repressed in the presence of glucose, and a low basal level of IME1 RNA is observed in vegetative cultures with acetate as
the sole carbon source. IREu, a 32-bp element in the IME1
promoter, exhibits upstream activation sequence activity depending on
Msn2 and -4 and the presence of acetate. We show that in the presence of glucose IREu functions as a negative element and that Sok2 mediates
this repression activity. We show that Sok2 associates with Msn2. Sok2
functions as a general repressor whose availability and activity depend
on glucose. The activity of Sok2 as a repressor depends on
phosphorylation of T598 by protein kinase A (PKA). Relief of repression
of Sok2 depends on both the N-terminal domain of Sok2 and Ime1. In the
absence of glucose and the presence of Ime1 Sok2 is converted to a weak
activator. Overexpression of Sok2 or mild expression of Sok2 with its
N-terminal domain deleted leads to a decrease in sporulation.
Previously it was reported that overexpression of Sok2 suppresses the
growth defect resulting from a temperature-sensitive PKA; thus Sok2 has
a positive role in mitosis. We show that Candida albicans
Efg1, a homolog of Sok2, complements sok2
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1603-1612.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Positive Regulator of Mitosis, Sok2, Functions as
a Negative Regulator of Meiosis in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
in repressing
IREu. Our results demonstrate that Sok2, a positive regulator of
mitosis, and Efg1, a positive regulator of filamentation, function as
negative regulators of meiosis. We suggest that cells use the same
regulators with opposing effects to ensure that meiosis will be an
alternative to mitosis.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biology, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel. Phone:
972-4-8294214. Fax: 972-4-8225153. E-mail:
ykassir{at}tx.technion.ac.il.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|