This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jia, S.
Right arrow Articles by Courey, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jia, S.
Right arrow Articles by Courey, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2002, p. 5089-5099, Vol. 22, No. 14
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5089-5099.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Dorsal Rel Homology Domain Plays an Active Role in Transcriptional Regulation

Songtao Jia, Rubén D. Flores-Saaib,,{dagger} and Albert J. Courey*

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569

Received 26 December 2001/ Returned for modification 22 February 2002/ Accepted 1 April 2002

The Dorsal morphogen directs formation of the Drosophila dorsoventral axis by both activating and repressing transcription. It contains an N-terminal Rel homology domain (RHD), which is responsible for DNA binding and regulated nuclear import, and a C-terminal domain (CTD) that contains activation and repression motifs. To determine if the RHD has a direct role in transcriptional control, we analyzed a series of RHD mutations in S2 cells and embryos. Two classes of mutations (termed class I and class II mutations) that alter activation without affecting DNA binding or nuclear import were identified. The two classes appear to define distinct protein interaction surfaces on opposite faces of the RHD. Class I mutations enhance an apparently inhibitory interaction between the RHD and the CTD and eliminate both activation and repression by Dorsal. In contrast, class II mutations result in increased activation in S2 cells but severely decreased activation in embryos and have little effect on repression. Analysis of the cuticles of class II mutant embryos suggests that, in the absence of Dorsal-mediated activation, Dorsal-mediated repression is not sufficient to pattern the embryo. These results provide some of the first evidence that the RHD plays an active role in transcriptional regulation in intact multicellular organisms.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569. Phone: (310) 825-2530. Fax: (310) 206-4038. E-mail: courey{at}chem.ucla.edu.

{dagger} Present address: BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA 92121.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2002, p. 5089-5099, Vol. 22, No. 14
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5089-5099.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ratnaparkhi, G. S., Jia, S., Courey, A. J. (2006). Uncoupling Dorsal-mediated activation from Dorsal-mediated repression in the Drosophila embryo. Development 133: 4409-4414 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bian, G., Shin, S. W., Cheon, H.-M., Kokoza, V., Raikhel, A. S. (2005). Transgenic alteration of Toll immune pathway in the female mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 13568-13573 [Abstract] [Full Text]