This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Orkin, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Orkin, S. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2002, p. 3121-3128, Vol. 22, No. 9
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.9.3121-3128.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Interaction between FOG-1 and the Corepressor C-Terminal Binding Protein Is Dispensable for Normal Erythropoiesis In Vivo

Samuel G. Katz,1,2 Alan B. Cantor,1 and Stuart H. Orkin1,2*

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School,1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 021152

Received 7 November 2001/ Returned for modification 14 December 2001/ Accepted 11 January 2002

The hematopoietic, zinc-finger protein FOG-1 is essential for the development of the erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages. FOG-1's function in hematopoiesis is dependent on its ability to interact with the transcription factor GATA-1. FOG-1 has also been observed to interact with the corepressor molecule C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) through a peptide motif shared by all FOG family members. In this study, we confirmed that FOG-1 and CtBP interact by coimmunoprecipitation. We further demonstrate that a FOG-1 mutant unable to interact with CtBP has increased erythropoietic (but not megakaryocytic) rescue (relative to the wild type) of a FOG-1-/- cell line. To analyze further the physiological role of the FOG-1-CtBP interaction, we generated knock-in mice that express a FOG-1 variant unable to bind CtBP. Surprisingly, these mice are normal and fertile. Furthermore, erythropoiesis at all stages of development is normal in these mice. Erythrocyte production is similar in mutant and wild-type mice even under conditions of erythropoietic stress stimulated by either exogenously added erythropoietin or phenylhydrazine-induced anemia. Thus, despite conservation of the FOG-CtBP interaction site, the in vivo function of FOG-1 in erythroid development is not affected by its inability to interact with the corepressor CtBP.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 320 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 355-7910. Fax: (617) 738-5922. E-mail: stuart_orkin{at}DFCI.harvard.edu.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2002, p. 3121-3128, Vol. 22, No. 9
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.9.3121-3128.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Snow, J. W., Orkin, S. H. (2009). Translational Isoforms of FOG1 Regulate GATA1-interacting Complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 29310-29319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cantor, A. B., Iwasaki, H., Arinobu, Y., Moran, T. B., Shigematsu, H., Sullivan, M. R., Akashi, K., Orkin, S. H. (2008). Antagonism of FOG-1 and GATA factors in fate choice for the mast cell lineage. JEM 205: 611-624 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Quinlan, K. G. R., Verger, A., Kwok, A., Lee, S. H. Y., Perdomo, J., Nardini, M., Bolognesi, M., Crossley, M. (2006). Role of the C-Terminal Binding Protein PXDLS Motif Binding Cleft in Protein Interactions and Transcriptional Repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 8202-8213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maeda, K., Nishiyama, C., Tokura, T., Nakano, H., Kanada, S., Nishiyama, M., Okumura, K., Ogawa, H. (2006). FOG-1 represses GATA-1-dependent Fc{epsilon}RI beta-chain transcription: transcriptional mechanism of mast-cell-specific gene expression in mice. Blood 108: 262-269 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lin, A. C., Roche, A. E., Wilk, J., Svensson, E. C. (2004). The N Termini of Friend of GATA (FOG) Proteins Define a Novel Transcriptional Repression Motif and a Superfamily of Transcriptional Repressors. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 55017-55023 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tanaka, M., Zheng, J., Kitajima, K., Kita, K., Yoshikawa, H., Nakano, T. (2004). Differentiation status dependent function of FOG-1. GENES CELLS 9: 1213-1226 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Garriga-Canut, M., Orkin, S. H. (2004). Transforming Acidic Coiled-coil Protein 3 (TACC3) Controls Friend of GATA-1 (FOG-1) Subcellular Localization and Regulates the Association between GATA-1 and FOG-1 during Hematopoiesis. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 23597-23605 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pal, S., Cantor, A. B., Johnson, K. D., Moran, T. B., Boyer, M. E., Orkin, S. H., Bresnick, E. H. (2004). Coregulator-dependent facilitation of chromatin occupancy by GATA-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 980-985 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Letting, D. L., Chen, Y.-Y., Rakowski, C., Reedy, S., Blobel, G. A. (2004). Context-dependent regulation of GATA-1 by friend of GATA-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 476-481 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grass, J. A., Boyer, M. E., Pal, S., Wu, J., Weiss, M. J., Bresnick, E. H. (2003). GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 8811-8816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Grunsven, L. A., Michiels, C., Van de Putte, T., Nelles, L., Wuytens, G., Verschueren, K., Huylebroeck, D. (2003). Interaction between Smad-interacting Protein-1 and the Corepressor C-terminal Binding Protein Is Dispensable for Transcriptional Repression of E-cadherin. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 26135-26145 [Abstract] [Full Text]