This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Park, N. J. Articles by Martinson, H. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Park, N. J. Articles by Martinson, H. G.

The Two Steps of Poly(A)-Dependent Termination, Pausing and Release, Can Be Uncoupled by Truncation of the RNA Polymerase II Carboxyl-Terminal Repeat Domain

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569

Received 24 December 2003/ Returned for modification 28 January 2004/ Accepted 24 February 2004

The carboxyl-terminal repeat domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II is thought to help coordinate events during RNA metabolism. The mammalian CTD consists of 52 imperfectly repeated heptads followed by 10 additional residues at the C terminus. The CTD is required for cleavage and polyadenylation in vitro. We studied poly(A)-dependent termination in vivo using CTD truncation mutants. Poly(A)-dependent termination occurs in two steps, pause and release. We found that the CTD is required for release, the first 25 heptads being sufficient. Neither the final 10 amino acids nor the variant heptads of the second half of the CTD were required. No part of the CTD was required for poly(A)-dependent pausing—the poly(A) signal could communicate directly with the body of the polymerase. By removing the CTD, pausing could be observed without being obscured by release. Poly(A)-dependent pausing appeared to operate by slowing down the polymerase, such as by down-regulation of a positive elongation factor. Although the first 25 heptads supported undiminished poly(A)-dependent termination, they did not efficiently support events near the promoter involved in abortive elongation. However, the second half of the CTD, including the final 10 amino acids, was sufficient for these functions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nag, A., Narsinh, K., Kazerouninia, A., Martinson, H. G. (2006). The conserved AAUAAA hexamer of the poly(A) signal can act alone to trigger a stable decrease in RNA polymerase II transcription velocity. RNA 12: 1534-1544 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ansari, A., Hampsey, M. (2005). A role for the CPF 3'-end processing machinery in RNAP II-dependent gene looping. Genes Dev. 19: 2969-2978 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Adamson, T. E., Shutt, D. C., Price, D. H. (2005). Functional Coupling of Cleavage and Polyadenylation with Transcription of mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 32262-32271 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhang, Z., Fu, J., Gilmour, D. S. (2005). CTD-dependent dismantling of the RNA polymerase II elongation complex by the pre-mRNA 3'-end processing factor, Pcf11. Genes Dev. 19: 1572-1580 [Abstract] [Full Text]