MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirkin, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mirkin, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirkin, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mirkin, S. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2005, p. 888-895, Vol. 25, No. 3
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.3.888-895.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanisms of Transcription-Replication Collisions in Bacteria

Ekaterina V. Mirkin and Sergei M. Mirkin*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Received 22 June 2004/ Returned for modification 22 October 2004/ Accepted 1 November 2004

While collisions between replication and transcription in bacteria are deemed inevitable, the fine details of the interplay between the two machineries are poorly understood. In this study, we evaluate the effects of transcription on the replication fork progression in vivo, by using electrophoresis analysis of replication intermediates. Studying Escherichia coli plasmids, which carry constitutive or inducible promoters in different orientations relative to the replication origin, we show that the mutual orientation of the two processes determines their mode of interaction. Replication elongation appears not to be affected by transcription proceeding in the codirectional orientation. Head-on transcription, by contrast, leads to severe inhibition of the replication fork progression. Furthermore, we evaluate the mechanism of this inhibition by limiting the area of direct contact between the two machineries. We observe that replication pausing zones coincide exactly with transcribed DNA segments. We conclude, therefore, that the replication fork is most likely attenuated upon direct physical interaction with the head-on transcription machinery.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 S. Ashland Ave., Chicago, IL 60607. Phone: (312) 996-9610. Fax: (312) 413-0353. E-mail: mirkin{at}uic.edu.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2005, p. 888-895, Vol. 25, No. 3
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.3.888-895.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.