This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhasarathy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kladde, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhasarathy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kladde, M. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2005, p. 2698-2707, Vol. 25, No. 7
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.7.2698-2707.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Promoter Occupancy Is a Major Determinant of Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme Requirements

Archana Dhasarathy and Michael P. Kladde*

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Received 27 September 2004/ Returned for modification 21 October 2004/ Accepted 3 January 2005

Chromatin creates transcriptional barriers that are overcome by coactivator activities such as histone acetylation by Gcn5 and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by SWI/SNF. Factors defining the differential coactivator requirements in the transactivation of various promoters remain elusive. Induction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 promoter does not require Gcn5 or SWI/SNF under fully inducing conditions of no phosphate. We show that PHO5 activation is highly dependent on both coactivators at intermediate phosphate concentrations, conditions that reduce the nuclear concentration of the Pho4 transactivator and severely diminish its association with PHO5 in the absence of Gcn5 or SWI/SNF. Conversely, physiological increases in Pho4 nuclear concentration and binding at PHO5 suppress the need for both Gcn5 and SWI/SNF, suggesting that coactivator redundancy is established at high Pho4 binding site occupancy. Consistent with this, we demonstrate, using chromatin immunoprecipitation, that Gcn5 and SWI/SNF are directly recruited to PHO5 and other strongly transcribed promoters, including GAL1-10, RPL19B, RPS22B, PYK1, and EFT2, which do not require either coactivator for expression. These results show that activator concentration and binding site occupancy play crucial roles in defining the extent to which transcription requires individual chromatin remodeling enzymes. In addition, Gcn5 and SWI/SNF associate with many more genomic targets than previously appreciated.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2128 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2128. Phone: (979) 862-6677. Fax: (979) 845-9274. E-mail: kladde{at}tamu.edu.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2005, p. 2698-2707, Vol. 25, No. 7
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.7.2698-2707.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wippo, C. J., Krstulovic, B. S., Ertel, F., Musladin, S., Blaschke, D., Sturzl, S., Yuan, G.-C., Horz, W., Korber, P., Barbaric, S. (2009). Differential Cofactor Requirements for Histone Eviction from Two Nucleosomes at the Yeast PHO84 Promoter Are Determined by Intrinsic Nucleosome Stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 2960-2981 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Erkina, T. Y., Tschetter, P. A., Erkine, A. M. (2008). Different Requirements of the SWI/SNF Complex for Robust Nucleosome Displacement at Promoters of Heat Shock Factor and Msn2- and Msn4-Regulated Heat Shock Genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28: 1207-1217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koutroubas, G., Merika, M., Thanos, D. (2008). Bypassing the Requirements for Epigenetic Modifications in Gene Transcription by Increasing Enhancer Strength. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28: 926-938 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chekanova, J. A., Abruzzi, K. C., Rosbash, M., Belostotsky, D. A. (2008). Sus1, Sac3, and Thp1 mediate post-transcriptional tethering of active genes to the nuclear rim as well as to non-nascent mRNP. RNA 14: 66-77 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barbaric, S., Luckenbach, T., Schmid, A., Blaschke, D., Horz, W., Korber, P. (2007). Redundancy of Chromatin Remodeling Pathways for the Induction of the Yeast PHO5 Promoter in Vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 27610-27621 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adkins, M. W., Williams, S. K., Linger, J., Tyler, J. K. (2007). Chromatin Disassembly from the PHO5 Promoter Is Essential for the Recruitment of the General Transcription Machinery and Coactivators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27: 6372-6382 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koehler, R. N., Rachfall, N., Rolfes, R. J. (2007). Activation of the ADE Genes Requires the Chromatin Remodeling Complexes SAGA and SWI/SNF. Eukaryot Cell 6: 1474-1485 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kundu, S., Horn, P. J., Peterson, C. L. (2007). SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster. Genes Dev. 21: 997-1004 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Korber, P., Barbaric, S., Luckenbach, T., Schmid, A., Schermer, U. J., Blaschke, D., Horz, W. (2006). The Histone Chaperone Asf1 Increases the Rate of Histone Eviction at the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 5539-5545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hertel, C. B., Langst, G., Horz, W., Korber, P. (2005). Nucleosome Stability at the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Promoters Correlates with Differential Cofactor Requirements for Chromatin Opening. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 10755-10767 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»