MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coïc, E.
Right arrow Articles by Haber, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coïc, E.
Right arrow Articles by Haber, J. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2006, p. 5470-5480, Vol. 26, No. 14
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.02443-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cell Cycle-Dependent Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Donor Preference during Mating-Type Switching by SBF (Swi4/Swi6) and Fkh1

Eric Coïc, Kaiming Sun,{dagger} Cherry Wu,{ddagger} and James E. Haber*

Department of Biology and Rosenstiel Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-9110

Received 22 December 2005/ Returned for modification 23 February 2006/ Accepted 2 May 2006

Saccharomyces mating-type switching occurs through a double-strand break-initiated gene conversion event at MAT, using one of two donors located distantly on the same chromosome, HML{alpha} and HMRa. MATa cells preferentially choose HML{alpha}, a decision that depends on the recombination enhancer (RE) that controls recombination along the left arm of chromosome III. We previously showed that an fhk1{Delta} mutation reduces HML{alpha} usage in MATa cells, but not to the level seen when RE is deleted. We now report that donor preference also depends on binding of the Swi4/Swi6 (SBF) transcription factors to an evolutionarily conserved SCB site within RE. As at other SCB-containing promoters, SBF binds to RE in the G1 phase. Surprisingly, Fkh1 binds to RE only in G2, which contrasts with its cell cycle-independent binding to its other target promoters. SBF and Fkh1 define two independent RE activation pathways, as deletion of both Fkh1 and SCB results in nearly complete loss of HML usage in MATa cells. These transcription factors create an epigenetic modification of RE in a fashion that apparently does not involve transcription. In addition, the putative helicase Chl1, previously involved in donor preference, functions in the SBF pathway.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology and Rosenstiel Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110. Phone: (781) 736-2462. Fax: (781) 736-2405. E-mail: haber{at}brandeis.edu.

{dagger} Present address: Whitehead Institute for Biological Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142.

{ddagger} Present address: Wyeth Research, 401 N. Middletown Road, Pearl River, NY 10965.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2006, p. 5470-5480, Vol. 26, No. 14
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.02443-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.