MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
MCB.00809-07v1
28/1/83    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bush, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Manley, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bush, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Manley, J. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2008, p. 83-92, Vol. 28, No. 1
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00809-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Variations in Intracellular Levels of TATA Binding Protein Can Affect Specific Genes by Different Mechanisms{triangledown}

Stephanie D. Bush, Patricia Richard, and James L. Manley*

Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027

Received 8 May 2007/ Returned for modification 30 May 2007/ Accepted 4 October 2007

We previously showed that reduced intracellular levels of the TATA binding protein (TBP), brought about by tbp heterozygosity in DT40 cells, resulted in a mitotic delay reflecting reduced expression of the mitotic regulator cdc25B but did not significantly affect overall transcription. Here we extend these findings in several ways. We first provide evidence that the decrease in cdc25B expression reflects reduced activity of the cdc25B core promoter in the heterozygous (TBP-het) cells. Strikingly, mutations in a previously described repressor element that overlaps the TATA box restored promoter activity in TBP-het cells, supporting the idea that the sensitivity of this promoter to TBP levels reflects a competition between TBP and the repressor for DNA binding. To determine whether cells might have mechanisms to compensate for fluctuations in TBP levels, we next examined expression of the two known vertebrate TBP homologues, TLP and TBP2. Significantly, mRNAs encoding both were significantly overexpressed relative to levels observed in wild-type cells. In the case of TLP, this was shown to reflect regulation of the core promoter by both TBP and TLP. Together, our results indicate that variations in TBP levels can affect the transcription of specific promoters in distinct ways, but overall transcription may be buffered by corresponding alterations in the expression of TBP homologues.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, 1117 Fairchild Center, New York, NY 10027. Phone: (212) 854-4647. Fax: (212) 865-8246. E-mail: mcb{at}biology.columbia.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 22 October 2007.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2008, p. 83-92, Vol. 28, No. 1
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00809-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.