MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
MCB.00375-08v1
28/14/4480    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cartagena-Lirola, H.
Right arrow Articles by Longhese, M. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cartagena-Lirola, H.
Right arrow Articles by Longhese, M. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2008, p. 4480-4493, Vol. 28, No. 14
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00375-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 Checkpoint Kinase in Signaling Double-Strand Breaks during the Meiotic Cell Cycle{triangledown}

Hugo Cartagena-Lirola ,{dagger},{ddagger} Ilaria Guerini,{ddagger} Nicola Manfrini, Giovanna Lucchini, and Maria Pia Longhese*

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, P.zza della Scienza 2, Università di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy

Received 5 March 2008/ Returned for modification 21 April 2008/ Accepted 12 May 2008

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can arise at unpredictable locations after DNA damage or in a programmed manner during meiosis. DNA damage checkpoint response to accidental DSBs during mitosis requires the Rad53 effector kinase, whereas the meiosis-specific Mek1 kinase, together with Red1 and Hop1, mediates the recombination checkpoint in response to programmed meiotic DSBs. Here we provide evidence that exogenous DSBs lead to Rad53 phosphorylation during the meiotic cell cycle, whereas programmed meiotic DSBs do not. However, the latter can trigger phosphorylation of a protein fusion between Rad53 and the Mec1-interacting protein Ddc2, suggesting that the inability of Rad53 to transduce the meiosis-specific DSB signals might be due to its failure to access the meiotic recombination sites. Rad53 phosphorylation/activation is elicited when unrepaired meiosis-specific DSBs escape the recombination checkpoint. This activation requires homologous chromosome segregation and delays the second meiotic division. Altogether, these data indicate that Rad53 prevents sister chromatid segregation in the presence of unrepaired programmed meiotic DSBs, thus providing a salvage mechanism ensuring genetic integrity in the gametes even in the absence of the recombination checkpoint.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, P.zza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39-0264483425. Fax: 39-0264483565. E-mail: mariapia.longhese{at}unimib.it

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 27 May 2008.

{dagger} Present address: Division of Hepatology and Gene Therapy, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.

{ddagger} These two authors contributed equally to the work.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2008, p. 4480-4493, Vol. 28, No. 14
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00375-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.