This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosetti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Basilico, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosetti, D.
Right arrow Articles by Basilico, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2008, p. 4759-4771, Vol. 28, No. 15
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.01849-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling Uses Multiple Mechanisms To Inhibit Wnt-Induced Transcription in Osteoblasts{triangledown}

Davide Ambrosetti,{dagger}* Greg Holmes,{dagger} Alka Mansukhani, and Claudio Basilico*

Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016

Received 10 October 2007/ Returned for modification 15 December 2007/ Accepted 17 May 2008

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and Wnt signals are both critical for proper bone development. We previously reported that the expression of activating FGF receptor mutations in osteoblasts downregulated the expression of many genes reported as targets of Wnt signaling, suggesting an antagonistic effect between Wnt signaling, which promotes osteoblast differentiation and function, and FGF signaling, which inhibits these processes. To analyze the effect of FGF on Wnt signaling in osteoblasts, we created reporter cell lines where a Wnt-responsive promoter drives luciferase expression and showed that Wnt3a-induced luciferase expression was specifically inhibited by FGF treatment. FGF specifically prevented the formation of a Wnt-induced transcriptional complex of TCF1 and -4 with β-catenin on DNA. FGF did not significantly affect the activation of β-catenin, although it reduced both the expression of TCF/LEF factors and their induction by Wnt. Microarray analysis using osteoblasts treated with Wnt3a and FGF alone or in combination showed that about 70% of the genes induced by Wnt3a were downregulated by combined FGF treatment. These included novel and previously identified Wnt target genes and genes involved in osteoblast differentiation. Furthermore, FGF alone could downregulate the expression of four Fzd Wnt receptor genes. Our results show that FGF antagonizes Wnt signaling by inhibiting Wnt-induced transcription and suggest that multiple mechanisms, including downregulation of TCFs and Wnt receptors, contribute to this effect.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Claudio Basilico: Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. Phone: (212) 263-5341. Fax: (212) 263-8714. E-mail: claudio.basilico{at}med.nyu.edu. Present address for Davide Ambrosetti: Department of Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy. Phone: 39 051 209 4239. Fax: 39 051 209 4286. E-mail: davide.ambrosetti{at}unibo.it

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 22 May 2008.

{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.

Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2008, p. 4759-4771, Vol. 28, No. 15
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.01849-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»