This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dimitrova, N.
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dimitrova, N.
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2009, p. 5552-5563, Vol. 29, No. 20
0270-7306/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00476-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cell Cycle-Dependent Role of MRN at Dysfunctional Telomeres: ATM Signaling-Dependent Induction of Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) in G1 and Resection-Mediated Inhibition of NHEJ in G2{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Nadya Dimitrova{ddagger} and Titia de Lange*

The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065

Received 13 April 2009/ Returned for modification 26 May 2009/ Accepted 30 July 2009

Here, we address the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex in the response to telomeres rendered dysfunctional by deletion of the shelterin component TRF2. Using conditional NBS1/TRF2 double-knockout MEFs, we show that MRN is required for ATM signaling in response to telomere dysfunction. This establishes that MRN is the only sensor for the ATM kinase and suggests that TRF2 might block ATM signaling by interfering with MRN binding to the telomere terminus, possibly by sequestering the telomere end in the t-loop structure. We also examined the role of the MRN/ATM pathway in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) of damaged telomeres. NBS1 deficiency abrogated the telomere fusions that occur in G1, consistent with the requirement for ATM and its target 53BP1 in this setting. Interestingly, NBS1 and ATM, but not H2AX, repressed NHEJ at dysfunctional telomeres in G2, specifically at telomeres generated by leading-strand DNA synthesis. Leading-strand telomere ends were not prone to fuse in the absence of either TRF2 or MRN/ATM, indicating redundancy in their protection. We propose that MRN represses NHEJ by promoting the generation of a 3' overhang after completion of leading-strand DNA synthesis. TRF2 may ensure overhang formation by recruiting MRN (and other nucleases) to newly generated telomere ends. The activation of the MRN/ATM pathway by the dysfunctional telomeres is proposed to induce resection that protects the leading-strand ends from NHEJ when TRF2 is absent. Thus, the role of MRN at dysfunctional telomeres is multifaceted, involving both repression of NHEJ in G2 through end resection and induction of NHEJ in G1 through ATM-dependent signaling.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065-6399. Phone: (212) 327-8146. Fax: (212) 327-7147. E-mail: delange{at}mail.rockefeller.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 10 August 2009.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/.

{ddagger} Present address: The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, 40 Ames Street, Cambridge, MA 02142.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2009, p. 5552-5563, Vol. 29, No. 20
0270-7306/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.00476-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • de Lange, T. (2009). How Telomeres Solve the End-Protection Problem. Science 326: 948-952 [Abstract] [Full Text]