This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaufman, R J Articles by Sharp, P A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kaufman, R J Articles by Sharp, P A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1983 September; 3(9): 1598-1608

Growth-dependent expression of dihydrofolate reductase mRNA from modular cDNA genes.

R J Kaufman and P A Sharp

ABSTRACT

Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) synthesis is regulated in a growth-dependent fashion. Dividing cells synthesize DHFR at a 10-fold-higher rate than do stationary cells. To study this growth-dependent synthesis. DHFR genes have been constructed from a DHFR cDNA segment, the adenovirus major late promoter, and fragments of simian virus 40 (SV40) which provide signals for polyadenylation. These genes have been introduced into Chinese hamster ovary cells. The DHFR mRNAs produced in different transformants are identical at their 5' ends, but differ in sequences in their 3' ends as different sites are utilized for polyadenylation. Three transformants that utilize either DHFR polyadenylation signals or the SV40 late polyadenylation signal exhibit growth-dependent DHFR synthesis. The level of DHFR mRNA in growing cells is approximately 10 times that in stationary cells for these transformants. This growth-dependent DHFR mRNA production probably results from posttranscriptional events. In contrast, three transformants that utilize the SV40 early polyadenylation signal and another transformant that utilizes a cellular polyadenylation signal do not exhibit growth-dependent DHFR synthesis. In these three cell lines, the fraction of mRNAs polyadenylated at different sites in a tandem array shifts between growing and stationary cells. These results suggest that the metabolic state of the cell is important in determining either the efficiency of polyadenylation at various sites or the stability of mRNA polyadenylated at various sites.

---

Mol Cell Biol. 1983 September; 3(9): 1598-1608

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Akgul, B., Tu, C.-P. D. (2004). Pentobarbital-mediated Regulation of Alternative Polyadenylation in Drosophila Glutathione S-Transferase D21 mRNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 4027-4033 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schmidt, E. E., Bondareva, A. A., Radke, J. R., Capecchi, M. R. (2003). Fundamental Cellular Processes Do Not Require Vertebrate-specific Sequences within the TATA-binding Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 6168-6174 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Noe, V., Ciudad, C. J., Chasin, L. A. (1999). Effect of Differential Polyadenylation and Cell Growth Phase on Dihydrofolate Reductase mRNA Stability. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 27807-27814 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Arts, J., Grimbergen, J., Toet, K., Kooistra, T. (1999). On the Role of c-Jun in the Induction of PAI-1 Gene Expression by Phorbol Ester, Serum, and IL-1{alpha} in HepG2 Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 19: 39-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Burger, C, Wick, M, Brusselbach, S, Muller, R (1994). Differential induction of 'metabolic genes' after mitogen stimulation and during normal cell cycle progression. J. Cell Sci. 107: 241-252 [Abstract]