This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pruitt, S C
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, R H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pruitt, S C
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, R H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1984 December; 4(12): 2851-2857

Effect of intercalating agents on RNA polymerase I promoter selection in Xenopus laevis.

S C Pruitt and R H Reeder

ABSTRACT

We have analyzed the effect of DNA intercalating agents on the transcription signals from two different Xenopus laevis RNA polymerase I promoters. The transcription signal from the promoter for the 7.5-kilobase rRNA precursor (the gene promoter) is unaffected over a large range of intercalating agent concentrations regardless of whether the template is injected plasmid DNA in oocytes, the amplified endogenous nucleoli of oocytes, or the endogenous chromosomes of cultured Xenopus kidney cells. The transcription signal from a closely related promoter located in the spacer DNA between genes (the spacer promoter) ranges between undetectable to equivalent to the gene promoter signal on different templates. The transcription signal from the spacer promoter is also differentially affected by intercalating agents relative to the gene promoter. Depending on the template, these agents can either increase or decrease the transcription signal from the spacer promoter. Fusions between the gene and spacer promoters demonstrate that intercalating agents affect transcription initiation. One explanation for these results is that the degree of supercoiling of the template DNA can differentially inhibit transcription from the spacer promoters. The different effects of intercalating agents on transcription from the spacer promoters of various templates could then be explained as differences in the degree of supercoiling present on these templates initially.


Mol Cell Biol. 1984 December; 4(12): 2851-2857




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Natoli, T., Ellsworth, M., Wu, C, Gross, K., Pruitt, S. (1997). Positive and negative DNA sequence elements are required to establish the pattern of Pax3 expression. Development 124: 617-626 [Abstract]