MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClung, J K
Right arrow Articles by Kletzien, R F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McClung, J K
Right arrow Articles by Kletzien, R F

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1984 June; 4(6): 1079-1085

Analysis of BHK cell growth kinetics after microinjection of catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.

J K McClung and R F Kletzien

ABSTRACT

The effect of catalytic subunit (C) of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase on cell growth kinetics of BHK cells was assessed by microinjection with chicken erythrocyte ghosts as vehicles for introduction of the protein into the cytosol of large populations of cells. The advantage in using chicken erythrocytes for microinjection is that the inactive erythrocyte nuclei serve as a probe for identifying and analyzing microinjection events. By utilizing this procedure, BHK cells were microinjected with an amount of C that was 5- to 10-fold greater than their endogenous levels. Growth kinetics were analyzed by [3H]thymidine incorporation and autoradiography. Cells were stained after autoradiography to more clearly reveal the chicken nuclei, and at each time point, cells were categorized into four groups: (i) not microinjected, not in S phase, (ii) not microinjected, in S phase, (iii) microinjected, not in S phase, (iv) microinjected, in S phase. Those cells not microinjected served as internal controls. Two experimental protocols were used to test the notion that C is involved in blocking cell progression through G1 phase of the cell cycle. First, cells were arrested in G0 phase by serum deprivation, microinjected with C or control proteins, and stimulated to proceed to S phase by the addition of serum or purified growth factors. Second, cells were collected in mitosis, microinjected with C or control proteins, and stimulated to proceed to S phase by the addition of serum. The results of these studies indicate that a 5- to 10-fold increase in the intracellular concentration of C is not a sufficient signal to arrest cell growth in G1 phase. Thus, growth-inhibitory effects of cyclic AMP on BHK cells are unlikely to be the result of activation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase.


Mol Cell Biol. 1984 June; 4(6): 1079-1085







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.