MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerondakis, S
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerondakis, S
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1986 November; 6(11): 3677-3684

Structure of the protein encoded by the chicken proto-oncogene c-myb.

S Gerondakis and J M Bishop

ABSTRACT

The retroviral oncogene v-myb arose by transduction of the chicken proto-oncogene c-myb. We isolated and sequenced cDNA that represents the entire coding domain of chicken c-myb. By transcribing the cDNA into mRNA in vitro and then translating the RNA, we were able to document the integrity of the cDNA and to identify the codon responsible for initiation of translation from c-myb. Two different alleles of v-myb are extant, one in the genome of avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) and the other in the genome of erythroblastosis virus 26 (E26V). The proteins encoded by the AMV and E26V alleles of v-myb differ from the product of c-myb in three ways: at their amino termini, they lack 71 and 80 amino acids respectively; at their carboxy termini, they are deficient in 199 and 278 residues; and 11 substitutions of amino acids are scattered throughout the product of AMV allele, whereas the product of the E26V allele contains only a single substitution. The structural origins of tumorigenicity by v-myb and the biological functions of c-myb remain enigmatic. The findings and molecular clones described here should now permit a systematic exploration of these enigmas.


Mol Cell Biol. 1986 November; 6(11): 3677-3684




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.