MCB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schatz, P J
Right arrow Articles by Botstein, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schatz, P J
Right arrow Articles by Botstein, D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1986 November; 6(11): 3722-3733

Genetically essential and nonessential alpha-tubulin genes specify functionally interchangeable proteins.

P J Schatz, F Solomon and D Botstein

ABSTRACT

Microtubules in yeast are essential components of the mitotic and meiotic spindles and are essential for nuclear movement during cell division and mating. The relative importance in these processes of the two divergent alpha-tubulin genes of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, TUB1 and TUB3, was examined through the construction of null mutations and by increasing their copy number on chromosomes and on plasmids. Experiments with null alleles of TUB3 showed that TUB3 was not essential for mitosis, meiosis, or mating. Null alleles of TUB3, however, did cause several phenotypes, including hypersensitivity to the antimicrotubule drug benomyl and poor spore viability. On the other hand, the TUB1 gene was essential for growth of normal haploid cells. Even in diploids heterozygous for a TUB1 null allele, several dominant phenotypes were evident, including slow growth and poor sporulation. This functional difference between the two genes is apparently due to different levels of expression, because extra copies of either gene could suppress the defects caused by a null mutation in the other. We conclude that in spite of the 10% divergence between the products of the two genes, there is no essential qualitative functional difference between them.


Mol Cell Biol. 1986 November; 6(11): 3722-3733




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.