This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beggs, A H Articles by Migeon, B R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beggs, A H Articles by Migeon, B R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1989 June; 9(6): 2322-2331

Chromatin loop structure of the human X chromosome: relevance to X inactivation and CpG clusters.

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

ABSTRACT

Part of the higher-order structure of chromatin is achieved by constraining DNA in loops ranging in size from 30 to 100 kilobase pairs; these loops have been implicated in defining functional domains and replicons and possibly in facilitating transcription. Because the human active and inactive X chromosomes differ in transcriptional activity and replication, we looked for differences in their chromatin loop structures. Since the islands of CpG-rich DNA at the 5' ends of X-linked housekeeping genes are the regions where functional differences in DNA methylation and nuclease sensitivity are found, we looked for scaffold association of these sequences after extraction of histones with lithium diiodosalicylate. Specifically, we examined the 5' CpG islands within the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, P3, GdX, phosphoglycerate kinase type 1, and alpha-galactosidase loci in human lymphoblasts obtained from individuals with 1 to 4 X chromosomes. Although we detected no scaffold-associated regions near these genes, we found several such regions at the ornithine transcarbamylase and blood clotting factor IX loci. Our results suggest that the CpG islands are excluded from the nuclear scaffold and that even though transcriptionally active, housekeeping genes are less likely than X-linked tissue-specific genes to be scaffold associated. In all cases, the pattern of scaffold association was the same for loci on active and inactive X chromosomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Craig, J., Boyle, S, Perry, P, Bickmore, W. (1997). Scaffold attachments within the human genome. J. Cell Sci. 110: 2673-2682 [Abstract]  
• Manuelidis, L (1990). A view of interphase chromosomes. Science 250: 1533-1540 [Abstract]  
• Higgs, D R, Wood, W G, Jarman, A P, Sharpe, J, Lida, J, Pretorius, I M, Ayyub, H (1990). A major positive regulatory region located far upstream of the human alpha-globin gene locus.. Genes Dev. 4: 1588-1601 [Abstract]