This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salmeron, J M Articles by Johnston, S A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salmeron, J M, Jr Articles by Johnston, S A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1989 July; 9(7): 2950-2956

Interaction between transcriptional activator protein LAC9 and negative regulatory protein GAL80.

Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.

ABSTRACT

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcriptional activation mediated by the GAL4 regulatory protein is repressed in the absence of galactose by the binding of the GAL80 protein, an interaction that requires the carboxy-terminal 28 amino acids of GAL4. The homolog of GAL4 from Kluyveromyces lactis, LAC9, activates transcription in S. cerevisiae and is highly similar to GAL4 in its carboxyl terminus but is not repressed by wild-type levels of GAL80 protein. Here we show that GAL80 does repress LAC9-activated transcription in S. cerevisiae if overproduced. We sought to determine the molecular basis for the difference in the responses of the LAC9 and GAL4 proteins to GAL80. Our results indicate that this difference is due primarily to the fact that under wild-type conditions, the level of LAC9 protein in S. cerevisiae is much higher than that of GAL4, which suggests that LAC9 escapes GAL80-mediated repression by titration of GAL80 protein in vivo. The difference in response to GAL80 is not due to amino acid sequence differences between the LAC9 and GAL4 carboxyl termini. We discuss the implications of these results for the mechanism of galactose metabolism regulation in S. cerevisiae and K. lactis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Anders, A., Lilie, H., Franke, K., Kapp, L., Stelling, J., Gilles, E. D., Breunig, K. D. (2006). The Galactose Switch in Kluyveromyces lactis Depends on Nuclear Competition between Gal4 and Gal1 for Gal80 Binding. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 29337-29348 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sil, A. K., Alam, S., Xin, P., Ma, L., Morgan, M., Lebo, C. M., Woods, M. P., Hopper, J. E. (1999). The Gal3p-Gal80p-Gal4p Transcription Switch of Yeast: Gal3p Destabilizes the Gal80p-Gal4p Complex in Response to Galactose and ATP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 7828-7840 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• King, K, Dohlman, H., Thorner, J, Caron, M., Lefkowitz, R. (1990). Control of yeast mating signal transduction by a mammalian beta 2-adrenergic receptor and Gs alpha subunit. Science 250: 121-123 [Abstract]