This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yamasaki, L Articles by Lanford, R E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yamasaki, L Articles by Lanford, R E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1989 July; 9(7): 3028-3036

Identification of four nuclear transport signal-binding proteins that interact with diverse transport signals.

L Yamasaki, P Kanda and R E Lanford

Department of Virology and Immunology, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas.

ABSTRACT

The transport of proteins into the nucleus requires not only the presence of a nuclear transport signal on the targeted protein but also the signal recognition proteins and the nuclear pore translocation apparatus. Complicating the search for the signal recognition proteins is the fact that the nuclear transport signals identified share little obvious homology. In this study, synthetic peptides homologous to the nuclear transport signals from the simian virus 40 large T antigen, Xenopus oocyte nucleoplasmin, adenovirus E1A, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae MAT alpha 2 proteins were coupled to a UV-photoactivable cross-linker and iodinated for use in an in vitro cross-linking reaction with cellular lysates. Four proteins, p140, p100, p70, and p55, which specifically interacted with the nuclear transport signal peptides were identified. Unique patterns of reactivity were observed with closely related pairs of nuclear transport signal peptides. Competition experiments with labeled and unlabeled peptides demonstrated that heterologous signals were able to bind the same protein and suggested that diverse signals use a common transport pathway. The subcellular distribution of the four nuclear transport signal-binding proteins suggested that nuclear transport involves both cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors. The four proteins were not bound by wheat germ agglutinin and were not associated tightly with the nuclear pore complex.

---

Mol Cell Biol. 1989 July; 9(7): 3028-3036

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fujihara, S. M., Cleaveland, J. S., Grosmaire, L. S., Berry, K. K., Kennedy, K. A., Blake, J. J., Loy, J., Rankin, B. M., Ledbetter, J. A., Nadler, S. G. (2000). A D-Amino Acid Peptide Inhibitor of NF-{kappa}B Nuclear Localization Is Efficacious in Models of Inflammatory Disease. J. Immunol. 165: 1004-1012 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cserpan, I, Udvardy, A (1995). The mechanism of nuclear transport of natural or artificial transport substrates in digitonin-permeabilized cells. J. Cell Sci. 108: 1849-1861 [Abstract]  
• Vandromme, M, Carnac, G, Gauthier-Rouviere, C, Fesquet, D, Lamb, N, Fernandez, A (1994). Nuclear import of the myogenic factor MyoD requires cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity but not the direct phosphorylation of MyoD. J. Cell Sci. 107: 613-620 [Abstract]  
• Stochaj, U, Bossie, M., van Zee, K, Whalen, A., Silver, P. (1993). Analysis of conserved binding proteins for nuclear localization sequences. J. Cell Sci. 104: 89-95 [Abstract]  
• Fischer, U, Luhrmann, R (1990). An essential signaling role for the m3G cap in the transport of U1 snRNP to the nucleus. Science 249: 786-790 [Abstract]