Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, January 1998, p. 290-302, Vol. 18, No. 1
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation and Characterization of New Alleles of
the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Gene CDC28 with
Cyclin-Specific Functional and Biochemical Defects
Kristi
Levine,*
L. J. W. M.
Oehlen, and
Frederick R.
Cross
The Rockefeller University, New York, New
York 10021
Received 23 May 1997/Returned for modification 1 July 1997/Accepted 7 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
The G1 cyclin Cln2 negatively regulates the
mating-factor pathway. In a genetic screen to identify factors required
for this regulation, we identified an allele of CDC28
(cdc28-csr1) that blocked this function of Cln2. Cln2
immunoprecipitated from cdc28-csr1 cells was completely
defective in histone H1 kinase activity, due to defects in Cdc28
binding and activation by Cln2. In contrast, Clb2-associated H1 kinase
and Cdc28 binding was normal in immunoprecipitates from these cells.
cdc28-csr1 was significantly deficient in other aspects of
genetic interaction with Cln2. The cdc28-csr1
mutation was determined to be Q188P, in the T loop distal to most of
the probable Cdk-cyclin interaction regions. We
performed random mutagenesis of CDC28 to identify
additional alleles incapable of causing CLN2-dependent mating-factor resistance but capable of complementing cdc28
temperature-sensitive and null alleles. Two such mutants had highly
defective Cln2-associated kinase, but, surprisingly, two other mutants
had levels of Cln2-associated kinase near to wild-type levels. We
performed a complementary screen for CDC28 mutants that
could cause efficient Cln2-dependent mating-factor resistance but not
complement a cdc28 null allele. Most such mutants were
found to alter residues essential for kinase activity; the proteins had
little or no associated kinase activity in bulk or in association with
Cln2. Several of these mutants also functioned in another assay for
CLN2-dependent function not involving the mating-factor
pathway, complementing the temperature sensitivity of a cln1 cln3
cdc28-csr1 strain. These results could indicate that Cln2-Cdc28
kinase activity is not directly relevant to some
CLN2-mediated functions. Mutants of this sort should be useful in differentiating the function of Cdc28 complexed with different cyclin regulatory subunits.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks)
regulate the occurrence of diverse cell cycle events in eukaryotic
cells. There is considerable diversity of the kinases and still more
diversity of the cyclins, even in a single organism. In the budding
yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc28 is the major Cdk
involved in cell cycle regulation, and it is activated by nine
different cyclins: the three G1 cyclins Cln1, Cln2, and
Cln3, involved in regulating the Start event; and the six B-type
cyclins (Clbs) involved in regulating S phase and mitosis (6,
23). Although activation of a Cdk by multiple cyclins is commonly
observed in other organisms, the situation in budding yeast is unusual
in that cyclins of divergent sequence classes all activate the same
Cdk. B-type, CLN1,2-type, and CLN3 cyclins have
only ~25% identity in the most highly conserved cyclin box region,
which comprises the Cdk binding interface. The high efficiency of
functional activation of Cdc28 by these very divergent cyclins poses an
interesting problem in molecular recognition.
Cln3-Cdc28 probably functions in vivo primarily as a transcriptional
activator of CLN1 and CLN2 as well as other genes
(10, 18, 33, 35). Cln1 and Cln2 are thought to directly
drive the Start event, consisting of bud emergence, negative regulation of the mating-factor response pathway, and activation of the Clb-Cdc28 kinases by stabilizing Clb proteins and by inducing degradation of the
Sic1 inhibitor of Clb-Cdc28 kinase activity (6). Clb-Cdc28 complexes are required for later cell cycle events such as DNA replication and mitosis (23). In most cases, these different regulatory specificities of the cyclin-Cdc28 complexes can be shown to
be due to the identity of the cyclin, although significant functional
overlap between different cyclins is observed.
The activity of the mating-factor signalling pathway is cell cycle
regulated. Both basal and pheromone-induced transcription of
pheromone-responsive genes are reduced as cells enter S phase (25,
26, 37, 40). It was observed that deletion of CLN1 and
CLN2 abolishes the cell cycle-regulated inducibility of the pheromone-responsive gene FUS1 while overexpression of
CLN2 leads to both strong repression of pheromone-induced
FUS1 transcription and resistance to mating-pheromone arrest
(25). Expression of the G1 cyclin genes
CLN1 and CLN2 as cells enter S phase is therefore required for repression of the mating-factor-induced signalling (25). Inhibition of the mating-factor pathway by Cln1 and
Cln2 appears to be highly specific to these homologous cyclins, since neither Cln3 nor Clb cyclins have a detectable ability to inhibit the
mating-factor pathway (25). The mechanism by which Cln1 or
Cln2 inhibits the mating-factor pathway is unknown, but the step in the
pathway that is inhibited has been deduced to be postreceptor and
probably post-G-protein activation (24, 25, 37). To study
the mechanism by which Cln2 inhibits the mating-factor pathway, we
initiated a genetic screen for mutations that block this inhibition. From this screen, we isolated a mutant allele of CDC28 that
was defective in binding and activation by Cln2. This mutant Cdc28 functioned well with Clb cyclins and complemented a cdc28
null allele. We screened for additional cdc28 mutants with
similar phenotypes and also for cdc28 mutants with the
reverse phenotype (i.e., the ability to confer Cln2-dependent
mating-factor pathway inhibition combined with a failure to complement
a cdc28 null allele). Both screens produced cdc28
mutants with diverse biochemical defects in cyclin binding and kinase
activation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
The plasmids used in this study are described in
Table 1. pKL038-1
(cdc28::HIS3/TRP1) was constructed as
follows. pRD47 (CDC28/TRP1/Ampr)
(9) was digested with AflII and ClaI,
releasing a 568-bp fragment of the CDC28 coding region. The
3' recessed ends were blunted with Klenow. pJA50-Delta (1),
a plasmid containing a HIS3/Kanr cassette, was
digested with SmaI, releasing the
HIS3/Kanr fragment. The blunted pRD47 fragments
were ligated to the SmaI-digested pJA50-Delta fragments and
transformed into Escherichia coli. E. coli carrying the
HIS3/Kanr-disrupted plasmids were selected on
Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing ampicillin and kanamycin, and
correct constructs were confirmed by KpnI digests. pKL049-1
(cdc28::Camr/TRP1) and
pKL050-1
(cdc28-HA::Camr/TRP1)
were constructed as follows. The chloramphenicol resistance gene,
Camr, contained within the pBCKS(+) plasmid was amplified
by PCR, with the incorporation of AflII and ClaI
sites at the 5' and 3' ends of the gene, respectively. The resulting
PCR product was digested with AflII and ClaI,
ligated to the AflII-ClaI-digested and
gel-purified pRD58 (cdc28T169A/TRP1) or pSF19
(CDC28-HA/TRP1) vector fragment, and transformed
into E. coli. E. coli carrying the
Camr-disrupted plasmids were selected on Luria-Bertani
medium containing ampicillin and chloramphenicol, and the correct
constructs were confirmed by digestion. Both hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged
and untagged versions of the cdc28-csr and
cdc28-rsc plasmids (pKL045-KL048 and pKL054-KL066) were
constructed by in vivo gap repair (described below). pKL039-1
(cdc28-csr1/URA3) was constructed by switching the TRP1 marker of pKL054 to URA3 with pTU10, as
described previously (7). Similarly, pKL051
(CLN2-3P/URA3), pKL052
(cln2K129A-3P/URA3), and pKL053
(cln2E183A-3P/URA3) were constructed by switching
the TRP1 markers of pT411, pKL003, and pKL004
(18), respectively, to URA3 with pTU10
(7). pKL019 (cdc28T169A-HA/TRP1) was
constructed by digesting pRD58 (cdc28T169A/TRP1)
with AflII and ClaI and subcloning the
AflII-ClaI fragment into an
AflII-ClaI-digested pSF19
(CDC28-HA/TRP1). Plasmids containing the
single-mutant alleles cdc28-L61S and
cdc28-K187E were constructed by the splice overlap
extension method described previously (13), with both
wild-type CDC28 and cdc28-csr19 or cdc28-csr41, respectively, as the templates. Following
PCR amplification of the single-mutant fragments, pKL075 and pKL077
(cdc28-L61S) and pKL081 and pKL082 (cdc28-K187E)
were constructed by in vivo gap repair (described below) with the
AflII-ClI-digested untagged vector pKL049-1;
KL078 and KL080 (cdc28-L61S-HA), and KL084 and KL085
(cdc28-K187E-HA) were constructed with the
AflII-ClI-digested HA-tagged vector pKL050-1.
Each of the single-mutant alleles was fully sequenced to ensure
the correct construction.
Yeast strains.
All the strains used in this study are
described in Table 2. All strains were
congenic with BF264-15D (MATa trp1 leu2 ura3 ade1
his2) (29). The strains were constructed and analyzed by standard genetic methods. DNA transformation was by the lithium acetate method. The cdc28::HIS3 disruption in
strain 2198-3A-2a was constructed as follows. pKL038-1
(cdc28::HIS3/TRP1) was digested with
XhoI and SacII, releasing a fragment containing
the disrupted cdc28::HIS3 gene, and the digest was
used to transform strain BOY760 containing pKL039-1. Yeast clones
carrying the disrupted cdc28::HIS3 gene were
identified by their His+ Trp
FOA
phenotype. The FUS1::HIS3,
far1::URA3,
leu2::LEU2::GAL1::CLN2, and
leu2::LEU2::GAL1::CLN3 gene constructs,
cln gene deletion alleles, and cdc28-13 mutant
allele have been described previously (4, 5, 28, 32).
Growth conditions.
Cells were grown in YEP medium (1% Difco
yeast extract, 2% Difco Bacto Peptone) containing 2% glucose (YEPDex)
or 3% galactose (YEPGal) as the carbon source. In experiments where
the plasmids were retained, synthetic dropout medium (SC) containing
2% glucose (SCDex) or 3% galactose (SCGal) was used. The SC was
prepared as described previously (25). For growth on solid
media, 2% Difco agar was added. In experiments designed to select
against the functional URA3 gene, 5-fluoroorotic acid (FOA)
plates containing 6.7 g of Difco yeast nitrogen base complete
(with amino acids and ammonium sulfate) per liter, 1 g of FOA
powder per liter, 2% Difco agar, 12 mg of uracil per liter, and the
remaining amino acids in the concentrations described by Ausubel et al.
(2) were used. As a carbon source, 2% glucose (FOADex) or
3% galactose (FOAGal) was added.
Mutagenesis.
Random mutagenesis of CDC28 was
performed by PCR with Taq polymerase, as described
previously (17). In all cases, all four deoxynucleoside
triphosphates were present at equal molar amounts of 1 mM each. In some
cases, MnCl2, at a final concentration of either 0.25 or
0.5 mM, was added to increase the mutation frequency.
Gap repair to introduce mutant CDC28 into plasmids;
untagging CDC28-HA.
A previously described (22)
method of in vivo recombination, or gap repair, was used to introduce
the original cdc28-csr1 allele into a plasmid, to generate
the library of mutant CDC28 plasmids used in the screens,
and to untag the HA-tagged CDC28 alleles. To introduce the
cdc28-csr1 allele into a plasmid (pKL054), the
cdc28-csr1 coding sequence was amplified by PCR with a
genomic DNA preparation from the 2195-13B strain as the template. The amplification used the seq#1-5'CDC28 primer (about 60 bp 5' of the
start of the coding sequence and about 140 bp 5' of the
AflII site within the CDC28 coding sequence), and
the seq#4-3'CDC28 primer (about 60 bp 3' of the end of the coding
sequence and about 300 bp 3' of the ClaI site within the
CDC28 coding sequence). The resulting 1,022-bp fragment was
cotransformed with AflII-ClaI-digested (or
gapped) and gel-purified pRD47 (CDC28/TRP1) into
strain 2112-10C. Transformants were selected on defined medium lacking
tryptophan and screened for the appropriate Csr mutant phenotype. The
plasmids were isolated from the transformants, and two independently
isolated plasmids were sequenced, each containing the single Q188P
mutation. To generate the library of mutant CDC28 plasmids,
the wild-type CDC28 allele was amplified by error-prone PCR
(17). The primers used in the amplification reactions were
at least 100 bp 5' or 3' of the AflII and ClaI
sites in the CDC28 coding region, respectively. Then the
amplified fragments were cotransformed with
AflII-ClaI-digested and gel-purified pSF19
(CDC28-HA/TRP1) into strain 2112-10C
(cdc28-csr screen) or 2198-3A-2a (cdc28-rsc
screen). Transformants were selected on defined medium lacking
tryptophan, and screened for appropriate phenotypes. To untag the
pSF19-based HA-tagged CDC28 plasmids recovered in these
screens, the HA-tagged plasmid constructs were digested with
KpnI to release the mutant CDC28 coding sequence; KpnI cuts once upstream of the AflII site (within
the polylinker of the plasmid) and once approximately 130 bp 3' of the
ClaI site (within the coding sequence of the gene). For all
mutant alleles, all the mutations found within the HA-tagged constructs
were included within this KpnI fragment. For the
cdc28-csr allele untagging, mutant KpnI fragments
were cotransformed with AflII-ClaI-digested and
gel-purified pRD58 (cdc28-T169A/TRP1) containing
an untagged and mutated version of the CDC28 gene (used to
reduce the functional background). For the cdc28-rsc allele
untagging, AflII-ClaI-digested pKL049-1,
containing a Camr-disrupted version of pRD58, was used
instead of pRD58 to further reduce the background. For all mutant
alleles, except for cdc28-rsc15, which contained two
mutations downstream of the ClaI site, all the mutations
were included within the AflII-ClaI gap region. Transformants were selected on defined medium lacking tryptophan and
screened for the appropriate mutant phenotype. Plasmids were isolated
and tested by digestion and retransformation. The untagged allele of
cdc28-rsc15 was sequenced to ensure the presence of mutations downstream of the ClaI site.
Immunoprecipitation, immunoblot analysis, and protein kinase
assay.
The immunoprecipitation, immunoblot analysis, and protein
kinase assay procedures were adapted from those of Cross and Blake (8) and Tyers et al. (35, 36) and have been
described previously (18). For experiments analyzing Cln2-HA
or Clb2-HA, the protocol used was described previously (18).
For experiments analyzing Cdc28-HA, or bulk kinase, the protocol was as
described, except that in the experiments analyzing the bulk kinase of
the cdc28-csr alleles, the cells were grown overnight at 38 instead of 30°C and kinase assays were performed at 38 instead of
30°C. For the experiment analyzing Cln3-HA, the following
modifications were made to optimize Cln3-Cdc28 association: following
filtration, the cells were resuspended in 250 µl of LSHNN extraction
buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10%
glycerol) instead of TNN extraction buffer; following incubation with
protein A-agarose (Repligen), the immunoprecipitates were washed with LSHNN extraction buffer three times for 1 min each and washed with HNN
extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, 10% glycerol) once for 2 min.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of a mutation blocking Cln2 regulation of the
mating-factor pathway.
Overexpression of CLN2 from the
GAL1 promoter results in repression of mating-pheromone
signal transduction and resistance to mating-pheromone-induced cell
cycle arrest (25). We devised a genetic screen to identify
factors involved in the Cln2-mediated inhibition of the
mating-pheromone pathway. We constructed a strain of the genotype
far1 FUS1::HIS3 MATa bar1 (Fig.
1A). The FUS1 promoter is
strongly induced by the mating-pheromone pathway (21, 34),
and the FUS1::HIS3 fusion is regulated similarly (32). Thus, on medium lacking histidine and containing
aminotriazole, the growth of this strain is mating-pheromone dependent
(Fig. 1A, bottom right panel). This strain is able to form colonies on
mating factor because of the far1 mutation. Introduction of GAL1::CLN2 into this strain eliminated colony formation
on galactose-histidine plates containing mating factor because
GAL1::CLN2 inhibited the mating-pheromone pathway, and
thus FUS1::HIS3 transcription, making the strain
phenotypically His
(Fig. 1A, top right panel). To
identify mutants that were defective in
GAL1::CLN2-mediated inhibition of the mating-pheromone
pathway, we screened for mutant clones that were His+ when
grown on galactose plates containing mating factor. Most of the
His+ mutant clones that were obtained were
Leu
, indicative of loss of the
LEU2::GAL1::CLN2 cassette. The Leu+
mutant clones were analyzed by Northern blot analysis for both CLN2 expression and FUS1 transcriptional
induction. Most of the Leu+ derivatives expressed elevated
levels of endogenous FUS1 transcript constitutively (data
not shown). These probably represented clones with constitutive
activation of the mating-pheromone pathway similar to the ones
described by Stevenson et al. (32). We did not analyze these
mutants further. One mutant exhibited essentially wild-type activation
of FUS1 transcription by mating-factor treatment, despite continued high expression of the CLN2 transcript from the
GAL1 promoter (Fig. 1B). This mutant also suppressed the
hyperpolarization phenotype, or elongated buds, normally found in cells
overexpressing CLN2 (19). The mutant strain was
crossed to a MAT
FAR1 FUS1::HIS3 LEU2::GAL1::CLN2 strain and analyzed by tetrad analysis.
The mutation, as determined by its hyperpolarization phenotype,
segregated 2:2 (i.e., as a single gene) that recombined freely with the
LEU2::GAL1::CLN2 cassette. In FAR1
LEU2::GAL1::CLN2 segregants from the cross, the presence
of the mutation restored the sensitivity to mating factor of cells
overexpressing CLN2, as measured by the halo assay (Fig.
1C). We named the mutation csr1-1, for cyclin-dependent signalling repression.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Isolation of the csr1-1 mutant; failure of
repression by GAL1::CLN2 expression and restoration of
mating-factor resistance to GAL1::CLN2 cells. (A)
Construction of a strain in which CLN2 overexpression
results in death due to inactivation of the mating-factor pathway.
MATa bar1 far1 strains with and without a
LEU2::GAL1::CLN2 construct and with and without an
FUS1::HIS3 construct were grown in the absence and
presence of mating factor on SCGal-His plates containing 50 mM
aminotriazole. The strains used were BOY1396 (GAL1::CLN2
HIS3), BOY1395 (HIS3), BOY916 (GAL1::CLN2
FUS1::HIS3), and BOY915 (FUS1::HIS3). All the
strains were MATa bar1 far1::URA3. (B) The
csr1-1 mutation restores FUS1 inducibility by
mating factor to GAL1::CLN2 cells. Cultures were grown
on YEPGal medium, and part of the culture was treated with mating
factor for 20 min. Samples were analyzed by Northern analysis for
FUS1 and TCM1 transcript levels. The transcripts
were quantitated with a PhosphorImager, and the FUS1 levels
indicated were normalized for loading in the different lanes, as
deduced from the TCM1 transcript levels. Values indicated in
the histogram are arbitrary units (A.U.). The strains used were 1255-5C
(wild type), 2198-3A (TRP1::GAL1::CLN2), and 2180-1B
(csr1-1 LEU2::GAL1::CLN2). (C) The csr1-1
mutation restores mating-factor sensitivity to
GAL1::CLN2 cells. Cultures were grown to saturation on
YEPGal medium and spread on YEPGal plates. Sterile discs containing 15 µl of a 0.025, 0.05, or 0.1 mM alpha-factor dilution were placed on
each lawn, clockwise from the top left. The plates were incubated for 2 days at 30°C. The strains used were 2198-3A
(LEU2::GAL1::CLN2) and 2180-1B (csr1-1
LEU2::GAL1::CLN2).
|
|
csr1-1 is an allele of CDC28.
Overexpressed
Cln2 requires Cdc28 to inactivate the mating-factor pathway
(25). Thus, one explanation for the csr1-1 mutant phenotype would be that the mutation rendered Cln2-Cdc28 kinase defective. Indeed, Cln2 immunoprecipitates from csr1-1
mutant cells, compared to wild-type cells, had extremely low levels of associated kinase activity and Cdc28 protein (see below). We therefore tested whether the mutation could be in CDC28. In a cross to
a cdc28-13 strain, the csr1-1 mutation segregated
2:2 in opposition to cdc28-13. The csr1-1 allele
was complemented by CDC28 on a low-copy-number plasmid,
providing further evidence that csr1-1 was an allele of
CDC28. To confirm this, we amplified the CDC28 gene from a csr1-1 strain by using high-fidelity Vent
polymerase to avoid the accumulation of errors and introduced the
recovered CDC28 gene into a low-copy-number plasmid by gap
repair (see Materials and Methods). The plasmids recovered by using the
PCR product from the csr1-1 strain complemented
cdc28-13 at 38°C but failed to complement
csr1-1 for mating-factor resistance upon CLN2
overexpression. A plasmid containing the wild-type CDC28
gene complemented both cdc28-13 and csr1-1. These
results mapped the csr1-1 mutation to CDC28, and
we renamed the allele cdc28-csr1. The sequence of the
cdc28-csr1 allele revealed only one nucleotide change: the Q188P substitution (Table 3). This
position is predicted to be in the activation loop, distal to most
regions involved in cyclin binding, based on the cyclin A-Cdk2 crystal
structure (15).
We tested cdc28-csr1 for additional phenotypes indicative of
defective cyclin interaction. CLN1 CLN2 CLN3 cdc28-csr1
strains were about 35% larger in cell volume than were controls,
suggesting a moderate in vivo defect in this aspect of G1
cyclin function. cln1 cln2 CLN3 cdc28-csr1 and cln1
CLN2 cln3 cdc28-csr1 strains were viable; however, the latter
strains but not the former were temperature sensitive, suggesting that
Cln2/Cdc28-csr1 function was less efficient than Cln3/Cdc28-csr1
function. This is surprising because in most assays Cln2 is much more
potent than Cln3 (18), and it suggested specificity in the
csr1 defect. The temperature sensitivity of cln1 CLN2
cln3 cdc28-csr1 strains was further analyzed in a cln1 CLN2
cln3 cdc28-13 GAL1::CLN3 strain, carrying plasmid copies of
either CDC28 or cdc28-csr1 (Fig.
2A). Cells carrying the wild-type copy of
CDC28 were viable at both 30 and 38°C (the permissive and
restrictive temperatures for the cdc28-13 allele, respectively), independent of the expression of
GAL1::CLN3. In contrast, cells carrying the
cdc28-csr1 plasmid were viable at 38°C only when
GAL1::CLN3 was expressed (Fig. 2A).
cdc28-csr1 failed to show significant genetic interaction
with disruption of the major mitotic B-type cyclin clb2:
clb2 cdc28-csr1 double mutants were fully viable and
temperature resistant and had only a moderately greater cell size than
did clb2 single mutants (data not shown).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
cdc28-csr1 is defective in genetic
interaction with CLN2. (A) Temperature sensitivity of the
cln1 CLN2 cln3 cdc28-csr1-1 strain. Strain 1227-3C
(cln1 CLN2 cln3 cdc28-13 pURA3/GAL1::CLN3)
was transformed with plasmids RD47 (CDC28), KL054
(cdc28-csr1), or RS414 (Vector). For each transformed
strain, 10-fold serial dilutions were prepared for two independently
isolated transformants, and 5 µl of each dilution was plated onto
both a YEPGal plate (GAL1::CLN3 on) and a YEPDex plate
(GAL1::CLN3 off) at both 30 and 38°C. The YEPGal
plates were incubated for 3 days, and the YEPDex plates were incubated
for 2 days. (B) Weakened alleles of CLN2 fail to support the
viability of a cln1 cln2 cln3 cdc28-csr1 strain. Strain
1607-2B (CDC28 cln1 cln2 cln3 GAL1::CLN3) and strain
1706-2B (cdc28-csr1 cln1 cln2 cln3 GAL1::CLN3) were each
transformed with plasmid KL051 (CLN2-3P), KL052
(cln2-K129A-3P), KL053 (cln2-E183A-3P), or RS416
(Vector). For each transformed strain, 10-fold serial dilutions were
prepared, and 5 µl of each dilution was plated onto both a YEPGal
plate (GAL1::CLN3 on) and a YEPDex plate
(GAL1::CLN3 off). The plates were incubated at 30°C
for 3 days.
|
|
We recently described CLN2 mutants with reduced function due
to an inability to interact efficiently with Cdc28 (18).
These mutants, cln2-K129A-3P and cln2-E183A-3P
(each driven by the CLN3 promoter), were able to complement
a cln1 cln2 cln3 strain; however, they were unable to
complement a cln1 cln2 cln3 cdc28-csr1 strain (although both
CLN3 and a wild-type CLN2 gene driven by the
CLN3 promoter, CLN2-3P, were able to do so) (Fig.
2B and data not shown).
Thus, overall, these genetic results suggested a strong and relatively
Cln2-specific functional defect associated with the csr1
mutant Cdc28.
Biochemical characterization of Cdc28-csr1-cyclin interaction.
Since the genetic assays suggested specific defects in Cln2-Cdc28
function, we wanted to further analyze these defects biochemically. We
immunoprecipitated HA-tagged Cln2 from the cdc28-csr1 strain and from the CDC28 strain. We detected, on average, about
400-fold less Cln2-associated histone H1 kinase activity from the
cdc28-csr1 strain than from the CDC28 strain
(Fig. 3A). This was
correlated with about a 40-fold defect in coimmunoprecipitation of
Cdc28-csr1; the small amount of Cdc28 coimmunoprecipitated appeared to
have an additional defect in activation as a histone H1 kinase. We observed no defect in Cdc28-csr1 protein abundance relative to the wild
type following purification of Cdc28 by immunoprecipitation or by p13
affinity chromatography (data not shown); thus, the defect in
Cln2-Cdc28 interaction is not due to low Cdc28-csr1 protein levels.
When we carried out a similar experiment with HA-tagged Cln3, we also
observed a significant defect in Cdc28 binding and activity from the
cdc28-csr1 strain, although the effect was reproducibly
smaller than the effect on Cln2 (Fig. 3B). In sharp contrast,
Clb2-associated Cdc28 and kinase activity, as well as bulk Cdc28-HA
kinase activity, was near normal in immunoprecipitates from the
cdc28-csr1 strain (Fig. 3C and data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Biochemical characterization of cyclin-dependent
activation of Cdc28-csr1. (A) Comparison of
Cln2-associated kinase activity, associated Cdc28 protein, and
associated Cdc28 specific kinase activity in CDC28 wild-type
and cdc28-csr1 cells. A CDC28 wild-type strain
(1255-5C) and a cdc28-csr1 strain (2195-13B) were each
transformed with plasmids RS414 (Vector) and KH100
(GAL1::CLN2-HA). Cultures of each transformant strain
were grown overnight at 30°C in SCGal-Trp. Before extraction,
log-phase cultures of each of the pKH100 transformants were split in
half and processed in duplicate. Cellular protein was extracted with
TNN buffer, HA-tagged Cln2 protein was isolated, and kinase assays were
performed. Cln2-HA protein and associated Cdc28 protein were analyzed
by immunoblotting. All the protocols are described in Materials and
Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot, the anti-Cdc28 immunoblot, and the H1
kinase blot are shown. The lanes of each blot correspond (from left to
right) to transformed strains 1255-5C pRS414, 2195-13B pRS414,
1255-5C pKH100, 1255-5C pKH100, 2195-13B pKH100, and 2195-13B
pKH100. Values indicated above the anti-Cdc28 immunoblot were
obtained by standardizing the associated Cdc28 protein levels to Cln2
protein levels. Values indicated above the H1 kinase blot were obtained
by standardizing the histone H1 radioactivity to Cln2 protein levels.
(B) Comparison of Cln3-associated kinase activity, associated Cdc28
protein, and associated Cdc28 specific kinase activity in
CDC28 wild-type and cdc28-csr1 cells. This
experiment is identical to the one described for panel A, with the
following exceptions: strains 1255-5C and 2195-13B were transformed
with plasmids RS414 (Vector) and KL002 (GAL1::CLN3-HA),
cellular protein was extracted with LSHNN extraction buffer (see
Materials and Methods), and Cln3-HA protein was analyzed
instead of Cln2-HA protein. The lanes of each blot correspond (from
left to right) to transformed strains 1255-5C pRS414, 2195-13B pRS414,
blank lane, 1255-5C pKL002, 1255-5C pKL002, 2195-13B pKL002, and
2195-13B pKL002. (C) Comparison of Clb2-associated kinase activity,
associated Cdc28 protein, and associated Cdc28 specific kinase activity
in CDC28 wild-type and cdc28-csr1 cells.
This experiment is identical to the one described for panel A,
with the following exceptions: strains 1255-5C and 2195-13B
were transformed with plasmids RS416 (Vector) and 143 (GAL1::CLB2-HA), each of the plasmids carries the
URA3 gene, the cultures were grown overnight in SCGal-Ura,
and Clb2-HA protein was analyzed instead of Cln2-HA protein. The lanes
of each blot correspond (from left to right) to transformed strains
1255-5C pRS416, 2195-13B pRS416, blank lane, 1255-5C p143, 1255-5C
p143, 2195-13B p143, and 2195-13B p143.
|
|
The striking defects in Cln2-associated Cdc28 and H1 kinase activity
were observed under both the relatively stringent immunoprecipitation conditions of Tyers et al. (35) and the gentler conditions
designed to optimize Cln3-Cdc28 binding and kinase activity (8,
12); using these conditions, we detected about 100-fold less
Cln2-associated histone H1 kinase activity from the
cdc28-csr1 strain than from the CDC28 strain
(data not shown). It appears likely that the in vitro defect is more
extreme than the in vivo defect, although the specificity (worst
interaction with Cln2, better with Cln3, no defect with Clb2) is in
agreement with that deduced from the genetic studies described above.
Isolation of additional cdc28 alleles with the Csr
phenotype.
Identification of additional alleles with similar
phenotypes to cdc28-csr1 could give information about the
Cdc28-Cln2 binding interface or the residues important for
Cdc28-Cln2-dependent functions. Therefore, we developed a method for
random mutagenesis of CDC28 and recovery of mutated
cdc28 genes with the same phenotype as cdc28-csr1: that is, complementation of
CDC28 function for viability but not for
Cln2-dependent mating-factor resistance. To do this, we
mutagenized CDC28 by error-prone PCR and recovered the
mutated genes on plasmids by cotransforming the mutant fragments
together with gapped vector (see Materials and Methods) into a
cln1 cln2 CLN3 GAL1::CLN2 cdc28-13 strain. We then
screened for viability on glucose at 38°C (requiring complementation
of cdc28-13 even in the absence of the major G1
cyclins CLN1 and CLN2), combined with tight
sensitivity to mating factor on galactose medium (the Csr phenotype),
indicating an inability to interact productively with overexpressed
Cln2 to cause mating-factor resistance. We wanted to eliminate simple
low-functioning alleles of CDC28; therefore, as a secondary
screen, we tested histone H1 kinase activity from asynchronously
cycling cultures (the CDC28 gene used for mutant isolation
was tagged with the HA epitope, making this determination simple). This
bulk Cdc28 histone H1 kinase activity is probably largely dependent on
a mixture of Clb cyclins expressed in asynchronous culture
(11). We selected four mutant CDC28 genes
that showed vigorous growth on glucose medium at 38°C, tight
alpha-factor sensitivity on galactose medium at 30 or 38°C, and
>80% of wild-type bulk Cdc28 H1 kinase activity (Fig.
4A and 5A
and data not shown).

View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
New cdc28-csr alleles are defective in their
genetic interaction with CLN2. (A) Halo assays for new
csr alleles. The alleles were tested in a cdc28-13
cln1 cln2 GAL-CLN2 background; the viability of the lawn at 38°C
indicates complementation of cdc28-13 cln1 cln2;
mating-factor sensitivity indicates failure of effective
CLN2-dependent function. Strain 2112-10C (cln1 cln2
CLN3 cdc28-13 GAL1::CLN2) was transformed with plasmids RS414
(Vector), SF19 (CDC28-HA), KL054 (cdc28-csr1),
KL055 (cdc28-csr3-HA), KL056 (cdc28-csr19-HA),
KL057 (cdc28-csr35-HA), and KL058
(cdc28-csr41-HA). Representative transformant strains were
grown up overnight in SCGal-Trp medium. A 200-µl volume of culture
was spread onto YEPGal plates and allowed to incubate at 30 or 38°C
for about 4 h. Following incubation, sterile disks containing 15 µl of a 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mM alpha-factor dilution were placed on
each lawn, clockwise from the top left. The plates were allowed to
incubate at 30°C for 2 days or 38°C for 3 days. (B) New
cdc28-csr alleles are defective in their interactions with
weakened alleles of CLN2. Strain 1706-2B (cdc28-csr1
cln1 cln2 cln3 GAL1::CLN3) was first transformed with plasmids
KL051 (CLN2-3P), KL052 (cln2KA), KL053
(cln2EA), or RS416 (Vector). Each of these transformed
strains (described in the legend to Fig. 2B), was additionally
transformed with plasmids SF19 (CDC28-HA), KL054
(cdc28-csr1), KL055 (cdc28-csr3-HA), KL056
(cdc28-csr19-HA), KL057 (cdc28-csr35-HA), KL058
(cdc28-csr41-HA), or RS414 (Vector). For each cotransformed
strain, 10-fold serial dilutions were prepared, and 5 µl of each
dilution was plated onto both a YEPGal plate (GAL1::CLN3
on) and a YEPDex plate (GAL1::CLN3 off). The plates were
incubated at 30°C for 3 days.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Total and Cln2-associated kinase assays and Cdc28
binding for new cdc28-csr alleles. (A) Comparison of total
Cdc28 kinase activities for new cdc28-csr alleles. The
wild-type strain 1255-5C was transformed with plasmids RS414 (Vector),
SF19 (CDC28-HA), KL055 (cdc28-csr3-HA), KL056
(cdc28-csr19-HA), KL057 (cdc28-csr35-HA), or
KL058 (cdc28-csr41-HA). Cultures of each transformant strain
were grown overnight at 38°C in SCDex-Trp. HA-tagged Cdc28 protein
was isolated, and kinase assays were performed at 38°C. Cdc28 protein
levels were analyzed by immunoblotting. All the procedures are
described in Materials and Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot and H1
kinase blot are shown. The lanes in each blot correspond (from left to
right) to transformed strains 1255-5C pRS414, 1255-5C pSF19, 1255-5C
pSF19, 1255-5C pKL055, 1255-5C pKL056, 1255-5C pKL057, and 1255-5C
pKL058. Values indicated above the H1 kinase blot are the total H1
kinase activities relative to wild-type values, not standardized to
Cdc28 protein levels. (B) Comparison of Cln2-associated kinase
activity, associated Cdc28 protein, and associated Cdc28 specific
kinase activity for new cdc28-csr alleles. Strain 2195-3A
(cdc28-csr1 GAL1::CLN2-HA) was transformed with plasmids
RS414 (Vector), RD47 (CDC28), KL054 (cdc28-csr1),
KL045 (cdc28-csr3), KL046 (cdc28-csr19), KL047
(cdc28-csr35), or KL048 (cdc28-csr41). Strain
2193-13B (cdc28-csr1) was transformed with pRS414. Cultures
of each transformant strain were grown overnight at 30°C in SCGal-Trp
medium. HA-tagged Cln2 protein was isolated, and kinase assays were
performed. Cln2-HA protein and associated Cdc28 protein were analyzed
by immunoblotting. All the methods are described in Materials and
Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot, anti-Cdc28 immunoblot, and H1 kinase
blot are shown. The lanes of each blot correspond (from left to right)
to transformed strains 2195-13B pRS414, 2195-3A pRS414, 2195-3A pRD47,
2195-3A pKL054, 2195-3A pKL045, 2195-3A pKL046, 2195-3A
pKL047, and 2195-3A pKL048. Values indicated above the anti-Cdc28
immunoblot were obtained by standardizing associated Cdc28 protein
levels to Cln2 protein levels. Levels from the untagged culture and
vector control (representing the level of Cln2-associated Cdc28-csr1
protein) have been subtracted. Values indicated above the H1 kinase
blot were obtained by standardizing histone H1 radioactivity to Cln2
protein levels. Levels from the untagged culture and vector control
(representing the level of H1 phosphorylation by the Cdc28-csr1 in the
strain) have been subtracted.
|
|
These mutant cdc28 genes resulted in tight mating-factor
sensitivity, essentially comparable to that observed with
cdc28-csr1 (Fig. 4A). Additionally, each of the mutant
cdc28 genes demonstrated defective genetic interactions with
the weakened alleles of CLN2 (Fig. 4B). However, the new
cdc28-csr alleles were clearly less defective than
cdc28-csr1. As shown in Fig. 4B, cdc28-csr
alleles 19, 35, and 41 were less defective than cdc28-csr1
in their genetic interactions with the weakened alleles of
CLN2. Additionally, each of the new cdc28-csr
alleles, but not cdc28-csr1, was competent at rescue of a
cln1 CLN2 cln3 cdc28-13 strain at 38°C (i.e., they could
function for Start with CLN2 as their sole G1
cyclin) (data not shown). Furthermore, each of the new
cdc28-csr alleles, but not cdc28-csr1, could
confer mating-factor resistance in a different GAL1::CLN2 strain additionally containing endogenous
CLN1 and CLN2 (data not shown).
Biochemical and molecular characterization of cdc28-csr
alleles.
We tested the new csr alleles for Cln2 binding
and kinase activation. To do this, we first untagged each of the
cdc28-csr alleles (see Materials and Methods) and then
introduced the untagged alleles into plasmids into a cdc28-csr1
GAL1::CLN2-HA strain. In extracts from this strain, Cln2
could be immunoprecipitated with the HA tag, but no significant Cdc28
protein or kinase activity coprecipitated due to the csr1
mutation. Therefore, we could attribute all Cdc28 binding and kinase
activity to the introduced plasmid cdc28-csr gene. For two
of the alleles, we observed results similar to those for
cdc28-csr1: low levels of Cdc28 protein and kinase activity
coimmunoprecipitated with overexpressed Cln2 (Fig. 5B). For two of the
alleles, in contrast, we observed high levels of Cdc28 protein and
kinase activity coimmunoprecipitated with Cln2 (Fig. 5B). These four
mutants did not differ significantly in the tightness of their
mating-factor sensitivity phenotype, although cdc28-csr19
and cdc28-csr35 were less defective than
cdc28-csr3 and cdc28-csr41 in their genetic
interactions with the weakened alleles of cln2 (Fig. 4B).
We sequenced these mutant cdc28 genes (Table 3). Three of
them had multiple amino acid substitutions. One of the mutations in
cdc28-csr41, K187E, was at a neighboring position to the
cdc28-csr1 amino acid substitution, Q188P, and these mutant
Cdc28 proteins shared the property of defective interaction with Cln2.
We therefore constructed K187E as a single mutant and found that this
single mutation largely (although not completely) reconstituted the
genetic and biochemical behavior of cdc28-csr41 (Fig.
6 and 7).
Therefore, this region of the Cdc28 T-loop may be important for the
Cdc28-Cln2 biochemical interaction. One mutant, cdc28-csr35,
contained only the single mutation I56T. This residue is conserved in
Cdk2. It is the "I" in the so-called PSTAIRE helix. In the cyclin
A-Cdk2 crystal structure, this hydrophobic isoleucine side chain
inserts into a hydrophobic pocket in cyclin A (15).
Surprisingly, this mutant exhibits near-wild-type Cln2-associated and
"bulk" (probably mainly Clb-associated) histone H1 kinase activity.
Because cdc28-csr19, with similar genetic and biochemical
behavior to cdc28-csr35, had as one of its mutations L61S,
near to I56 (both predicted to be in the PSTAIRE helix), we constructed
the L61S single mutant and found that it largely reconstituted the
cdc28-csr19 phenotype (Fig. 6 and 7). Therefore, the correct
sequence or conformation of the PSTAIRE helix may be important for the
function of the Cdc28-Cln2 complex although not for effective
biochemical interaction (binding and kinase activation).

View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
cdc28-L61S and cdc28-K187E
single-mutant alleles are defective in their genetic interaction with
CLN2. Halo assays for single-mutant alleles, tested in a
cdc28-13 cln1 cln2 GAL-CLN2 background, are shown. Strain
2112-10C was transformed with plasmids SF19 (CDC28-HA),
RS414 (Vector), KL056 (cdc28-csr19-HA), KL078
(cdc28-L61S-HA), KL058 (cdc28-csr41-HA), and
KL084 (cdc28-K187E-HA). Pooled transformants were grown
overnight in SCGal-Trp medium, and halo assays were prepared as
described in the legend to Fig. 4. The plates were allowed to incubate
for 1 day.
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Total and Cln2-associated kinase assays and Cdc28
binding for cdc28-L61S and cdc28-K187E alleles.
(A) Comparison of total Cdc28 kinase activities. The wild-type strain
1255-5C was transformed with plasmids RS414 (Vector), SF19
(CDC28-HA), KL056 (cdc28-csr19-HA), KL078
(cdc28-L61S-HA), KL080 (cdc28-L61S-HA), KL058
(cdc28-csr41-HA), KL084 (cdc28-K187E-HA), or
KL085 (cdc28-K187E-HA). Samples were prepared as described
in the legend to Fig. 5A and in Materials and Methods. The anti-HA
immunoblot and H1 kinase blot are shown. The lanes on each blot
correspond to transformed strains 1255-5C pRS414, 1255-5C pSF19,
1255-5C pSF19, 1255-5C pKL056, 1255-5C pKL078, 1255-5C
pKL080, 1255-5C pKL058, 1255-5C pKL084, and 1255-5C pKL085. The values
indicated above the H1 kinase blot are the total H1 kinase activities
relative to wild-type values, not standardized to Cdc28 protein levels.
(B) Comparison of Cln2-associated kinase activity, associated Cdc28
protein, and associated Cdc28 specific kinase activity for new
cdc28-csr alleles. Strain 2195-3A (cdc28-csr1
GAL1::CLN2-HA) was transformed with plasmids RS414 (Vector),
RD47 (CDC28), KL046 (cdc28-csr19), KL075
(cdc28-L61S), KL077 (cdc28-L61S), KL048
(cdc28-csr41), KL081 (cdc28-K187E), or KL082
(cdc28-K187E). Strain 2193-13B (cdc28-csr1) was
transformed with pRS414. Samples were prepared as described in the
legend to Fig. 5B and in Materials and Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot,
anti-Cdc28 immunoblot, and H1 kinase blot are shown. The lanes of each
blot correspond to transformed strains 2195-13B pRS414, 2195-3A pRS414,
2195-3A pRD47, 2195-3A pRD47, 2195-3A pKL046, 2195-3A pKL075, 2195-3A
pKL077, 2195-3A pKL048, 2195-3A pKL081, and 2195-3A pKL082. Values
indicated above the anti-Cdc28 immunoblot and the H1 kinase blot were
obtained as described in the legend to Fig. 5B.
|
|
Screen for cdc28 mutants defective for viability but
not for Cln2-dependent mating-factor resistance (Rsc phenotype).
The Csr screen described above identified cdc28 mutants that
were fully competent for viability (complementation of
cdc28-13 at 38°C) but did not support Cln2-dependent
inhibition of the mating-factor pathway. We were concerned that this
genetic assay might simply reflect greater mutational or intrinsic
sensitivity of the mating-factor pathway assay and/or Cln2 association,
so that subtle defects in Cdc28 function overall might be reflected in
the apparently highly specific Csr phenotype. In an attempt to address
this question, we performed the converse screen, looking for
cdc28 mutants that could support Cln2-dependent inhibition of the mating-factor pathway but could not complement cdc28
for viability (resistant to mating factor, still cdc28-). To
do this, we constructed a strain of genotype GAL1::CLN2
cdc28::HIS3 pcdc28-csr1/URA3 ura3. This strain was
viable due to complementation of the cdc28::HIS3 disruption by cdc28-csr1 on the URA3-containing
plasmid. However, because of the Csr phenotype of the
cdc28-csr1 allele, this strain was alpha-factor sensitive on
galactose medium. Additionally, because this strain was dependent upon
the cdc28-csr1/URA3 plasmid for viability, it was
sensitive to FOA, a compound lethal to URA3 strains
(3). When this strain was transformed with wild-type CDC28 on a TRP1 plasmid, it became alpha-factor
resistant on galactose medium and FOA resistant as expected; when
transformed with cdc28-csr1, it remained alpha-factor
sensitive on galactose medium yet became FOA resistant, as expected
(Fig. 8). We transformed the strain with the mutated CDC28
library and screened for clones that were alpha-factor resistant on
galactose medium (indicating an effective Cln2-Cdc28 interaction) yet
FOA sensitive (perhaps indicating a defective Clb-Cdc28 interaction).
We identified four mutant plasmids that conferred this phenotype (Fig.
8). These mutants were characterized
quantitatively by serial dilution on control YEPGal medium, on YEPGal
medium containing alpha-factor, and on FOA medium. cdc28-rsc
mutants 1, 5, and 15 gave alpha-factor resistance with about a
10-fold-lower colony-forming efficiency than that of wild-type
CDC28; the colony-forming efficiency of
cdc28-rsc13 was reduced by 100-fold, and the colonies were
smaller. Vector and cdc28-csr1 on a plasmid were completely
negative. Neither the wild-type CDC28 nor mutant
cdc28-rsc alleles allowed growth on YEPDex medium containing
alpha-factor (data not shown), suggesting that the mating-pheromone
resistance conferred by these alleles is dependent on the
overexpression of CLN2. On FOA, the cdc28-rsc alleles gave no viable colonies whereas both CDC28 and
cdc28-csr1 were equally effective. We transferred the
plasmids to a GAL1::CDC28 strain (38) to
confirm by a different assay that they failed to complement a
cdc28 null allele. Transformants were streaked on glucose
medium to inactivate GAL1::CDC28. While transformants with wild-type CDC28 were fully viable on glucose medium,
transformants with these mutant cdc28 genes were inviable on
glucose medium (data not shown), confirming the conclusion reached on
the basis of their FOA-sensitive phenotype (Fig. 8).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
cdc28-rsc alleles complement
cdc28-csr1 for mating-factor resistance but do not
complement a cdc28 null for viability. (A) Serial dilution
assays on alpha-factor and FOA. Strain 2198-3A-2a
(cdc28::HIS3 pURA3/cdc28-csr1) was
transformed with plasmids SF19 (CDC28-HA), KL059
(cdc28-rsc1-HA), KL060 (cdc28-rsc5-HA), KL061
(cdc28-rsc13-HA), KL062 (cdc28-rsc15-HA), KL054
(cdc28-csr1), or RS414 (Vector). Transformants were grown on
SCDex-Trp-Ura plates. For each transformed strain, 10-fold serial
dilutions were prepared, and 5 µl of each dilution was plated onto a
YEPGal plate, a YEPGal plate containing 0.3 mM alpha-factor, and an
FOADex plate (3). The plates were allowed to incubate at
30°C for 3 days. A representative set of transformants is shown.
|
|
We determined the mutations in the cdc28-rsc mutants (Table
4). Several of these mutations disrupt
residues likely to be essential for protein kinase catalytic activity.
In cdc28-rsc13, Glu 58 is mutated to Gly. This residue (Glu
51 of CDK2) is conserved in all eukaryotic protein kinases and belongs
to a triad of catalytic-site residues. These residues (Lys 33, Glu 51, and Asp 145 of CDK2) are involved in ATP phosphate orientation and
magnesium coordination and are likely to be critical for catalysis
(15, 41). In cdc28-rsc1, Arg 159 is mutated to
Gly. This residue (Arg 150 of CDK2), together with two additional
arginine residues (Arg 50 and Arg126 of CDK2), forms part of the basic
pocket that binds the phosphorylated threonine residue. The
arginine-phosphate interactions are thought to stabilize the region of
the phosphorylation site (30). A positive residue in this
position is highly conserved in kinases with phosphorylated activation
loops (16), including all cyclin-dependent kinases and
protein kinase A. In cdc28-rsc5, Arg 178 in the P+1 loop is mutated to Ser. This arginine (Arg 169 of CDK2) is conserved in proline-directed kinases (Cdks and mitogen-activated protein kinase) and is speculated to interact with residues of the substrate in the
vicinity of the proline C-terminal to the Ser/Thr phosphoacceptor residue (30). We were surprised to detect biological
activity by the mating-factor resistance assay in CDC28
genes mutated at these presumably critical residues.
cdc28-rsc15 was multiply mutant.
Biochemical characterization of cdc28-rsc kinase
activity: total and Cln2-associated.
We tested the total (bulk)
kinase activity associated with the Cdc28-rsc proteins in asynchronous
culture, taking advantage of the HA epitope on the mutant Cdc28 protein
to avoid interference from Cdc28-csr1. cdc28-rsc1 (R159G)
exhibited essentially undetectable H1 kinase activity, and
cdc28-rsc13 (E58G) exhibited only about 1% of wild-type
levels (Fig. 9A). cdc28-rsc5
(R178S) had about 10% of the wild-type activity but was still clearly
reduced from the wild type cdc28-rsc15 (multiply mutant) had
about 40% of the wild-type activity, but Cdc28 protein abundance was
somewhat reduced. Next, we tested the binding and kinase activity of
these Cdc28-rsc proteins complexed to Cln2. As for the
cdc28-csr alleles, we first untagged the
cdc28-rsc alleles (see Materials and Methods) and then
introduced the untagged cdc28-rsc alleles into plasmids into a cdc28-csr1 GAL1::CLN2-HA strain. As described above,
in extracts from this strain, Cln2 could be immunoprecipitated by using
the HA tag, but no significant Cdc28 protein or kinase activity
coprecipitated due to the csr1 mutation. Therefore, we could
attribute almost all the Cdc28 binding and kinase activity to the
introduced plasmid cdc28-rsc allele. The
cdc28-rsc mutants had almost no detectable kinase
coprecipitated with Cln2-HA (<2% of the wild-type level). Cdc28
coimmunoprecipitation was variable, being at least 50% of the
wild-type level for cdc28-rsc mutants 5 and 13 and roughly 10% of the wild-type level for cdc28-rsc mutants 1 and 15 (Fig. 9B).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Total and Cln2-associated kinase assays and Cdc28
binding for cdc28-rsc alleles. (A) Comparison of total Cdc28
kinase activities for cdc28-rsc alleles. Strain 2198-3A-2a
(CLN1 CLN2 CLN3 cdc28::HIS3 pKL039-1) was transformed
with plasmids RS414 (Vector), SF19 (CDC28-HA), KL059
(CDC28-rsc1-HA), KL060 (cdc28-rsc5-HA), KL061
(cdc28-rsc13-HA), or KL062 (cdc28-rsc15-HA).
Cultures of each transformant strain were grown overnight at 30°C in
SCDex-Trp. HA-tagged Cdc28 protein was isolated, and kinase assays were
performed at 30°C. Cdc28 protein levels were analyzed by
immunoblotting. All the procedures are described in Materials and
Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot and H1 kinase blot are shown. The lanes
on each blot correspond to transformed strains 2198-3A-2a pRS414,
2198-3A-2a pSF19, 2198-3A-2a pSF19, 2198-3A-2a pKL059, 2198-3A-2a
pKL060, 2198-3A-2a pKL061, and 2198-3A-2a pKL062. Values indicated
above the H1 kinase blot are total H1 kinase activities relative to
wild-type values, not standardized to Cdc28 protein levels. Note that
the levels of Cdc28-rsc15 protein were reproducibly lower than
wild-type levels; when standardized to Cdc28-rsc15 protein levels, bulk
Cdc28-rsc15 kinase activity for this experiment was 0.9, relative to
wild-type activity. (B) Comparison of Cln2-associated kinase activity
and associated Cdc28 protein for cdc28-rsc alleles. Strain
2195-3A (cdc28-csr1 GAL1::CLN2-HA) was transformed with
plasmids RS414 (Vector), RD47 (CDC28), KL063
(cdc28-rsc1), KL064 (cdc28-rsc5), KL065
(cdc28-rsc13), or KL066 (cdc28-rsc15). Strain
2193-13B (cdc28-csr1) was transformed with pRS414. Cultures
of each transformant strain were grown overnight at 30°C in SCGal-Trp
medium. HA-tagged Cln2 protein was isolated, and kinase assays were
performed at 30°C. Cln2-HA protein and associated Cdc28 protein were
analyzed by immunoblot. All protocols are described in Materials and
Methods. The anti-HA immunoblot, anti-Cdc28 immunoblot, and H1 kinase
blot are shown. The lanes of each blot correspond to transformed
strains 2195-13B pRS414, 2195-3A pRS414, 2195-3A pRD47, 2195-3A pRD47,
2195-3A pKL063, 2195-3A pKL064, 2195-3A pKL065, and 2195-3A pKL066.
Values indicated above the anti-Cdc28 immunoblot and H1 kinase blot
were obtained as described in the legend to Fig. 5B.
|
|
How can severely kinase-defective Cdc28 provide biological
function?
The results with the csr alleles of
cdc28 (see above) clearly showed that Cln2-dependent
mating-factor resistance was genetically CDC28 dependent.
However, the results with the rsc alleles suggested that
severely kinase-defective alleles of CDC28, some of which were also significantly defective in binding to Cln2, could
nevertheless support CLN2-dependent mating-factor
resistance, in some cases to nearly wild-type levels (Fig. 8). The
effect of the cdc28-rsc alleles on the mating-factor pathway
may be indirect, working by somehow recruiting the resident Cdc28-csr1
protein, normally incompetent to interact with Cln2 to cause
mating-factor resistance, into effective complexes with Cln2. However,
it is clear from the measurement of Cln2-associated kinase activity
that the rsc alleles did not result in the activation of
Cln2-dependent Cdc28-csr1-dependent kinase activity detectable in
vitro, since the activation observed in the cdc28-rsc
transformants (Fig. 9B) was close to the background cdc28-csr levels (Fig. 9B, Vector lanes).
One specific model for how the cdc28-rsc alleles could
complement the cdc28-csr1 defect in
CLN2-dependent mating-factor resistance is that the
Cdc28-rsc proteins sequester the Far1 inhibitor (4, 27).
cdc28-csr1 far1 GAL1::CLN2 strains are resistant to
mating factor on galactose (GAL1::CLN2 on) but not on
glucose (GAL1::CLN2 off), presumably due to inefficient
Cln2/Cdc28-csr1 interaction combined with the loss of Far1-dependent
inhibition. (Mating-factor resistance in far1 strains is
dependent on CLN2 [4].) cdc28-csr1 far1 GAL1::CLN2 strains are resistant to mating factor on
galactose only at 30°C, not at 38°C, perhaps due to partial
thermolability of the Cdc28-csr1 function. Therefore, we tested the
cdc28-rsc alleles for the ability to complement the defect
in cdc28-csr1-1 far1 GAL1::CLN2 mating-factor resistance
under these two conditions: glucose at 30°C and galactose at 38°C
(Fig. 10A). cdc28-rsc1
complemented mating-factor resistance under both conditions, and
cdc28-rsc5 and cdc28-rsc13 complemented it on
galactose at 38°C. Thus, the ability of cdc28-rsc1,
cdc28-rsc5, and cdc28-rsc13 to complement mating-factor resistance in cdc28-csr1 strains (Fig. 8 and
10A) is at least not completely dependent on interaction with Far1. Furthermore, complementation by cdc28-rsc1 does not require
CLN2 overexpression. In contrast, cdc28-rsc15
could not complement the defect in cdc28-csr1 far1
GAL1::CLN2 mating-factor resistance under either condition
(Fig. 10A). Thus, the ability of cdc28-rsc15 to complement
mating-factor resistance in the cdc28-csr1 FAR1 GAL1::CLN2 cells (Fig. 8) could be attributed to antagonizing or sequestering Far1, resulting in its inability to complement in the
far1 mutant strain. Surprisingly, we found that wild-type CDC28 was unable to confer strong mating-factor resistance
in this strain on galactose medium (GAL1::CLN2
expressed) at 38°C, being much weaker in this assay than the
rsc alleles. In contrast, GAL1::CLN2 strains
with wild-type CDC28 but lacking cdc28-csr1 are
strongly mating-factor resistant at 38°C (data not shown). This
suggests some dominant-negative effect of the cdc28-csr1 allele to which the rsc alleles are not subject.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Additional CLN2-dependent complementation of
cdc28-csr1 by cdc28-rsc alleles. (A)
Complementation of mating-factor resistance of CLN1 CLN2 CLN3
far1::URA3 cdc28-csr1 mating-factor resistance. Strain
2180-14A-1a (cdc28-csr1 far1::URA3 GAL1::CLN2) was
transformed with plasmids RS414 (Vector), SF19 (CDC28-HA),
KL054 (cdc28-csr1), KL059 (cdc28-rsc1-HA), KL060
(cdc28-rsc5-HA), or KL061 (cdc28-rsc13-HA). Each
transformant strain was grown overnight in both SCDex-Trp and
SCGal-Trp. Portions of the SCDex-Trp cultures (100 µl) and the
SCGal-Trp cultures (200 µl) were spread onto a YEPDex plate and
YEPGal plate, respectively. The YEPDex and YEPGal plates were allowed
to incubate at 30 and 38°C, respectively, for about 4 h.
Following incubation, sterile disks containing 15 µl of a 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mM alpha-factor dilution were placed on each plate, clockwise
from the top left. YEPDex plates were allowed to incubate at 30°C for
2 days, and YEPGal plates were allowed to incubate at 38°C for 3 days. The picture on the left shows the wild-type CDC28 and
cdc28-rsc1 complementation of the mating-factor resistance
of this strain on YEPDex at 30°C. The pictures on the right show the
cdc28-rsc1, cdc28-rsc5, and
cdc28-rsc13 complementation of the mating-factor resistance
of this strain on YEPGal at 38°C. Wild-type CDC28 only
weakly complements in this assay. (B) Complementation of cln1
cln3 cdc28-13 pcdc28-csr1 inviability at 38°C. Strain 1227-3C
(cln1 CLN2 cln3 cdc28-13 pGAL1::CLN3/URA3)
was grown on YEPDex medium and screened for loss of
pGAL1::CLN3/URA3. The resulting strain was
cotransformed with both the KL039-1 plasmid
(cdc28-csr1/URA3) and one of the TRP1
plasmids KL059 (cdc28-rsc1-HA), KL060
(cdc28-rsc5-HA), KL061 (cdc28-rsc13-HA), or KL062
(cdc28-rsc15-HA). Transformants were grown on SCDex-Trp-Ura.
For each transformed strain, 10-fold serial dilutions were prepared,
and 5 µl of each dilution was plated onto a YEPDex plate at both 30 and 38°C. The plates were allowed to incubate for 3 days. A
representative set of dilutions is shown.
|
|
As an additional test of the CLN2-dependent function of
these alleles, we tested if the cdc28-rsc alleles could
complement cdc28-csr1 cln1 CLN2 cln3 temperature sensitivity
(Fig. 10B). cdc28-rsc1, cdc28-rsc5, and
cdc28-rsc13 were able to complement this defect; cdc28-rsc1 did so quite strongly. This extends the
CLN2-dependent function of these cdc28-rsc
alleles to a context in which CLN2 is not overexpressed and
in which the mating-factor pathway is not involved.
Analysis of the cdc28-rsc alleles is complicated in part by
their inability to complement a cdc28 null allele and the
consequent requirement for the presence of an additional
CDC28 allele in the cells assayed. As mentioned above, this
requirement leaves open the possibility that the cdc28-rsc
alleles provide CLN2-dependent functions by somehow
recruiting the resident Cdc28-csr1 protein into effective Cln2-Cdc28
complexes. In an attempt to further address this possibility, we
decided to ask whether the CLN2-dependent functions of the
cdc28-rsc alleles were specifically dependent upon the
cdc28-csr1 allele by testing for cdc28-rsc
complementation of mating-pheromone sensitivity of the 2112-10C strain
(cln1 cln2 CLN3 GAL1::CLN2 cdc28-13), a strain not
containing the cdc28-csr1 allele, at 30°C (Fig. 4A). Of
the four cdc28-rsc alleles tested, only
cdc28-rsc1 and cdc28-rsc15 yielded healthy
transformants; cdc28-rsc5 and cdc28-rsc13
produced only tiny transformant colonies, suggesting a dominant
negative effect of these alleles in the cdc28-13 background.
The cdc28-rsc1 allele was completely unable to complement
the mating-pheromone sensitivity of strain 2112-10C at 30°C.
Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the CLN2-dependent functions of cdc28-rsc1 are
dependent specifically upon the presence of cdc28-csr1. The
cdc28-rsc15 allele was able to weakly complement the
mating-pheromone sensitivity of strain 2112-10C at 30°C
(approximately 100-fold less than wild-type CDC28 levels
[data not shown]), suggesting that the mating-pheromone resistance of
cdc28-rsc15 is not completely specific for the presence of
the cdc28-csr1 allele.
To test whether known kinase-inactive alleles of CDC28 have
similar CLN2-dependent functions in these assays, we tested
the ability of cdc28-T169A (pRD58 and pKL019) to complement
the mating-pheromone sensitivity of strain 2198-3A-2a (CLN1 CLN2
CLN3 GAL1::CLN2 cdc28::HIS3 pcdc28-csr1/URA3).
The cdc28-T169A allele has been shown to be inactive as a
kinase yet able to associate with both Cln2 and Clb2 proteins
(20). cdc28-T169A was unable to rescue the
pheromone sensitivity of this strain (data not shown). This result
indicates that not all kinase-inactive Cdc28 proteins, even those that
bind to Cln2, can provide CLN2-dependent functions.
 |
DISCUSSION |
CDC28 alleles with cyclin-specific functional
defects.
Cln2 is thought to function by binding and activating the
Cdc28 kinase (8, 29, 35, 36, 39) Cln2 has been found to
immunoprecipitate with Cdc28 in an active kinase complex (35, 39) whose activity is dependent upon a functional
CDC28 allele (39). The overexpression of
CLN2 leads to repression of the mating-pheromone pathway and
resistance to mating-pheromone-induced arrest (25). The
overexpression of CLN2 has also been shown to cause
hyperpolarization of cortical actin and elongation of buds
(19). Both repression of the mating-pheromone pathway and the hyperpolarization phenotype have been shown to be dependent upon a functional CDC28 allele; at restrictive
temperatures, cells containing temperature-sensitive alleles of
cdc28 fail to repress the mating-pheromone pathway or to
hyperpolarize in response to overexpressed CLN2 (19,
25). In these assays, cells containing temperature-sensitive
alleles of cdc28 were arrested in G1. Here we
have isolated and characterized an allele of CDC28,
cdc28-csr1, that supports both cell cycle progression and
high levels of bulk-Cdc28 and Clb2-Cdc28 kinase activity yet
specifically prevents CLN2-mediated repression of the
mating-pheromone pathway and hyperpolarization, as well as the
formation of Cln2-Cdc28 complex and kinase activity. These observations
further support the idea that these CLN2-mediated responses
require Cdc28 in specific physical association with Cln2.
The cdc28-csr1 mutation appeared easy to understand,
functioning poorly in both genetic and biochemical
CLN2-dependent assays. Two additional cdc28-csr
alleles were similar to cdc28-csr1, having both genetic and
biochemical CLN2-dependent defects. However, two other
cdc28-csr alleles, similarly defective in supporting CLN2-mediated mating-pheromone resistance and viability in
combination with weakened alleles of CLN2, were found to
promote high levels of Cln2-associated kinase activity and Cln2
binding. One possible explanation for these findings is that small
quantitative defects in Cln2-associated kinase activities place these
mutants below a threshold of Cln2 activity necessary to support
CLN2-dependent functions. A second possible explanation for
these findings is that these mutants have qualitative defects in their
Cln2-associated kinase activity and, although able to phosphorylate
histone H1 in vitro, are unable to phosphorylate the substrates
necessary to support CLN2-dependent functions in vivo. For
example, the mutants may be defective in their physical association
with potential Cln2-Cdc28 substrates. A third possible explanation for
these findings is that Cln2-Cdc28 kinase activity is not directly
relevant to CLN2-mediated mating-pheromone resistance (see
below).
The isolation of csr alleles of CDC28 that are
genetically and biochemically much more defective in their interaction
with Cln2 than with other cyclins could indicate that Cln2 interacts with Cdc28 in a way that is qualitatively different from other cyclins
or that the binding interface between Cln2 and Cdc28 is generally more
sensitive to mutation. Recent results with a large series of mutant
alleles of CLN2 suggests that there are significant differences between the Cln2-Cdc28 interaction and the cyclin A-Cdk2
interaction, since some mutations in the cyclin homology region of Cln2
predicted to destroy cyclin folding based on the cyclin A crystal
structure (15, 30) have relatively minor effects on Cln2
function (14). Therefore, general lability of the Cln2-Cdc28
interface may not be expected.
Kinase-inactive alleles of CDC28 with biological
activity?
When we looked for mutant CDC28 genes that
would support CLN2-dependent mating-factor resistance but
not complement a cdc28 null for viability, we thought that
it might be possible to obtain alleles of CDC28 with close
to normal levels of Cln2-associated kinase activity but with defects in
Clb-associated (or bulk) kinase activity. In fact, we obtained alleles
of CDC28 that were strikingly defective in Cln2-associated
kinase activity, and in some cases highly defective in Cln2 binding as
well, that nevertheless could complement the CLN2-dependent
mating-factor resistance defect of cdc28-csr1. Some of these
alleles could also complement defects of cdc28-csr1 in other
CLN2-dependent functions. One possible explanation for these
results is that despite the lack of detectable Cln2-associated kinase
activity in our in vitro assay system, these mutants do in fact have
sufficient Cln2-associated kinase activity in vivo to support
CLN2-dependent functions. It is possible that these mutants,
despite their inability to phosphorylate histone H1, would be fully
capable of phosphorylating the substrates necessary for
CLN2-dependent responses. However, given the fact that at least one of the mutants, cdc28-rsc13, has a mutation in a
critical catalytic residue and that two others, cdc28-rsc1
and cdc28-rsc5, have mutations in residues that are likely
to be important for kinase activity (Table 4), it appears more probable
that these mutants are indeed inactive or severely reduced for
Cln2-associated kinase function yet somehow function to promote
CLN2-dependent functions. One explanation for
kinase-inactive alleles with CLN2-dependent activities is
that the kinase-inactive Cdc28 mutants are working through an indirect
mechanism, somehow recruiting the resident Cdc28-csr protein into
effective complexes with Cln2. For example, the Cdc28-rsc proteins
could bind tightly to Cln2-Cdc28 inhibitor proteins, relieving
inhibition of the Cln2/Cdc28-csr1 complex. Arguing against this idea is
the observation that the kinase-inactive mutants do not restore
detectable Cln2/Cdc28-csr1 binding or kinase activity in
immunoprecipitates (see above). Also, we tested this possibility
genetically in the case of Far1, a protein that has been reported to
inhibit the activity of the Cln2-Cdc28 kinase complex (27).
Our results (see above) indicate that the kinase-inactive alleles of
Cdc28 do not work (or at least do not work solely) through a
Far1-dependent mechanism. We cannot rule out the possibility that
another (as yet unidentified) Cln2-Cdc28 inhibitor is being targeted by
the kinase-inactive Cdc28 proteins.
Another possible explanation for kinase-inactive alleles of
cdc28 with CLN2-dependent activities is that
Cln2-associated Cdc28 kinase activity is not required for some
CLN2-dependent processes and that the kinase-inactive
alleles are directly capable of performing these functions. Perhaps,
for example, some CLN2-dependent responses depend only upon
Cln2-Cdc28 complex formation and not upon Cln2-Cdc28 kinase activity.
The kinase-inactive Cdc28 complexed with Cln2 might still bind to some
substrate(s), and binding might be sufficient for a biological response
even without substrate phosphorylation. Along the same lines, a
potentially enhanced or irreversible binding of the kinase-inactive
Cln2-Cdc28 complex to some substrate(s) might bypass the need for
substrate phosphorylation. For example, substrates that are usually
phosphorylated and inactivated by the Cln2-Cdc28 complex might be
effectively inactivated by being tightly bound by the mutant kinase
complex. The suggestion that cyclins may have functions independent of
their abilities to activate the kinase activities of their Cdk partners
has been made for cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 has been found to activate the
transcription of estrogen receptor-regulated genes, independent of
complex formation to a Cdk partner (42). Our results with
the cdc28-rsc alleles are similar to the cyclin D1 findings
in that the Cln2 cyclin might be able to function independently of
associated kinase activity. Our results differ in that the
CLN2-mediated mating pheromone repression is dependent on
both CLN2 overexpression and on the Cdk partner of Cln2,
Cdc28.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Many thanks go to Daniel Lim for his valuable contributions to
the initial stages of the Csr screen. We thank Ray Deshaies and Peter
Sorger for providing plasmids and Ray Deshaies for providing the
anti-Cdc28 antibody.
This work was supported by NIH grant GM47238 and the Norman and Rosita
Winston Foundation. K.L. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Predoctoral Fellow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Rockefeller
University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 327-7675. Fax: (212) 327-7923. E-mail:
levinek{at}rockvax.rockefeller.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allen, J. B., and S. J. Elledge.
1994.
A family of vectors that facilitate transposon and insertional mutagenesis of cloned genes in yeast.
Yeast
10:1267-1272[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1987.
.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
|
| 3.
|
Boeke, J. D.,
F. LaCroute, and G. R. Fink.
1984.
A positive selection for mutants lacking 5' phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
197:345-346[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Chang, F., and I. Herskowitz.
1990.
Identification of a gene necessary for cell cycle arrest by a negative growth factor of yeast: FAR1 is an inhibitor of a G1 cyclin, CLN2.
Cell
63:999-1011[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cross, F. R.
1990.
Cell cycle arrest caused by CLN gene deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae resembles START-I arrest and is independent of the mating-pheromone signalling pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:6482-6490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cross, F. R.
1995.
Starting the cell cycle: what's the point?
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7:790-797[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cross, F. R.
1997.
Marker swap plasmids: convenient tools for yeast molecular genetics.
Yeast
13:647-653[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cross, F. R., and C. M. Blake.
1993.
The yeast Cln3 protein is an unstable activator of Cdc28.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:3266-3271[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Deshaies, R. J., and M. Kirschner.
1995.
G1 cyclin-dependent activation of p34CDC28 (Cdc28p) in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1182-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Dirick, L.,
T. Böhm, and K. Nasmyth.
1995.
Roles and regulation of Cln-Cdc28 kinases at the start of the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
14:4803-4813 |