Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, January 1998, p. 368-377, Vol. 18, No. 1
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Large Subunit of Basal Transcription Factor
SNAPc Is a Myb Domain Protein That Interacts with
Oct-1
Mee Wa
Wong,1,2
R.
William
Henry,1
Beicong
Ma,1,2
Ryuji
Kobayashi,1
Natacha
Klages,3
Patrick
Matthias,4
Michel
Strubin,3 and
Nouria
Hernandez1,2,*
Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory1 and
Howard Hughes Medical
Institute,2 Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, and
Department of Genetics and Microbiology, University
Medical Center, 1211 Geneva 4,3 and
Friedrich Miescher Institute, 4002 Basel,4 Switzerland
Received 3 September 1997/Returned for modification 6 October
1997/Accepted 8 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human RNA polymerase II and III snRNA promoters have similar
enhancers, the distal sequence elements (DSEs), and similar basal
promoter elements, the proximal sequence elements (PSEs). The DSE,
which contains an octamer motif, binds broadly expressed activator
Oct-1. The PSE binds a multiprotein complex referred to as
SNAPc or PTF. On DNAs containing both an octamer site and a
PSE, Oct-1 and SNAPc bind cooperatively. SNAPc
consists of at least four stably associated subunits, SNAP43, SNAP45,
SNAP50, and SNAP190. None of the three small subunits, which have all been cloned, can bind to the PSE on their own. Here we report the
isolation of cDNAs corresponding to the largest subunit of SNAPc, SNAP190. SNAP190 contains an unusual Myb DNA binding
domain consisting of four complete repeats (Ra to Rd) and a half repeat (Rh). A truncated protein consisting of the last two SNAP190 Myb repeats, Rc and Rd, can bind to the PSE, suggesting that the SNAP190 Myb domain contributes to recognition of the PSE by the SNAP complex. SNAP190 is required for snRNA gene transcription by both RNA
polymerases II and III and interacts with SNAP45. In addition, SNAP190
interacts with Oct-1. Together, these results suggest that the largest
subunit of the SNAP complex is involved in direct recognition of the
PSE and is a target for the Oct-1 activator. They also provide an example of a basal transcription factor containing a Myb DNA binding domain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The regulation of transcription
initiation is mediated by the interplay between two classes of promoter
elements: the basal promoter elements, which can be defined as those
promoter elements sufficient to direct basal levels of transcription in
vitro, and the regulatory elements, which modulate the levels of
transcription. The basal elements are recognized by basal transcription
factors, whereas the regulatory elements are recognized by either
transcriptional activators or repressors. Eucaryotic activators are
often modular, consisting of a DNA binding domain, which targets the
activator to the correct promoter, and of activation domains, whose
role is to enhance transcription (see references 21-23,
32, and 33 for reviews).
The human snRNA gene family contains both RNA polymerase II and RNA
polymerase III genes. The RNA polymerase II snRNA promoters consist of
a proximal sequence element (PSE), which is sufficient to direct basal
levels of transcription in vitro, and a distal sequence element, which
activates basal transcription. The RNA polymerase III snRNA promoters
are similar, except that basal transcription is directed by the
combination of a PSE and a TATA box (reviewed in reference
9). The PSE is recognized by a multisubunit complex
called the SNAP complex (SNAPc) (7) or PTF
(34). Since SNAPc can bind to the PSE on its
own, it corresponds to a sequence-specific DNA binding basal
transcription factor. SNAPc contains at least four
subunits, SNAP43, SNAP45, SNAP50, and SNAP190, and cDNAs encoding the
SNAP43 (7) or PTF
(35), SNAP45
(24) or PTF
(35), and SNAP50 (6)
or PTF
(2) subunits have been isolated. Cross-linking
studies suggest that SNAP50 (6) and the largest subunit of
the complex, SNAP190 (PTF
) (34), are in close contact
with DNA. Recombinant SNAP50, however, does not bind to the PSE
(6); thus, how SNAPc recognizes its target sequence is not yet understood.
Although SNAPc is capable of binding to the PSE on its own,
its binding is strongly enhanced by the concomitant binding of at least
two factors. On a basal RNA polymerase III promoter, containing both a
PSE and a TATA box, SNAPc binds cooperatively with TBP, and
this effect is dependent on the amino-terminal domain of TBP
(16). And on DNAs containing an octamer site and a PSE, SNAPc binds cooperatively with the Oct-1 or Oct-2 POU
domain (17) but not with the Pit-1 POU domain
(15). Of all the amino acid differences between the Oct-1
and Pit-1 POU domains, a single one is the key determinant for the
differential abilities of these two proteins to recruit
SNAPc to the PSE (15). This effect contributes to efficient transcription in vitro and is largely independent of the
Oct-1 activation domains, indicating that a function that is the
hallmark of activation domains, namely, recruitment of a basal
transcription complex resulting in activation of transcription, can be
performed by a DNA-binding domain (3, 15). However, it
remains to be determined whether cooperative binding results from a
direct Oct-1 POU-SNAPc interaction and which subunit in SNAPc is contacted by the Oct-1 POU domain.
Here, we report the isolation of a cDNA encoding a 1,469-amino-acid
protein that corresponds to full-length SNAP190. SNAP190 is an unusual
Myb domain protein. Unlike most Myb domains from animal cells and plant
cells, which contain three and two repeats, respectively, (see
references 11 and 14 for
reviews), SNAP190 contains a half repeat (Rh) followed by four complete
repeats, Ra, Rb, Rc, and Rd. We show that just the Rc and Rd repeats
are capable of recognizing the PSE, suggesting that the SNAP190 Myb domain contributes to specific binding of the SNAP complex to the PSE.
SNAP190 interacts with the SNAP45 subunit of SNAPc and with
activator Oct-1. Our observations suggest that the SNAP complexes required for RNA polymerase II and III snRNA gene transcription contain
at least four common subunits, provide further insight into the
architecture of the complex, and identify SNAP190 as a target for
activation by Oct-1.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Purification of SNAP190 and isolation of corresponding
cDNAs.
The biochemical purification of SNAPc has been
described previously (7). We also purified SNAPc
by immunoprecipitation. An S100 extract from HeLa cells was first
fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The material
precipitating between 18 and 32% ammonium sulfate was resuspended in
buffer D (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 0.2 mM EDTA, 15% glycerol, 3 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing 100 mM
KCl (D100), dialyzed against the same buffer, and loaded on
a P11 (Whatman) phosphocellulose column (8 mg of protein/ml of packed
resin). The column was washed with 3 column volumes of buffer
D100 and then step eluted with 5 column volumes of buffer
D350, followed by five column volumes of buffer
D500. Then, 80 ml of the 350 to 500 mM KCl elution step
mixture (P11-C fraction) was directly used in nondenaturing
immunoprecipitations with 4 ml of protein A-agarose beads coupled to an
anti-SNAP43 antibody (
-CSH375 antibody) (7). The beads
were washed extensively with HTMG100 (20 mM HEPES [pH
7.9], 15% glycerol, 0.1% Tween 20, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl), and the bound material was then eluted twice in 12 ml of HTMG60 containing 0.5-mg/ml specific peptide, CSH375,
against which the antibody was raised. The eluate was further
fractionated on a 200-µl Q-Sepharose column, and the fractions were
tested in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) with a probe containing the mouse U6 PSE. The proteins in the fractions containing DNA binding activity were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, redissolved in Laemmli buffer, and fractionated on a 5% sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel. The protein band migrating with an
apparent molecular mass of 190 kDa was excised from the gel and
subjected to amino acid sequencing as described previously (7). Amino acid sequence information obtained both from
protein purified by immunoaffinity and from protein purified by
conventional chromatography (7) was used to design
degenerate oligonucleotide primers for use in PCRs, with cDNA prepared
from total HeLa cell RNA as the template. A p190-specific
156-nucleotide (nt) fragment (encoding amino acids [aa] E242 to K294)
was obtained.
A partial cDNA encoding the carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 and
containing 3' noncoding sequences, including a polyadenylation site and
a run of A bases, was obtained in a screen related to the one-hybrid
screen described in reference 29; the cDNA encoded aa I800 to V1469. This clone was used to screen a Namalwa cell cDNA
library, and two more clones were obtained, K35#2 and K35#8, which
extended the cDNA sequence upstream to the codon for aa Q422. To obtain
5' missing sequences upstream of the codon for Q422, we performed PCR
with a reverse primer corresponding to a region near the 5' end of the
longest cDNA clone, K35#8, and a forward primer corresponding to a
region near the 3' end of the 156-nt PCR fragment, with total HeLa cell
cDNA as the template. We obtained a 500-bp fragment that was used to
prepare an [
-32P]dCTP (300 Ci/mmol; New England
Nuclear)-radiolabled DNA probe by the random priming method. The probe
was used to screen >750,000 phage recombinants of a
gt10 human
stomach cDNA library (Clontech). Two positive clones (1711 and 1011)
with insert sizes of about 1.1 kb were isolated; this extended the cDNA
sequence up to the codon for aa E84.
We then designed nested oligonucleotide primers corresponding to
regions near the 5' end of the 1011 cDNA clone. These reverse primers
were used in PCRs together with forward primers derived from vector
arms from a variety of libraries. From a Namalwa cDNA library
(29), a specific DNA fragment of approximately 500 bp was
generated. The amplified PCR product was sequenced; this extended the
sequence of the cDNA to the codon for a putative initiating methionine
and a further 22 nt upstream. To ensure that this product was not due
to some PCR artifact, we designed a forward primer corresponding to the
5' end of the fragment and used it in a PCR with either of the primers
corresponding to regions near the 5' end of the 1011 cDNA, with cDNA
made from total HeLa cell RNA as the template. Fragments with the
expected sequences were obtained.
Because the 22 nt upstream of the codon for the putative initiating
methionine corresponded to an open reading frame, we designed
a second
set of nested PCR primers for the region near the codon
for the
putative initiating methionine and repeated the PCR with
forward
primers derived from the vector arms from a variety of
libraries. We
obtained a specific fragment of about 300 nt (Nter
fragment). The Nter
fragment was sequenced; it was devoid of ATGs
upstream of the putative
initiating ATG but contained an in-frame
stop codon starting 189 nt
upstream of the putative initiating
ATG. As before, PCR performed with
a forward primer corresponding
to the 5' end of the Nter fragment and
reverse primers derived
from the region near the codon for the putative
initiating methionine,
with cDNA made from total HeLa cell RNA as the
template, gave
fragments with the expected sequences. A complete open
reading
frame encoding SNAP190 was reconstituted from the various
overlapping
cDNAs by a combination of PCR and conventional cloning
techniques.
All fragments derived from PCRs were resequenced to ensure
that
no errors had been introduced during the PCR.
Generation of antipeptide antibodies.
Synthetic peptides
derived from the predicted amino acid sequence for SNAP190 (see Fig. 1)
were coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce) and injected into
rabbits to generate polyclonal antipeptide antibodies. Rabbit antisera
were tested in an EMSA as previously described (25).
Immunodepletions and in vitro transcription assays.
Rabbit
preimmune or anti-SNAP190 antibodies were covalently cross-linked to
protein A-agarose beads (5). All immunodepletions were
performed for 30 min at room temperature in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. For
U6 snRNA, VAI, and AdML transcription experiments, immunodepletions
were done with 100 µl of whole-cell extracts (13) depleted
with an equal volume of preimmune antibody beads, preimmune and
anti-SNAP190 antibody beads mixed at ratios of 2:1 and 1:2, or only
anti-SNAP190 antibody beads. Depletions were also performed with the
largest amount of anti-SNAP190 antibody beads, which had been
preincubated with 10 µg of a nonspecific peptide (CSH483)
(6) or a specific peptide (190-3 peptide). For U1 snRNA
transcription experiments, 40 µl of whole-cell extract was depleted
with 20 µl of antibody beads while maintaining the same bead ratios
as those described above. Immunodepletion reaction mixtures were
centrifuged for 1 min at room temperature, and the supernatants were
transferred to fresh 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. The supernatants were
immediately tested in in vitro transcription experiments. Eight, 4, 7, and 18 µl of extract were used for U6 snRNA, VAI, AdML, and U1 snRNA
transcription reactions, respectively. To test for the effects of
dilution of the extract by antibody beads, whole-cell extract or
whole-cell extract diluted two- and fourfold in buffer D was tested.
Reconstitution of transcription was tested by the addition of 2, 4, and
8 µl of a SNAPc-enriched fraction (mono-Q fraction;
approximately 0.3 mg of protein/ml) (7) to transcription
reaction mixtures; the reactions were performed with extract treated
with the highest level of anti-SNAP190 antibody beads.
Expression of recombinant proteins and
coimmunoprecipitations.
The SNAP190 coding sequence was subcloned
into the pCITE-2a(+) vector (Novagen) to generate construct
pCITE-SNAP190. Three micrograms of pCITE-SNAP190 and 1 µg of
pCITE-SNAP45 (25) were used as the template for coupled in
vitro transcription and translation (Promega) in a final volume of 50 µl containing 4 µl of L-[35S]methionine
(1,233 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear), either in separate reactions or
in cotranslation reactions. For immunoprecipitation control
experiments, 10 µl of each individually labeled protein was combined
with 190 µl of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9)-15% glycerol-0.1% Tween 20-5
mM MgCl2-1 mM dithiothreitol-0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride containing 100 mM KCl (HMGT100) and incubated at
4°C for 2 h. Then, 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads coupled
to either anti-SNAP190 antibody (antibody 402) or anti-SNAP45 antibody
(
-CSH467; rabbit 234) was added, and the reaction mixtures were
incubated at 4°C for 1 h. The antibody beads were then washed
extensively with HMGT100, and the bound proteins were
eluted by boiling the beads in Laemmli buffer. For
coimmunoprecipitation experiments, 3, 10, or 30 µl of cotranslated
labeled proteins was used and the reaction mixtures were adjusted to a
200-µl final volume with HMGT100. The samples were then
processed exactly as described above. The eluted proteins were
fractionated by SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
visualized by autoradiography. Similar experiments were performed with
in vitro-translated SNAP43 (7) and SNAP50 (6),
but no interactions with SNAP190 could be detected.
Expression of SNAP190 Myb repeats in E. coli.
Fragments corresponding to aa 390 to 518 (RcRd), 283 to 414 (RaRb), 283 to 518 (RaRbRcRd), 283 to 572 (RaRbRcRd and Arg-rich and Ser-rich
regions), 330 to 518 (RbRcRd), 238 to 518 (RhRaRbRcRd), and 238 to 572 (RhRaRbRcRd and Arg-rich and Ser-rich regions) of SNAP190 were
generated by PCR amplification with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene). PCR fragments corresponding to aa 390 to 518, 283 to 414, 283 to 518, and 283 to 572 were ligated into a pET-GST vector
(8) to generate constructs pET-GST-190RcRd, pET-GST-190RaRb, pET-GST-190RaRbRcRd, and pET-GST-190RaRbRcRdSer, respectively. PCR
fragments corresponding to aa 330 to 518, 238 to 518, and 238 to 572 were ligated into a modified pSBET vector (27) containing a
glutathione S-transferase (GST)-coding sequence to generate constructs pSBET-GST-190RbRcRd, pSBET-GST-190RhRaRbRcRd, and
pSBET-GST-190RhRaRbRcRdSer, respectively. GST fusion proteins were
expressed in Escherichia coli BL21-DE3 (30), and
lysates were prepared as described previously (31). Fusion
proteins were bound to glutathione-agarose (Sigma), the beads were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 and
10% glycerol, and the bound proteins were eluted with 10 mM
glutathione in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.8. Where indicated, the GST moiety was
cleaved by treatment with thrombin. All the proteins were analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The various proteins were then
tested for binding to wild-type and mutated PSEs in an EMSA as
described previously (25). The EMSA whose results are shown
in in Fig. 7C was performed as described in reference
29.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide
sequence obtained in this study has been assigned GenBank accession no.
AF032387.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of cDNAs encoding p190.
In our original purified
SNAPc preparation, three prominent polypeptides with
apparent molecular masses of 43, 45, and 50 kDa were readily visible.
These polypeptides have all been cloned and are indeed part of the SNAP
complex (6, 7, 24). In addition, however, a polypeptide with
an apparent molecular mass of about 190 kDa was clearly visible
(7). We used an antibody raised against SNAP43
(7) to confirm by coimmunoprecipitation assays that the
190-kDa polypeptide (p190) is associated with SNAPc (data
not shown) and to purify the protein. We obtained p190 peptide
sequences from both SNAPc purified by conventional chromatography (7) and immunopurified SNAPc.
With this information, we designed degenerate oligonucleotides for PCR
from cDNA prepared from total cellular RNA and obtained a p190-specific
PCR fragment. We also identified a partial p190-encoding cDNA in a
one-hybrid screen performed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(29) (see below).
We used both the cDNA isolated through the yeast one hybrid screen and
the PCR probe to assemble, by a combination of library
screens and
direct reverse transcription-PCRs (see Materials and
Methods for
details), an open reading frame that encodes the protein
shown in Fig.
1A. The sequence contains all twelve of
the peptide
sequences we obtained from p190 (shaded in Fig.
1A) and
constitutes
a novel 1,469-aa protein with a calculated molecular mass
of 159.2
kDa and an isoelectric point of 8.3. The open reading frame is
probably full length, because it is preceded by an in-frame termination
codon 189 nt upstream of the first AUG codon and terminates with
a UGA
opal codon.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Amino acid sequence and schematic structure of SNAP190.
(A) Amino acid sequence of SNAP190. The shaded regions correspond to
peptide sequences obtained from the purified protein. The dashed arrow
corresponds to the Myb half repeat, Rh, and the other arrows indicate
Myb repeats Ra, Rb, Rc, and Rd, with the conserved tryptophan (or
phenylalanine in the Ra repeat and tyrosines in Rb and Rc repeats)
indicated in boldface. The arginine-rich and serine-rich regions are
boxed. The leucines spaced as in a leucine zipper are indicated by
asterisks. The synthetic peptides used to generate antibodies in
rabbits are underlined: peptide 190-1 (aa 1452 to 1469) gave antibodies
398 and 399a; peptide 190-2 (aa 1309 to 1328) gave antibodies 400 and
401; peptide 190-3 (aa 843 to 865) gave antibodies 402 and 403; and
peptide 190-4 (aa 712 to 735) gave antibodies 439 and 440. (B)
Schematic structure of p190. The location of the Myb domain with the
half repeat (Rh) and the four complete repeats (Ra, Rb, Rc, and Rd), as
well as the locations of the arginine-rich, serine-rich, and leucine
zipper-like regions, are indicated. The region of the protein that
interacts with Oct-1 in a yeast one-hybrid assay is indicated by a
bracket. (C) Alignment of the p190 half Myb repeat, Rh, and repeats Ra,
Rb, Rc, and Rd and Myb repeats R1, R2, and R3 from the human A-Myb,
B-Myb (19), and c-Myb (12, 28) proteins. The
conserved tryptophans (replaced in some cases by tyrosines or
phenylalanines) are indicated in boldface. In this alignment, the p190
Ra repeat is 17, 25, and 22% identical to the Myb R1, R2, and R3
repeats, respectively; the p190 Rb repeat is 14, 23, and 23% identical
to the Myb R1, R2, and R3 repeats, respectively; the p190 Rc repeat is
27, 38, and 23% identical to the Myb R1, R2, and R3 repeats,
respectively; and the p190 Rd repeat is 21, 38, and 30% identical to
the Myb R1, R2, and R3 repeats, respectively.
|
|
p190 contains a Myb DNA binding domain.
As shown in Fig. 1A
and B, the p190 sequence contains several striking features. The
protein contains an unusual Myb domain, immediately followed by an
arginine-rich region and a serine-rich region, and in the
carboxy-terminal region of the protein is a leucine zipper-like motif.
The Myb domain similarity extends from the tryptophan at position 263 to the glutamine at position 503.
Proteins of the c-Myb family include c-Myb and the related A-Myb and
B-Myb proteins (
19). The Myb domains of these proteins
are
each composed of three imperfect tandem repeats, R1, R2, and
R3. Plant
Myb proteins usually have only two imperfect tandem
repeats, R2 and R3.
Each repeat contains three diagnostic tryptophan
residues (Fig.
1C)
(
11,
14). The minimal DNA binding domains
of Myb proteins
consist of just the R2 and R3 repeats, and the
solution structure of
the mouse c-Myb R2-R3 repeats bound to DNA
has been solved
(
20). Each repeat contains three helices, the
second and
third of which form a variation of the helix-turn-helix
motif with the
third helix corresponding to the DNA recognition
helix. The recognition
helices of both repeats are placed in tandem
on the DNA and recognize a
continuous sequence within the major
groove (
20).
Figure
1C shows an alignment of SNAP190 sequences from amino acid 263 to amino acid 503 with the R1, R2, and R3 repeats of
the human A-Myb,
B-Myb, and c-Myb proteins. Unlike other Myb DNA
binding domain
proteins, p190 contains a half repeat (Rh) followed
by four repeats
(Ra, Rb, Rc, and Rd). In Ra, the third tryptophan
is replaced by a
phenylalanine, while in Rb and Rc, the second
and third tryptophans,
respectively, are replaced by tyrosines.
The p190 repeats that are the
most similar to the R2 repeats of
the A-, B-, and c-Myb proteins are
the Rc and Rd repeats, each
with 38% identity with R2, and the p190
repeat that is the most
similar to the R3 repeats is the Rd repeat,
with 30% identity.
All four p190 repeats, however, are most similar to
the R2 repeats.
Interestingly, repeats Ra, Rc, and Rd all contain a
cysteine corresponding
to Cys131 in the c-Myb R2 repeat, which in c-Myb
has the potential
to mediate redox regulation of DNA binding
(
18).
The presence of a Myb domain-like sequence in p190 suggests that p190
is a DNA-binding subunit of SNAP190, consistent with
a cross-linking
experiment that detected a protein of about 180
kDa specifically
cross-linked to the DNA in a highly purifed PTF
fraction
(
34) and with the observation that none of the other
SNAP
c subunits isolated so far can bind DNA specifically on
their
own (
6). Hence, p190 is a strong candidate for a DNA
binding
subunit of the SNAP complex.
p190 corresponds to the largest subunit of SNAPc.
To characterize the function of p190, and in particular to determine
whether p190 is indeed part of the SNAP complex, we raised antibodies
against four peptides (Fig. 1A) and used the antibody raised against
amino acids 843 to 865 (antibody 402) for the experiments described in
this work. We first performed an immunoblot analysis. Recombinant p190
translated in vitro was fractionated alongside a
SNAPc-containing phosphocellulose P11 column fraction on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, the proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose, and p190 was visualized with the anti-p190 antibody
(antibody 402). As shown in Fig. 2, the
recombinant protein comigrated with endogenous p190, even though its
calculated molecular mass is only 159 kDa. This is consistent with the
cDNA encoding a full-length p190 protein and indicates that p190
migrates anomalously on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Recombinant p190 comigrates with SNAP190. Three (lane
1), 10 (lane 2), and 30 (lane 3) µl of a SNAPc-containing
P11C fraction (7) and 5 (lane 4), 10 (lane 5), and 30 (lane
6) µl of reticulocyte lysate programmed with the p190 cDNA or a
mixture of 10 µl of the P11C fraction and 10 µl of p190
cDNA-programmed reticulocyte lysate (lane 7) were fractionated on an
SDS-5% polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose, and the filter was immunoblotted with the anti-p190 402 antibody. Unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate gave no signal (data not
shown). The positions of molecular weight markers and of SNAP190 in the
P11C fraction are indicated.
|
|
We then tested the effects of the anti-p190 antibodies in an EMSA. As
shown in Fig.
3A, a DNA-protein complex
was formed upon
incubation of a probe containing the wild-type mouse U6
PSE, a
high-affinity binding site for SNAP
c, with a
fraction highly enriched
in SNAP
c (lane 1; complex labeled
SNAP
c). This complex was not
formed on a probe containing a
PSE debilitated by point mutations
(ABC mutation [
25])
(lane 2). The addition of preimmune antibodies
had no effect on the
mobility of the SNAP
c-PSE complex (lane 3),
but the
addition of the anti-p190 peptide antibody (

-SNAP190)
retarded the
migration of the SNAP
c-DNA complex (lane 4; complex
labeled
SNAP
c+Ab). The effect was abolished by preincubation of
the
antibody with 1 or 3 µg of the peptide against which the antibody
was
raised (lanes 5, 6) but not by preincubation with similar
amounts of an
irrelevant peptide (lanes 7, 8). The addition of
the anti-p190 peptide
antibody also resulted in the appearance
of a faster-migrating complex,
which may correspond to a partially
disrupted or degraded SNAP complex
(lanes 4 to 8). Whatever the
case, however, the specific nature of the
anti-p190 antibody-retarded
complex strongly suggests that p190 is part
of the SNAP
c-PSE complex.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
p190 corresponds to the SNAP190 subunit of
SNAPc. (A) EMSA performed with a probe containing the
wild-type mouse U6 PSE (lanes 1 and 3 to 8) or a mutated mouse U6 PSE
(ABC mutation [25];lane 2), a fraction highly enriched
in SNAPc (mono-Q fraction) (7), and either no
antibodies (lanes 1 and 2), 1 µl of preimmune antibodies (lane 3), or
1 µl of anti-p190 (402) antibodies (lanes 4 to 8). Lanes 5 and 6 also
contained 1 and 3 µg, respectively, of specific peptide (peptide
190-3), and lanes 7 and 8 contained 1 and 3 µg, respectively, of
nonspecific peptide (peptide CSH375). The locations of the free probe
and the complexes containing SNAPc or SNAPc and
anti-p190 antibodies (SNAPc + Ab) bound to the PSE are
indicated. (B) Beads coated with either preimmune (lanes 3 to 6) or
anti-p190 (402) (lanes 7 to 10) antibodies were incubated with the
SNAPc-enriched mono-Q fraction. The bound material was then
eluted either without (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) or with (lanes 5, 6, 9, and 10) a specific peptide (peptide 190-3) and used in an EMSA with a
probe containing the wild-type mouse U6 PSE. For lanes 1 and 2, the
EMSA was performed with a probe containing the wild-type (lane 1) or
mutated (lane 2) mouse U6 PSE and the SNAPc-enriched mono-Q
fraction.
|
|
To determine whether p190 is also part of the SNAP complex when it is
not bound to DNA, we performed nondenaturing immunoprecipitations
with
nuclear extracts and either the anti-p190 antibody or preimmune
antibodies and eluted the bound material with a buffer containing
either no peptide or an excess of specific peptide. The eluted
material
was then used in an EMSA. As shown in Fig.
3B, the material
eluted from
the preimmune beads did not bind to the PSE probe
(lanes 3 to 6). In
contrast, material eluted from the anti-p190
beads with a specific
peptide, but not without a peptide, bound
to the PSE probe (compare
lanes 9 and 10 with lanes 7 and 8).
Together, these data indicate that
the cDNA we have isolated encodes
a subunit of SNAP
c, and
we therefore refer to p190 as SNAP190.
SNAP190 is required for RNA polymerase II and III transcription of
snRNA genes.
Fractions enriched in the SNAP complex are required
for RNA polymerase II and III transcription of snRNA genes, suggesting that SNAPc is part of the initiation complexes assembled on
both the RNA polymerase II and III snRNA promoters. It is possible, however, that the RNA polymerase II and III snRNA promoters recruit different versions of the SNAP complex containing, for example, different sets of subunits. We tested the involvement of SNAP190 in RNA
polymerase II and III transcription from the four types of promoters
depicted in Fig. 4A: the adenovirus 2 (Ad2) major-late promoter exemplifies a typical TATA box-containing RNA
polymerase II mRNA promoter, the U1 and U6 promoters exemplify RNA
polymerase II and III PSE-containing snRNA promoters, respectively, and
the Ad2 VAI promoter exemplifies an RNA polymerase III promoter with gene-internal elements.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
SNAP190 is required for RNA polymerase II and III
transcription from snRNA promoters. (A) Schematic representation of the
four promoters used for in vitro transcription. (B) SNAP190 is required
for human snRNA gene transcription. For the AdML, VAI, and U6 snRNA
gene transcription experiments, 100 µl of HeLa whole-cell extract was
depleted with either 100 µl of rabbit preimmune antibody beads (lane
4), 67 µl of preimmune antibody beads plus 33 µl of anti-SNAP190
antibody (antibody 402) beads (lane 5), 33 µl of preimmune antibody
beads plus 67 µl of anti-SNAP190 antibody beads (lane 6), or 100 µl
of anti-SNAP190 antibody beads (lanes 7 to 12). In lanes 8 and 9, the
anti-SNAP190 antibody beads were first incubated with an excess of a
nonspecific (CSH483) and a specific (peptide 190-3) peptide,
respectively. In lanes 10 to 12, 2, 4, and 8 µl, respectively, of the
SNAPc-enriched mono-Q fraction were added to transcription
reaction mixtures. Lanes 1 to 3 show transcription performed with
undiluted extract (lane 1), extract diluted 1:2 with buffer D (lane 2),
and extract diluted 1:4 with buffer D (lane 3). Lane 2 is directly
comparable to lanes 4 to 12. The U1 snRNA gene transcription was
sensitive to the effects of dilution (lanes 2 and 3); therefore, 40 µl of whole-cell extract was depleted with 20 µl of antibody beads
by using the same ratio of preimmune to anti-SNAP190 antibody beads as
that described above. The bands corresponding to correctly initiated
RNA are labeled AdML for the Ad2 major-late promoter, U1 5' for the U1
snRNA promoter, U6 5' for the U6 snRNA promoter, and VAI for the Ad2
VAI promoter. The band labeled RT corresponds to transcripts derived
from cryptic promoters located within vector sequences
(25).
|
|
Transcription from these four promoters was tested in extracts that had
been incubated with beads coated either with preimmune
antibodies or
with anti-SNAP190 antibodies. As shown in Fig.
4B,
treatment of a
nuclear extract with preimmune-antibody-coated
beads had little effect
on transcription from any of these promoters
(compare lane 4 to lane 2;
note that the U1 construct generates
two transcripts, only the lower of
which results from U1 promoter
activity [
25]).
However, treatment of the extract with increasing
amounts of
anti-SNAP190 antibody-coated beads and correspondingly
decreasing
amounts of preimmune-antibody-coated beads resulted
in a severe
decrease in transcription from the U1 and U6 snRNA
promoters (lanes 5 to 7). The inhibitory effect was specific,
because it was abolished by
preincubation of the beads with the
specific peptide against which the
anti-SNAP190 antibody was raised
(lane 9) but not by incubation with an
irrelevant peptide (lane
8). Furthermore, the addition of increasing
amounts of a SNAP
c fraction to the immunodepleted extract
restored U1 and U6 transcription
(compare lanes 10 to 12 with lane 7).
In contrast, transcription
from the Ad2 major-late and VAI promoters
was not affected by
depletion of SNAP190, and transcription from the
VAI promoter
was inhibited rather than increased by addition of the
SNAP
c fraction
(lanes 10 to 12). Similar results were
obtained with antibodies
directed against different SNAP190 peptide
sequences (data not
shown). Together, these data indicate that SNAP190
is required
for both RNA polymerase II and III transcription of snRNA
genes
but not for transcription of a typical mRNA promoter or a typical
TATA-less RNA polymerase III promoter. Thus, if different forms
of
SNAP
c are involved in RNA polymerase II and III snRNA gene
transcription, they contain at least four common subunits, SNAP43
(
7), SNAP45 (
24), SNAP50 (
6), and
SNAP190.
SNAP190 associates with SNAP45.
To understand how SNAP190 fits
into the architecture of the SNAP complex, we tested whether SNAP190
could associate with any of the previously cloned SNAPc
subunits. SNAP190 was cotranslated in a reticulocyte lysate with either
SNAP43, SNAP45, SNAP50, or the three proteins together. We then
performed immunoprecipitations with antibodies directed against the
various subunits. Figure 5 shows the
results for SNAP45. As shown in Fig. 5A, anti-SNAP190 antibodies were
able to recognize in vitro-translated SNAP190 (lane 4) but not SNAP45
(lane 8), as expected. However, when increasing amounts of cotranslated
SNAP45 and SNAP190 were incubated with the anti-SNAP190 antibody,
increasing amounts of SNAP45 were coimmunoprecipitated with SNAP190
(lanes 5 to 7). Reciprocally, as shown in Fig. 5B, anti-SNAP45
antibodies recognized in vitro-translated SNAP45 (lane 4) but not
SNAP190 (lane 8). However, when increasing amounts of cotranslated
SNAP45 and SNAP190 were incubated with anti-SNAP45 antibodies,
increasing amounts of SNAP190 were coimmunoprecipitated with SNAP45
(lanes 5 to 7). Together, these data indicate that SNAP190 and SNAP45
interact strongly with each other. We could not detect, however, any
strong interaction between SNAP190 and SNAP43 or SNAP50, and
cotranslation of all four subunits did not result in
coimmunoprecipitation of SNAP43 or SNAP50 alongside SNAP45 and SNAP190
(data not shown). This raises the question of how the SNAP complex is
assembled; this question is discussed below.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
SNAP190 interacts with SNAP45. (A) A cDNA encoding
SNAP190 (lanes 1 and 4), SNAP45 (lanes 2 and 8), or a mixture of cDNAs
encoding SNAP190 and SNAP45 (lanes 3 and 5 to 7) were expressed by
coupled in vitro transcription and translation in reticulocyte lysates.
In lanes 1 to 3, 1 µl of the products was loaded directly on the
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. In lanes 4 to 8, 10, 3, 10, 30, and 30 µl,
respectively, of the products were first incubated with beads coated
with the anti-SNAP190 (402) antibody. The beads were washed, and the
bound proteins were eluted by boiling the beads in Laemmli buffer and
were fractionated on the SDS-polyacrylamide gel. (B) The same
experiment as in panel A was performed, except that in lanes 4 to 8, the products were first incubated with beads coated with an anti-SNAP45
antibody ( -CSH467; rabbit 234).
|
|
The SNAP190 Rc and Rd Myb domain repeats can bind the PSE.
The
presence of a DNA binding domain sequence in SNAP190 immediately
suggested that within the SNAP complex, SNAP190 is involved in
recognizing the PSE. To test this hypothesis, we expressed full-length
SNAP190 in a baculovirus expression system; we also expressed a number
of SNAP190 fragments corresponding to the entire Myb domain or parts of
it in E. coli (see Materials and Methods). Of these
proteins, only one, consisting of the Rc and Rd repeats, bound to DNA,
as shown in Fig. 6A. To test DNA binding
we used the two probes shown in Fig. 6B. A GST fusion protein
containing the Rc and Rd repeats bound to a wild-type mouse U6 PSE
probe but not to a mutated probe carrying six point mutations within the PSE (compare lanes 3 to 5 with lanes 6 to 8). Similarly, an RcRd
protein lacking the GST moiety bound specifically to the PSE (compare
lanes 10 to 13 with lanes 15 to 18). These results suggest that the Rc
and Rd repeats of the SNAP190 Myb domain contribute to recognition of
the PSE within the SNAP complex.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
DNA binding of the SNAP190 Myb repeats. (A) An EMSA was
performed with a probe containing a wild-type (lanes 1, 3 to 5, and 9 to 13) or mutated (lanes 2, 6 to 8, and 14 to 18) mouse U6 PSE and
either 2 µl of a fraction enriched in SNAPc (mono-Q
fraction; 0.3 mg of protein/ml [7]) (lanes 1 and 2) or
0.1 (lanes 3, 6, 10, and 15), 0.3 (lanes 4, 7, 11, and 16), 1 (lanes 5, 8, 12, and 17) or 3 (lanes 13 and 18) µl of the bacterially expressed
proteins indicated above the lanes. In lanes 9 and 14, no proteins were
added to the probes. The locations of free probes, complexes containing
SNAPc, GST-190RcRd, and 190RcRd are indicated. (B) The
sequences of the PSEs present in the wild-type and mutant probes are
shown. Uppercase letters correspond to sequences derived from the mouse
U6 promoter, with underlined characters corresponding to mutations.
Flanking sequences are in lowercase characters. The c-Myb consensus
binding site (c-Myb BS) is also indicated.
|
|
SNAP190 interacts with Oct-1.
SNAPc and Oct-1 can
bind cooperatively to DNA, suggesting protein-protein interactions
between these two factors on DNA (15, 17). We therefore
checked whether proteins identified in an Oct-1 interaction screen in
yeast (29) corresponded to subunits of SNAPc. In
this screen, summarized in Fig. 7A, the
parental yeast strain carried, as a selectable marker, an integrated
copy of a HIS3 allele with six octamer sites upstream of the
TATA element, as well as a plasmid that directs constitutive expression
of full-length Oct-1. Because Oct-1 does not activate transcription in
yeast, this strain transcribes the HIS3 gene at basal levels
and thus does not grow in the presence of aminotriazole (AT), a
competitive inhibitor of the HIS3 gene product. This tester
strain was transformed with a library of cDNAs fused to the VP16
transcriptional activation domain, and AT-resistant colonies were
selected. Cells that grow under these selective conditions may express
VP16 hybrid proteins that stimulate HIS3 transcription by
being recruited to the HIS3 promoter through their
interaction with DNA-bound Oct-1 (29). Indeed, such a screen
resulted in the isolation of cDNAs encoding OBF-1 (also called OCA-B
[10] and Bob1 [4]), a protein that interacts with octamer-bound Oct-1 (29). As shown below,
this type of screen also resulted in the isolation of a cDNA encoding part of SNAP190.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 interacts with
DNA-bound Oct-1 both in vivo and in vitro. (A) The strategy for
isolating proteins interacting with DNA-bound Oct-1 (29) is
depicted. An interaction between Oct-1, which is transcriptionally
inactive in yeast, and a fusion protein containing the VP16 activation
domain results in induction of HIS3 transcription, which in
turn allows cells to grow on AT-containing medium. The Oct-1 protein
and the VP16 cDNA library were expressed from single-copy plasmids
marked with the URA3 and TRP1 genes,
respectively. Expression of the VP16 hybrid proteins was placed under
control of the galactose-inducible GAL1, 10 regulatory sequences (UASG). (B) Yeast cells expressing
Oct-1, SNAP190C, and OBF-1 as indicated above the lanes were plated on
medium without AT or containing 40 mM AT. Only cells expressing induced
levels of the HIS3 gene product can grow in the presence of
AT. (C) EMSA performed with a probe containing an octamer motif and the
in vitro-translated proteins indicated above the lanes. The total
amount of reticulocyte lysate was kept constant in all lanes. Lane 1 contains unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate only, lanes 2 to 5 contain 1 µl of Oct-1 POU, lane 3 contains in addition 1 µl of OBF-1, and
lanes 4 and 5 contain 1 and 2 µl, respectively, of SNAP190C.
|
|
Figure
7B shows the growth of various yeast strains on medium devoid
of, or containing, AT. All the strains grew on control
medium
containing histidine but devoid of AT, showing that expression
of the
various proteins does not interfere with yeast growth.
On the selective
medium containing AT, however, the parental strain
failed to grow (lane
1). A strain expressing a fusion protein
consisting of
Oct-1-interacting factor OBF-1 fused to the VP16
activation domain
could grow on both the control medium and the
AT-containing selective
medium, and growth on the selective medium
depended on the presence of
Oct-1, as expected (lanes 4 and 5).
In addition, a strain expressing a
SNAP190-VP16 fusion protein
also grew on the selective medium in an
Oct-1-dependent (lanes
2 and 3) and octamer site-dependent (data not
shown) manner. Sequence
analysis of the cDNA encoding this SNAP190-VP16
fusion protein
revealed that it encodes SNAP190 sequences from
isoleucine 800
to the carboxyl terminus. The cDNA also contained 3'
noncoding
sequences including a polyadenylation signal and a run of A
bases.
Thus, the carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 can interact with
DNA-bound
Oct-1 in vivo.
To determine whether the carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 could also
interact with DNA-bound Oct-1 in vitro, we performed
an EMSA with a
probe containing an octamer motif. As shown in
Fig.
7C, The Oct-1 POU
domain bound to the octamer probe (lane
2). In the presence of the
Oct-1 POU domain and OBF-1, a slower-migrating
complex (lane 3), which
contains both the Oct-1 POU and OBF-1,
was formed (
29).
Similarly, in the presence of the Oct-1 POU
and the carboxy-terminal
half of SNAP190 (SNAP190C), a slower-migrating
complex (lanes 4 and 5),
which was not obtained in the absence
of the Oct-1 POU domain, was
formed (data not shown). Together,
these results show that the largest
subunit of SNAP
c can interact
with DNA-bound Oct-1 both in
vivo and in vitro and thus suggest
that SNAP190 is a target of the
Oct-1 activator.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We describe the characterization of a cDNA encoding the largest
subunit of the SNAP complex, SNAP190. That SNAP190 is part of
SNAPc was determined by the observations that antibodies
directed against SNAP190 retard the migration of the
SNAPc-PSE complex in an EMSA and can immunoprecipitate a
protein complex that binds to the PSE and retards the probe
indistinguishably from SNAPc. In addition, depletion of
extracts with anti-SNAP190 antibodies inhibits both RNA polymerase II
and III transcription from snRNA promoters, as expected for a subunit
of SNAPc. This result, together with the observations that
depletions of transcription extracts with anti-SNAP43 (7),
anti-SNAP45 (24), and anti-SNAP50 (6) antibodies
also inhibit both RNA polymerase II and III transcription from snRNA
promoters, indicates that the SNAP complexes involved in RNA polymerase
II and III snRNA gene transcription contain at least four common
subunits.
Architecture of the SNAP complex.
SNAP190 interacts with
SNAP45 in a coimmunoprecipitation assay. We have shown before that
SNAP43 and SNAP50 can also be coimmunoprecipitated (6). We
interpret these observations as reflecting protein-protein contacts
that occur within the SNAP complex. Intriguingly, however, we have been
unable to show protein-protein contacts between the SNAP190-SNAP45 pair
and the SNAP43-SNAP50 pair of proteins by coimmunoprecipitation
experiments in either the presence or absence of TBP (unpublished
results). Our recent results indicate that this is due to the lack of a
small, previously undetected, subunit. In the presence of this
additional subunit, a SNAP complex capable of binding specifically to
the PSE can be assembled (6a).
SNAP190 contains a Myb DNA binding domain.
SNAP190 contains a
region with strong similarity to the c-Myb DNA binding domain. However,
unlike the c-Myb DNA binding domain, which contains three repeats, the
SNAP190 Myb domain contains four repeats and one half repeat. A number
of proteins, including the yeast SWI3 and ADA2 proteins, the
transcriptional corepressor N-Cor, and the yeast TFC5 subunit of
TFIIIB, contain one or two copies of a domain, which has been called
the SANT domain, that resembles a Myb repeat (1). Although
the SANT domain has been hypothesized to be involved in DNA binding,
this has not been shown experimentally. The SNAP190 repeats are,
however, much more related to the Myb R1 to R3 repeats than to the
SANT domain, consistent with the ability of the SNAP190 Rc and Rd
repeats to bind to the PSE.
The c-Myb DNA binding domain binds to consensus sequence AACNG through
the DNA recognition helices of repeats R2 and R3, which
contact the DNA
in the major groove. In SNAP190, we could observe
binding to DNA by
repeats Rc and Rd, suggesting that these two
repeats might correspond
functionally to the c-Myb R2 and R3 repeats.
Indeed, the Rc and Rd
repeats are the SNAP190 pair of repeats
most similar to the R2 and R3
repeats. However, although the mouse
U6 PSE, a high-affinity site for
SNAP
c, contains an AACTG sequence
which matches the AACNG
sequence recognized by the R2 and R3 repeats
of c-Myb (Fig.
6B), none
of the amino acids involved in base pair
recognition in the c-Myb
R2R3-DNA structure, including the K128,
E132, and N136 residues in R2
and the N179, K182, N183, N186,
and S187 residues in R3
(
20), are conserved within any of the
SNAP190 repeats,
including repeats Rc and Rd (Fig.
1C). Thus,
the Rc and Rd repeats may
recognize another sequence within the
PSE.
The observation that the full-length SNAP190 protein as well as several
SNAP190 truncations did not bind to the PSE is puzzling.
This may be
due to improper folding of the largest subunit in
the absence of the
other SNAP
c subunits or perhaps to the presence
of negative
regulatory elements within SNAP190 itself. Nevertheless,
the
observation that the SNAP190 Rc and Rd repeats can bind specifically
to
the PSE strongly suggests that this subunit contacts the DNA
directly
within the SNAP complex, consistent with the cross-linking
results of
Yoon et al. (
34). It seems unlikely, however, that
the Rc
and Rd repeats impart to SNAP
c all of its DNA binding
specificity.
Indeed, the PSE is a large promoter element, and other
parts of
SNAP190 (within or outside of the Myb domain) or other
subunits
of SNAP
c probably contribute to its recognition.
For example,
SNAP50 can also be cross-linked to the PSE (
6)
and thus may
contribute to the specificity of DNA binding of the SNAP
complex.
SNAP190 interacts with Oct-1.
One of the mechanisms by which
transcriptional activators can activate transcription is by recruiting
members of the basal machinery to a promoter. For example, the
Drosophila melanogaster activators Bicoid and Hunchback can
activate transcription in vitro by recruitment of basal transcription
factor TFIID. Recruitment involves protein-protein contacts with two of
the TFIID subunits, TAFII110 and TAFII60
(26). In the case of snRNA promoters, the DNA binding POU
domain of activator Oct-1 can recruit SNAPc to the PSE
(15, 17), and this effect contributes to efficient snRNA
gene transcription in vitro (15). We have isolated the region encoding the carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 in a yeast one-hybrid screen as a DNA-bound Oct-1-interacting protein, and we
could show that this region of SNAP190 can form a complex with the
Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer motif in vitro. Thus, the DNA
binding domain of Oct-1 may contribute to transcription activation by
contacting the carboxy-terminal half of SNAP190 and so recruiting basal
transcription complex SNAPc to the PSE.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Winship Herr and Vivek Mittal for comments on
the manuscript. We also thank Spencer Teplin for oligonucleotide
synthesis and James Duffy, Michael Ockler, and Philip Renna for artwork and photography.
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant
RO1GM38810 to N.H. and a grant from the Swiss National Fund to
M.S.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory, P.O. Box 100, 1 Bungtown Rd., Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724. Phone: (516) 367-8421. Fax: (516) 367-6801. E-mail:
hernande{at}cshl.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aasland, R.,
A. F. Stewart, and T. Gibson.
1996.
The SANT domain: a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21:87-88[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bai, L.,
Z. Wang,
J.-B. Yoon, and R. G. Roeder.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of the subunit of human proximal sequence element-binding transcription factor and its involvement in transcription of small nuclear RNA genes by RNA polymerases II and III.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5419-5426[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Ford, E., and N. Hernandez.
1997.
Characterization of a trimeric complex containing Oct-1, SNAPc, and DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:16048-16055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Gstaiger, M.,
L. Knoepfel,
O. Georgiev,
W. Schaffner, and C. M. Hovens.
1995.
A B-cell coactivator of octamer-binding transcription factors.
Nature
373:360-362[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Harlow, E., and D. Lane.
1988.
.
Antibodies: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Henry, R. W.,
B. Ma,
C. L. Sadowski,
R. Kobayashi, and N. Hernandez.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of SNAP50, a subunit of the snRNA-activating protein complex SNAPc.
EMBO J.
15:7129-7136[Medline].
|
| 6a.
| Henry, R. W., V. Mittal, and N. Hernandez.
Unpublished data.
|
| 7.
|
Henry, R. W.,
C. L. Sadowski,
R. Kobayashi, and N. Hernandez.
1995.
A TBP-TAF complex required for transcription of human snRNA genes by RNA polymerases II and III.
Nature
374:653-657[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Lai, J.-S.,
M. A. Cleary, and W. Herr.
1992.
A single amino acid exchange transfers VP16-induced positive control from the Oct-1 to the Oct-2 homeodomain.
Genes Dev.
6:2058-2065[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Lobo, S. M., and N. Hernandez.
1994.
Transcription of snRNA genes by RNA polymerases II and III, p. 127-159. In
R. C. Conaway, and J. W. Conaway (ed.), Transcription, mechanisms and regulation.
Raven Press, Ltd., New York, N.Y.
|
| 10.
|
Luo, Y., and R. G. Roeder.
1995.
Cloning, functional characterization, and mechanism of action of the B-cell-specific transcription coactivator OCA-B.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4115-4124[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Luscher, B., and R. N. Eisenman.
1990.
New light on Myc and Myb. Part II. Myb.
Genes Dev.
4:2235-2241[Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Majello, B.,
L. C. Kenyon, and R. Dalla-Favera.
1986.
Human c-myb protooncogene: nucleotide sequence of cDNA and organization of the genomic locus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:9636-9640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Maroney, P. A.,
G. J. Hannon, and T. W. Nielsen.
1990.
Transcription and cap trimethylation of a nematode spliced leader RNA in a cell-free system.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:709-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Martin, C., and J. Paz-Ares.
1997.
MYB transcription factors in plants.
Trends Genet.
13:67-73[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Mittal, V.,
M. A. Cleary,
W. Herr, and N. Hernandez.
1996.
The Oct-1 POU-specific domain can stimulate small nuclear RNA gene transcription by stabilizing the basal transcription complex SNAPc.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1955-1965[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Mittal, V., and N. Hernandez.
1997.
Role for the amino-terminal region of human TBP in U6 snRNA transcription.
Science
275:1136-1140[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Murphy, S.,
J.-B. Yoon,
T. Gerster, and R. G. Roeder.
1992.
Oct-1 and Oct-2 potentiate functional interactions of a transcription factor with the proximal sequence element of small nuclear RNA genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:3247-3261[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Myrset, A. H.,
A. Bostad,
N. Jamin,
P.-N. Lirsac,
F. Toma, and O. S. Gabrielsen.
1993.
DNA and redox state induced conformational changes in the DNA-binding domain of the Myb oncoprotein.
EMBO J.
12:4625-4633[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Nomura, N.,
M. Takahashi,
M. Matsui,
S. Ishii,
T. Date,
S. Sasamoto, and R. Ishizaki.
1988.
Isolation of human cDNA clones of myb-related genes, A-myb and B-myb.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:11075-11089[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Ogata, K.,
S. Morikawa,
H. Nakamura,
A. Sekikawa,
T. Inoue,
H. Kanai,
A. Sarai,
S. Ishii, and Y. Nishimura.
1994.
Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices.
Cell
79:639-648[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Ptashne, M.
1988.
How eucaryotic transcriptional activators work.
Nature
335:683-689[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Ptashne, M., and A. Gann.
1997.
Transcriptional activation by recruitment.
Nature
386:569-577[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Ranish, J. A., and S. Hahn.
1991.
Transcription: basal factors and activation.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:151-158.
|
| 24.
|
Sadowski, C. L.,
R. W. Henry,
R. Kobayashi, and N. Hernandez.
1996.
The SNAP45 subunit of the small nuclear RNA (snRNA) activating protein complex is required for RNA polymerase II and III snRNA gene transcription and interacts with the TATA box binding protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:4289-4293[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Sadowski, C. L.,
R. W. Henry,
S. M. Lobo, and N. Hernandez.
1993.
Targeting TBP to a non-TATA box cis-regulatory element: a TBP-containing complex activates transcription from snRNA promoters through the PSE.
Genes Dev.
7:1535-1548[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Sauer, F.,
S. Hansen, and R. Tjian.
1995.
Multiple TAFIIs directing synergistic activation of transcription.
Science
270:1783-1788[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Schenk, P. M.,
S. Baumann,
R. Mattes, and H.-H. Steinbiss.
1995.
Improved high level expression system for eucaryotic genes in E. coli using T7 RNA polymerase and rare Arg tRNAs.
BioTechniques
19:196-200.
[Medline] |
| 28.
|
Slamon, D. J.,
T. C. Boone,
D. C. Murdock,
D. E. Keith,
M. F. Press,
R. A. Larson, and L. M. Souza.
1986.
Studies of the human c-Myb gene and its product in human acute leukemias.
Science
233:347-351[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Strubin, M.,
J. W. Newell, and P. Matthias.
1995.
OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins.
Cell
80:497-506[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Studier, F. W.,
A. H. Rosenberg,
J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff.
1990.
Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes.
Methods Enzymol.
185:60-89[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Tansey, W. P.,
S. Ruppert,
R. Tjian, and W. Herr.
1994.
Multiple regions of TBP participate in the response to transcriptional activators in vivo.
Genes Dev.
8:2756-2769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Tjian, R., and T. Maniatis.
1994.
Transcription activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces.
Cell
77:5-8[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Triezenberg, S. J.
1995.
Structure and function of transcriptional activation domains.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:190-196[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Yoon, J.-B.,
S. Murphy,
L. Bai,
Z. Wang, and R. G. Roeder.
1995.
Proximal sequence element-binding transcription factor (PTF) is a multisubunit complex required for transcription of both RNA polymerase II- and RNA polymerase III-dependent small nuclear RNA genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2019-2027[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Yoon, J.-B., and R. G. Roeder.
1996.
Cloning of two proximal sequence element-binding transcription factor subunits ( and ) that are required for transcription of small nuclear RNA genes by RNA polymerases II and III and interact with the TATA-binding protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1-9[Abstract].
|
Mol Cell Biol, January 1998, p. 368-377, Vol. 18, No. 1
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hung, K.-H., Titus, M., Chiang, S.-C., Stumph, W. E.
(2009). A Map of Drosophila melanogaster Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein Complex (DmSNAPc) Domains Involved in Subunit Assembly and DNA Binding. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 22568-22579
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gu, L., Husain-Ponnampalam, R., Hoffmann-Benning, S., Henry, R. W.
(2007). The Protein Kinase CK2 Phosphorylates SNAP190 to Negatively Regulate SNAPC DNA Binding and Human U6 Transcription by RNA Polymerase III. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 27887-27896
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hernandez, G. Jr, Valafar, F., Stumph, W. E.
(2007). Insect small nuclear RNA gene promoters evolve rapidly yet retain conserved features involved in determining promoter activity and RNA polymerase specificity. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 21-34
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jawdekar, G. W., Hanzlowsky, A., Hovde, S. L., Jelencic, B., Feig, M., Geiger, J. H., Henry, R. W.
(2006). The Unorthodox SNAP50 Zinc Finger Domain Contributes to Cooperative Promoter Recognition by Human SNAPC. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 31050-31060
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rave-Harel, N., Miller, N. L. G., Givens, M. L., Mellon, P. L.
(2005). The Groucho-related Gene Family Regulates the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Gene through Interaction with the Homeodomain Proteins MSX1 and OCT1. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 30975-30983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schimanski, B., Nguyen, T. N., Gunzl, A.
(2005). Characterization of a Multisubunit Transcription Factor Complex Essential for Spliced-Leader RNA Gene Transcription in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 7303-7313
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gu, L., Esselman, W. J., Henry, R. W.
(2005). Cooperation between Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein Complex (SNAPC) and TATA-box-binding Protein Antagonizes Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibition of DNA Binding by SNAPC. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 27697-27704
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gridasova, A. A., Henry, R. W.
(2005). The p53 Tumor Suppressor Protein Represses Human snRNA Gene Transcription by RNA Polymerases II and III Independently of Sequence-Specific DNA Binding. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 3247-3260
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, C., Harding, G. A., Parise, J., McNamara-Schroeder, K. J., Stumph, W. E.
(2004). Architectural Arrangement of Cloned Proximal Sequence Element-Binding Protein Subunits on Drosophila U1 and U6 snRNA Gene Promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 1897-1906
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hinkley, C. S., Hirsch, H. A., Gu, L., LaMere, B., Henry, R. W.
(2003). The Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein 190 Myb DNA Binding Domain Stimulates TATA Box-binding Protein-TATA Box Recognition. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 18649-18657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ma, B., Hernandez, N.
(2002). Redundant Cooperative Interactions for Assembly of a Human U6 Transcription Initiation Complex. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 8067-8078
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hovde, S., Hinkley, C. S., Strong, K., Brooks, A., Gu, L., Henry, R. W., Geiger, J.
(2002). Activator recruitment by the general transcription machinery: X-ray structural analysis of the Oct-1 POU domain/human U1 octamer/SNAP190 peptide ternary complex. Genes Dev.
16: 2772-2777
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schramm, L., Hernandez, N.
(2002). Recruitment of RNA polymerase III to its target promoters. Genes Dev.
16: 2593-2620
[Full Text]
-
Sterner, D. E., Wang, X., Bloom, M. H., Simon, G. M., Berger, S. L.
(2002). The SANT Domain of Ada2 Is Required for Normal Acetylation of Histones by the Yeast SAGA Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 8178-8186
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andersen, B., Rosenfeld, M. G.
(2001). POU Domain Factors in the Neuroendocrine System: Lessons from Developmental Biology Provide Insights into Human Disease. Endocr. Rev.
22: 2-35
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pinson, B., Brendeford, E. M., Gabrielsen, O. S., Daignan-Fornier, B.
(2001). Highly conserved features of DNA binding between two divergent members of the Myb family of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 527-535
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hirsch, H. A., Gu, L., Henry, R. W.
(2000). The Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein Targets Distinct General Transcription Factors To Regulate RNA Polymerase III Gene Expression. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 9182-9191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hardin, S. B., Ortler, C. J., McNamara-Schroeder, K. J., Stumph, W. E.
(2000). Similarities and differences in the conformation of protein-DNA complexes at the U1 and U6 snRNA gene promoters. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 2771-2778
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Röckelein, I., Röhrig, S., Donhauser, R., Eimer, S., Baumeister, R.
(2000). Identification of Amino Acid Residues in the Caenorhabditis elegans POU Protein UNC-86 That Mediate UNC-86-MEC-3-DNA Ternary Complex Formation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 4806-4813
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Paule, M. R., White, R. J.
(2000). SURVEY AND SUMMARY Transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 1283-1298
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Belsham, D. D., Mellon, P. L.
(2000). Transcription Factors Oct-1 and C/EBP{beta} (CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein-{beta}) Are Involved in the Glutamate/Nitric Oxide/cyclic-Guanosine 5'-Monophosphate-Mediated Repression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Gene Expression. Mol. Endocrinol.
14: 212-228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Luo, H., Gilinger, G., Mukherjee, D., Bellofatto, V.
(1999). Transcription Initiation at the TATA-less Spliced Leader RNA Gene Promoter Requires at Least Two DNA-binding Proteins and a Tripartite Architecture That Includes an Initiator Element. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 31947-31954
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ansari, S. A., Safak, M., Gallia, G. L., Sawaya, B. E., Amini, S., Khalili, K.
(1999). Interaction of YB-1 with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat and TAR RNA modulates viral promoter activity. J. Gen. Virol.
80: 2629-2638
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McDonald, W. H., Ohi, R., Smelkova, N., Frendewey, D., Gould, K. L.
(1999). Myb-Related Fission Yeast cdc5p Is a Component of a 40S snRNP-Containing Complex and Is Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 5352-5362
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mittal, V., Ma, B., Hernandez, N.
(1999). SNAPc: a core promoter factor with a built-in DNA-binding damper that is deactivated by the Oct-1 POU domain. Genes Dev.
13: 1807-1821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kakizawa, T., Miyamoto, T., Ichikawa, K., Kaneko, A., Suzuki, S., Hara, M., Nagasawa, T., Takeda, T., Mori, J.-i., Kumagai, M., Hashizume, K.
(1999). Functional Interaction between Oct-1 and Retinoid X Receptor. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 19103-19108
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krapp, A., Strubin, M.
(1999). B-Cell Coactivator OBF-1 Exhibits Unusual Transcriptional Properties and Functions in a DNA-Bound Oct-1-Dependent Fashion. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 4247-4254
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sauter, P., Matthias, P.
(1998). Coactivator OBF-1 Makes Selective Contacts with Both the POU-Specific Domain and the POU Homeodomain and Acts as a Molecular Clamp on DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol.
18: 7397-7409
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ford, E., Strubin, M., Hernandez, N.
(1998). The Oct-1 POU domain activates snRNA gene transcription by contacting a region in the SNAPc largest subunit that bears sequence similarities to the Oct-1 coactivator OBF-1. Genes Dev.
12: 3528-3540
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Henry, R. W., Mittal, V., Ma, B., Kobayashi, R., Hernandez, N.
(1998). SNAP19 mediates the assembly of a functional core promoter complex (SNAPc) shared by RNA polymerases II and III. Genes Dev.
12: 2664-2672
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, T. I., Young, R. A.
(1998). Regulation of gene expression by TBP-associated proteins. Genes Dev.
12: 1398-1408
[Full Text]
-
HENRY, R.W., FORD, E., MITAL, R., MITTAL, V., HERNANDEZ, N.
(1998). Crossing the Line between RNA Polymerases: Transcription of Human snRNA Genes by RNA Polymerases II and III. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
63: 111-120
[Abstract]
-
Ma, B., Hernandez, N.
(2001). A Map of Protein-Protein Contacts within the Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein Complex SNAPc. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 5027-5035
[Abstract]
[Full Text]