Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1998, p. 6430-6435, Vol. 18, No. 11
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Homologous Recombination, but Not DNA Repair, Is
Reduced in Vertebrate Cells Deficient in RAD52
Yuko
Yamaguchi-Iwai,1
Eiichiro
Sonoda,1
Jean-Marie
Buerstedde,2,
Olga
Bezzubova,2,
Ciaran
Morrison,1
Minoru
Takata,1
Akira
Shinohara,3,
and
Shunichi
Takeda1,*
Bayer-chair Department of Molecular
Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University,
Konoe Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501,1
and
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka
University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043,3
Japan, and
Basel Institute for Immunology, CH-4005 Basel,
Switzerland2
Received 30 April 1998/Returned for modification 1 June
1998/Accepted 27 July 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rad52 plays a pivotal role in double-strand break (DSB) repair and
genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where mutation of this gene leads to extreme X-ray sensitivity and defective recombination. Yeast Rad51 and Rad52 interact, as do their human homologues, which stimulates Rad51-mediated DNA strand exchange in
vitro, suggesting that Rad51 and Rad52 act cooperatively. To define the
role of Rad52 in vertebrates, we generated
RAD52
/
mutants of the chicken B-cell line
DT40. Surprisingly, RAD52
/
cells were not
hypersensitive to DNA damages induced by
-irradiation, methyl
methanesulfonate, or cis-platinum(II)diammine
dichloride (cisplatin). Intrachromosomal recombination, measured by
immunoglobulin gene conversion, and radiation-induced Rad51 nuclear
focus formation, which is a putative intermediate step during
recombinational repair, occurred as frequently in
RAD52
/
cells as in wild-type cells.
Targeted integration frequencies, however, were consistently reduced in
RAD52
/
cells, showing a clear role for
Rad52 in genetic recombination. These findings reveal
striking differences between S. cerevisiae and vertebrates
in the functions of RAD51 and RAD52.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The many strategies that have
evolved to deal with DNA damage attest to the vital importance of
chromosomal integrity to all organisms. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) can
lead to immediate cell death if unrepaired or to chromosomal loss or
translocation if not repaired correctly. Aside from environmentally
induced damage, DSBs of genomic DNA are generated during several
biological processes such as meiotic recombination or the development
of the vertebrate immune system. Accordingly, the enzymes and systems
of DSB repair are of great interest in biology.
The RAD52 epistasis group of genes (RAD50,
RAD51, RAD52, RAD54,
RAD55, RAD57, RAD59, MRE11,
and XRS2) has been defined by the respective
Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants, which are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and exhibit mitotic and meiotic
recombination defects. While phenotypic differences between
mutants distinguish between these genes genetically, it is clear that
they are constituents of a pathway for the repair of DSB damage
by homologous recombination (reviewed in references 10,
22, and 27). The high degree of
conservation of the RAD52 group of genes from yeast to
vertebrates (4, 8, 14, 23, 25) suggests a similar role for
these proteins. However, while vertebrate
RAD54
/
cells reflect the yeast phenotype,
namely, extreme sensitivity to
-ray and defective recombination
(5, 9), RAD51 deficiency results in the death of
vertebrate cells, indicating that Rad51 is essential for cell
proliferation (16, 29, 34).
Rad52 mutants show the most pronounced phenotype among
RAD52 epistasis group mutants in S. cerevisiae. Rad52 is essential for an intermediate stage after the
formation of DSBs but before the appearance of stable recombinants
during gene conversion (26). Rad52 is also involved in
single-strand annealing (13) and other RAD51-independent forms of recombination (30),
which may explain the severe phenotype of rad52 mutants.
Recent evidence suggests that both yeast and human Rad52 interact with
the respective Rad51 protein, a structural and functional homologue of
the well-characterized Escherichia coli RecA protein
(25, 26), during recombination (31). This
interaction facilitates the Rad51 strand exchange reaction (3, 21,
28), potentially involving Rad52 binding of DNA (3, 18,
27). To define the role of Rad52 in vertebrate cells, we
generated RAD52
/
clones from the chicken
B-lymphocyte line DT40, which exhibits highly efficient targeted
integration following the transfection of genomic DNA constructs
(7).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid constructs.
The ~11-kb genomic chicken
RAD52 locus was cloned from DT40 genomic DNA by long-range
PCR with the chicken RAD52 cDNA primers 5'-tga aag gca agg
gaa gga cag tga aag cca tg-3' and 5'-gtc tgt cca cat tta gtg ttt att
ctt gtg tt-3' (4), and the positions of the exons and
introns were determined by sequencing (Fig. 1). The Hisr or
Bsrr selection marker genes under the control of the
-actin promoter (7) were inserted between the
left and right arms derived by PCR amplification of this construct. To
make the disruption construct for the rearranged Ig
locus, Ig
-neo, the Neor cassette was inserted
into the BglI site in the C region of the 13-kb
BglII-XbaI fragment from the 18-D-1 clone
(24). The RAD52 expression vector consisted of
the EcoRI-SalI fragment of chicken cDNA
(4) cloned into pApuroII (15).
Cell culture, DNA transfections, and sIgM staining.
The
conditions of cell culture and DNA transfections were described
previously (29). To measure the rate of immunoglobulin (Ig)
gene conversion, cells were subcloned and the percentage of surface
IgM-positive (sIgM+) cells in 45 subclones from each
genotype was measured as described previously (5).
Measurement of Rad51 foci.
Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were
permeabilized with 0.1% Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) and incubated with rabbit
anti-human Rad51 antiserum (33). Staining was visualized
with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG
(Santa Cruz), and the cells were mounted under Slow Fade solution
(Molecular Probes). All the images were taken by confocal microscopy
(MRC-1024; Bio-Rad) and processed with Adobe Photoshop version 4.0J.
Measurement of sensitivity of cells to
-rays, MMS, and
cisplatin.
Serially diluted cells were plated in medium containing
methylcellulose and irradiated with a 137Cs source or
treated with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (Sigma) or
cis-platinum(II)diammine dichloride (cisplatin). Colonies
were counted 10 days after treatment. The percent survival was
determined relative to the number of colonies from untreated cells.
Measurement of targeted integration frequencies.
To analyze
targeted integration events at the
-Actin and
Ovalbumin loci, the disruption construct DNA for either
locus described in reference 7 was transfected into
cells and Southern blot analysis was performed following selection of
clones resistant to the appropriate antibiotic. To analyze targeted
integration events at the rearranged Ig
locus,
sorter-purified sIgM+ cells were transfected with the
rearranged Ig
-neo disruption construct. G418-resistant
cells were selected in bulk populations, and sIgM expression was
measured by flow cytometry (7).
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of RAD52
/
mutants.
Two
RAD52 disruption constructs, RAD52his and
RAD52bsr, were generated from an ~11-kb genomic PCR
product (4). Targeted integration of these constructs was
expected to replace the chicken RAD52 coding sequence
for amino acids 137 to 182 (which lie in the conserved N-terminal
region implicated in DNA binding [18, 19]) with the
selection markers. The disruption of the RAD52 gene in two
independently isolated clones was verified by Southern and
Northern blot analyses (Fig. 1B and C).
These RAD52
/
clones were
indistinguishable from wild-type cells with respect to growth rate and
cloning efficiency (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Strategy of disruption of the RAD52 gene. (A)
Schematic representation of part of the RAD52 locus, the two
gene disruption constructs, and the configuration of the targeted loci.
Solid boxes indicate the positions of exons; numbers show the 3'
nucleotide of each exon relative to the start codon (4).
Relevant EcoRI recognition sites are indicated by RI. (B)
Southern blot analysis of EcoRI-digested DNA from the
indicated genotypes with the probe shown in panel A. The positions and
sizes of the hybridizing fragments of the wild-type and targeted loci
are indicated. (C) Northern blot analysis of total RNA with the
full-length chicken RAD52 cDNA as a probe. The same filter
was rehybridized with a chicken -Actin probe
(7).
|
|
Effects of Rad52 deficiency on sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents,
Rad51 focus formation, and Ig gene conversion.
The repair capacity
of cells defective in RAD52 was analyzed in a colony
survival assay with RAD54
/
cells in parallel
as a control. We examined its sensitivity to ionizing radiation and to
MMS, as well as to a DNA-cross-linking agent, cisplatin. Repair of DNA
lesions induced by cisplatin is known to depend upon both nucleotide
excision repair and recombinatorial repair in yeast (12).
RAD54
/
cells showed increased sensitivity to
ionizing radiation (Fig. 2A) and MMS
(Fig. 2B), as reported previously. Rad54 was also required for the
repair of cisplatin adducts (Fig. 2C), implicating the recombinatorial
repair pathway in the repair of interstrand cross-linking in vertebrate
cells. In marked contrast to rad52 mutants of S. cerevisiae, which are extremely sensitive to DNA-damaging agents,
there was no significant difference between wild-type and
RAD52
/
DT40 clones in sensitivity to
ionizing radiation (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the sensitivity of
RAD52
/
DT40 cells to MMS or to cisplatin was
not significantly increased over those of wild-type
(RAD52+/+) and heterozygous
(RAD52+/
) cells (Fig. 2B and C). These
observations indicate that although the recombinational
repair pathway is involved in DSB repair in vertebrate
cells, it can function in the absence of Rad52.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Sensitivity of the indicated clones to DNA-damaging
agents. The fractions of colonies surviving after the indicated
treatment of cells compared to nontreated controls of the same genotype
are shown on the y axis on a logarithmic scale. (A) Ionizing
radiation; (B) MMS; (C) cisplatin. The radiation doses and the MMS and
cisplatin concentrations are displayed on the x axis on a linear scale
in each graph. Data shown are the means ± standard deviations of
at least three separate experiments.
|
|
To monitor the kinetics of recombinational repair, we analyzed the
appearance of Rad51 foci in cell nuclei over time after
application of

-radiation (Fig.
3).
Since Rad51 polymerizes on
DNA and promotes in vitro strand exchange
(
2,
26), a Rad51
focus may reflect an intermediate structure
of recombinational
repair. The formation of Rad51 foci is observed
during meiosis
in
S. cerevisiae and is abrogated in
rad52 mutants (
10a). Furthermore,
Rad51 foci are
also observed in vertebrate cells during the S
phase (
33),
which implies that Rad51 may be responsible for
repairing spontaneous
DSBs during the cell cycle (
29). Rad51
foci were induced in
DT40 cells by

-irradiation in a dose-dependent
manner (data not
shown), as previously reported for mammalian
cells (
11). We
found no significant difference between
RAD52
/
and wild-type cells with respect to
the number of Rad51 foci
in cycling cells and to the kinetics of Rad51
focus formation
following

-irradiation. This observation, along with
the capacity
of
RAD52
/
cells to withstand

-radiation, indicates that DSB repair occurs
efficiently in the
absence of Rad52.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Immunofluorescent visualization of Rad51. At the time
indicated after 8-Gy -irradiation, wild-type and
RAD52 / cells were analyzed. Controls were
stained with normal rabbit serum followed by FITC-conjugated
anti-rabbit IgG and are overexposed relative to the experimental
frames.
|
|
In a manner similar to the process of B-cell diversification in the
bursa of Fabricius, DT40 continues to diversify its Ig
light
(

)-chain locus by gene conversion, with pseudogenes serving
as
donors (
6). To analyze such intrachromosomal recombination,
RAD52
/
clones were generated from an
sIgM

variant of DT40, clone 18, containing a frameshift
in its rearranged
V segment in the light-chain locus. Since this
frameshift mutation
can be repaired by overlapping gene conversion
events leading
to reexpression of sIgM, the rate of Ig gene conversion
can be
assessed by measuring the percentage of sIgM
+
revertants (
6). We measured the average percentage of
sIgM
+ revertants of 45 subclones each from the wild-type
and the two
RAD52
/
clones and found no
difference between these clones (the reversion
rate was 2.48 × 10
3 for the wild type and 2.40 × 10
3
and 2.89 × 10
3 for the two
RAD52
/
clones, as calculated from the
equation in reference
17).
Reduced targeted integration frequencies in
RAD52
/
cells.
We next examined
targeted integration frequencies at the Ig
,
-Actin, and Ovalbumin loci, comparing
wild-type cells, two RAD52
/
clones,
and two RAD52
/
clones reconstituted with
chicken RAD52 cDNA. To measure targeted integration
frequencies at the Ig
locus, we sorted sIgM+
cells from each of the five clones, transfected them with the Ig
-neo construct (Fig. 4A),
and measured the expression of sIgM in the bulk population of
G418-resistant cells. Since integration of the Ig
-neo
construct at the Ig
locus results in sIgM
cells, the fraction of sIgM
cells among transfectants
reflects the frequency of the targeted integration events at this
locus. Spontaneous reversion caused by Ig gene conversion was
1%.
Representative data are shown in Fig. 4B. While transfection
efficiencies during these experiments were comparable, the averages of
targeted integration frequencies at this locus in triplicate
experiments were consistently lower (ca. threefold) in
RAD52
/
clones than in the wild type. The
expression of RAD52 cDNA restored targeted integration to
wild-type levels in the two RAD52
/
clones
(Table 1). Similarly, the disruption of
RAD52 caused a four- to eightfold reduction of the targeted
integration frequency at the
-Actin locus when a
-Actin targeting construct was used (7). This
frequency was partially restored in a reconstituted clone
(RAD52R-1), which expressed the RAD52 cDNA
transcript at a level ca. 10-fold higher than that in wild-type DT40
cells (data not shown), confirming that Rad52 is involved in the
targeted integration of transfected genomic DNA constructs (Table
1). While RAD52
/
clones showed a marked
reduction in targeted integration frequencies at the
-Actin and Ig
loci, the targeted
integration frequency at the Ovalbumin locus was reduced
only to ~85% of the wild-type levels (with some variation depending
on the construct and locus in question). Taking all loci together,
there is a significant reduction in targeted integration frequency
between wild-type and RAD52
/
clones
(P < 0.05, Dunnett's multicomparison test). This
reduced efficiency of targeted integration events has been also
observed in murine embryonic stem (ES) cells deficient in
RAD52 (24a).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Measurement of targeted integration frequencies at the
Ig locus. (A) Schematic representation of part of the
rearranged Ig locus and the disruption construct
(Ig -neo). V1, first pseudogene; L, leader sequence;
V , variable gene segment; J , joining gene segment; C , constant
gene segment. BglI (BgI), BglII (BgII), and
XbaI (X) restriction sites are indicated. Not all
BglI sites in this region are shown. (B) Histograms of sIgM
expression of wild-type (a and b), RAD52 / (c
and d), and RAD52 cDNA-reconstituted
RAD52 / (RAD52R) (e and f) clones
after no transfection (a) or transfection of Ig -neo and
G418 selection of transfectants of each clone (b to f). The
x and y axes show the fluorescence intensity from
an FITC-conjugated anti-IgM polyclonal antibody on a logarithmic scale
and the cell number on a linear scale in each graph, respectively. The
percentage of cells losing sIgM expression is shown in each panel.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The above data demonstrate that Rad52 is not required for the
repair of induced DSBs, Rad51 focus formation, or intragenic Ig gene
conversion. Similarly, X-ray sensitivity was not increased in
RAD52-deficient ES cells or mutant mice (24a).
These results are perhaps surprising, given the severe phenotype
associated with mutation of the RAD52 gene in S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, while the rad51,
rad52, and rad54 mutants of S. cerevisiae exhibit similar defects in both DNA repair and
recombination, we and other groups have revealed that
RAD51-, RAD52-, and
RAD54-deficient DT40 cells display quite distinct
phenotypes, as do the corresponding murine ES cell mutants (5, 9,
16, 29, 34). A further example of such differences is found in
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, where mutation of the
RAD51 and RAD54 homologues,
rhp51+ and rhp54+, leads
to similar hypersensitivity to radiation and targeted integration
deficiency, whereas deficiency in the RAD52 homologue, rad22+, has a less severe effect
(20).
There are a number of possible explanations for the difference in
phenotypes resulting from the deficiency of RAD52 homologues between S. cerevisiae and vertebrate cells, and these
explanations are not mutually exclusive. There may be as yet
undescribed vertebrate homologues of RAD52, which might
compensate for the absence of Rad52. The recent description of S. cerevisiae RAD59, a homologue of RAD52, and its role in
intrachromosomal recombination (1) suggests that other
vertebrate RAD52 homologues remain to be defined. However,
neither low-stringency Southern hybridization nor PCR with degenerate
primers encompassing the most highly conserved N-terminal region
identified any RAD52 homologue in chicken genomic DNA or
cDNA, respectively. Nevertheless, a complex of Rad55 and Rad57 has been
shown to act similarly to Rad52 in facilitating strand exchange by
Rad51 in the presence of replication protein A in vitro
(32), suggesting that any putative Rad52 homologue which is
responsible for this Rad51-dependent function of Rad52 may be a
functional but not necessarily a structural homologue.
In addition, the precise mechanism for recombinational repair may
differ between vertebrate and yeast species. Accordingly, the relative
contributions of Rad51, Rad52, and Rad54 homologues to recombinational
repair may not be identical, explaining the observed weaker phenotype
of the RAD52-deficient vertebrate cells compared to
RAD51- and RAD54-deficient cells.
RAD52
/
DT40 clones showed a significant
decrease in the frequency of targeted integration at the
Ig
and
-Actin loci while showing normal
sensitivity to
-rays and MMS, in agreement with observations on
RAD52-deficient murine ES cells. DSB repair in DT40 cells
relies on recombinational repair, as shown by the severe effects of
RAD54 deficiency (5). While the absence of such hypersensitivity to DSBs implies a secondary role for Rad52 in recombinational repair, recombination of transfected DNA with genomic
sequences may be a more subtle method to define the involvement of
Rad52 in homologous recombination than is a survival assay. Recent in
vitro studies of strand exchange reactions have indicated that
Rad52 is required during the critical, early steps in genetic recombination (3, 21, 28). Since the DNA structure is known to play a role in determining the genetic requirements for yeast recombination in vivo (30), the in vitro reaction may
reflect the homologous recombination of transfected plasmid DNA
rather than the recombinational repair of chromosomal DNA. Rad52
may facilitate targeted integration by specifically interacting with transfected targeting construct DNA, which might explain the results obtained in the gene-targeting experiments above. Further genetic studies with knockout mouse and DT40 technology may help to clarify the
relationships in the complex mechanism(s) of recombination and
chromosomal maintenance.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We would like to thank T. Shibata (Riken, Wako, Japan), T. Ogawa
(Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan), and A. Pastink (University of
Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands) for critically reading the manuscript;
Y. Kubota (Caltech, Pasadena, Calif.) for statistical analysis; and M. Hashishin, Y. Sato, O. Koga, and M. Hirao for their excellent technical
assistance.
C.M. is the recipient of a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship. The
Bayer-chair of the Department of Molecular Immunology and
Allergology is supported by Bayer Yakuhin, Kyoto, Japan. This work was
supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and
by a grant from The Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and
Pharmaceutical Research. The Basel Institute for Immunology was founded
and is supported by F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bayer-chair
Department of Molecular Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of
Medicine, Kyoto University, Konoe Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. Phone: 81-75-771-8159. Fax: 81-75-771-8184. E-mail:
stakeda{at}mfour.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Present address: Department of Cellular Immunology,
Heinrich-Pette-Institute, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Present address: Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology,
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bai, Y., and L. S. Symington.
1996.
A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
10:2025-2037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Baumann, P.,
F. E. Benson, and S. C. West.
1996.
Human Rad51 protein promotes ATP-dependent homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro.
Cell
87:757-766[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Benson, F. E.,
P. Baumann, and S. C. West.
1998.
Synergistic actions of Rad51 and Rad52 in recombination and DNA repair.
Nature
391:401-404[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bezzubova, O. Y.,
H. Schmidt,
K. Ostermann,
W.-D. Heyer, and J.-M. Buerstedde.
1993.
Identification of a chicken RAD52 homologue suggests conservation of the RAD52 recombination pathway throughout the evolution of higher eukaryotes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:5945-5949[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bezzubova, O. Y.,
A. Silbergleit,
Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai,
S. Takeda, and J.-M. Buerstedde.
1997.
Reduced X-ray resistance and homologous recombination frequencies in a RAD54 / mutant of the chicken DT40 cell line.
Cell
89:185-193[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Buerstedde, J. M.,
C. A. Reynaud,
E. H. Humphries,
W. Olson,
D. L. Ewert, and J. C. Weill.
1990.
Light chain gene conversion continues at high rate in an ALV-induced cell line.
EMBO J.
9:921-927[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Buerstedde, J. M., and S. Takeda.
1991.
Increased ratio of targeted to random integration after transfection of chicken B cell lines.
Cell
67:179-188[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Dolganov, G. M.,
R. S. Maser,
A. Novikov,
L. Tosto,
S. Chong,
D. A. Bressan, and J. H. J. Petrini.
1996.
Human Rad50 is physically associated with human Mre11: identification of a conserved multiprotein complex implicated in recombinational DNA repair.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:4832-4841[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Essers, J.,
R. W. Hendriks,
S. M. A. Swagemakers,
C. Troelstra,
J. de Wit,
D. Bootsma,
J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and R. Kanaar.
1997.
Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination.
Cell
89:195-204[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Game, J. C.
1993.
DNA double-strand breaks and the RAD50-RAD57 genes in Saccharomyces.
Semin. Cancer Biol.
4:73-83[Medline].
|
| 10a.
|
Gasior, S. L.,
A. K. Wong,
Y. Kora,
A. Shinohara, and D. K. Bishop.
1998.
Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with Rad55 and Rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes.
Genes Dev.
12:2208-2221[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Haaf, T.,
E. I. Golub,
G. Reddy,
C. M. Radding, and D. C. Ward.
1995.
Nuclear foci of mammalian Rad51 recombination protein in somatic cells after DNA damage and its localization in synaptonemal complexes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2298-2302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hannan, M. A.,
S. G. Zimmer, and J. Hazle.
1984.
Mechanisms of cisplatin (cis-diamminodichloroplatinum II)-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in yeast.
Mutat. Res.
127:23-30[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Ivanov, E. L.,
N. Sugawara,
J. Fishman-Lobell, and J. E. Haber.
1996.
Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
142:693-704[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Kanaar, R.,
C. Troelstra,
S. M. A. Swagemakers,
J. Essers,
B. Smit,
J.-H. Franssen,
A. Pastink,
O. Bezzubova,
J.-M. Buerstedde,
B. Clever,
W.-D. Heyer, and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers.
1996.
Human and mouse homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 DNA repair gene: evidence for functional conservation.
Curr. Biol.
6:828-838[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Kurosaki, T.,
M. Takata,
Y. Yamanashi,
T. Inazu,
T. Taniguchi,
T. Yamamoto, and H. Yamamura.
1994.
Syk activation by the Src-family tyrosine kinase in the B cell receptor signaling.
J. Exp. Med.
179:1725-1729[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Lim, D.-S., and P. Hasty.
1996.
A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7133-7143[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Luria, S. E., and M. Delbrück.
1943.
Mutation of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance.
Genetics
28:491-511[Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mortensen, U. H.,
C. Bendixen,
I. Sunjevaric, and R. Rothstein.
1996.
DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:10729-10734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Muris, D. F.,
O. Bezzubova,
J.-M. Buerstedde,
K. Vreeken,
A. S. Balajee,
C. J. Osgood,
C. Troelstra,
J. H. Hoeijmakers,
K. Ostermann,
H. Schmidt,
A. T. Natarajan,
J. C. J. Eeken,
P. H. M. Lohman, and A. Pastink.
1994.
Cloning of human and mouse genes homologous to RAD52, a yeast gene involved in DNA repair and recombination.
Mutat. Res.
315:295-305[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Muris, D. F. R.,
K. Vreeken,
H. Schmidt,
K. Ostermann,
B. Clever,
P. H. M. Lohman, and A. Pastink.
1997.
Homologous recombination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: different requirements for the rhp51+, rhp54+, and rad22+ genes.
Curr. Genet.
31:248-254[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
New, J. H.,
T. Sugiyama,
E. Zaitseva, and S. C. Kowalczykowski.
1998.
Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A.
Nature
391:407-410[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Petes, T. D.,
R. E. Malone, and L. S. Symington.
1991.
Recombination in yeast, p. 407-522.
In
J. R. Broach, J. R. Pringle, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces, vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 23.
|
Petrini, J. H. J.,
M. E. Walsh,
C. DiMare,
J. R. Korenberg,
X. N. Chen, and D. T. Weaver.
1995.
Isolation and characterization of the human MRE11 homologue.
Genomics
29:80-86[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Reynaud, C. A.,
V. Anquez,
H. Grimal, and J. C. Weill.
1987.
A hyperconversion mechanism generates the chicken light chain preimmune repertoire.
Cell
48:379-388[Medline].
|
| 24a.
|
Rijkers, T.,
J. Van Den Ouweland,
B. Morolli,
A. G. Rolink,
W. M. Baarends,
P. P. H. Van Sloun,
P. H. M. Lohman, and A. Pastink.
1998.
Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6423-6429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Shinohara, A.,
H. Ogawa,
Y. Matsuda,
N. Ushio,
K. Ikeo, and T. Ogawa.
1993.
Cloning of human, mouse and fission yeast recombination genes homologous to RAD51 and recA.
Nat. Genet.
4:239-243[Medline]. (Erratum, 5:312, 1993.)
|
| 26.
|
Shinohara, A.,
H. Ogawa, and T. Ogawa.
1992.
Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein.
Cell
69:457-470[Medline]. (Erratum, 71:180, 1992.)
|
| 27.
|
Shinohara, A., and T. Ogawa.
1995.
Homologous recombination and the roles of double-strand breaks.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:387-391[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Shinohara, A., and T. Ogawa.
1998.
Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination.
Nature
391:404-407[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Sonoda, E.,
M. S. Sasaki,
J.-M. Buerstedde,
O. Bezzubova,
A. Shinohara,
H. Ogawa,
M. Takata,
Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, and S. Takeda.
1998.
Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death.
EMBO J.
17:598-608[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Sugawara, N.,
E. L. Ivanov,
J. Fishman-Lobell,
B. L. Ray,
X. Wu, and J. E. Haber.
1995.
DNA structure-dependent requirements for yeast RAD genes in gene conversion.
Nature
373:84-86[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sung, P.
1997.
Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:28194-28197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sung, P.
1997.
Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase.
Genes Dev.
11:1111-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Tashiro, S.,
N. Kotomura,
A. Shinohara,
K. Tanaka,
K. Ueda, and N. Kamada.
1996.
S phase specific formation of the human Rad51 protein nuclear foci in lymphocytes.
Oncogene
12:2165-2170[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Tsuzuki, T.,
Y. Fujii,
K. Sakumi,
Y. Tominaga,
K. Nakao,
M. Sekiguchi,
A. Matsushiro,
Y. Yoshimura, and T. Morita.
1996.
Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:6236-6240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1998, p. 6430-6435, Vol. 18, No. 11
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gildemeister, O. S., Sage, J. M., Knight, K. L.
(2009). Cellular Redistribution of Rad51 in Response to DNA Damage: NOVEL ROLE FOR Rad51C. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 31945-31952
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morozumi, Y., Takizawa, Y., Takaku, M., Kurumizaka, H.
(2009). Human PSF binds to RAD51 and modulates its homologous-pairing and strand-exchange activities. Nucleic Acids Res
37: 4296-4307
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takaku, M., Machida, S., Hosoya, N., Nakayama, S., Takizawa, Y., Sakane, I., Shibata, T., Miyagawa, K., Kurumizaka, H.
(2009). Recombination Activator Function of the Novel RAD51- and RAD51B-binding Protein, Human EVL. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 14326-14336
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Urtishak, K. A., Smith, K. D., Chanoux, R. A., Greenberg, R. A., Johnson, F. B., Brown, E. J.
(2009). Timeless Maintains Genomic Stability and Suppresses Sister Chromatid Exchange during Unperturbed DNA Replication. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 8777-8785
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Coic, E., Feldman, T., Landman, A. S., Haber, J. E.
(2008). Mechanisms of Rad52-Independent Spontaneous and UV-Induced Mitotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics
179: 199-211
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wray, J., Liu, J., Nickoloff, J. A., Shen, Z.
(2008). Distinct RAD51 Associations with RAD52 and BCCIP in Response to DNA Damage and Replication Stress. Cancer Res.
68: 2699-2707
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Octobre, G., Lorenz, A., Loidl, J., Kohli, J.
(2008). The Rad52 Homologs Rad22 and Rti1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Are Not Essential for Meiotic Interhomolog Recombination, but Are Required for Meiotic Intrachromosomal Recombination and Mating-Type-Related DNA Repair. Genetics
178: 2399-2412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Otsuki, M., Seki, M., Inoue, E., Yoshimura, A., Kato, G., Yamanouchi, S., Kawabe, Y.-i., Tada, S., Shinohara, A., Komura, J.-i., Ono, T., Takeda, S., Ishii, Y., Enomoto, T.
(2007). Functional interactions between BLM and XRCC3 in the cell. JCB
179: 53-63
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nojima, K., Hochegger, H., Saberi, A., Fukushima, T., Kikuchi, K., Yoshimura, M., Orelli, B. J., Bishop, D. K., Hirano, S., Ohzeki, M., Ishiai, M., Yamamoto, K., Takata, M., Arakawa, H., Buerstedde, J.-M., Yamazoe, M., Kawamoto, T., Araki, K., Takahashi, J. A., Hashimoto, N., Takeda, S., Sonoda, E.
(2005). Multiple Repair Pathways Mediate Tolerance to Chemotherapeutic Cross-linking Agents in Vertebrate Cells. Cancer Res.
65: 11704-11711
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yonetani, Y., Hochegger, H., Sonoda, E., Shinya, S., Yoshikawa, H., Takeda, S., Yamazoe, M.
(2005). Differential and collaborative actions of Rad51 paralog proteins in cellular response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 4544-4552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boeckman, H. J., Trego, K. S., Turchi, J. J.
(2005). Cisplatin Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Ionizing Radiation via Inhibition of Nonhomologous End Joining. Mol Cancer Res
3: 277-285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hatanaka, A., Yamazoe, M., Sale, J. E., Takata, M., Yamamoto, K., Kitao, H., Sonoda, E., Kikuchi, K., Yonetani, Y., Takeda, S.
(2005). Similar Effects of Brca2 Truncation and Rad51 Paralog Deficiency on Immunoglobulin V Gene Diversification in DT40 Cells Support an Early Role for Rad51 Paralogs in Homologous Recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 1124-1134
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, K., Hirano, S., Ishiai, M., Morishima, K., Kitao, H., Namikoshi, K., Kimura, M., Matsushita, N., Arakawa, H., Buerstedde, J.-M., Komatsu, K., Thompson, L. H., Takata, M.
(2005). Fanconi Anemia Protein FANCD2 Promotes Immunoglobulin Gene Conversion and DNA Repair through a Mechanism Related to Homologous Recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 34-43
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Langston, L. D., Symington, L. S.
(2004). Gene targeting in yeast is initiated by two independent strand invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 15392-15397
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Akamatsu, Y., Dziadkowiec, D., Ikeguchi, M., Shinagawa, H., Iwasaki, H.
(2003). Two different Swi5-containing protein complexes are involved in mating-type switching and recombination repair in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 15770-15775
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warren, M., Lord, C. J., Masabanda, J., Griffin, D., Ashworth, A.
(2003). Phenotypic effects of heterozygosity for a BRCA2 mutation. Hum Mol Genet
12: 2645-2656
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Allen, C., Halbrook, J., Nickoloff, J. A.
(2003). Interactive Competition Between Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining. Mol Cancer Res
1: 913-920
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Adachi, N., Suzuki, H., Iiizumi, S., Koyama, H.
(2003). Hypersensitivity of Nonhomologous DNA End-joining Mutants to VP-16 and ICRF-193: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REPAIR OF TOPOISOMERASE II-MEDIATED DNA DAMAGE. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 35897-35902
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rothkamm, K., Kruger, I., Thompson, L. H., Lobrich, M.
(2003). Pathways of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair during the Mammalian Cell Cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 5706-5715
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, K., Ishiai, M., Matsushita, N., Arakawa, H., Lamerdin, J. E., Buerstedde, J.-M., Tanimoto, M., Harada, M., Thompson, L. H., Takata, M.
(2003). Fanconi Anemia FANCG Protein in Mitigating Radiation- and Enzyme-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination in Vertebrate Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 5421-5430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kitao, H., Yuan, Z.-M.
(2002). Regulation of Ionizing Radiation-induced Rad52 Nuclear Foci Formation by c-Abl-mediated Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 48944-48948
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Symington, L. S.
(2002). Role of RAD52 Epistasis Group Genes in Homologous Recombination and Double-Strand Break Repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 630-670
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wei, C., Skopp, R., Takata, M., Takeda, S., Price, C. M.
(2002). Effects of double-strand break repair proteins on vertebrate telomere structure. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 2862-2870
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Allen, C., Kurimasa, A., Brenneman, M. A., Chen, D. J., Nickoloff, J. A.
(2002). DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 3758-3763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van den Bosch, M., Zonneveld, J. B. M., Vreeken, K., de Vries, F. A. T., Lohman, P. H. M., Pastink, A.
(2002). Differential expression and requirements for Schizosaccharomyces pombeRAD52 homologs in DNA repair and recombination. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 1316-1324
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanaka, K., Kagawa, W., Kinebuchi, T., Kurumizaka, H., Miyagawa, K.
(2002). Human Rad54B is a double-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase and has biochemical properties different from its structural homolog in yeast, Tid1/Rdh54. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 1346-1353
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yanez, R. J., Porter, A. C. G.
(2002). Differential effects of Rad52p overexpression on gene targeting and extrachromosomal homologous recombination in a human cell line. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 740-748
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dunstan, H. M., Ludlow, C., Goehle, S., Cronk, M., Szankasi, P., Evans, D. R. H., Simon, J. A., Lamb, J. R.
(2002). Cell-Based Assays for Identification of Novel Double-Strand Break-Inducing Agents. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
94: 88-94
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Davis, A. P., Symington, L. S.
(2001). The Yeast Recombinational Repair Protein Rad59 Interacts With Rad52 and Stimulates Single-Strand Annealing. Genetics
159: 515-525
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsutsui, Y., Khasanov, F. K., Shinagawa, H., Iwasaki, H., Bashkirov, V. I.
(2001). Multiple Interactions Among the Components of the Recombinational DNA Repair System in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics
159: 91-105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lisby, M., Rothstein, R., Mortensen, U. H.
(2001). From the Cover: Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8276-8282
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sonoda, E., Takata, M., Yamashita, Y. M., Morrison, C., Takeda, S.
(2001). Homologous DNA recombination in vertebrate cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8388-8394
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vasquez, K. M., Marburger, K., Intody, Z., Wilson, J. H.
(2001). Manipulating the mammalian genome by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8403-8410
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Masson, J.-Y., Stasiak, A. Z., Stasiak, A., Benson, F. E., West, S. C.
(2001). Complex formation by the human RAD51C and XRCC3 recombination repair proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8440-8446
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kuzminov, A.
(2001). DNA replication meets genetic exchange: Chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8461-8468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rothkamm, K., Kühne, M., Jeggo, P. A., Löbrich, M.
(2001). Radiation-induced Genomic Rearrangements Formed by Nonhomologous End-Joining of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Cancer Res.
61: 3886-3893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Tachiiri, S., Fukushima, T., Sonoda, E., Schild, D., Thompson, L. H., Takeda, S.
(2001). Chromosome Instability and Defective Recombinational Repair in Knockout Mutants of the Five Rad51 Paralogs. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 2858-2866
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Sonoda, E., Fukushima, T., Morrison, C., Albala, J. S., Swagemakers, S. M. A., Kanaar, R., Thompson, L. H., Takeda, S.
(2000). The Rad51 Paralog Rad51B Promotes Homologous Recombinational Repair. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 6476-6482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McHugh, P. J., Sones, W. R., Hartley, J. A.
(2000). Repair of Intermediate Structures Produced at DNA Interstrand Cross-Links in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 3425-3433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, W., Hesabi, B., Babbo, A., Pacione, C., Liu, J., Chen, D. J., Nickoloff, J. A., Shen, Z.
(2000). Regulation of double-strand break-induced mammalian homologous recombination by UBL1, a RAD51-interacting protein. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 1145-1153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takao, N., Mori, R., Kato, H., Shinohara, A., Yamamoto, K.-i.
(2000). c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Is Not Essential for Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Functions in Chromosomal Maintenance. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 725-728
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bai, Y., Davis, A. P., Symington, L. S.
(1999). A Novel Allele of RAD52 That Causes Severe DNA Repair and Recombination Deficiencies Only in the Absence of RAD51 or RAD59. Genetics
153: 1117-1130
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morrison, C., Shinohara, A., Sonoda, E., Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., Takata, M., Weichselbaum, R. R., Takeda, S.
(1999). The Essential Functions of Human Rad51 Are Independent of ATP Hydrolysis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 6891-6897
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bell, D. W., Wahrer, D. C. R., Kang, D. H., MacMahon, M. S., FitzGerald, M. G., Ishioka, C., Isselbacher, K. J., Krainer, M., Haber, D. A.
(1999). Common Nonsense Mutations in RAD52. Cancer Res.
59: 3883-3888
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khasanov, F. K., Savchenko, G. V., Bashkirova, E. V., Korolev, V. G., Heyer, W.-D., Bashkirov, V. I.
(1999). A New Recombinational DNA Repair Gene From Schizosaccharomyces pombe With Homology to Escherichia coli RecA. Genetics
152: 1557-1572
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Paques, F., Haber, J. E.
(1999). Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63: 349-404
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rijkers, T., Van Den Ouweland, J., Morolli, B., Rolink, A. G., Baarends, W. M., Van Sloun, P. P. H., Lohman, P. H. M., Pastink, A.
(1998). Targeted Inactivation of Mouse RAD52 Reduces Homologous Recombination but Not Resistance to Ionizing Radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
18: 6423-6429
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, W. J., Lee, S., Park, M. S., Jang, Y. K., Kim, J. B., Park, S. D.
(2000). Rad22 Protein, a Rad52 Homologue in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Binds to DNA Double-strand Breaks. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 35607-35611
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kagawa, W., Kurumizaka, H., Ikawa, S., Yokoyama, S., Shibata, T.
(2001). Homologous Pairing Promoted by the Human Rad52 Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 35201-35208
[Abstract]
[Full Text]