Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1998, p. 6605-6615, Vol. 18, No. 11
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Regulation of Exit from Quiescence by p27 and
Cyclin D1-CDK4
Mohamed H.
Ladha,
Kwang Y.
Lee,
Todd M.
Upton,
Michael F.
Reed,
and
Mark E.
Ewen*
The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received 30 April 1998/Returned for modification 17 June
1998/Accepted 18 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The synthesis of cyclin D1 and its assembly with cyclin-dependent
kinase 4 (CDK4) to form an active complex is a rate-limiting step in
progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Using an activated allele of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1), we show that this kinase plays a significant role in positively
regulating the expression of cyclin D1. This was found both in
quiescent serum-starved cells and in cells expressing dominant-negative
Ras. Despite the observation that cyclin D1 is a target of MEK1, in
cycling cells, activated MEK1, but not cyclin D1, is capable of
overcoming a G1 arrest induced by Ras inactivation. Either
wild-type or catalytically inactive CDK4 cooperates with cyclin D1 in
reversing the G1 arrest induced by inhibition of Ras
activity. In quiescent NIH 3T3 cells expressing either ectopic cyclin
D1 or activated MEK1, cyclin D1 is able to efficiently associate with
CDK4; however, the complex is inactive. A significant percentage of the
cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes are associated with p27 in serum-starved
activated MEK1 or cyclin D1 cell lines. Reduction of p27 levels by
expression of antisense p27 allows for S-phase entry from quiescence in
NIH 3T3 cells expressing ectopic cyclin D1, but not in parental cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Both positive and negative
extracellular growth factors exert their influence upon proliferation
during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. At a point in late
G1, termed the restriction point (R), cells become largely
refractory to these factors and once past R are committed to completing
the mitotic cycle (62, 87, 97). The action of serum growth
factors is mediated, in part, through their activation of receptor
tyrosine kinases. Ras, an inner plasma membrane-bound GTPase, plays a
significant role in receiving and transducing extracellular signals by
functioning as a downstream mediator of several membrane-bound receptor
and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (5, 45, 46, 69). Ras
influences, and is required for, both the G0/G1
transition and passage through G1 to a point temporally
coincident with the restriction point. In certain situations, Ras has
been shown to be sufficient for progression from G0 to S
phase, as demonstrated by the ability of microinjected activated or
wild-type Ras to induce DNA synthesis from quiescence in the absence of
serum factors (19, 84). Furthermore, microinjection of
murine fibroblasts with anti-Ras neutralizing antibodies prevents
efficient serum-induced S-phase entry from a G0 state
(16, 52), and expression of a dominant-negative Ras protein
(RasN17) inhibits the proliferation of NIH 3T3 and 32D
myeloid cells, resulting in a G1 arrest (8, 18,
59).
In terms of nuclear events influencing progression through the
G1 phase of the cell cycle, a key role is played by
G1 cyclins and their catalytic subunits, the
cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The three D-type cyclins associate
with and activate CDK4 and CDK6. Cyclin E is required for the
activation of CDK2. The synthesis of D-type cyclins, whose expression
is rate limiting for G1 progression, is regulated by
various mitogens (79, 80). The assembly of D cyclins with
their catalytic partners is also a mitogen-regulated process occurring
in early to mid-G1 (48, 49). Cyclin D-CDK4/CDK6 complexes promote G1 progression, at least in part, by
phosphorylating the retinoblastoma protein, Rb, thereby inactivating
its ability to act as a transcriptional repressor in a complex with E2F
(74, 80). In turn, the expression of cyclin E, which is also
rate limiting for G1 progression, is controlled in part by
Rb (22, 26, 57). Cyclin E-CDK2 complexes then participate in
the phosphorylation and inactivation of Rb but are also thought to have
other critical substrates whose phosphorylation is required for DNA
synthesis (11, 34, 44, 58, 71, 78, 98). The phosphorylation of Rb roughly coincides with the passage of cells from serum dependence to serum independence and, like Ras, has been linked to restriction point control (26, 92).
The activity of G1 cyclin-CDK complexes is regulated, in
part, by the CDK inhibitors p21 and p27. These CDK inhibitors can directly inhibit the activity of both cyclin D-CDK4/CDK6 and cyclin E-CDK2 holoenzymes or prevent the activation of these kinases by
cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase (CAK) (28, 32, 66,
82). Indeed, the accumulation of p27 is required for cells to
efficiently exit from the cell cycle and enter a quiescent state
(12, 72). Conversely, p21 and p27 may have a positive role
in G1 progression. p21, and to a lesser extent p27, can
promote the assembly and nuclear localization of cyclin D-CDK4
complexes (35). In many but not all cell systems described
elsewhere, p27 levels are high and p21 levels are low during
quiescence, with mitogenic stimulation leading to a reciprocal
reduction in p27 levels and elevation in p21 levels (21, 24, 39,
55, 56). These observations indicate the physiological importance of the connection between the influence of mitogens on the expression of CDK inhibitors and their actions during G1.
The influence of Ras on G1 progression has recently been
shown to be mediated through direct effects on the cell cycle
machinery. Ras transduces extracellular signals through multiple
downstream pathways, and activation of more than one effector pathway
is required for efficient mitogenesis (27). In this context,
the Ras effector pathway involving the Raf1, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (p42mapk and p44mapk [also known as ERK1 and ERK2, respectively, and hereafter referred to as MAPK]) cascade is best characterized. Each element of
this pathway has been shown to participate in G1
progression (7, 14, 33, 61) and to positively regulate
cyclin D1 expression (2, 20, 25, 36, 40, 94). The importance of this link between Ras and cyclin D1 is highlighted by a number of
observations: (i) the activity of cyclin D1-CDK4 appears to be required
only in cells expressing functional Rb (81); (ii) the
CDK4/CDK6-specific inhibitor p16 inhibits Ras-induced mitogenesis (75); (iii) the expression of dominant-negative Ras can
inhibit the expression of cyclin D1 (2, 65); and (iv)
inactivation of Ras activity leading to a G1 arrest is Rb
dependent (38, 50, 65). In addition, Ras-mediated signaling
has also been suggested to be involved in regulating the expression of
CDK inhibitors. Both Ras-dependent and -independent pathways have been
suggested to have a role in downregulating the expression of p27 during G1 progression (1, 86, 93). With Raf-nuclear
receptor fusions, the acute induction of Raf kinase activity has been
shown to induce the expression of p21 (76, 77, 96).
Here we have reassessed the relative contribution of cyclin D1
expression to Ras-induced G1 progression, with particular
focus on the Raf/MEK/MAPK pathway. This is motivated by a number of observations. Previously, we have shown that expression of cyclin D1
plus CDK4, achieved by transient transfection, can reverse the
G1 cell cycle arrest induced by dominant-negative Ras
(65). This result, together with the observation that the
Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK pathway regulates the expression of cyclin D1, might
be taken to suggest that this cyclin is the sole critical target of Ras during mitogenic stimulation. However, recent findings question the
physiological relevance of such overexpression studies. For example,
although p16 can inhibit Ras-induced mitogenesis, Ras plus Myc can
drive cells from G0 to S phase in the absence of the
activation of cyclin D1-CDK4 and without inducing Rb phosphorylation (38). In addition, microinjection of active cyclin D-CDK4
complexes, or overexpression of cyclin E, can also promote
G1 progression in the absence of Rb phosphorylation
(37, 43). We have thus also addressed the potential
importance of the coordinate regulation of cyclin D1 and p27. This is
motivated by the realization that both downregulation of cyclin D1 and
elevated expression of p27, two events which can be brought about
through the inhibition of Ras activity, are characteristic of quiescent
cells. Together with the finding that p27 can inhibit the activity of,
yet paradoxically possibly promote the assembly of, cyclin D-CDK4, we
have asked whether regulation of the levels of cyclin D1 and p27 is
required to maintain a quiescent state.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and antibodies.
The retroviral plasmid encoding
activated MEK1 (MEK-E217/E221) (14) was kindly provided by
C. Marshall. pCMV5-asp27 (72) for expression of antisense
p27 was kindly provided by N. Rivard and J. Pouysségur.
pMT-RasN17 (and its empty vector counterpart, pMT-
Bam),
pDCR-HRasV12, pCMV-Rb, pRc/CMV-cyclin D1, and pcDNA3-p16
plasmids encoding dominant-negative Ras, oncogenic Ras, Rb, murine
cyclin D1, and p16, respectively, have been described previously
(65). pBABE-puro (51) was kindly provided by J. Morgenstern and H. Land. pCMV-CDK4 (91) encoding human CDK4
was kindly provided by E. Harlow. pRc/CMV-CDK4K35M
(30) encoding inactive murine CDK4 was kindly provided by C. Sherr. pcDNA3-GFP encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) was kindly
provided by P. Silver. Polyclonal antibody to cyclin D1 was from
Upstate Biotechnology Inc. Polyclonal antibody to CDK4 (C-22) was from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Monoclonal antibodies to p27 (catalog no.
K25020) and MEK1 (catalog no. M17020) were from Transduction
Laboratories. Monoclonal antibodies to cyclin D2 (DCS-5.2) and cyclin
D3 (DCS-22) were from NeoMarkers.
Cell lines.
NIH 3T3 derivatives expressing activated MEK1
(MEK1-E217/E221, MEK-EE) were made with retroviral supernatants
prepared from the packaging cell line Bosc23 (64)
transfected with pBABE-puro-MEK-EE or pBABE-puro (control). Pooled
populations of infected NIH 3T3 cells were generated by selection in
puromycin (2 µg/ml; Sigma) for 4 to 6 days. Cyclin D1 derivatives of
NIH 3T3 cells and the parental line (70) were kindly
provided by M. Roussel and C. Sherr. NIH 3T3 cells and their
derivatives were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 5% bovine calf serum (BCS; HyClone), glutamine,
penicillin, and streptomycin. Cell lines were rendered quiescent by
culture in DMEM-0.25% BCS for 96 h. Rb
/
3T3
cells were maintained as described previously (65).
Immunoprecipitations and Western blot analysis.
Cells
(2 × 105) were washed twice with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and then lysed in DIP buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.2], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Tween 20 and 1%
Triton X-100 containing 1 mM NaF, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 µg of
aprotinin per ml, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml) for 30 min on ice. The
samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g, and
supernatants were precipitated with appropriate antibodies as indicated
in the figure legends. Immune complexes were collected with protein A-Sepharose beads, then washed three times with DIP buffer containing inhibitors, and then suspended in sample buffer. Boiled samples were
electrophoresed through a sodium dodecyl sulfate-10 or 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel. The gels were then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After the transfer, the
filter was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline
containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST), and the filter was incubated at room
temperature for 60 min with primary antibodies in TBST. After three
washes with TBST, 60 min of incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-mouse or anti-rabbit), and three more washes with TBST, detection was performed with enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham). Signal was detected with XAR5 film
(Kodak).
CDK4 kinase assays.
CDK4 kinase assays were performed as
described elsewhere (48, 54). In time course assays,
aliquots of lysates containing equivalent amounts of total protein, 100 µg, determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad), were used for kinase
assays. Magnetic sorting was performed by transfecting cells with a
plasmid encoding the CD20 surface marker alone with the other indicated
plasmids. Forty-two hours after transfection, cells were trypsinized
and incubated with monoclonal antibody to CD20 as described elsewhere (65), followed by incubation with magnetic beads covalently attached to sheep anti-mouse immunoglobulin G antibody (Dynabeads; Dynal, Inc.). The CD20-positive transfected cells were then
magnetically separated from the untransfected cell population. The
sorted cells were then used to perform CDK4 kinase assays.
Cell cycle analysis.
Cell cycle phase distribution analysis
of transfected cells was performed as described elsewhere (17,
65). When these assays are performed, titrations with both
RasN17- and p16-encoding plasmids are carried out. The data
shown are for the plasmid concentrations which result in a maximal
increase in the G1 population for a given cell line.
Microinjection.
Microinjection experiments were performed as
described previously (65) with the following modifications.
Cells to be microinjected were plated on coverslips and made quiescent
by serum starvation. The indicated plasmids were injected into the
nuclei of starved cells. Approximately 100 to 150 cells were
microinjected per experiment. To monitor injected cells, a plasmid,
pcDNA3-GFP, encoding GFP was coinjected. At 24 h after injection,
the cells were incubated for 12 to 14 h with 5-bromodeoxyuridine
(BrdU) at 10 µM. Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde-2%
glucose in PBS and then washed with PBS. A PBS solution containing
0.2% Triton X-100 was used to permeabilize the cells. After being
washed, cells were blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100-5% fetal bovine
serum in PBS with subsequent washing in 5 mM MgSO4 in PBS.
Cells were then incubated for 1 h in 5 mM MgSO4 in PBS
containing 100 U of DNase (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml and anti-BrdU
monoclonal antibody (unconjugated; Becton Dickinson) at a 1/10 dilution
in a humidified chamber at room temperature. Cells were then washed in
0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and incubated with rhodamine-conjugated goat
anti-mouse antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) at a
1/200 dilution for 15 min at room temperature. After being washed with
0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, nuclei were stained with DAPI
(4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), washed, and mounted. Cells were
examined by fluorescence microscopy.
 |
RESULTS |
Neither ectopic expression of cyclin D1 nor that of activated MEK1
is sufficient to activate CDK4 in quiescent cells.
NIH 3T3 cells
expressing ectopic cyclin D1 or constitutively active MEK1
(MEK1-E217/E221 [14], hereafter referred to as MEK-EE)
were characterized for the expression of these exogenously expressed
proteins (Fig. 1A). As previously
reported (70), compared to parental NIH 3T3 cells the cyclin
D1 lines expressed approximately five times more cyclin D1 (Fig. 1A;
see also Fig. 5A). MEK-EE was expressed at a level two to three times
that of the endogenous protein. These lines were used to investigate
the early mitogenic activation of cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression of activated MEK1 (MEK-EE) and cyclin D1 in
NIH 3T3 cells. (A) Parental NIH 3T3 cells and their cyclin D1 and
MEK-EE derivatives were rendered quiescent by serum starvation or
maintained in a cycling asynchronous state. Under these two conditions,
the levels of endogenous and exogenous MEK1, cyclin D1, and CDK4 were
determined by Western blot analysis of whole-cell lysates. (B) Same as
panel A, except that the cell cycle distribution of the cells was
monitored by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. (C) Lysates
were prepared from serum-starved and asynchronous cultures of parental
NIH 3T3 cells and the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE derivatives.
Immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibody to CDK4 were performed. Immune
complexes were assayed for CDK4-associated kinase activity with
recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Rb as
substrate. NRS, normal rabbit serum.
|
|
The parental, cyclin D1, and MEK-EE lines were rendered quiescent by
serum starvation for a period of 96 h. The increase in
the
G
0/G
1 population (50%), under these
conditions, was approximately
the same for the MEK-EE and parental
lines (Fig.
1B). By comparison,
the cyclin D1 line did not arrest quite
as efficiently (40% increase
in G
0/G
1) as the
other lines under these conditions. Cyclin D1
was undetectable in the
parental line. By contrast, a significant
amount of cyclin D1 was
detected in the MEK-EE line, consistent
with the role of the
Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK pathway in the positive
regulation of cyclin D1
synthesis. The levels of cyclin D1 in
the starved MEK-EE lines were
comparable to that found in an asynchronous
culture of parental or
MEK-EE cycling cells (Fig.
1A). The levels
of CDK4 were similar in both
starved and asynchronous cultures
in each of the lines.
To begin to understand why both the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines could be
arrested in G
0/early G
1 by serum withdrawal,
the ability
of CDK4 to support kinase activity under these conditions
was
determined. In serum-starved cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines, CDK4
immune complexes did not show associated kinase activity against
a
recombinant Rb substrate (Fig.
1C). Thus, despite the continued
expression of cyclin D1, CDK4 was inactive. These results provide
a
possible explanation for why neither the ectopic expression
of
activated MEK1 nor that of cyclin D1 is sufficient to efficiently
drive
NIH 3T3 cells from a quiescent state into S phase.
Expression of activated MEK1 or cyclin D1 and CDK4, but not cyclin
D1 alone, can overcome G1 arrest induced by
dominant-negative Ras.
In cells stimulated out of a quiescent
state, either serum withdrawal or inhibition of Ras activity in the
presence of serum, prior to the restriction point, prevents S-phase
entry. Likewise, in an asynchronous population Ras inhibition leads to
a G1 arrest. Given that neither the serum-starved cyclin D1
line nor the MEK-EE line showed detectable amounts of CDK4 activity, a
characteristic of mid- to late G1 cells, they have likely
not progressed beyond the G0/G1 transition
under these conditions. This motivated us to next determine if ectopic
expression of cyclin D1 or MEK-EE has similar effects on the cell cycle
in an asynchronous population of cycling cells with respect to
Ras-mediated signaling. Specifically, we compared the effects of serum
withdrawal (noted above) and inhibition of Ras activity. We also
reinvestigated the requirements of cyclin D1 and CDK4 with respect to
their participation in the override of a G1 arrest induced
by the expression of dominant-negative Ras.
We have previously demonstrated that expression of dominant-negative
Ras, Ras
N17, results in an Rb-dependent G
1
arrest that is mediated, at least
in part, by the downregulation of
cyclin D1 expression (
65).
This mutant of Ras has a
preferential affinity for GDP and is
thought to function by
sequestering guanine nucleotide exchange
factors, thereby inhibiting
endogenous Ras (
8,
18,
83,
85), and blocking the activation
of MAPKs in response to receptor
tyrosine kinases (
15,
73,
89,
95). Furthermore, we had
shown that transient transfection of
both cyclin D1 and CDK4 could
override a G
1 arrest caused
by inhibition of Ras activity (
65).
Given that transient
overexpression studies can sometimes lead
to aphysiological results, we
determined whether stable expression
of cyclin D1 could override a
G
1 arrest induced by Ras
N17 and whether there
was a requirement for the coexpression of CDK4.
This would also allow
us to more accurately compare the outcomes
when analyzing the cyclin D1
and MEK-EE lines, which, as opposed
to transient transfection of cyclin
D1, express roughly the same
amount of cyclin D1.
Either stable or transient expression of cyclin D1 alone only partially
overrode a G
1 arrest induced by Ras
N17 (Fig.
2A), by the same experimental approach we
had previously
employed (
65). Ectopic expression of CDK4
caused a significant
reversal in the G
1 arrest induced by
dominant-negative Ras in
the cyclin D1 lines but not in the parental
line, consistent with
our previous results. Given that the expression
of cyclin D1 and
not that of CDK4 is thought to be rate limiting for
G
1 progression
and that the expression of the former but
not of the latter is
inhibited by expression of Ras
N17, we
also investigated the requirement for CDK4 activity in these
override
experiments. Expression of a catalytically inactive allele
of CDK4,
CDK4
K35M (
30), also allowed the cyclin D1 line,
but not parental NIH
3T3 cells, to override the
Ras
N17-induced G
1 arrest (Fig.
2A). Thus,
expression of cyclin D1 alone
is not sufficient to override a cell
cycle arrest mediated by
the inhibition of Ras activity. That there is
a requirement for
either wild-type or catalytically inactive CDK4
suggests the possibility
that titration of CDK inhibitors, an
established function of cyclin
D-CDK4 complexes (
10,
66),
participates in the override.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Relative ability of stable expression of cyclin D1 or
MEK-EE to reverse the cell cycle arrest induced by RasN17.
(A) The indicated cell lines were transfected with pMT- Bam (control
plasmid; similar results were obtained with pcDNA3 and pCMV),
pMT-RasN17, pCMV-CDK4, pRc/CMV-CDK4K35M
(catalytically inactive CDK4), or pcDNA3-p16 together with a plasmid
encoding the CD20 cell surface marker. The transfected population was
identified by staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
anti-CD20 antibody, and DNA content (2N, 4N) was monitored by staining
with propidium iodide. The cell cycle distribution of the transfected
population was determined by two-color flow cytometry. The cells were
cultured in DMEM-5% BCS throughout the experiment. The absolute
changes in the percentages of cells in G1 compared to
control transfections are shown with the mean standard error from at
least three independent experiments. In control transfected cultures,
the G1 population was approximately 40%. WT, wild type.
(B) Same as panel A except that Rb / 3T3 cells, cultured
in DMEM-10% fetal bovine serum, were used. The expression plasmid for
Rb was pCMV-Rb. The absolute changes in the percentages of cells in
G1 compared to control transfections are shown with the
mean standard error from at least three independent experiments.
|
|
The findings noted above differ from an Rb-mediated G
1
arrest in Rb-deficient fibroblasts. Here ectopic expression of cyclin
D1 alone was sufficient to significantly reverse the cell cycle
block
induced by Rb (Fig.
2B). Together with our previous results,
these new
data suggest that, though a G
1 arrest caused by Ras
inactivation is Rb dependent, there are different requirements
with
respect to cyclin D1 and CDK4 in reversing an Rb- versus
a
Ras
N17-induced G
1 arrest.
In contrast to the cyclin D1 lines, the MEK-EE lines efficiently
reversed a G
1 arrest induced by expression of
Ras
N17. Similar results were obtained by transient
transfection of plasmids
encoding MEK-EE and Ras
N17 (data
not shown). Since the levels of cyclin D1 in both starved
and
asynchronous MEK-EE cells did not exceed those observed in
the cyclin
D1 line, the result cannot be entirely attributable
to MEK1-mediated
regulation of cyclin D1, and additional events
play a significant role
in the ability of MEK-EE to reverse the
G
1 arrest induced
by dominant-negative Ras. Together with the
results noted above, these
data suggest that ectopic expression
of cyclin D1 and that of MEK-EE
have different cellular responses
to serum withdrawal and Ras
inactivation.
To begin to understand the different abilities of ectopic cyclin D1 and
MEK-EE to override a G
1 arrest induced by
Ras
N17, we analyzed its effect on CDK4 activity in the
various cell
lines. Consistent with the notion that a
Ras
N17-induced G
1 arrest is caused in part by
inhibition of cyclin D1
expression, the expression of
Ras
N17 in cycling NIH 3T3 cells resulted in an inhibition
of CDK4 kinase
activity (Fig.
3A). This
was determined by analyzing the transfected
subpopulation after
magnetic sorting. The degree of inhibition
was greater than 50%
compared to approximately 75% for p16-transfected
cells. The
difference may be in part to due to our observations
that the
Ras
N17 expression specifically inhibits the expression of
cyclin D1
but does not affect the synthesis of cyclin D2 and cyclin D3
(Fig.
3B). With the available antibodies, we have not been able to
accurately
assess whether the above-noted difference in CDK4 activity
is
due to cyclin D2- and cyclin D3-associated kinase activity.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of RasN17 expression on CDK4 activity
and D cyclin levels. (A) NIH 3T3 cells, cultured in DMEM-5% BCS, were
transfected with plasmids encoding the indicated proteins or vector
alone together with a plasmid encoding the surface marker CD20.
Forty-two hours later, transfected cells were isolated by magnetic
sorting with Dynabeads (see Materials and Methods). Extracts were
prepared, normalized for protein content, and subjected to
immunoprecipitation for CDK4. CDK4-associated kinase was measured by
using glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Rb as a substrate. In
lane 1, control normal rabbit serum was used. Lane 2 is the control
(pMT- Bam, vector-alone transfection; the same results were obtained
when pcDNA3 was used as the vector control) set to 100% kinase
activity. The bar graph represents the relative kinase activity with
the mean standard error from at least three independent experiments. A
representative autoradiogram is shown. (B) Same as panel A except that
cell extracts were used for Western blot analysis for cyclin D1, cyclin
D2, cyclin D3, and CDK4. Indicated proteins were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence.
|
|
Expression of MEK-EE largely prevented the downregulation of cyclin D1
and the inhibition of CDK4 kinase activity caused by
expression of
Ras
N17 (Fig.
4). Transient
transfection of plasmids encoding activated
Ras, Ras
V12
(
5), or MEK-EE was also able to prevent the inhibition of
CDK4 kinase activity caused by expression of Ras
N17 (Fig.
3
and data not shown). By contrast, in the cyclin D1 line,
CDK4 activity
was inhibited to a similar degree as that found
for the parental NIH
3T3 line (Fig.
4A). Thus, the relative ability
of ectopic cyclin D1 and
MEK-EE to override a Ras
N17-induced G
1 arrest
correlates, to a significant extent, with their
ability to prevent the
inhibition of CDK4 activity following Ras
inactivation.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The effect of activated MEK1 on CDK4 activity and cyclin
D1 levels in cells transiently expressing RasN17. (A) NIH
3T3 cells expressing ectopic cyclin D1 or MEK-EE or cells infected with
control virus were transiently transfected with control plasmid
(pMT- Bam), pMT-RasN17, or pcDNA3-p16. The transfected
population, cultured in DMEM-5% BCS, was magnetically sorted, and
CDK4 kinase assays were performed as described for Fig. 3B. Kinase
activity for vector control transfections was set to 100% as
indicated. The bar graph represents the relative kinase activity with
the mean standard error from at least three independent experiments. A
representative autoradiogram is shown. GST, glutathione
S-transferase. (B) Same as panel A except that cell lysates
were used to assess the relative amounts of cyclin D1 protein present
as a function of RasN17 expression by Western blot
analysis.
|
|
Cyclin D1 and CDK4 complex formation in cell lines that
constitutively express cyclin D1 during G1
progression.
The above results suggest that cyclin D1 and
activated MEK1 differ in their abilities to overcome Ras inactivation
in cycling cells, while both the cyclin D1 and activated MEK1 lines
responded similarly to serum deprivation and subsequently to
quiescence; both lines could be arrested in
G0/G1 with CDK4 inactive. As a first step in
determining why CDK4 might be inactive in the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE
lines, we assayed the ability of cyclin D1 and CDK4 to form complexes
in serum-starved cells. Cyclin D1 immunoprecipitates were found to
contain CDK4, and conversely, CDK4 immune complexes were found to
contain cyclin D1. The degree to which complexes between cyclin D1 and
CDK4 could be detected in serum-starved cells was comparable to that
observed in mid- to late G1 or in cycling cells (Fig.
5). The parental line, used as a control, did not show complex formation between cyclin D1 and CDK4 in starved and early G1 cells, simply due to the lack of cyclin D1
expression under these conditions. Cyclin D1 was detected at 6 to
9 h after serum stimulation of quiescent parental NIH 3T3 cells.
At this time in mid- to late G1, complexes could be
detected between cyclin D1 and CDK4 (Fig. 5) (48),
commensurate with the appearance of kinase activity (see below)
(48). The results suggest that the inability to detect
CDK4-associated kinase activity in starved cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines
was not due to the inability of cyclin D1 to associate with CDK4.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Association between cyclin D1 and CDK4. (A) Parental NIH
3T3 cells and their MEK-EE and cyclin D1 derivatives were rendered
quiescent by serum starvation. Cells were then restimulated by serum
addition. At the indicated times, lysates were prepared and
immunoprecipitations (IP) for cyclin D1 were performed. Immune
complexes were resolved in a denaturing gel, and Western blot analysis
was performed for cyclin D1. Lysates prepared from cycling asynchronous
cultures (designated A) were also analyzed. (B) Same as panel A except
that CDK4 was analyzed. (C and D) Same as above except that CDK4
immunoprecipitates were analyzed for associated cyclin D1 and cyclin D1
immunoprecipitates were analyzed for associated CDK4. The experiments
performed for each of the blots shown in panels A, B, C, and D were
performed in parallel. Indicated proteins were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence, and the exposure time in each of the panels is the
same; thus, the relative amounts of cyclin D1 associated with CDK4 and
vice versa can be compared. The results are representative of at least
five independent experiments.
|
|
We also measured CDK4-associated kinase activity during G
1
following serum stimulation. In parental NIH 3T3 cells, CDK4 activity
was first detected at 9 h after stimulation at the time when
complexes
between cyclin D1 could be detected (Fig.
5 and
6). The cyclin
D1 and MEK-EE lines
reproducibly displayed CDK4 activity at 9
and 4 h poststimulation,
respectively (Fig.
6).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
CDK4 kinase activity during G1. Parental NIH
3T3 cells and their MEK-EE and cyclin D1 derivatives were rendered
quiescent by serum starvation. Cells were stimulated to reenter the
cell cycle by serum addition. At the indicated times, lysates were
prepared and normalized for protein content, and immunoprecipitations
for CDK4 were performed. Immune complexes were then assayed for
CDK4-associated kinase activity with glutathione
S-transferase-Rb as substrate. Cycling asynchronous
cultures (designated A) were also assayed. Control immunoprecipitations
from asynchronous cultures with normal rabbit serum (N) are shown. The
results are representative of at least three independent experiments.
|
|
p27 is bound to inactive CDK4 in quiescent cyclin D1 and MEK-EE
lines.
We next sought to determine why CDK4 was inactive in the
serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells expressing cyclin D1 and MEK-EE. Three possibilities were considered. First, under conditions of serum starvation, CDK4 might be rendered inactive due to tyrosine
phosphorylation at position 17 (88). Second, cyclin D1 when
expressed in serum-starved cells might fail to localize to the nucleus.
In some cell systems, cyclin D1 has been reported to be localized to
the cytoplasm in starved cells (4). Third, one or more CDK
inhibitors might be responsible for maintaining cyclin D1-CDK4 in an
inactive state. In terms of the first possibility, we were unable to
detect the presence of tyrosine phosphate in CDK4 either in the
parental NIH 3T3 cells or in the cyclin D1 or MEK-EE derivatives, with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. Similarly, we did not detect significant amounts of cyclin D1 in the cytoplasm of starved cyclin D1
or MEK-EE lines by indirect immunofluorescence.
We next investigated the possibility that CDK inhibitors might be
involved in the inhibition of CDK4 in the cyclin D1 and
MEK-EE lines
under conditions of serum starvation. The CDK inhibitor
p27 is present
at comparatively high levels in starved cells,
and the levels
decrease upon mitogenic stimulation (
56,
82).
p27 has
the ability to inhibit active cyclin D-CDK4 complexes
(
67,
90). In addition, an approximately twofold elevation
in p27
levels has been reported to inhibit CAK-dependent activation
of CDK4 in
murine macrophages (
28). CAK is active in serum-starved
cells (
29,
47); thus, p27 association with cyclin D1-CDK4
complexes might prevent the access of CAK to CDK4. Together, these
observations suggested that p27 might participate in the inhibition
of
CDK4 in starved cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines.
In the parental line, the levels of p27 were found to be highest in
starved cells and decreased during passage through G
1 (Fig.
7A). In the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines,
the levels of p27
were approximately twofold higher than that in the
parental line,
as determined by densitometric scanning, under
conditions of serum
starvation. For these lines, the levels of p27
decreased during
G
1 progression, although not as
dramatically as in the parental
cells (Fig.
7A).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Association of p27 with cyclin D1 and CDK4. (A) Parental
NIH 3T3 cells and their MEK-EE and cyclin D1 derivatives were rendered
quiescent by serum starvation. Cells were then restimulated by serum
addition. At the indicated times, lysates were prepared and
immunoprecipitations (IP) for p27 were performed. Immune complexes were
resolved in a denaturing gel, and Western blot analysis was performed
for p27. Lysates prepared from cycling asynchronous cultures
(designated A) were also analyzed. (B, C, D, and E) Same as panel A
except that antibodies used for immunoprecipitation and Western blot
analysis (Blot) were as indicated. The experiments for each of the
blots shown in panels A, B, C, D, and E were performed in parallel.
Indicated proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence, and the
exposure time in each of the panels is the same; thus, a comparison of
the relative amounts of p27 associated with cyclin D1 and CDK4 can be
made. The results are representative of at least five independent
experiments.
|
|
We next determined to what extent cyclin D1 and CDK4 could be found
associated with p27 in NIH 3T3 cells and their cyclin
D1 and MEK-EE
derivatives. In both the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines,
a significant
proportion of the detectable cyclin D1 and CDK4
was found associated
with p27 under conditions of serum starvation
(Fig.
7B, C, D, and E).
The blots shown in Fig.
7 were from the
same lysates used in Fig.
5;
thus, a comparison of the relative
amounts of total cyclin D1 and CDK4
associated with p27 can be
made. By contrast, in starved parental NIH
3T3 cells, low levels
of CDK4 could be found associated with p27 (Fig.
7D and E). The
results are consistent with the observation that cyclin
D1 and
CDK4 can independently associate with p27 in vitro
(
90). The
results shown here suggest that cyclin D1-CDK4
complexes have
a higher affinity for p27 than do the monomeric
subunits, consistent
with the observation made with p21 (
9).
Thus, ectopic expression
of cyclin D1 in quiescent cells results in a
significant proportion
of p27 being bound to CDK4 in comparison to the
parental line.
When the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines were released from a
G
0/G
1 state by serum addition, the amount of
p27 found associated
with cyclin D1 and CDK4 decreased, despite the
relatively high
levels of p27 in these lines (Fig.
7). In the cyclin D1
line,
the increase in CDK4 kinase activity accompanies a reduction in
p27 binding to cyclin D1 (compare Fig.
6 and
7B). By contrast,
in the
parental NIH 3T3 cells, a significant amount of p27 was
found
associated with cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes in late G
1,
coincident
with the formation of cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes and their
activation
(Fig.
5 and
6). In Fig.
7, in comparing panels B and C, it
is
noteworthy that reciprocal immunoprecipitations with cyclin D1
and
p27 show differing amounts of coprecipitating protein, i.e.,
in early
G
1, more p27 precipitates with cyclin D1 in the MEK-EE
lines than in the cyclin D1 lines but comparable amounts of cyclin
D1
precipitated with p27 in both lines. Similar observations were
noted in
comparing panels D and E (Fig.
7). This likely reflects
the differing
abilities of the antibodies employed to detect pairwise
interactions
between the proteins. However, over a time course
the trends in the
relative amounts of associated protein are similar
in the interactions
measured. Given these observations, it is
difficult to firmly establish
a causal relationship between the
relative amounts of p27 associated
with cyclin D1 and CDK4 and
the activation of CDK4 in the cyclin D1 and
MEK-EE lines.
Antisense p27 cooperates with ectopic cyclin D1 to promote
progression from quiescence to S phase.
The above results suggest
the possibility that increased expression of p27 found in serum-starved
cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines may be responsible for the lack of
detectable CDK4-associated kinase activity under these conditions.
Theoretically, lowering p27 levels might lead to the activation of
cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes. To test this possibility indirectly, we
determined whether microinjection of a plasmid expressing antisense p27
into the cyclin D1 lines, and two clonal derivatives, would allow these
cells to progress through G1 and enter S phase.
The p27 plasmid construct used in these studies has previously been
shown to significantly reduce the levels of p27 in transfected
cells
(
72). DNA replication was monitored by incorporation of
BrdU. The MEK-EE lines failed to adhere sufficiently well to the
coverslips to be microinjected; thus, only the cyclin D1 and parental
lines were used. Microinjection of antisense p27 plasmid led to
a
significant increase in DNA synthesis in NIH 3T3 cells expressing
exogenous cyclin D1 but not in the parental NIH 3T3 cells (Fig.
8).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Effect of microinjection of antisense p27-encoding
plasmid into quiescent cells on S-phase entry. (A) Vector plasmids,
pcDNA3 and pCMV, or plasmids encoding either antisense p27
(pCMV5-asp27) or CDK4 (pCMV-CDK4 together with a plasmid encoding GFP
[pcDNA3-GFP]) were microinjected into serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells
(Parental) or their cyclin D1 derivative. BrdU was added to the
cultures, and cells were subsequently stained for incorporated BrdU as
described in Materials and Methods. The percentages of nuclei staining
positive for both BrdU and GFP are shown (filled bars). Also shown is
the percent BrdU incorporation for uninjected cells (open bars). Shown
are the means plus standard errors for three independent experiments.
(B) Same as panel A except that two clonal derivatives of the NIH
3T3-cyclin D1 lines, A2 and C3, were used. The results are for one
experiment.
|
|
The above results suggest that inhibition of p27 synthesis in quiescent
cells, containing assembled but inactive cyclin D1-CDK4
complexes,
facilitates DNA replication. These observations prompted
us to
determine if enforced expression of CDK4 might allow the
cyclin D1 NIH
3T3 derivatives to proceed from quiescence to S
phase in the absence of
added serum. In this setting, CDK4 would
be predicted to titrate p27,
thereby allowing cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes
to become active. Indeed,
microinjection of a plasmid encoding
CDK4 into serum-starved cyclin D1
lines, but not the parental
NIH 3T3 cells, resulted in a significant
induction of DNA synthesis
(Fig.
8A).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Progression from G0 through G1 and into S
phase is thought to require the integration of extracellular signals
that coordinately regulate the cell cycle machinery. Two major pathways
identified that participate in this process are the assembly and
activation of cyclin D-dependent kinase, and the Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK
kinase cascade. The data presented by our group and by others suggest that these pathways are, in part, linked in that cyclin D1 expression is a downstream effect of MEK1 activation. The expression of the CDK
inhibitor p27 is also regulated by extracellular signaling. p27 plays a
critical role in entrance into G0, and the data presented here suggest that p27 has a role in maintaining a G0 state.
Furthermore, our data suggest that elevated expression of cyclin D1 and
reduced expression of p27 may cooperate to deregulate the
G0/G1 transition. Activating mutations in Ras,
amplification or overexpression of cyclin D1, and low levels of p27 are
found in a significant percentage of human cancers (6, 23, 41,
68). These data are consistent with the observation that
deregulation of the signal transduction pathways that control
progression through G1 is a major target in the development
of cancer (63).
We show here that ectopic expression of cyclin D1 alone is insufficient
to override a G1 arrest induced by expression of
dominant-negative Ras in cycling cells in the presence of serum.
Wild-type or catalytically inactive CDK4 is able to cooperate with
cyclin D1 to reverse the arrest caused by RasN17
expression. In contrast, cyclin D1 alone can override the
G1 arrest induced by Rb. Rb accumulates in its
unphosphorylated growth-suppressive form when reintroduced into
Rb-negative cells, and ectopic expression of cyclin D1 alone can
reverse this effect (data not shown). Likewise, we and others had
previously shown that expression of RasN17 also results in
the accumulation of unphosphorylated Rb (38, 65). Together,
these results suggest that ectopic expression of cyclin D1 can promote
the activation of CDK4 in the setting of Rb overexpression in
Rb-negative cells but not in cells expressing dominant-negative Ras.
Indeed, RasN17 expression in the cyclin D1 derivatives of
NIH 3T3 cells results in a significant inhibition of CDK4 activity
(Fig. 3). These results suggest that the Ras inactivation brings about
other events in addition to the inhibition of cyclin D1 synthesis. Our
observation that catalytically inactive CDK4 can cooperate with cyclin
D1 to reverse the G1 arrest brought about by Ras
inactivation suggests that one or more CDK inhibitors may be involved.
Thus far, we have not been able to demonstrate that the inhibition of
CDK4 in the cyclin D1 lines is caused by p27 due to our inability to accurately assess the degree to which this or other CDK inhibitors are
associated with CDK4 in transfected and sorted cells. Consistent with
the idea that CDK inhibitors are involved is the observation that
expression of RasN17 in NIH 3T3 cells during mitogenic
stimulation out of a quiescent state prevents the downregulation of p27
normally seen during G1 (1, 86).
In contrast to ectopic cyclin D1, expression of an activated form of
MEK1 effectively overcame the G1 arrest induced by
inactivation of Ras (Fig. 2). Our data suggest that MEK-EE overrides a
G1 arrest induced by expression of RasN17 in
part by positively regulating cyclin D1 expression (Fig. 4) but also
through another pathway(s) that remains to be identified. It has been
shown that p27 can be phosphorylated in vitro by MAPK and that this
phosphorylation event may play a role in p27 degradation and/or
regulate its ability to bind CDK2 (3, 31). These data are
consistent with our interpretation that catalytically inactive CDK4
cooperates with cyclin D1 to override a G1 arrest induced by Ras inactivation by titrating CDK inhibitors. Furthermore, the data
support our finding that CDK4 is activated earlier after mitogenic
stimulation in the MEK-EE lines than in the cyclin D1 lines, although
our data do not allow us to directly suggest the involvement of p27.
The results presented here suggest that, in serum-starved derivatives
of NIH 3T3 cells, under conditions where cyclin D1 is constitutively
expressed, cyclin D1 is associated with CDK4 (Fig. 5). This contrasts
with previous observations indicating that ectopic cyclin D3 and CDK4
fail to assemble in serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells (48). NIH
3T3 cells from a variety of sources yielded similar results (data not
shown). The results are consistent with a number of observations.
First, we have noted that, in serum-starved cells that express cyclin
D1, there are elevated p27 levels compared to those in parental cells
and significant amounts of cyclin D1 and CDK4 are found associated with
p27. Recently, it has been demonstrated that members of the p21 family
of CDK inhibitors can function as cyclin D-CDK4 assembly factors
(35). Thus, the presence of elevated levels of p27 in the
quiescent cyclin D1 and MEK-EE derivatives of NIH 3T3 cells, compared
to those in the parental line, may be responsible for promoting the
assembly of cyclin D1 and CDK4 in this setting. Second, our results
obtained with microinjection of antisense p27 plasmid indirectly
support the observation that cyclin D1 and CDK4 can assemble in vivo in serum-starved cells. Expression of antisense p27 was effective in
driving the cyclin D1 lines, but not parental NIH 3T3 cells, into S
phase. Assuming that the reduction in p27 levels allows CDK4 to become
active and in turn promote S-phase entry suggests that cyclin D1 and
CDK4 were assembled in serum-starved cells. We do not rule out the
possibility that reduction of p27 levels also promotes S-phase entry,
in part, through activation of cyclin E-CDK2.
During the completion of this work, Cheng et al. (10)
reported that MEK1 plays a significant role in both the synthesis of
cyclin D1 and its assembly with CDK4. By contrast, we find that cyclin
D1 and CDK4 assemble in the presence or absence of MEK1 activation,
although these complexes are inactive in the absence of mitogenic
stimulation. There are a number of differences between our experimental
approach and those of Cheng et al. that may account for the different
experimental outcomes. The most significant difference is that they
used cell clones harboring an inducible activated MEK1, whereas we
utilized pooled populations that constitutively express activated MEK1.
The Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK pathway is known to be subject to a negative
feedback loop limiting the amount of total activated MAPK. In this
regard, it has been noted that in NIH 3T3 cells expressing activated
MEK1 (the same retroviral vector used in this study) there is only a
modest increase in overall MAPK activity (14). It is likely
that in an inducible system the degree of transient activation of MAPK
is greater than that in a constitutive system. Second, the antibodies
used in this study to detect cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes are different
from those used by Cheng et al., possibly accounting for a relative difference in the ability to detect complexes. Lastly and independent of studying MEK1, we compared the assembly of cyclin D1 and CDK4 in
cyclin D1 lines and MEK-EE lines. Cheng et al. utilized cell lines
overexpressing both cyclin D1 and CDK4. There is the possibility that
the relative levels of cyclin D1 and CDK4 may influence the ability of
CDK inhibitors such as p27 to facilitate their assembly. It is also
noteworthy that a requirement for MAPK in the assembly of active CDK4
may not be universal. Work with breast epithelial cells suggests that
MAPK activation is not required for the activation of cyclin D1-CDK4
(42).
Our finding that, in serum-starved MEK-EE lines, CDK4 kinase is
inactive despite the formation of cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes (Fig. 6 and
7) suggests that an additional mitogenic event is required to activate
CDK4 which is not provided by activated MEK1. Given that in the MEK-EE
lines the timing of CDK4 activation appeared to precede a significant
reduction in p27 associated with cyclin D1 and CDK4, this additional
event probably does not solely involve p27 binding. Furthermore, our
results suggest that mitogens, possibly operating in a Ras-independent
manner, may contribute to CDK4 activation. This follows from the
observation that, in the MEK-EE line, CDK4 is inactive following serum
starvation but remains active upon introduction of RasN17.
Consistent with this interpretation, recently it has been demonstrated that the effect of activated Ras or MEK1 on the cell cycle machinery and G1 progression can be altered by extracellular
signaling (60).
In human diploid fibroblasts, expression of antisense p21 has been
reported to allow cells to enter S phase from a quiescent state
(53). Consistent with the possible requirement for cyclin D1
to achieve this effect, in this study cyclin D1 was reported to be
present in quiescent human fibroblasts, in contrast to the situation in
quiescent NIH 3T3 cells. Similar to our results obtained with p27, in
the cyclin D1 and MEK-EE lines, both cyclin D1 and CDK4 were found
associated with p21 in serum-starved cells (data not shown). In the
parental line, p21 was found associated with cyclin D1 only at times
when complexes between cyclin D1 and CDK4 could be detected (data not
shown). Whether expression of antisense p21 will induce S-phase entry
in NIH 3T3 cells expressing ectopic cyclin D1 remains to be determined.
Together, these data suggest that both p27 and p21 play an active role
in maintaining a quiescent state. In addition, our data suggest that
downregulation of cyclin D1 expression participates in maintaining a
state of quiescence.
CDK4 normally becomes activated in mid-G1 and is thought to
promote DNA synthesis by phosphorylating and inactivating Rb at this
time. Our data suggest, but do not prove, that activation of cyclin
D1-CDK4 in serum-starved cells, by lowering p27 levels, is sufficient
to allow for entrance into and progression through G1 with
subsequent S-phase entry. This is consistent with the recent
demonstration that microinjection of active cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes,
prepared from insect cells, is sufficient to initiate DNA synthesis
from a quiescent state in human diploid fibroblasts (13).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Martine Roussel and Charles Sherr for the cyclin D1
lines, Christopher Marshall for the activated MEK1 retroviral vector,
Jacques Pouysségur and Natalie Rivard for the antisense p27
plasmid, Geoffrey Cooper for the RasN17 plasmid, Pamela
Silver for the GFP plasmid, Warren Pear and David Baltimore for the
Bosc23 packaging line, and Edward Harlow for the CDK4 plasmid. We thank
Othon Iliopoulos, Christine McMahon, Justin Lamb, Martine Roussel, and
Peter Adams for critical review of the manuscript.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA65842
to M.E.E. M.E.E. is a Scholar for the Leukemia Society of America.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617)
632-2206. E-mail: mark_ewen{at}dfci.harvard.edu.
Present address: Cytomatrix, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139.
Present address: Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's
Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aktas, H.,
H. Cai, and G. M. Cooper.
1997.
Ras links growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3850-3857[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Albanese, C.,
J. Johnson,
G. Watanabe,
N. Eklund,
D. Vu,
A. Arnold, and R. G. Pestell.
1995.
Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23589-23597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Alessandrini, A.,
D. S. Chiaur, and M. Pagano.
1997.
Regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 by degradation and phosphorylation.
Leukemia
11:342-345[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Baldin, V.,
J. Lukas,
M. J. Marcote,
M. Pagano, and G. Draetta.
1993.
Cyclin D1 is a nuclear protein required for cell cycle progression in G1.
Genes Dev.
7:812-821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Barbacid, M.
1987.
ras genes.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
56:779-827[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bos, J. L.
1989.
ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review.
Cancer Res.
49:4682-4689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Brunet, A.,
G. Pages, and J. Pouysségur.
1994.
Constitutive active mutants of MAP kinase kinase (MEK1) induce growth factor-relaxation and oncogenicity when expressed in fibroblasts.
Oncogene
9:3379-3387[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cai, H.,
J. Szeberenyi, and G. M. Cooper.
1990.
Effect of a dominant inhibitory Ha-ras mutation on mitogenic signal transduction in NIH 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:5314-5323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chen, J.,
P. Saha,
S. Kornbluth,
B. D. Dynlacht, and A. Dutta.
1996.
Cyclin-binding motifs are essential to the function of p21CIP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:4673-4682[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Cheng, M.,
V. Sexl,
C. J. Sherr, and M. F. Roussel.
1998.
Assembly of cyclin D-dependent kinase and titration of p27Kip1 by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK1).
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:1091-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Clurman, B. E.,
R. J. Sheaff,
K. Thress,
M. Groudine, and J. M. Roberts.
1996.
Turnover of cyclin E by the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway is regulated by cdk2 binding and cyclin phosphorylation.
Genes Dev.
10:1979-1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Coats, S.,
W. M. Flanagan,
M. Nourse, and J. M. Roberts.
1996.
Requirement of p27Kip1 for restriction point control of the fibroblast cell cycle.
Science
272:877-880[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Connell-Crowley, L.,
S. J. Elledge, and W. J. Harper.
1998.
G1 cyclin-dependent kinases are sufficient to initiate DNA synthesis in quiescent human fibroblasts.
Curr. Biol.
8:65-68[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Cowley, S.,
H. Paterson,
P. Kemp, and C. J. Marshall.
1994.
Activation of MAP kinase kinase is necessary and sufficient for PC12 differentiation and for transformation of NIH 3T3 cells.
Cell
77:841-852[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
de Vries-Smits, A. M. M.,
B. M. T. Burgering,
S. J. Leevers,
C. J. Marshall, and J. L. Bos.
1992.
Involvement of p21ras in activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2.
Nature
357:602-604[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Dobrowolski, S.,
M. Harter, and D. W. Stacey.
1994.
Cellular ras activity is required for passage through multiple points of the G0/G1 phase in BALB/c 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:5441-5449[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Ewen, M. E.,
H. K. Sluss,
C. J. Sherr,
H. Matsushime,
J.-Y. Kato, and D. M. Livingston.
1993.
Functional interactions of the retinoblastoma protein with mammalian D-type cyclins.
Cell
73:487-497[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Feig, L. A., and G. M. Cooper.
1988.
Inhibition of NIH 3T3 cell proliferation by a mutant ras protein with preferential affinity for GDP.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:3235-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Feramisco, J. R.,
M. Gross,
T. Kamata,
M. Rosenberg, and R. W. Sweet.
1984.
Microinjection of the oncogene form of the human H-ras (T-24) protein results in rapid proliferation of quiescent cells.
Cell
38:109-117[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Filmus, J.,
A. I. Robles,
W. Shi,
M. J. Wong,
L. L. Colombo, and C. J. Conti.
1994.
Induction of cyclin D1 overexpression by activated ras.
Oncogene
9:3627-3633[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Firpo, E. J.,
A. Koff,
M. J. Solomon, and J. M. Roberts.
1994.
Inactivation of a Cdk2 inhibitor during interleukin 2-induced proliferation of human T lymphocytes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4889-4901[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Geng, Y.,
E. N. Eaton,
M. Picon,
J. M. Roberts,
A. S. Lundberg,
A. Gifford,
C. Sardet, and R. A. Weinberg.
1996.
Regulation of cyclin E transcription by E2Fs and retinoblastoma protein.
Oncogene
16:2402-2407.
|
| 23.
|
Hall, M., and G. Peters.
1996.
Genetic alterations of cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and Cdk inhibitors in human cancer.
Adv. Cancer Res.
68:67-108[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hengst, L.,
V. Dulic,
J. M. Slingerland,
E. Lees, and S. I. Reed.
1994.
A cell cycle-regulated inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5291-5295[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Herber, B.,
M. Truss,
M. Beato, and R. Muller.
1994.
Inducible regulatory elements in the human cyclin D1 promoter.
Oncogene
9:1295-1304[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Herrera, R. E.,
V. P. Sah,
B. O. Williams,
T. P. Makela,
R. A. Weinberg, and T. Jacks.
1996.
Altered cell cycle kinetics, gene expression, and G1 restriction point regulation in Rb-deficient fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2402-2407[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Joneson, T.,
M. A. White,
M. H. Wigler, and D. Bar-Sagi.
1996.
Stimulation of membrane ruffling and MAP kinase activation by distinct effectors of RAS.
Science
271:810-812[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Kato, J.-Y.,
M. Matsuoka,
K. Polyak,
J. Massague, and C. J. Sherr.
1994.
Cyclic AMP-induced G1 phase arrest mediated by an inhibitor (p27Kip1) of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 activation.
Cell
79:487-496[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kato, J.-Y.,
M. Matsuoka,
D. K. Strom, and C. J. Sherr.
1994.
Regulation of cyclin D-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) by cdk4-activating kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2713-2721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Kato, J.-Y.,
H. Matsushime,
S. W. Hiebert,
M. E. Ewen, and C. J. Sherr.
1993.
Direct binding of cyclin D to the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb) and pRb phosphorylation by the cyclin D-dependent kinase cdk4.
Genes Dev.
7:331-342[Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kawada, M.,
S. Yamagoe,
Y. Murakami,
K. Suzuki,
S. Mizuno, and Y. Uehara.
1997.
Induction of p27Kip1 degradation and anchorage independence through the MAP kinase signaling pathway.
Oncogene
15:629-637[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Koff, A.,
M. Ohtsuki,
K. Polyak,
J. M. Roberts, and J. Massagué.
1993.
Negative regulation of G1 in mammalian cells: inhibition of cyclin E-dependent kinase by TGF- .
Science
260:536-539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Kolch, W.,
G. Heidecker,
P. Lloyd, and U. R. Rapp.
1991.
Raf-1 protein kinase is required for growth of induced NIH/3T3 cells.
Nature
12:426-428.
|
| 34.
|
Krude, T.,
M. Jackman,
J. Pines, and R. A. Lasky.
1997.
Cyclin/Cdk-dependent initiation of DNA replication in a human cell-free system.
Cell
88:109-119[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
LaBaer, J.,
M. D. Garrett,
L. F. Stevenson,
J. M. Slingerland,
C. Sandhu,
H. S. Chou,
A. Fattaey, and E. Harlow.
1997.
New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitors.
Genes Dev.
11:847-862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Lavoie, J. N.,
G. L'Allemain,
A. Brunet,
R. Muller, and J. Pouysségur.
1996.
Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:20608-20616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Leng, X.,
L. Connell-Crowley,
D. Goodrich, and J. W. Harper.
1997.
S-phase entry upon ectopic expression of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases in the absence of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation.
Curr. Biol.
7:709-712[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Leone, G.,
J. DeGregori,
R. Sears,
L. Jakoi, and J. R. Nevins.
1997.
Myc and Ras collaborate in inducing accumulation of active cyclin E/Cdk2 and E2F.
Nature
387:422-426[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Li, Y.,
C. W. Jenkins,
M. A. Nichols, and Y. Xiong.
1994.
Cell cycle expression and p53 regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21.
Oncogene
9:2261-2268[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Liu, J.-J.,
J.-R. Chao,
M.-C. Jiang,
S.-Y. Ng,
J. J.-Y. Yen, and H. F. Yang-Yen.
1995.
Ras transformation results in an elevated level of cyclin D1 and acceleration of G1 progression in NIH 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:3654-3663[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Loda, M.,
B. Cukor,
S. W. Tam,
P. Lavin,
M. Fiorentino,
G. F. Draetta,
J. M. Jessup, and M. Pagano.
1997.
Increased proteosome-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in aggressive colorectal carcinomas.
Nat. Med.
3:231-234[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Lukas, J.,
J. Bartkova, and J. Bartek.
1996.
Convergence of mitogenic signalling cascades from diverse classes of receptors at the cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase-pRb-controlled G1 checkpoint.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6917-6925[Abstract].
|
| 43.
|
Lukas, J.,
T. Herzinger,
K. Hansen,
M. C. Moroni,
D. Resnitzky,
K. Helin,
S. I. Reed, and J. Bartek.
1997.
Cyclin E-induced S phase without activation of the pRb/E2F pathway.
Genes Dev.
11:1479-1492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Lundberg, A. S., and R. A. Weinberg.
1998.
Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:753-761[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Marshall, C. J.
1995.
Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation.
Cell
80:179-185[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Marshall, C. J.
1997.
Ras effectors.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8:197-204.
|
| 47.
|
Matsuoka, M.,
J.-Y. Kato,
R. P. Fisher,
D. O. Morgan, and C. J. Sherr.
1994.
Activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) by mouse MO15-associated kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:7265-7275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Matsushime, H.,
D. E. Quelle,
S. A. Shurtleff,
M. Shibuya,
C. J. Sherr, and J.-Y. Kato.
1994.
D-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2066-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Meyerson, M., and E. Harlow.
1994.
Identification of G1 kinase activity for cdk6, a novel cyclin D partner.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2077-2086[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Mittnacht, S.,
H. Paterson,
M. F. Olson, and C. J. Marshall.
1997.
Ras signalling is required for inactivation of tumour suppressor pRb cell-cycle control protein.
Curr. Biol.
7:219-221[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Morgenstern, J. P., and H. Land.
1990.
Advanced mammalian gene transfer: high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging line.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Mulcahy, L. S.,
M. R. Smith, and D. W. Stacey.
1985.
Requirement for ras proto-oncogene function during serum-stimulated growth of NIH3T3 cells.
Nature
313:241-243[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Nakanashi, M.,
G. R. Adami,
R. S. Robetorye,
A. Noda,
S. F. Venable,
D. Dimitrov,
O. M. Pereira-Smith, and J. R. Smith.
1995.
Exit from G0 and entry into the cell cycle of cells expressing p21Sdi1 antisense RNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4352-4356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Neuman, E.,
M. H. Ladha,
N. Lin,
T. M. Upton,
S. J. Miller,
J. DiRenzo,
R. G. Pestell,
P. W. Hinds,
S. F. Dowdy,
M. Brown, and M. E. Ewen.
1997.
Cyclin D1 stimulation of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity independent of cdk4.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5338-5347[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Noda, A.,
Y. Ning,
S. F. Venable,
O. M. Pereira-Smith, and J. R. Smith.
1994.
Cloning of senescent cell-derived inhibitors of DNA synthesis using an expression screen.
Exp. Cell Res.
211:90-98[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Nourse, J.,
E. Firpo,
W. M. Flanagan,
S. Coats,
K. Polyak,
M. H. Lee,
J. Massague,
G. R. Crabtree, and J. M. Roberts.
1994.
Interleukin-2-mediated elimination of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor prevented by rapamycin.
Nature
372:570-573[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Ohtsubo, M., and J. M. Roberts.
1993.
Cyclin-dependent regulation of G1 in mammalian fibroblasts.
Science
259:1908-1912[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Ohtsubo, M.,
A. M. Theodoras,
J. Schumacher,
J. M. Roberts, and M. Pagano.
1995.
Human cyclin E, a nuclear protein essential for the G1-to-S phase transition.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2612-2624[Abstract].
|
| 59.
|
Okuda, K.,
T. J. Ernst, and J. D. Griffin.
1994.
Inhibition of p21ras activation blocks proliferation but not differentiation of interleukin-3-dependent myeloid cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:24602-24607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Olson, M. F.,
H. F. Paterson, and C. J. Marshall.
1998.
Signals from Ras and Rho GTPases interact to regulate expression of p21Waf1/Cip1.
Nature
394:295-299[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Pages, G.,
P. Lenorman,
G. L'Allemain,
J.-C. Chambard,
S. Meloche, and J. Pouysségur.
1993.
Mitogen-activated protein kinase p42mapk and p44mapk are required for fibroblast proliferation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8319-8323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Pardee, A. B.
1974.
A restriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:1286-1290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Pardee, A. B.
1989.
G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation.
Science
246:603-608[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Pear, W. S.,
G. P. Nolan,
M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8392-8396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Peeper, D. S.,
T. M. Upton,
M. H. Ladha,
E. Neuman,
J. Zalvide,
R. Bernards,
J. A. DeCaprio, and M. E. Ewen.
1997.
Ras signalling linked to the cell-cycle machinery by the retinoblastoma protein.
Nature
386:177-181[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Polyak, K.,
J.-Y. Kato,
M. J. Solomon,
C. J. Sherr,
J. Massague,
J. M. Roberts, and A. Koff.
1994.
p27Kip1, a cyclin-cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor- and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest.
Genes Dev.
8:9-22[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Polyak, K.,
M.-H. Lee,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
A. Koff,
J. M. Roberts,
P. Tempst, and J. Massague.
1994.
Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signal.
Cell
78:59-66[Medline].
|
| 68.
|
Porter, P. L.,
K. E. Malone,
P. J. Heagerty,
G. M. Alexander,
L. A. Gatti,
E. J. Firpo, and J. R. Daling.
1997.
Expression of cell-cycle regulators p27Kip1 and cyclin E, alone and in combination, correlates with survival in young breast cancer patients.
Nat. Med.
3:222-225[Medline].
|
| 69.
|
Pronk, G. J., and J. L. Bos.
1994.
The role of p21ras in receptor tyrosine kinase signalling.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1198:131-147[Medline].
|
| 70.
|
Quelle, D. E.,
R. A. Ashmun,
S. A. Shurtleff,
J. Kato,
D. Bar-Sagi,
M. F. Roussel, and C. J. Sherr.
1993.
Overexpression of mouse D-type cyclins accelerates G1 phase in rodent fibroblasts.
Genes Dev.
7:1559-1571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Resnitzky, D., and S. I. Reed.
1995.
Different roles for cyclins D1 and E in regulation of the G1-to-S transition.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:3463-3469[Abstract].
|
| 72.
|
Rivard, N.,
G. L'Allemain,
J. Bartek, and J. Pouysségur.
1996.
Abrogation of p27Kip1 by cDNA antisense suppresses quiescence (G0 state) in fibroblasts.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:18337-18341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Robbins, D. J.,
M. Cheng,
E. Zhen,
C. A. Vanderbilt,
L. A. Feig, and M. H. Cobb.
1992.
Evidence for a Ras-dependent extracellular signal-related protein kinase (ERK) cascade.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:6924-6928[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 74.
|
Sellers, W. R., and W. G. Kaelin.
1996.
RB as a modulator of transcription.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
1288:M1-M5[Medline].
|
| 75.
|
Serrano, M.,
E. Gomez-Lohoz,
R. A. DePinho,
D. Beach, and D. Bar-Sagi.
1995.
Inhibition of Ras-induced proliferation and transformation by p16INK4.
Science
267:249-252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 76.
|
Serrano, M.,
A. W. Lin,
M. E. McCurrach,
D. Beach, and S. W. Lowe.
1997.
Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a.
Cell
88:593-602[Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Sewing, A.,
B. Wiseman,
A. LLoyd, and H. Land.
1997.
High-intensity Raf signal causes cell cycle arrest mediated by p21Cip1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5588-5597[Abstract].
|
| 78.
|
Sheaff, R. J.,
M. Groudine,
M. Gordon,
J. M. Roberts, and B. E. Clurman.
1997.
Cyclin E-cdk2 is a regulator of p27Kip1.
Genes Dev.
11:1464-1478[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 79.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1993.
Mammalian G1 cyclins.
Cell
73:1059-1065[Medline].
|
| 80.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1994.
G1 phase progression: cycling on cue.
Cell
79:551-555[Medline].
|
| 81.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1996.
Cancer cell cycles.
Science
274:1672-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 82.
|
Sherr, C. J., and J. M. Roberts.
1995.
Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev.
9:1149-1163[Free Full Text].
|
| 83.
|
Stacey, D. W.,
L. A. Feig, and J. B. Gibbs.
1991.
Dominant inhibitor Ras mutants selectively inhibit the activity of either cellular or oncogenic Ras.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4053-4064[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 84.
|
Stacey, D. W., and H. F. Kung.
1984.
Transformation of NIH 3T3 cells by microinjection of Ha-ras protein.
Nature
310:508-511[Medline].
|
| 85.
|
Szeberenyi, J.,
H. Cai, and G. M. Cooper.
1990.
Effect of a dominant inhibitory Ha-ras mutation on neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:5324-5332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 86.
|
Takuwa, N., and Y. Takuwa.
1997.
Ras activity late in G1 phase required for p27kip1 downregulation, passage through the restriction point, and entry into S phase in growth factor-stimulated NIH 3T3 fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5348-5358[Abstract].
|
| 87.
|
Temin, H.
1971.
Stimulation by serum of multiplication of stationary chicken cells.
J. Cell. Physiol.
78:161-170[Medline].
|
| 88.
|
Terada, Y.,
M. Tatsuka,
S. Jinno, and H. Okayama.
1995.
Requirement for tyrosine phosphorylation of Cdk4 in G1 arrest induced by ultraviolet radiation.
Nature
376:358-362[Medline].
|
| 89.
|
Thomas, S. M.,
M. DeMarco,
G. D'Arcangelo,
S. Helegoua, and J. S. Brugge.
1992.
Ras is essential for nerve growth factor- and phorbol ester-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of MAP kinases.
Cell
68:1031-1040[Medline].
|
| 90.
|
Toyoshima, H., and T. Hunter.
1994.
p27, a novel inhibitor of G1 cyclin-cdk protein kinase activity, is related to p21.
Cell
78:67-74[Medline].
|
| 91.
|
van den Heuvel, S., and E. Harlow.
1993.
Distinct roles for cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control.
Science
262:2050-2054[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 92.
|
Weinberg, R. A.
1995.
The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.
Cell
81:323-330[Medline].
|
| 93.
|
Winston, J.,
F. Dong, and W. J. Pledger.
1996.
Differential modulation of G1 cyclins and the cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 by platelet-derived growth factor and plasma factors in density-arrested fibroblasts.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:11253-11260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 94.
|
Winston, J. T.,
S. R. Coats,
Y.-Z. Wang, and W. J. Pledger.
1996.
Regulation of the cell cycle machinery by oncogenic Ras.
Oncogene
12:127-134[Medline].
|
| 95.
|
Wood, K. W.,
C. Sarnecki,
T. M. Roberts, and J. Blenis.
1992.
ras mediates nerve growth factor receptor modulation of three signal-transducing protein kinases: MAP kinase, Raf-1, and RSK.
Cell
68:1041-1050[Medline].
|
| 96.
|
Woods, D.,
D. Parry,
H. Cherwinski,
E. Bosch,
E. Lees, and M. McMahon.
1997.
Raf-induced proliferation or cell cycle arrest is determined by the level of Raf activity with arrest mediated by p21Cip1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5598-5611[Abstract].
|
| 97.
|
Zetterberg, A.,
O. Larsson, and K. G. Wiman.
1995.
What is the restriction point?
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7:835-842[Medline].
|
| 98.
|
Zhao, J.,
B. Dynlacht,
T. Imai,
T.-A. Hori, and E. Harlow.
1998.
Expression of NPAT, a novel substrate of cyclin E-cdk2, promotes S-phase entry.
Genes Dev.
12:456-461[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1998, p. 6605-6615, Vol. 18, No. 11
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Liu, Y., Perdreau, S. A., Chatterjee, P., Wang, L., Kuan, S.-F., Duensing, A.
(2008). Imatinib Mesylate Induces Quiescence in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Cells through the CDH1-SKP2-p27Kip1 Signaling Axis. Cancer Res.
68: 9015-9023
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Susaki, E., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, K. I.
(2007). Cyclin D2 Translocates p27 out of the Nucleus and Promotes Its Degradation at the G0-G1 Transition. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 4626-4640
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bockstaele, L., Kooken, H., Libert, F., Paternot, S., Dumont, J. E., de Launoit, Y., Roger, P. P., Coulonval, K.
(2006). Regulated Activating Thr172 Phosphorylation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4(CDK4): Its Relationship with Cyclins and CDK "Inhibitors".. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 5070-5085
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garnovskaya, M. N., Mukhin, Y. V., Vlasova, T. M., Grewal, J. S., Ullian, M. E., Tholanikunnel, B. G., Raymond, J. R.
(2004). Mitogen-induced Rapid Phosphorylation of Serine 795 of the Retinoblastoma Gene Product in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Involves ERK Activation. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 24899-24905
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Istomina, N. E., Shushanov, S. S., Springhetti, E. M., Karpov, V. L., Krasheninnikov, I. A., Stevens, K., Zaret, K. S., Singh, P. B., Grigoryev, S. A.
(2003). Insulation of the Chicken {beta}-Globin Chromosomal Domain from a Chromatin-Condensing Protein, MENT. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 6455-6468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carroll, J. S., Lynch, D. K., Swarbrick, A., Renoir, J.-M., Sarcevic, B., Daly, R. J., Musgrove, E. A., Sutherland, R. L.
(2003). p27Kip1 Induces Quiescence and Growth Factor Insensitivity in Tamoxifen-treated Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res.
63: 4322-4326
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moeller, S. J., Head, E. D., Sheaff, R. J.
(2003). p27Kip1 Inhibition of GRB2-SOS Formation Can Regulate Ras Activation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 3735-3752
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gonzalez, T., Seoane, M., Caamano, P., Vinuela, J., Dominguez, F., Zalvide, J.
(2003). Inhibition of Cdk4 Activity Enhances Translation of p27kip1 in Quiescent Rb-negative Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 12688-12695
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Delmas, C., Aragou, N., Poussard, S., Cottin, P., Darbon, J.-M., Manenti, S.
(2003). MAP Kinase-dependent Degradation of p27Kip1 by Calpains in Choroidal Melanoma Cells. REQUIREMENT OF p27Kip1 NUCLEAR EXPORT. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 12443-12451
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chopra, S., Fernandez de Mattos, S., Lam, E. W.-F., Mann, D. J.
(2002). Jab1 Co-activation of c-Jun Is Abrogated by the Serine 10-phosphorylated Form of p27Kip1. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 32413-32416
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lazaro, J.-B., Bailey, P. J., Lassar, A. B.
(2002). Cyclin D-cdk4 activity modulates the subnuclear localization and interaction of MEF2 with SRC-family coactivators during skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev.
16: 1792-1805
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Itahana, K., Dimri, G. P., Hara, E., Itahana, Y., Zou, Y., Desprez, P.-Y., Campisi, J.
(2002). A Role for p53 in Maintaining and Establishing the Quiescence Growth Arrest in Human Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 18206-18214
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fagin, J. A.
(2002). Minireview: Branded from the Start--Distinct Oncogenic Initiating Events May Determine Tumor Fate in the Thyroid. Mol. Endocrinol.
16: 903-911
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kops, G. J. P. L., Medema, R. H., Glassford, J., Essers, M. A. G., Dijkers, P. F., Coffer, P. J., Lam, E. W.-F., Burgering, B. M. T.
(2002). Control of Cell Cycle Exit and Entry by Protein Kinase B-Regulated Forkhead Transcription Factors. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 2025-2036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Izzard, T. D, Taylor, C., Birkett, S. D, Jackson, C. L, Newby, A. C
(2002). Mechanisms underlying maintenance of smooth muscle cell quiescence in rat aorta: role of the cyclin dependent kinases and their inhibitors. Cardiovasc Res
53: 242-252
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Latella, L., Sacco, A., Pajalunga, D., Tiainen, M., Macera, D., D'Angelo, M., Felici, A., Sacchi, A., Crescenzi, M.
(2001). Reconstitution of Cyclin D1-Associated Kinase Activity Drives Terminally Differentiated Cells into the Cell Cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 5631-5643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kwon, E.-J., Oh, E.-J., Kim, Y.-S., Hirose, F., Ohno, K., Nishida, Y., Matsukage, A., Yamaguchi, M., Yoo, M.-A.
(2001). E2F-dependent transcription of the raf proto-oncogene during Drosophila development. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 1808-1814
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Don, M.-J., Chang, Y.-H., Chen, K.-K., Ho, L.-K., Chau, Y.-P.
(2001). Induction of CDK Inhibitors (p21WAF1 and p27Kip1) and Bak in the {beta}-Lapachone-Induced Apoptosis of Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Pharmacol.
59: 784-794
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Soni, R., O'Reilly, T., Furet, P., Muller, L., Stephan, C., Zumstein-Mecker, S., Fretz, H., Fabbro, D., Chaudhuri, B.
(2001). Selective In Vivo and In Vitro Effects of a Small Molecule Inhibitor of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
93: 436-446
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fux, C., Moser, S., Schlatter, S., Rimann, M., Bailey, J. E., Fussenegger, M.
(2001). Streptogramin- and tetracycline-responsive dual regulated expression of p27Kip1 sense and antisense enables positive and negative growth control of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Nucleic Acids Res
29: e19-e19
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bagui, T. K., Jackson, R. J., Agrawal, D., Pledger, W. J.
(2000). Analysis of Cyclin D3-cdk4 Complexes in Fibroblasts Expressing and Lacking p27kip1 and p21cip1. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 8748-8757
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Achenbach, T. V., Müller, R., Slater, E. P.
(2000). Synergistic Antitumor Effect of Chemotherapy and Antisense-mediated Ablation of the Cell Cycle Inhibitor p27KIP-1. Clin. Cancer Res.
6: 3006-3014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hampl, A., Pacherník, J., Dvorák, P.
(2000). Levels and Interactions of p27, Cyclin D3, and CDK4 During the Formation and Maintenance of the Corpus Luteum in Mice. Biol. Reprod.
62: 1393-1401
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swarbrick, A., Lee, C. S. L., Sutherland, R. L., Musgrove, E. A.
(2000). Cooperation of p27Kip1 and p18INK4c in Progestin-Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest in T-47D Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 2581-2591
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, K. Y., Ladha, M. H., McMahon, C., Ewen, M. E.
(1999). The Retinoblastoma Protein Is Linked to the Activation of Ras. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 7724-7732
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsutsui, T., Hesabi, B., Moons, D. S., Pandolfi, P. P., Hansel, K. S., Koff, A., Kiyokawa, H.
(1999). Targeted Disruption of CDK4 Delays Cell Cycle Entry with Enhanced p27Kip1 Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 7011-7019
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanguay, D., Pavlovic, S., Piatelli, M. J., Bartek, J., Chiles, T. C.
(1999). B Cell Antigen Receptor-Mediated Activation of Cyclin-Dependent Retinoblastoma Protein Kinases and Inhibition by Co-Cross-Linking with Fc{gamma} Receptors. J. Immunol.
163: 3160-3168
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mateyak, M. K., Obaya, A. J., Sedivy, J. M.
(1999). c-Myc Regulates Cyclin D-Cdk4 and -Cdk6 Activity but Affects Cell Cycle Progression at Multiple Independent Points. Mol. Cell. Biol.
19: 4672-4683
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, H.-Y., Zhou, B. P., Hung, M.-C., Lee, M.-H.
(2000). Oncogenic Signals of HER-2/neu in Regulating the Stability of the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 24735-24739
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Delmas, C., Manenti, S., Boudjelal, A., Peyssonnaux, C., Eychene, A., Darbon, J.-M.
(2001). The p42/p44 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activation Triggers p27Kip1 Degradation Independently of CDK2/Cyclin E in NIH 3T3 Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 34958-34965
[Abstract]
[Full Text]