Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1998, p. 6921-6929, Vol. 18, No. 12
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Protein Kinase A-Dependent Derepression of the
Human Prodynorphin Gene via Differential Binding to an Intragenic
Silencer Element
Angel M.
Carrión,
Britt
Mellström, and
Jose R.
Naranjo*
Instituto de Neurobiología, Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28002 Madrid,
Spain
Received 5 June 1998/Returned for modification 30 July
1998/Accepted 19 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Induction of the prodynorphin gene has been implicated in medium
and long-term adaptation during memory acquisition and pain. By 5'
deletion mapping and site-directed mutagenesis of the human prodynorphin promoter, we demonstrate that both basal transcription and
protein kinase A (PKA)-induced transcription in NB69 and SK-N-MC human
neuroblastoma cells are regulated by the GAGTCAAGG sequence centered at position +40 in the 5' untranslated region of the gene
(named the DRE, for downstream regulatory element). The DRE repressed
basal transcription in an orientation-independent and cell-specific
manner when placed downstream from the heterologous thymidine kinase
promoter. Southwestern blotting and UV cross-linking experiments with
nuclear extracts from human neuroblastoma cells or human brain revealed
a protein complex of approximately 110 kDa that specifically bound to
the DRE. Forskolin treatment reduced binding to the DRE, and the time
course paralleled that for an increase in prodynorphin gene expression.
Our results suggest that under basal conditions, expression of the
prodynorphin gene is repressed by occupancy of the DRE site. Upon PKA
stimulation, binding to the DRE is reduced and transcription increases.
We propose a model for human prodynorphin activation through
PKA-dependent derepression at the DRE site.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The level of expression of a
given gene reflects the balance between positive and negative signals
affecting the general transcription machinery via sequence-specific
DNA-binding factors (17, 35, 40). Extracellular signals
modify basal transcription by changing the expression and/or efficiency
of transcriptional activators such as Fos, Jun, and cyclic AMP
(cAMP)-responsive element (CRE) binding protein (CREB) (23,
31, 38) or transcriptional repressors such as inducible cAMP
early repressor (ICER) and CRE modulator (CREM) (13, 35).
Alternatively, extracellular signals can activate genes that are
constitutively repressed through active derepression (19, 20,
39).
Learning and chronic pain adaptation involve profound changes in gene
expression within the central nervous system, including prodynorphin
gene expression (7, 33). Tonically, dynorphin peptides
modulate the release of neurotransmitters from presynaptic terminals
(42, 44) and so regulate brain function. Induction of the
rat prodynorphin gene in different cells and tissues is associated with
the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C signal
transduction pathways (7, 26, 41). In rat spinal cord
neurons, early induction of c-Fos is followed by a substantial increase
in prodynorphin mRNA levels (26, 33). Furthermore, antisense
studies indicate that c-Fos participates in prodynorphin gene
transactivation (22, 26). In cultured striatal neurons,
however, induction of the rat prodynorphin gene has been associated
exclusively with the phosphorylation of CREB upon dopamine D1 receptor
activation (7).
Transcription of the rat prodynorphin gene is controlled by at least
five regulatory elements distributed along 2 kb of the promoter region.
Three elements have been described in the distal area of the
promoter, at positions
1656,
1627, and
1543 relative to the
transcription start site (11). These elements function as
CREs (DynCRE1, -2, and -3), and binding to CREB results in repression
of AP-1-mediated prodynorphin transactivation (8). The
mechanism for this transrepression is not known, although competition
by different nuclear complexes at the DynCRE3 element could be a
possibility, since it has been shown that DynCRE3 also binds AP-1
nuclear complexes and through this interaction transactivates the
prodynorphin gene (8, 29, 30). In the proximal promoter region, close to the transcription start site, a noncanonical AP-1 site
(ncDynAP-1) and a CRE-like element (DynCRE4) are present (11,
33). The ncDynAP-1 site, located at position
257, is conserved
in the human gene and binds Fos-Jun heterodimers in vitro. Through this
interaction, the ncDynAP-1 site is responsible for the induction of
prodynorphin in NCB20 cells after treatment with phorbol esters
(33). The DynCRE4 element is located downstream from the
transcription start site, centered at position +61, and participates in
transcriptional induction via cAMP (11, 12, 28).
By deletion analysis and site-directed mutagenesis, we define the
minimal inducible promoter responsible for basal and PKA-regulated transcription of the human prodynorphin gene in human neuroblastoma cells. We also demonstrate the functional importance of a downstream response element (DRE), which acts as a transcriptional silencer under
basal conditions. Furthermore, we have identified a 110-kDa nuclear
complex that binds specifically to the DRE in several human
neuroblastoma cell lines under basal conditions. Upon PKA stimulation,
binding to the DRE is reduced and the prodynorphin gene is transcribed.
Our results suggest that prodynorphin transcription is actively
repressed in human neuroblastoma cell lines and that PKA activation
results in transcriptional derepression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Culture of cell lines.
The neuronal cell lines NB69,
SK-N-MC, SK-NB(E), and SH-SY5Y were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (DMEM)-Ham F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal
calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and 50 µg of gentamicin per ml. DMEM
containing the same supplements was used to grow HeLa and U373 cells.
Plasmid constructions.
A 1.8-kb fragment (
1660 to +150)
containing the regulatory region of the human prodynorphin gene
(21) was prepared by PCR with human genomic DNA as a
template and the specific primers 5'-CAAGCTTACAGATGAGCAATCAGAGGTTC-3' and
5'-TTGGATCCCTGGGCAGCTTCTGGCCGAGCAGGTCGGTCGGAGGTG-3'. The PCR
product was confirmed by sequencing on both strands and then cloned in
the promoterless reporter vector pBLCAT3 (27) by using
HindIII and BamHI primer restriction sites,
generating reporter plasmid pHD1CAT. Deletion of a 644-bp
BglII fragment from the 5' end of the 1.8-kb fragment
generated reporter plasmid pHD2CAT. Subsequent deletion up to position
150 by using a TaqI restriction site produced the reporter
plasmid pHD3CAT containing 300 bp of the regulatory region (see Fig.
2A).
Site-directed mutagenesis of the human prodynorphin promoter was
performed directly on reporter plasmid pHD1CAT by using a non-PCR-based
protocol (Transformer kit; Clontech). The oligonucleotide 5'-CCAAGCCGGAATCAAGGAGG-3' (mDRE) introduced a
single base mutation in the DRE, generating the reporter plasmid
pHD1mDRECAT. The underlined letters depict the position of the mutated base.
The oligonucleotide 5'-TCGACCAAGCCGGAGTCAAGGAGG-3',
containing the DRE sequence bearing
XhoI or
HindIII restriction sites,
was cloned downstream or
upstream of the thymidine kinase minimal
promoter in the reporter
vector pBLCAT2 (
27). The resulting
reporter plasmids
pTKDRECAT (downstream), pTKcDRECAT (downstream
complementary),
and pcDRETKCAT (upstream complementary) (see Fig.
5A) were
confirmed by
sequencing.
Primer extension analysis.
mRNA was extracted from NB69 and
SK-N-MC cells (FastTrack; Invitrogen). Primer extension analysis was
performed as described previously (4). The oligonucleotide
5'-GAAGCCGGAGTCAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3' was 5' end labeled with
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and used as a
primer for the extension. Labeled primer (1 pmol) was mixed with 250 ng
of poly(A)+ RNA in annealing buffer {5 mM PIPES
[piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)]
[pH 6.4], 200 mM NaCl} and incubated for 12 h at 55°C. The
annealed products were extended for 1 h at 42°C with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (10 U) in the presence of
25 µg of actinomycin D per ml. The primer extension products were
resolved in a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel together with a
sequencing reaction mixture obtained with the same primer.
Transient transfection and CAT analysis.
Cells were seeded
8 h before transfection at a density of 2 × 106
cells per 100-mm-diameter dish. Ten micrograms of DNA, containing 3 µg of reporter plasmid, 1 µg of
-galactosidase expression vector (pCH110; Pharmacia), and 6 µg of carrier plasmid DNA, was
coprecipitated with calcium phosphate and added to the NB69 cultures.
For transfection of SK-N-MC cells, double the amount of plasmid DNA was
used. Twelve hours later, the cells were washed, fresh medium was
added, and the cells were left for an additional period of 24 h.
Treatments (25 µM forskolin, 1 mM dibutyryl-cAMP, or 1 µM
H89) were performed 6 h or 24 h before the NB69 or SK-N-MC
cells, respectively, were harvested. Cells were lysed by three
freeze-thaw cycles, and the protein concentration was determined
(Bradford assay; Bio-Rad). The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT)
activity was assayed in 100 µg of protein extract (18) and
normalized with respect to
-galactosidase activity.
Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis.
Nuclear extracts
were prepared as described previously (3). Cells
(106) were incubated on ice in hypotonic buffer. The nuclei
were pelleted and lysed with high-salt buffer. Nuclear proteins were
quantified and extracts were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the human DRE
(5'-GAAGCCGGAGTCAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3') and DREmut5 (mDRE)
(5'-GAAGCCGGAATCAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3' [mutation in
boldface]) were labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4
polynucleotide kinase and used as probes. Nuclear proteins (5 to 10 µg) were incubated with radioactive oligonucleotide probe (100,000 cpm) for 20 min at room temperature in reaction buffer [10 mM HEPES
(pH 7.9) 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 8 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.15 µg of poly(dI-dC) per ml]. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved in 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels and
visualized by autoradiography. For DNA competition experiments, a 3- to
30-fold excess of unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide was added 5 min before the probe. As cold competitors, the canonical CRE from the
somatostatin gene (cCRE), 5'-CTTGGCTGACGTCAGAGA-3', and the
canonical AP-1 from the collagenase gene (cAP-1),
5'-AAGCTTGCATGACTCAGACAG-3', were used. To assess
nonspecific binding, cold double-stranded oligonucleotides containing
the Sp1 site (5'-ATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGCG-3' and the Oct1 site
(5'-TGTCGAATGCAAATCACTAGAA-3') were used in competition
experiments. To define key nucleotides within the DRE sequence, the
following mutated (boldface) double-stranded oligonucleotides were used
in competition experiments: DREmut1, 5'-GAAGCAAGAGTCAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3'; DREmut2,
5'-GAAGCCGGAGTCAAAAAGGCCCCTG-3'; DREmut3,
5'-GAAGCCGAAATCAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3'; and
DREmut4, 5'-GAAGCCGGAAACAAGGAGGCCCCTG-3'.
UV cross-linking.
Conditions for protein-DNA interaction
were as described for electrophoretic mobility shift experiments. After
incubation of nuclear extracts with the DRE probe, the reaction mixture
was UV cross-linked for 30 min by using a high-intensity UV lamp at a
distance of 3.5 cm at room temperature (4). An equal volume of Laemmli buffer (×2; 100 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 200 mM DTT, 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.2% bromphenol blue, and 20% glycerol) was
added, and samples were boiled. The UV cross-linked products were
resolved in SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography. Competition was performed by adding a 30-fold excess
of cold DRE oligonucleotide 5 min before the probe. In control
experiments with proteinase K (3 µg), the enzyme was added during the incubation.
Southwestern analysis.
Southwestern analysis was carried out
essentially as described previously (4). Nuclear proteins
(50 µg) were resolved in SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The blots were renatured in
phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min at room temperature and blocked
with 3% nonfat dry milk in TNED buffer (40 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 50 mM
NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT) for 1 h. The
binding assay was performed for 2 h at room temperature in TNED
buffer containing salmon sperm DNA (10 µg/ml) and 106 cpm
of double-stranded DRE oligonucleotide per ml labeled with [
-32P]dCTP by nick translation. Unbound probe was
removed by washing three times with 20 ml of the same buffer for 10 min
each at room temperature. The blots were exposed for autoradiography.
In competition experiments, a 50-fold excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotides containing cAP-1, cCRE, DRE, or mutated DRE was used.
RNA analysis.
Extraction of total RNA, reverse transcription
(RT)-PCR, and Southern blotting were performed essentially as described
previously (33). The specific primers used to amplify human
prodynorphin mRNA were 5'-TGGCAGGGGCTGGTCCTGGCTGCCTGC-3' and
5'-TTATGCATCAAAAAGCTCTCCAGAGTA-3'. To control for the amount
of RNA in each sample,
-actin was amplified.
 |
RESULTS |
The human prodynorphin gene uses two major transcription start
sites.
Sequence analysis of the human (15) and rat
(12) prodynorphin transcripts indicated that the
transcription start sites in both genes are located within the same
region (Fig. 1A, box and arrow,
respectively), which is different from the site initially assigned for
the human gene (21) (Fig. 1A, asterisk). To map the human
prodynorphin gene, we first established the transcription start site by
primer extension analysis with mRNA from NB69 and SK-N-MC cells, human
neuroblastoma cell lines that express prodynorphin (8). In
both cell lines, we found that the human prodynorphin gene uses two
major transcription start sites (Fig. 1B), separated by 5 nucleotides,
which have a location equivalent to the transcription start sites in
the rat prodynorphin gene. The sequence ATAAA, located 50 bp upstream
from the initiation of the longer transcript, is a putative TATA box in
the human prodynorphin gene (Fig. 1C).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The transcription start site in the human prodynorphin
gene. (A) Alignment of the rat and human prodynorphin genes. The arrow
indicates the transcription start site in the rat gene (12).
The box encompasses the region in the human gene recently proposed to
contain the start of transcription for the human gene (15),
and the asterisk denotes a position proposed earlier (21).
(B) Primer extension analysis of human prodynorphin transcripts using
mRNA from NB69 and SK-N-MC cells. The first transcription start site is
represented by +1, and the solid circle indicates a second
transcription start site 5 bp downstream. A sequencing reaction with
the primer used for the extension analysis is shown to the right. (C)
Nucleotide sequence of the region in the human prodynorphin gene
containing the transcription start site (+1 and solid circle) shown in
relation to a putative TATA box (boxed) located at 50 bp. For
comparison, the corresponding region of the rat gene is shown.
|
|
Basal and inducible transcription of the human prodynorphin gene
requires the 5' untranslated region.
To analyze regulatory
mechanisms that control the expression of the human prodynorphin gene,
we cloned a 1.8-kb genomic fragment encompassing the promoter region
+150 to
1660 and prepared a set of reporter constructs containing the
entire fragment (pHD1CAT) and 5' deletions linked to a CAT reporter
gene (Fig. 2A). Transient transfections
were performed with NB69 and SK-N-MC cells. In both cell lines, under
basal conditions, a threefold increase in acetylation was obtained with
the pHD1CAT construct compared to the empty vector pBLCAT3 (Fig. 2B).
The 5' deletion constructs, pHD2CAT and pHD3CAT, still retained
acetylation values, similar to pHD1CAT and significantly higher than
pBLCAT3 (Fig. 2B). Upon PKA stimulation, which induces prodynorphin
expression (7, 26, 41), increased transactivation occurred
with the pHD1CAT to -3CAT constructs. These results point to the 300-bp
fragment (
150 to +150) included in pHD3CAT as the minimal inducible
promoter for the human prodynorphin gene. Interestingly, transfection
with the pHD1CAT to -3CAT constructs in HeLa cells, a cell line devoid
of prodynorphin expression, resulted in acetylation values not
different from those obtained with pBLCAT3 under either basal or
forskolin-stimulated conditions (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Deletion mapping of the human prodynorphin promoter. (A)
Schematic representation of the 5' deletions (no. 1 to 3) in the human
promotor and the reporter vector pBLCAT3 (no. 4). (B) Transient
transfections in the human neuroblastoma cells NB69 and SK-N-MC and in
HeLa cells with the reporter plasmids 1 to 4 shown in panel A,
corresponding to the numbers on the x axis. The results are
expressed as CAT activity relative to that of empty reporter vector
pBLCAT3 (no. 4) under basal conditions. Open bars represent values from
untreated cultures, and solid bars represent values from
forskolin-treated cultures. The transfection experiments were repeated
seven times in duplicate.
|
|
The minimal inducible promoter contains the DRE.
Sequence
analysis of the minimal inducible promoter showed that the last 4 bases
of the rat DynCRE4 (GTCA), a sequence involved in the transcriptional
activation of the rat prodynorphin gene (11, 12, 28), were
conserved in the human prodynorphin gene at position +40. With NB69
nuclear extracts, an oligonucleotide encompassing nucleotides from +30
to +50 of the human gene generated several retarded bands (Fig.
3, lane 1). The two upper bands were competed by the element itself (Fig. 3, lanes 2 to 4) and were not
affected by a 30-fold excess of oligonucleotide containing the Sp1 site
or the Oct1 site (Fig. 3, lanes 11 and 12), indicating the specificity
of the protein-DNA interaction. Moreover, competition with increasing
concentrations of cold cCRE or cAP-1 did not modify the appearance of
the specific retarded bands (Fig. 3, lanes 5 to 10). Based on these
results, we named the putative regulatory sequence centered at +40,
DRE.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of the DRE from
the human prodynorphin gene. Results from competition assays of the DRE
retarded bands with the indicated fold excess (3-, 15-, and 30-fold) of
cold competitors (top) are shown. The two specific DRE retarded bands
are indicated by arrows. Nonspecific retarded bands are indicated by
asterisks.
|
|
To further investigate the functional relevance of the human DRE, we
performed site-directed mutagenesis of the DRE within
the reporter
plasmid pHD1CAT. To select a base for the mutation
of the DRE, we
prepared a series of variants of the DRE oligonucleotide
containing
substitutions of selected nucleotides with adenosines.
We analyzed
their ability to compete the DRE retarded bands in
electrophoretic
mobility shift assays. The DRE mutants 1 and 2
were still able to
compete the DRE retarded bands as efficiently
as cold wild-type DRE,
while mutants 3 to 5 had lost this capability
(Fig.
4A). These results indicate that the
central single base
substitution G

A in the mutated oligonucleotide
DREmut5 is sufficient
to alter the functionality of the DRE site.
Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays performed with the DREmut5
oligonucleotide (hereafter
mDRE) showed a considerable reduction in the
intensity of the
two uppermost retarded bands compared with wild-type
DRE, and
cold mDRE did not compete the DRE-specific retarded bands
(Fig.
4B). After transient transfections in NB69 or SK-N-MC cells,
increased
CAT activity was observed with the mutated reporter plasmid
pHD1mDRECAT,
similar to that seen with the wild-type pHD1CAT after
forskolin
treatment, and no further induction was obtained by PKA
stimulation
with the mutated DRE construct (Fig.
4C). We interpret
these results
as a repression of basal transcription at the DRE site.
Upon PKA
activation, or mutation of the DRE, the repression is relieved
and transcription is activated. Since forskolin is not able to
transactivate the construct containing the mutated DRE, we hypothesize
that PKA-mediated prodynorphin induction is initiated through
derepression at the DRE site. Based on alignment of the human
(
21), pig (
21), rat (
12), and mouse
(
34) prodynorphin
promoters, together with data from the
competition using DRE mutant
oligonucleotides, we propose the sequence
PuNGTCAPuPuG as the
consensus DRE.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the DRE on the human
prodynorphin promoter. (A) Sequence of the different DRE mutant
oligonucleotides aligned with the wild-type DRE. Their ability to
compete the specific DRE retarded bands is shown to the right. (B)
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showing the retardation pattern
with the wild-type DRE as a probe (lane 1) and the effect on the
specific retarded bands (arrowheads) of the selected mutation DREmut5
(renamed mDRE [lane 3]). Competition with 30-fold excess of cold
mutated DRE (mDRE) is shown in lane 2. Asterisks denote nonspecific
retarded bands. (B) Transient transfections in NB69 and in SK-N-MC
cells were performed with plasmids containing either the wild-type
promoter (pHD1CAT) or the promoter mutated at the DRE site
(pHD1mDRECAT). CAT activity obtained from each reporter plasmid under
basal conditions (open bars) and after forskolin treatment (solid bars)
is shown. The transfection experiments were repeated four times in
duplicate.
|
|
The DRE acts as a transcriptional silencer and mediates
PKA-dependent transcriptional derepression.
To determine whether
the DRE can repress transcription from a heterologous promoter, we
subcloned the DRE sequence in both orientations downstream from the
minimal promoter of the thymidine kinase (tk) gene in the
reporter vector pBLCAT2, generating reporter plasmids pTKDRECAT and
pTKcDRECAT (Fig. 5A). Transient
transfections in NB69 and SK-N-MC cells revealed that insertion of the
DRE site downstream from the tk minimal promoter,
independent of the orientation, significantly reduced the basal
transcription obtained with the tk minimal promoter alone
(Fig. 5B). The same experiment performed with HeLa cells or U373 human
glioma cells failed to show any difference in transcription between the
pTKDRECAT or pTKcDRECAT and pBLCAT2 reporter plasmids (Fig. 5B).
Consistent with these results, nuclear extracts from HeLa and U373
cells failed to generate the specific DRE retarded bands in
electrophoretic mobility shift assays that are readily observed with
nuclear extracts from NB69 or SK-N-MC cells (Fig. 5C). Thus,
transcriptional repression by DRE is cell specific and involves
specific nuclear proteins present in NB69 and SK-N-MC cells that
interact with the DRE sequence. However, the DRE did not influence
basal transactivation when placed upstream from the tk
minimal promoter in reporter plasmid pcDRETKCAT (Fig. 5A and B). These
results indicate that the DRE represses transcription in a manner
independent of the orientation and promoter context, but only when
placed downstream from the TATA box. To test the hypothesis that
PKA-dependent transcription of the human prodynorphin gene is mediated
through derepression at the DRE, NB69 and SK-N-MC cells were
transfected with reporter plasmid pTKDRECAT and treated with forskolin.
Consistent with the notion of transcriptional derepression, in both
cell lines under stimulated conditions, CAT activity from the reporter
pTKDRECAT was similar to that obtained with the vector pBLCAT2 (Fig.
5D).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Repression of the heterologous promoter from the
thymidine kinase gene by DRE. (A) Schematic representation of the DRE
constructs used (no. 2 to 4) and the empty reporter vector pBLCAT2 (no.
1). (B) Effect of the DRE under basal conditions after transient
transfections in NB69, SK-N-MC, HeLa, and U373 cell lines with the
reporter plasmids 2 to 4 shown in panel A, corresponding to the numbers
on the x axis. The results are expressed as CAT activity
relative to that of the pBLCAT2 reporter (no. 1). (C) Electrophoretic
mobility shift assay with the DRE as a probe and nuclear extracts from
the indicated cell lines (top). Arrows indicate the DRE-specific
retarded bands. Asterisks denote nonspecific retarded bands. (D) Effect
of the DRE after transient transfections in forskolin-treated NB69 and
SK-N-MC cells using the reporter plasmids 1 and 2 shown in panel A,
corresponding to the numbers on the x axis. The results are
expressed as CAT activity relative to that of the pBLCAT2 reporter
after forskolin treatment. All transfection experiments were repeated
four times in duplicate.
|
|
To further investigate the derepression activity, we tested whether the
appearance of the specific DRE retarded bands was
modified as a result
of PKA stimulation. Nuclear extracts were
prepared from the two
neuroblastoma cell lines under basal conditions
and at different times
following forskolin treatment. Our results
clearly showed that the
intensity of the specific DRE retarded
bands was reduced upon forskolin
treatment (Fig.
6A). Interestingly,
in
each cell line, the time course for the decreased intensity
of the DRE
bands closely correlated with the time course of prodynorphin
mRNA
induction (Fig.
6B). Furthermore, the decrease in intensity
of the
specific DRE retarded band after forskolin was reversed
by H89, a
selective inhibitor of PKA (Fig.
6C, compare lanes 3
and 4), and was
mimicked by treatment with the stable analog of
cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP
(Fig.
6C, compare lanes 1 to 3). Together,
these findings support a
mechanism by which, under basal conditions,
a nuclear repressor
occupies the DRE site. Upon PKA induction,
the repressor is released
from the DRE and transcription can proceed.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Blocking of binding to the DRE after PKA activation
correlates with the increase in prodynorphin expression in NB69 and
SK-N-MC cells. (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showing
reduction in the DRE-specific retarded bands (arrows) at the indicated
times (top) after forskolin treatment. (B) Southern blot after RT-PCR
showing increase in prodynorphin expression in NB69 and SK-N-MC cells
at the indicated times (top) after forskolin treatment. Amplification
of -actin was performed in parallel as a control for the mRNA input.
(C) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showing reduction in the
DRE-specific retarded bands (arrows) by dibutyryl-cAMP (lane 2) or
forskolin (lane 3) treatments at the 6-h time point with the NB69 cell
line. The effect of forskolin treatment blocked by H89 is shown in lane
4. Asterisks in panels A and C denote nonspecific retarded bands.
|
|
A 110-kDa nuclear protein complex binds specifically to the
DRE.
Our results indicate that the DRE behaves as a
stimulus-dependent transcriptional silencer and controls both basal and
forskolin-induced transcription. To characterize the nuclear protein or
proteins that bind to the DRE, we performed UV cross-linking of nuclear extracts from NB69 cells incubated with the DRE probe. Two specific bands with apparent molecular masses of 110 and 55 kDa, respectively, were obtained after UV irradiation (Fig.
7A, lane 3). The intensity of these bands
was reduced when the protein-DNA interaction was performed in the
presence of proteinase K or when a 30-fold excess of cold DRE was added
(Fig. 7A, lanes 2 and 4, respectively). Omission of the UV irradiation
resulted in the absence of specific bands (Fig. 7A, lane 1).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Characterization of the nuclear activity that binds to
the DRE site. (A) NB69 nuclear extracts were UV cross-linked after
incubation with the DRE probe and electrophoresed. Three micrograms of
proteinase K (lane 2) or a 30-fold excess of cold DRE (lane 4)
abolished or reduced, respectively, the specific autoradiographic
signal (lane 3). Without UV irradiation, no specific band was observed
(lane 1). (B) Southwestern analysis with NB69 nuclear extracts. A
protein complex of 110 kDa was obtained with the DRE probe. The
autoradiographic band was competed with an excess of cold DRE but not
by cold mDRE (top). A probe containing the mutated DRE seriously
reduced the autoradiographic signal. (C) Southwestern analysis with the
DRE as a probe and nuclear extracts from the neuroblastoma cell lines
indicated (top) and human brain samples. The arrow indicates the
specific band obtained for the 110-kDa protein complex. Protein
molecular mass markers are shown to the left.
|
|
In order to validate this finding, we performed Southwestern analysis
with nuclear extracts from NB69 cells and the DRE oligonucleotide
as a
probe. Binding to a protein complex of 110 kDa was observed
reproducibly (Fig.
7B, lane 1). The intensity of the 110-kDa band
was
specifically reduced upon competition with an excess of cold
DRE
oligonucleotide, but was not modified by an excess of cold
oligonucleotide containing the canonical sequences for CRE or
the AP-1
site (Fig.
7B, lanes 2 to 4). Furthermore, no reduction
in intensity
was observed upon competition with the mutated DRE
oligonucleotide
(Fig.
7B, lane 5), although when the mutated DRE
oligonucleotide was
used as a probe, a faint 110-kDa band was
still observed (Fig.
7B, lane
6). This is in agreement with results
obtained by electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (Fig.
4A) and
suggests that the mutated DRE may
retain some residual binding
activity in vitro. The 110-kDa DRE binding
protein complex was
also detected in nuclear extracts from SK-N-MC,
SK-NB(E), and
SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell lines (Fig.
7C).
Conversely,
the 110-kDa band was absent in nuclear extracts from HeLa
and
U373 cells (data not shown). Interestingly, Southwestern analysis
of nuclear extracts prepared from human caudate and cerebellum
also
showed the 110-kDa band corresponding to the DRE binding
protein (Fig.
7C). These results support the hypothesis that the
110-kDa protein
complex that binds specifically to the DRE site
corresponds to the
repressor activity, which, under basal conditions,
is responsible for
transcriptional silencing of genes containing
the DRE
element.
To test whether the 110-kDa DRE binding protein complex indeed
corresponds to the factor which reduces its binding to the
DRE upon PKA
stimulation, we performed Southwestern experiments
using nuclear
extracts from forskolin-treated NB69 or SK-N-MC
cells. In agreement
with the time course for unbinding from the
DRE (Fig.
6A) and the time
course for prodynorphin induction (Fig.
6B) after forskolin, a
substantial reduction in intensity of the
110-kDa band was observed 6 or 24 h after PKA stimulation of NB69
or SK-N-MC cells,
respectively (Fig.
8). In NB69 cells,
binding
to the 110-kDa band returned to control values 12 h
following
forskolin (Fig.
8), corresponding to the time when
prodynorphin
mRNA levels have returned to basal values (Fig.
6B).
Conversely,
in SK-N-MC cells, in which prodynorphin mRNA levels
remained elevated
up to 48 h after forskolin (Fig.
6B), binding to
the 110-kDa band
stayed reduced 24 h after treatment, the longest
time point analyzed
(Fig.
8).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
PKA activation blocks binding of the DRE probe to the
110-kDa protein complex. The results represent Southwestern analysis
with nuclear extracts from NB69 and SK-N-MC cells at different times
after forskolin treatment. The arrow indicates the specific band
obtained for the 110-kDa protein complex.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Using deletion mapping and site-directed mutagenesis, we have
characterized the DRE site, an intragenic regulatory element that
regulates basal and PKA-dependent induction of the human prodynorphin
gene. Our results suggest a novel mechanism that involves PKA-dependent
transcriptional derepression by differential binding of the DRE binding
protein complex to the DRE.
In an early report about the human prodynorphin gene, the
transcriptional start site was assigned based on its proximity to a
putative TATA box (21). Later, Douglass et al.
(12) determined the transcription start site in the rat gene
and, upon comparison with the human gene, concluded that the postulated
transcription start site in the human gene was incorrect. Instead, they
found a region in the human promoter with close sequence similarity to
the rat prodynorphin transcription start site (12). More recently, RNase protection analysis also identified this region as the
start of transcription in the human gene (15). Our data for
the human transcription start site agree with these more recent predictions (12, 15). Moreover, we found that the human gene contains two transcription start sites, as has been previously described for the rat gene (12). The existence of several
sites for transcriptional initiation may reflect the presence of a
strong secondary structure in this region, but its functional
significance, if any, is presently not understood.
The human DRE is related to rat DynCRE4, an asymmetric CRE-like
sequence (CGTCA) first described in the rat prodynorphin promoter that
participates in transcriptional activation by cAMP (11, 12,
28). Like DynCRE4, the human DRE is intragenic and is located in
close proximity to the transcription start site. However, the human DRE
contains the sequence GGAGTCA, which more
closely resembles an AP-1 sequence (TGAGTCA) in which the
initial T is replaced by a G (underlined). Nevertheless, competition
experiments with AP-1 or CRE cold oligonucleotides in either
electrophoretic mobility shift or Southwestern assays did not modify
the binding to the DRE probe, suggesting that the DRE behaves neither
as a canonical CRE nor as an AP-1 site. Instead, the DRE probe forms two cell-specific slowly migrating retarded bands with nuclear extracts
from prodynorphin-expressing human neuroblastoma cells. The central G
residue in the DRE is essential for the binding to the element in vitro
and for the regulatory action of the DRE in transient transfection
experiments, further indicating the specificity of the DRE-protein
interaction. We have defined a preliminary DRE consensus
(PuNGTCAPuPuG) based on sequence alignment of prodynorphin genes
and nucleotide substitutions. However, a final consensus has to await
the identification of DRE sequences present in other genes.
Importantly, reduction in the binding to the DRE upon PKA stimulation
correlates well with an increased transactivation of the prodynorphin
promoter and an increased expression of prodynorphin, indicating that
the DRE functions as a transcriptional silencer. Supporting this
notion, the DRE can repress transcription in an orientation-independent
manner when placed downstream from the transcription start site of a heterologous promoter. However, the DRE shows a position-dependent repressor activity, being totally ineffective when placed upstream of
the TATA box. A similar effect has been described recently for the SNOG
site, a negative regulatory element that confers neuron-specific
expression to the GAP-43 gene and is also present in promoters of other
neuron-specific genes, such as those coding for SNAP-25 and nNOS
(43). Since the position downstream from the transcription
start site appears to be essential for the function of DRE, occupancy
of this site by specific repressor proteins may interfere with the
formation of the transcription initiation complex or with its
conversion to a functional elongation complex and thus inhibit
transcription. Such mechanisms have been demonstrated to operate in the
repression of the H5 histone gene (16). Furthermore, a
position-dependent transcriptional function has been shown recently for
the neuron-restrictive silencer (NRS) element (25, 32) in
the regulation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene (5). In neuronal tissue, the NRS activates transcription if placed in close proximity to or downstream from the TATA box, but
silences the expression of the gene in neurons when located further
upstream (5). Interestingly, in nonneuronal tissue, the NRS
consistently behaves as a transcriptional silencer (5).
Two independent experimental techniques, UV cross-linking and
Southwestern analysis, have allowed the initial characterization of the
DRE binding activity, a 110-kDa nuclear complex that specifically binds
to the DRE. In addition, a weaker 55-kDa band observed after UV
cross-linking was competed with unlabeled DRE. It is tempting to
speculate that the 110-kDa complex represents a dimer of the 55-kDa
protein and that these two forms generate the two DRE-specific retarded
bands. The DRE binding activity has been detected reproducibly in the
prodynorphin-expressing cell lines tested, as well as in caudate
samples from human brain. The latter finding further strengthens the
functional significance of the DRE binding activity, since it is
associated with the high level of expression of the prodynorphin gene
in the caudate in vivo (2). However, the 110-kDa nuclear activity was observed also in human cerebellum. Since prodynorphin is
expressed at very low levels in rat cerebellum (2), this suggests that the DRE binding protein complex may be involved in the
regulation of other genes having DRE or DRE-like elements in their promoters.
The increased activity of the prodynorphin promoter containing a
mutation in the DRE implicates DRE binding activity in the repression
of prodynorphin transcription under basal conditions. Unlike other
repressor factors that restrict transcription of their target genes to
cells in which these genes are not expressed (6, 24, 36, 37,
43), the DRE binding activity was detected in cell lines and a
brain region where prodynorphin is expressed. This indicates that the
DRE binding activity does not confer cell-specific expression, but
rather determines gene inducibility in a cell-specific manner.
Derepression of the peripherin gene occurs in a cell-specific manner in
NGF-differentiated PC12 cells through protein-protein interactions that
displace the repressor NF1-L from the negative regulatory element NRE
located in the proximal promoter of the gene. However, NF1-L is also
detectable in undifferentiated PC12 cells and in nonneuronal cells,
where it silences transcription of the peripherin gene (1,
39).
PKA activation in human neuroblastoma cells transactivates the
prodynorphin gene, and the time course of this induction correlates with a reduction in binding to the DRE. The mechanism of PKA-mediated derepression at the DRE is presently unknown. However, one could speculate that phosphorylation by PKA reduces the affinity of the DRE
binding protein for the DRE, accounting for the derepression. Alternatively, PKA-dependent phosphorylation of other nucleoproteins able to interact with the DRE binding protein may play a role in
prodynorphin derepression. Recently, mechanisms of derepression have
been documented in which changes in the protein components of a
DNA-protein complex lead to unbinding from the regulatory element
(1, 39). Release of repressor proteins, allowing transactivators to bind to a regulatory element, has been described in
the elastin and Pit1, or GHF1, genes. The IGF-I-mediated increase in
elastin transcription occurs via a mechanism of derepression that
involves activation of a retinoblastoma control element by nuclear
complexes which contain the Rb protein following the abrogation of Sp3
repressor binding (9). In the case of the Pit1/GHF1 gene,
the release of AP-1 complexes allows the Pit1/GHF1 protein to act at an
enhancer site close to the AP-1 site, thus causing upregulation of the
gene (10). Furthermore, a mechanism of derepression mediated
by distal regulatory elements has been proposed in the rat prodynorphin
gene (8). In this case, transactivation of the rat promoter
by AP-1 nuclear complexes requires derepression by phosphorylation of
the CREB protein.
Taken together, our results suggest that PKA-dependent transcriptional
derepression acting at the DRE is responsible for the induction of the
prodynorphin gene in human neuroblastoma cells. Recently, using
expression cloning with the DRE as a probe, we have isolated a cDNA
encoding a protein that binds to DRE as a 110-kDa complex. A manuscript
describing these results has been submitted elsewhere. Further studies
involving the cDNA coding for the DRE binding protein should lead to
better understanding of the mechanism of the PKA-induced changes in
prodynorphin gene expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank N. S. Foulkes and W. A. Link for critical reading
of the manuscript, J. Chowen for correction of English style and grammar, and I. DomPablo and D. Campos for technical assistance.
This work has been supported by grants from DGICYT (PB95-0099), CAM
(I+D0049/94), Europharma S.A., and Janssen-Cilag S.A. to J.R.N.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de
Neurobiología, C.S.I.C., Av. Dr. Arce 37, 28002 Madrid, Spain.
Phone: 34 1 585 4726. Fax: 34 1 585 4754. E-mail:
JRNARANJO{at}SAMBA.CNB.UAM.ES.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, A. D.,
D. M. Choate, and M. A. Thompson.
1995.
NF1-L is the DNA-binding component of the protein complex at the peripherin negative regulatory element.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:6975-6983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alvarez, G.,
A. Fairén,
J. Douglass, and J. R. Naranjo.
1990.
Expression of the prodynorphin gene in the developing and adult cerebral cortex of the rat: an in situ hybridization study.
J. Comp. Neurol.
300:287-300[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Andrews, N. C., and D. V. Faller.
1991.
A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:2499[Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1995.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
Wiley, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Bessis, A.,
N. Champtiaux,
L. Chatelin, and J.-P. Changeux.
1997.
The neuron-restrictive silencer element: a dual enhancer/silencer crucial for patterned expression of a nicotine receptor gene in the brain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:5906-5911[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chong, J. A.,
J. Tapia-Ramirez,
S. Kim,
J. J. Toledo-Aral,
Y. Zheng,
M. C. Boutros,
Y. M. Altshuller,
M. A. Frohman,
S. D. Kraner, and G. Mandel.
1995.
REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons.
Cell
80:949-957[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cole, R. L.,
C. Konradi,
J. Douglass, and S. E. Hyman.
1995.
Neuronal adaptation to amphetamine and dopamine: molecular mechanisms of prodynorphin gene regulation in rat striatum.
Neuron
14:813-823[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Collins-Hicok, J.,
L. Lin,
C. Spiro,
P. J. Laybourn,
R. Tschumper,
B. Rapacz, and C. T. McMurray.
1994.
Induction of the rat prodynorphin gene through Gs-coupled receptors may involve phosphorylation-dependent derepression and activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2837-2848[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Conn, K. J.,
C. B. Rich,
D. E. Jensen,
M. R. Fontanilla,
M. M. Bashir,
J. Rosenbloom, and J. A. Foster.
1996.
Insulin-like growth factor-1 regulates transcription of elastin gene through a putative retinoblastoma control element.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28853-28860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Delhase, M.,
J. L. Castrillo,
M. de la Hoya,
F. Rajas, and E. L. Hooghe-Peters.
1996.
AP-1 and Oct-1 transcription factors down-regulate the expression of the human PIT1/GHF1 gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:32349-32358[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Douglass, J.,
A. A. McKinzie, and K. M. Pollock.
1994.
Identification of multiple DNA elements regulating basal and protein kinase A-induced transcriptional expression of the rat prodynorphin gene.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:333-344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Douglass, J.,
C. T. McMurray,
J. E. Garrett,
J. P. Adelman, and L. Calvetta.
1989.
Characterization of the rat prodynorphin gene.
Mol. Endocrinol.
3:2070-2078[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Foulkes, N. S., and P. Sassone-Corsi.
1996.
Transcription factors coupled to the cAMP-signalling pathway.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1288:101-121.
|
| 14.
|
Geijer, T.,
J. Bergh, and L. Terenius.
1991.
Expression of prodynorphin in human small cell lung carcinoma cell lines.
Regul. Pept.
34:181-188[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Geijer, T.,
M. Telkov, and L. Terenius.
1995.
Characterization of human prodynorphin gene transcripts.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215:881-888[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Gomez-Cuadrado, A.,
S. Rousseau,
J. Renaud, and A. Ruiz-Carrillo.
1992.
Repression of the H5 histone gene by a factor from erythrocytes that binds to the region of transcription initiation.
EMBO J.
11:1857-1866[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Goodrich, J. A.,
G. Cutter, and R. Tjian.
1996.
Contacts in context: promoter specificity and macromolecular interactions in transcription.
Cell
84:825-830[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Gorman, C. M.,
L. F. Moffat, and B. H. Howard.
1982.
Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2:1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Gray, S., and M. Levine.
1996.
Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
10:700-710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hanna-Rose, W., and U. Hansen.
1996.
Active repression mechanisms of eukaryotic transcription repressors.
Trends Genet.
12:229-234[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Horikawa, S.,
T. Takai,
M. Toyosato,
H. Takahashi,
M. Noda,
H. Kakidani,
T. Kobo,
T. Hirose,
S. Inayama,
H. Hayashida,
T. Miyata, and S. Numa.
1983.
Isolation and structural organization of the human preproenkephalin B gene.
Nature
306:611-614[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hunter, J. C.,
V. L. Woodburn,
C. Durieux,
E. K. E. Pettersson,
J. A. Poat, and J. Hughes.
1995.
c-fos antisense oligodeoxynucleotide increases formalin-induced nociception and regulates preprodynorphin expression.
Neuroscience
65:485-492[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Karin, M., and T. Smeal.
1992.
Control of transcription factor by signal transduction pathways: the beginning to the end.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17:418-422[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kemp, L. M.,
C. L. Dent, and D. S. Latchman.
1990.
Octamer motif mediates transcriptional repression of HSV immediate early genes and octamer-containing cellular promoters in neuronal cells.
Neuron
4:215-222[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kraner, S. D.,
J. A. Chong,
H.-J. Tsay, and G. Mandel.
1992.
Silencing the type II sodium channel gene: a model for neural-specific gene regulation.
Neuron
9:37-44[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lucas, J. J.,
B. Mellström,
M. I. Colado, and J. R. Naranjo.
1993.
Molecular mechanism of pain: serotonin1A receptor agonists trigger transactivation by c-Fos of the prodynorphin gene in spinal cord neurons.
Neuron
10:599-611[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Luckow, B., and G. Schütz.
1987.
CAT construction with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoter and regulatory elements.
Nucleic Acids Res.
13:5490-5491.
|
| 28.
|
McMurray, C. T.,
L. Devi,
L. Calavetta, and J. Douglass.
1989.
Regulated expression of the prodynorphin gene in the R2C Leydig tumor cell line.
Endocrinology
124:49-59[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Messersmith, D. J.,
D. J. Kim,
J. Gu,
R. Dubner, and M. J. Iadarola.
1996.
c-Jun activation of DynCRE 3 site in the prodynorphin promoter.
Mol. Brain Res.
40:15-22[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Messersmith, D. J.,
J. Gu,
R. Dubner,
J. Douglass, and M. J. Iadarola.
1994.
Basal and inducible transcriptional activity of an upstream AP-1/CRE element (DYNCRE3) in the prodynorphin promoter.
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
5:238-245[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Morgan, J. I., and T. Curran.
1991.
Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous system: involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun.
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
14:421-451[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Mori, N.,
C. Schoenherr,
D. J. Vandenberh, and D. J. Anderson.
1992.
A common silencer element in the SCG10 and type II Na+ channel genes binds a factor present in nonneuronal cells but not in neuronal cells.
Neuron
9:45-54[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Naranjo, J. R.,
B. Mellström,
M. Achaval, and P. Sassone-Corsi.
1991.
Molecular pathways of pain: Fos/Jun-mediated activation of the prodynorphin gene through a noncanonical AP-1 site.
Neuron
6:607-617[Medline].
|
| 34.
| Naranjo, J. R. Unpublished data.
|
| 35.
|
Sassone-Corsi, P.
1995.
Transcription factors responsive to cAMP.
Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.
11:355-377[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schoenherr, C. J., and D. J. Anderson.
1995.
The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes.
Science
267:1360-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Schoenherr, C. J., and D. J. Anderson.
1995.
Silencing is golden: negative regulation in the control of neuronal gene transcription.
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
5:566-571[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Segal, R. A., and M. E. Greenberg.
1996.
Intracellular signaling pathways activated by neurotrophic factors.
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
19:463-489[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Thompson, M. A.,
E. Lee,
D. Lawe,
E. Gizang-Ginsberg, and E. B. Ziff.
1992.
Nerve growth factor-induced derepression of peripherin gene expression is associated with alterations in proteins binding to a negative regulatory element.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2501-2513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Tjian, R., and T. Maniatis.
1994.
Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces.
Cell
77:5-8[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Ventura, C.,
G. Pintus,
I. Vaona,
F. Bennardini,
G. Pinna, and B. Tadolini.
1995.
Phorbol ester regulation of opioid peptide gene expression in myocardial cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:30115-30120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Wagner, J. J.,
G. W. Terman, and C. Chavkin.
1993.
Endogenous dynorphins inhibit excitatory neurotransmission and block LTP induction in the hippocampus.
Nature
363:451-454[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Weber, J. R. M., and J. H. P. Skene.
1997.
Identification of a novel repressive element that contributes to neuron-specific gene expression.
J. Neurosci.
17:7583-7593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Weisskopf, M. G.,
R. A. Zalutsky, and R. A. Nicoll.
1993.
The opioid peptide dynorphin mediates heterosynaptic depression of hippocampal mossy fiber synapses and modulates long-term potentiation.
Nature
362:423-427[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1998, p. 6921-6929, Vol. 18, No. 12
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rivas, M., Mellstrom, B., Torres, B., Cali, G., Ferrara, A. M., Terracciano, D., Zannini, M., Morreale de Escobar, G., Naranjo, J. R.
(2009). The DREAM Protein Is Associated with Thyroid Enlargement and Nodular Development. Mol. Endocrinol.
23: 862-870
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mellstrom, B., Savignac, M., Gomez-Villafuertes, R., Naranjo, J. R.
(2008). Ca2+-Operated Transcriptional Networks: Molecular Mechanisms and In Vivo Models. Physiol. Rev.
88: 421-449
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Matsuda, M., Yamamoto, T.-a., Hirata, M.
(2006). Ca2+-Dependent Regulation of Calcitonin Gene Expression by the Transcriptional Repressor DREAM. Endocrinology
147: 4608-4617
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jacobson, D. A., Cho, J., Landa, L. R. Jr., Tamarina, N. A., Roe, M. W., Buxbaum, J. D., Philipson, L. H.
(2006). Downstream regulatory element antagonistic modulator regulates islet prodynorphin expression. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.
291: E587-E595
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zamorano, R., Suchindran, S., Gainer, J. V.
(2006). 3'-Untranslated region of the type 2 bradykinin receptor is a potent regulator of gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
290: F456-F464
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gomez-Villafuertes, R., Torres, B., Barrio, J., Savignac, M., Gabellini, N., Rizzato, F., Pintado, B., Gutierrez-Adan, A., Mellstrom, B., Carafoli, E., Naranjo, J. R.
(2005). Downstream Regulatory Element Antagonist Modulator Regulates Ca2+ Homeostasis and Viability in Cerebellar Neurons. J. Neurosci.
25: 10822-10830
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Osawa, M., Dace, A., Tong, K. I., Valiveti, A., Ikura, M., Ames, J. B.
(2005). Mg2+ and Ca2+ Differentially Regulate DNA Binding and Dimerization of DREAM. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 18008-18014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Scsucova, S., Palacios, D., Savignac, M., Mellstrom, B., Naranjo, J. R., Aranda, A.
(2005). The repressor DREAM acts as a transcriptional activator on Vitamin D and retinoic acid response elements. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 2269-2279
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rivas, M., Mellstrom, B., Naranjo, J. R., Santisteban, P.
(2004). Transcriptional Repressor DREAM Interacts with Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 and Regulates Thyroglobulin Gene Expression. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 33114-33122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Link, W. A., Ledo, F., Torres, B., Palczewska, M., Madsen, T. M., Savignac, M., Albar, J. P., Mellstrom, B., Naranjo, J. R.
(2004). Day-Night Changes in Downstream Regulatory Element Antagonist Modulator/Potassium Channel Interacting Protein Activity Contribute to Circadian Gene Expression in Pineal Gland. J. Neurosci.
24: 5346-5355
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de los Santos-Arteaga, M., Sierra-Dominguez, S. A., Fontanella, G. H., Delgado-Garcia, J. M., Carrion, A. M.
(2003). Analgesia Induced by Dietary Restriction Is Mediated by the {kappa}-Opioid System. J. Neurosci.
23: 11120-11126
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sakai, N., Thome, J., Newton, S. S., Chen, J., Kelz, M. B., Steffen, C., Nestler, E. J., Duman, R. S.
(2002). Inducible and Brain Region-Specific CREB Transgenic Mice. Mol. Pharmacol.
61: 1453-1464
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carafoli, E.
(2002). Calcium signaling: A tale for all seasons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 1115-1122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ledo, F., Carrión, A. M., Link, W. A., Mellström, B., Naranjo, J. R.
(2000). DREAM-alpha CREM Interaction via Leucine-Charged Domains Derepresses Downstream Regulatory Element-Dependent Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 9120-9126
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
SUSINI, S., VAN HAASTEREN, G., LI, S., PRENTKI, M., SCHLEGEL, W.
(2000). Essentiality of intron control in the induction of c-fos by glucose and glucoincretin peptides in INS-1 {beta}-cells. FASEB J.
14: 128-136
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Osawa, M., Tong, K. I., Lilliehook, C., Wasco, W., Buxbaum, J. D., Cheng, H.-Y. M., Penninger, J. M., Ikura, M., Ames, J. B.
(2001). Calcium-regulated DNA Binding and Oligomerization of the Neuronal Calcium-sensing Protein, Calsenilin/DREAM/KChIP3. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 41005-41013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]