To map the ETO domain(s) required for CoR interaction, we performed
yeast two-hybrid (data not shown) and GST pulldown experiments. Truncation of ETO at amino acid 416 (ETO
C) abrogated the interaction with SMRT (Fig. 2a). Finer mapping of the
interaction revealed that deletion of amino acids 488 to 525, containing the zinc fingers of ETO, also prevented CoR interaction.
Point mutation of cysteine residues in either zinc finger abolished the
interaction (C488S and C508S; Fig. 2a), indicating that both zinc
fingers are critical for the interaction between ETO and a CoR. The
C-terminal truncation (ETO
C) that abolished in vitro interaction
between ETO and SMRT similarly abolished the ETO-N-CoR interaction in
vivo, as demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 2b).
To investigate the possibility that ETO might recruit the HDAC
component of the CoR/HDAC complex, anti-Flag immunoprecipitates were
analyzed for the presence of HDAC activity and protein (Fig. 2c and d).
HDAC activity (Fig. 2c) and HDAC1 protein (Fig. 2d) were undetectable
in anti-Flag immunoprecipitates from cells transfected with the empty
Flag control vector, although anti-N-CoR antibodies immunoprecipitated
levels of HDAC activity comparable to those of Flag-ETO-transfected
cells (Fig. 2c and data not shown). HDAC activity was specifically
detected in the anti-Flag immunoprecipitates from Flag-ETO-transfected
293T cells (Fig. 2c); likewise, anti-Flag antibodies specifically
precipitated significant levels of HDAC1 protein (Fig. 2d). These
results confirmed the specific association of ETO with HDAC in vivo.
ETO did not interact with HDAC in vitro (Fig. 2e), strongly suggesting
that the interaction with HDAC in vivo was indirect and due to the
interaction with an endogenous CoR. Moreover, ETO
C did not recruit
HDAC activity or protein in vivo (Fig. 2c and d), further suggesting
that the ETO-N-CoR interaction is required for HDAC recruitment in
vivo. The ETO point mutants that did not interact with SMRT similarly
did not coimmunoprecipitate with N-CoR or HDAC1 in 293T cells (data not shown).
In the AML1/ETO fusion protein, the transcriptional activation domain
of AML1 has been replaced with ETO (41, 42). Therefore, we
tested whether AML1/ETO retained the ability of ETO to interact with
CoRs and HDACs. Both GST-NCoR RD3 and GST-SMRT RD fusion proteins (Fig.
3a and data not shown) interacted with in
vitro-translated AML1/ETO. A specific AML1/ETO-N-CoR/HDAC complex was
detected in vivo in coimmunoprecipitation experiments performed with
293T cells cotransfected with a Myc-tagged AML1/ETO expression vector. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc tag antibodies, and
the resulting immunocomplexes were analyzed for the presence of N-CoR
protein and HDAC activity. As shown in Fig. 3b and c, N-CoR was
specifically detected by Western blotting and anti-Myc tag antibodies
precipitated significant levels of HDAC activity from
AML1/ETO-transfected cells. In contrast, N-CoR did not interact with
AML1/ETO
C in vitro (Fig. 3a) and it was absent in immunoprecipitates from AML1/ETO
C-transfected cells (Fig. 3b). Likewise, no detectable HDAC activity was found in the AML1/ETO
C immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3c).
It has been previously demonstrated that the ectopic expression of
AML1/ETO into hematopoietic precursor cell lines blocks terminal
differentiation (48, 64, 70, 73). To explore the biological
relevance of the interaction between AML1/ETO and the N-CoR-HDAC
complex, we compared the abilities of AML1/ETO and the AML1/ETO
C
mutant to block terminal differentiation of human promonocytic U937
cells after vitamin D3 and TGF-
treatment. To facilitate
the monitoring of ectopic protein expression, the two fusion proteins
were fused to the GFP. The parental GFP, GFP-AML1/ETO, and
GFP-AML1/ETO
C cDNAs were cloned under the control of the 5' long
terminal repeat of a derivative of the hybrid Epstein-Barr virus-retroviral PINCO vector (see Materials and Methods)
(14). Efficiency of infection, as evaluated by the frequency
of GFP-positive cells, varied from 70 to 90% (PINCO control) to 50 to
75% (GFP-AML1/ETO and GFP-AML1/ETO
C) (Fig.
4a). The intensities of the fluorescence signals were similar in AML1/ETO and AML1/ETO
C cells, indicating comparable levels of expression that were confirmed by Western analysis
(Fig. 4a and data not shown). Evaluation of vitamin
D3-induced differentiation in cells infected with either
the control, GFP-AML1/ETO, or GFP-AML1/ETO
C retrovirus was performed
by double-fluorescence fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)
analysis (see Materials and Methods) of the CD14 differentiation
antigen in GFP-positive and -negative cells. In cells infected with the
control retrovirus, CD14 expression was low or absent without
stimulation but increased progressively during vitamin
D3-induced differentiation in both the GFP-positive and
-negative cell populations (Fig. 4b). Comparable up-regulation of CD14
expression was also detected in the GFP-negative cells of both the
AML1/ETO- and AML1/ETO
C-infected populations. Differentiation was,
instead, inhibited in the GFP-AML1/ETO GFP-positive cells, while it was
almost complete in the GFP-AML1/ETO
C GFP-positive cells (Fig. 4b).
The ability of the GFP-AML1/ETO fusion protein to inhibit
differentiation was similar to what we have observed for the parental
AML1/ETO when it is expressed in U937 or 32D cells (unpublished
results). It therefore appears that the integrity of the N-CoR binding
region is critical for the capacity of AML1/ETO to block
differentiation by vitamin D3 and TGF-
, suggesting that recruitment of the N-CoR-HDAC complex is critical to the biological activity of AML1/ETO.
The data presented here identify a role for recruitment of the
N-CoR/SMRT-HDAC repression complex in the mechanism of transcriptional repression by ETO and, possibly, other ETO family members
(31). Most importantly, our results suggest that one crucial
mechanism of oncogenic activation of AML1 by the t(8;21) chromosome
translocation is its conversion from a transcriptional activator to a
repressor. One of the AML1 isoforms (AML1B), in fact, is associated in
vivo with the transcriptional coactivator p300 (32). The
p300-interacting domain of AML1 is lost in the chromosomal
translocation and is replaced with ETO, which retains the N-CoR-HDAC
interaction domain. The resulting AML1/ETO fusion protein, therefore,
is devoid of the ability of AML1 to recruit one HAT (p300), while it is
endowed with that of ETO to recruit the N-CoR/SMRT CoR complex,
including HDAC. This would be predicted to alter the chromatin
structure of AML1 target genes in a manner that is the opposite of that normally associated with AML1B-dependent activation during
hematopoietic differentiation (Fig. 5
shows a model). This hypothesis is supported by recent findings showing
that AML1B is a transcriptional activator of some AML1 target
promoters, while AML1/ETO behaves as a transcriptional repressor
(11, 23, 38, 40, 41, 51). Consistent with our results, the
transcriptional repressor function of AML1/ETO was mapped within its
C-terminal region, including the two zinc fingers (40).
Our data strongly suggest that recruitment of the CoR/Sin3/HDAC complex
is important for the function of AML1/ETO. However, it should be
pointed out that this CoR complex may mediate transcriptional repression via both HDAC-dependent and HDAC-independent mechanisms. While this paper was under review, Wong and Privalsky reported on
SMRT-mediated repression that was unaffected by the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (65). Interestingly, we have observed that
trichostatin A only very modestly relieves ETO-dependent repression in
293T cells (74). It should also be noted that AML1/ETO has
been shown to activate the transcription of some genes, including those
for macrophage colony-stimulating factor and BCL-2 (33, 51).
This could relate to the recent observation that N-CoR and SMRT can activate a subset of genes that are normally repressed by thyroid hormone (57). Alternatively, this could reflect another
function of the AML1/ETO fusion protein. Further understanding of the
mechanism(s) mediating deregulation of AML1 target genes by AML1/ETO
awaits the analysis of chromatin structure and dynamics of those genes in vivo.
We thank C. Matteucci for excellent technical help, S. Nimer for
the AML1/ETO cDNA, C. Hassig and S. Schreiber for HDAC1 antiserum, and
C. Seiser for reagents and helpful discussions. V.G. and J.Z. contributed equally to this work.
This work was supported by NIH grants DK43806 and DK45586 (to M.A.L.),
by the DNA Sequencing Core of the Center for Molecular Studies in
Digestive and Liver Disease (NIH P30 DK50306) at the University of
Pennsylvania, and by grants from AIRC and EC (Biomed program) to S.M.
and P.G.P. M.F. is the recipient of a fellowship from INT (Milan).
| 1.
|
Alland, L.,
R. Muhle,
H. Hou,
J. Potes,
L. Chin,
N. Schreiber-Agus, and R. A. DePinho.
1997.
Role for N-CoR and histone deacetylase in Sin3-mediated transcriptional repression.
Nature
387:49-55[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ayer, D. E.,
Q. A. Lawrence, and R. N. Eisenman.
1995.
Mad-Max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3.
Cell
80:767-776[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bae, S. C.,
E. Ogawa,
M. Maruyama,
H. Oka,
M. Satake,
K. Shigesada,
N. A. Jenkins,
D. J. Gilbert,
N. G. Copeland, and Y. Ito.
1994.
PEBP2 alpha B/mouse AML1 consists of multiple isoforms that possess differential transactivation potentials.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:3242-3252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Britos-Bray, M., and A. D. Friedman.
1997.
Core binding factor cannot synergistically activate the myeloperoxidase proximal enhancer in immature myeloid cells without c-Myb.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5127-5135[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Brownell, J. E.,
J. Zhou,
T. Ranalli,
R. Kobayashi,
D. G. Edmondson,
S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis.
1996.
Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation.
Cell
84:843-851[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Candau, R.,
J. X. Zhou,
C. D. Allis, and S. L. Berger.
1997.
Histone acetyltransferase activity and interaction with ADA2 are critical for GCN5 function in vivo.
EMBO J.
16:555-565[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Carmen, A. A.,
S. E. Rundlett, and M. Grunstein.
1996.
HDA1 and HDA3 are components of a yeast histone deacetylase (HDA) complex.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:15837-15844[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chen, H.,
R. J. Lin,
R. L. Schiltz,
D. Chakravarti,
A. Nash,
L. Nagy,
M. L. Privalsky,
Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans.
1997.
Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300.
Cell
90:569-580[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chen, J. D., and R. M. Evans.
1995.
A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors.
Nature
377:454-457[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Collins, S. J.
1998.
Acute promyelocytic leukemia: relieving repression induces remission.
Blood
91:2631-2633[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Frank, R.,
H. Zhang,
H. Uchida,
S. Meyers,
S. W. Hiebert, and S. D. Nimer.
1995.
AML1/ETO blocks transactivation of the GM-CSF promoter by AML1B.
Oncogene
11:2667-2674[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Giles, R. H.,
D. J. Peters, and M. H. Breuning.
1998.
Conjunction dysfunction: CBP/p300 in human disease.
Trends Gene.
14:178-183.
|
| 13.
|
Grant, P. A.,
D. E. Sterner,
L. J. Duggan,
J. L. Workman, and S. L. Berger.
1998.
The SAGA unfolds: convergence of transcription regulators in chromatin-modifying complexes.
Trends Cell Biol.
8:193-197.
[Medline] |
| 14.
|
Grignani, F.,
S. DeMatteis,
C. Nervi,
L. Tomassoni,
V. Gelmetti,
M. Cioce,
M. Fanelli,
M. Ruthardt,
F. F. Ferrara,
I. Zamir,
C. Seiser,
F. Grignani,
M. A. Lazar,
S. Minucci, and P. G. Pelicci.
1998.
Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor- recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia.
Nature
391:815-818[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Grignani, F.,
T. Kinsella,
A. Mencarelli,
M. Valtieri,
D. Riganelli,
F. Grignani,
L. Lanfrancone,
C. Peschle,
G. P. Nolan, and P. G. Pelicci.
1998.
High-efficiency gene transfer and selection of human hematopoietic progenitor cells with a hybrid EBV/retroviral vector expressing the green fluorescence protein.
Cancer Res.
58:14-19[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Grunstein, M.
1997.
Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription.
Nature
389:349-352[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Guidez, F.,
S. Ivins,
J. Zhu,
M. Soderstrom,
S. Waxman, and A. Zelent.
1998.
Reduced retinoic acid-sensitivities of nuclear receptor corepressor binding to PML- and PLZF-RAR underlie molecular pathogenesis and treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Blood
91:2634-2642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hassig, C. A.,
T. C. Fleischer,
A. N. Billin,
S. L. Schreiber, and D. E. Ayer.
1997.
Histone deacetylase activity is required for full transcriptional repression by mSin3A.
Cell
89:341-348[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hassig, C. A., and S. L. Schreiber.
1998.
Nuclear histone acetylases and deacetylases and transcriptional regulation: HATs off to HDACs.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
1:300-308.
|
| 20.
|
Hassig, C. A.,
J. K. Tong,
T. C. Fleischer,
T. Owa,
P. G. Grable,
D. E. Ayer, and S. L. Schreiber.
1998.
A role for histone deacetylase activity in HDAC1-mediated transcriptional repression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3519-3524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
He, L. Z.,
F. Guidex,
C. Tribioli,
D. Peruzzi,
M. Ruthardt,
A. Zelent, and P. P. Pandolfi.
1998.
Distinct interactions of PML-RAR and PLZF-RAR with co-repressors determine differential responses to RA in APL.
Nat. Gen.
18:126-135[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Heinzel, T.,
R. M. Lavinsky,
T.-M. Mullen,
M. Soderstrom,
C. D. Laherty,
J. Torchia,
W.-M. Yuang,
G. Brard,
S. D. Ngo,
J. R. Davie,
E. Seto,
R. N. Eisenman,
D. W. Rose,
C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1997.
A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression.
Nature
387:43-48[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Hiebert, S. W.,
J. R. Downing,
N. Lenny, and S. Meyers.
1996.
Transcriptional regulation by the t(8;21) fusion protein, AML-1/ETO.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
211:253-258[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hong, S. H.,
G. David,
C. W. Wong,
A. Dejean, and M. L. Privalsky.
1997.
SMRT corepressor interacts with PLZF and with the PML-retinoic acid receptor and PLZF-RAR oncoproteins associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9028-9033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Horlein, A. J.,
A. M. Naar,
T. Heinzel,
J. Torchia,
B. Gloss,
R. Kurokawa,
A. Ryan,
Y. Kamei,
M. Soderstrom,
C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1995.
Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor.
Nature
377:397-404[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.
1998.
Eukaryotic transcription: an interlaced network of transcription factors and chromatin-modifying machines.
Cell
92:307-313[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl.
1998.
Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5121-5127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Kagoshima, H.,
K. Shigesada,
M. Satake,
Y. Ito,
H. Miyoshi,
M. Ohki,
M. Pepling, and P. Gergen.
1993.
The Runt domain identifies a new family of heteromeric transcriptional regulators.
Trends Genet.
9:338-341[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kao, H.-Y.,
P. Ordentlich,
K. Koyano-Nakagawa,
Z. Tang,
M. Downes,
C. R. Kintner,
R. M. Evans, and T. Kadesch.
1998.
A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway.
Genes Dev.
12:2269-2277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Kasten, M. M.,
S. Dorland, and D. J. Stillman.
1997.
A large protein complex containing the yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p transcriptional regulators.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4852-4858[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Kitabayashi, I.,
K. Ida,
F. Morohoshi,
A. Yokoyama,
N. Mitsuhashi,
K. Shimizu,
N. Nomura,
Y. Hayashi, and M. Ohki.
1998.
The AML1-MTG8 leukemic fusion protein forms a complex with a novel member of the MTG8(ETO/CDR) family, MTGR1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:846-858[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Kitabayashi, I.,
A. Yokoyama,
K. Shimizu, and M. Ohki.
1998.
Interaction and functional cooperation of the leukemia-associated factors AML1 and p300 in myeloid cell differentiation.
EMBO J.
17:2994-3004[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Klampfer, L.,
J. Zhang,
A. O. Zelenetz,
H. Uchida, and S. D. Nimer.
1996.
The AML1/ETO fusion protein activates transcription of BCL-2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:14059-14061[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Korzus, E.,
J. Torchia,
D. W. Rose,
L. Xu,
R. Kurokawa,
E. M. McInerney,
T. M. Mullen,
C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1998.
Transcription factor-specific requirements for coactivators and their acetyltransferase functions.
Science
279:703-707[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Kuo, M. H.,
J. Zhou,
P. Jambeck,
M. E. Churchill, and C. D. Allis.
1998.
Histone acetyltransferase activity of yeast Gcn5p is required for the activation of target genes in vivo.
Genes Dev.
12:627-639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Laherty, C. D.,
A. N. Billin,
R. M. Lavinsky,
G. S. Yochum,
A. C. Bush,
J. M. Sun,
T. M. Mullen,
J. R. Davie,
D. W. Rose,
C. K. Glass,
M. G. Rosenfeld,
D. E. Ayer, and R. N. Eisenman.
1998.
SAP30, a component of the mSin3 corepressor complex involved in N-CoR-mediated repression by specific transcription factors.
Mol. Cell.
2:33-42[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Laherty, C. E.,
W.-M. Yang,
J.-M. Sun,
J. R. Davie,
E. Seto, and R. N. Eisenman.
1997.
Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate Mad transcriptional repression.
Cell
89:349-356[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Lenny, N.,
S. Meyers, and S. W. Hiebert.
1995.
Functional domains of the t(8;21) fusion protein, AML-1/ETO.
Oncogene
11:1761-1769[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Lin, R. J.,
L. Nagy,
S. Inoue,
W. Shao,
W. H. Miller, and R. M. Evans.
1998.
Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia.
Nature
391:811-814[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Lutterbach, B,
D. Sun,
J. Schuetz, and S. W. Hiebert.
1998.
The MYND motif is required for repression of basal transcription from the multidrug resistance 1 promoter by the t(8;21) fusion protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3604-3611[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Meyers, S.,
N. Lenny, and S. W. Hiebert.
1995.
The t(8;21) fusion protein interferes with AML1-B-dependent transcriptional activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1974-1982[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Miyoshi, H.,
T. Kozu,
K. Shimizu,
K. Enomoto,
N. Naseki,
Y. Kaneko,
N. Kamada, and M. Ohki.
1993.
The t(8;21) translocation in acute myeloid leukemia results in production of an AML1-MTG8 fusion transcript.
EMBO J.
12:2715-2721[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Mizzen, C. A.,
X. J. Yang,
T. Kokubo,
J. E. Brownell,
A. J. Bannister,
T. Owen-Hughes,
J. Workman,
L. Wang,
S. L. Berger,
T. Kouzarides,
Y. Nakatani, and C. D. Allis.
1996.
The TAF(II)250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity.
Cell
87:1261-1270[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Nagy, L.,
H.-Y. Kao,
D. Chakvarkti,
R. J. Lin,
C. A. Hassig,
D. E. Ayer,
S. L. Schreiber, and R. M. Evans.
1997.
Nuclear receptor repression mediated by a complex containing SMRT, mSin3A, and histone deacetylase.
Cell
89:373-380[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Nuchprayoon, I.,
S. Meyers,
L. M. Scott,
J. Suzow,
S. Hiebert, and A. D. Friedman.
1994.
PEBP2/CBF, the murine homolog of the human myeloid AML1 and PEBP2 beta/CBR beta proto-oncoproteins, regulates the murine myeloperoxidase and neutrophil elastase genes in immature myeloid cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:5558-5568[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Nucifora, G., and J. D. Rowley.
1995.
AML1 and the 8;21 and 3;21 translocations in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia.
Blood
86:1-14[Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Ogryzko, V. V.,
R. L. Schlitz,
V. Russanova,
B. H. Howard, and Y. Nakatani.
1996.
The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases.
Cell
87:953-959[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Okuda, T.,
Z. Cai,
N. Lenny,
C. J. Lyu,
J. M. vanDeursen,
H. Harada, and J. R. Downing.
1998.
Expression of a knocked-in AML1-ETO leukemia gene inhibits the establishment of normal definitive hematopoiesis and directly generates dysplastic hematopoietic progenitors.
Blood
91:3134-3143[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Okuda, T.,
J. vanDeursen,
S. W. Hiebert,
G. Grosveld, and J. R. Downing.
1996.
AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis.
Cell
84:321-330[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Petrovick, M. S.,
S. W. Hiebert,
A. D. Friedman,
C. J. Hetherington,
D. G. Tenen, and D.-E. Zhang.
1998.
Multiple functional domains of AML1: PU.1 and C/EBP synergize with different regions of AML1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3915-3925[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Rhoades, K. L.,
C. J. Hetherington,
J. D. Rowley,
S. W. Hiebert,
G. Nucifora,
D. G. Tenen, and D. E. Zhang.
1996.
Synergistic up-regulation of the myeloid-specific promoter for the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor by AML1 and the t(8;21) fusion protein may contribute to leukemogenesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11895-11900[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Roth, S. Y., and C. D. Allis.
1996.
Histone acetylation and chromatin assembly: a single escort, multiple dances?
Cell
87:5-8[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rundlett, S. E.,
A. A. Carmen,
R. Kobayashi,
S. Bavykin,
B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein.
1996.
HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:14503-14508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Rundlett, S. E.,
A. A. Carmen,
N. Suka,
B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein.
1998.
Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3.
Nature
392:831-835[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Spencer, T. E.,
G. Jenster,
M. M. Burcin,
C. D. Allis,
J. Zhou,
C. A. Mizzen,
N. J. McKenna,
S. A. Onate,
S. Y. Tsai,
M.-J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley.
1997.
Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase.
Nature
389:194-198[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Struhl, K.
1998.
Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.
Genes Dev.
12:599-606[Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Tagami, T.,
L. D. Madison,
T. Nagaya, and J. L. Jameson.
1997.
Nuclear receptor corepressors activate rather than suppress basal transcription of genes that are negatively regulated by thyroid hormone.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2642-2648[Abstract].
|
| 58.
|
Taunton, J.,
C. A. Hassig, and S. L. Schreiber.
1996.
A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p.
Science
272:408-411[Abstract].
|
| 59.
|
Torchia, J.,
C. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1998.
Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:373-383[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Uchida, H.,
J. Zhang, and S. D. Nimer.
1997.
AML1A and AML1B can transactivate the human IL-3 promoter.
J. Immunol.
158:2251-2258[Abstract].
|
| 61.
|
Utley, R. T.,
K. Ikeda,
P. A. Grant,
J. Cote,
D. J. Steger,
A. Eberharter,
S. John, and J. L. Workman.
1998.
Transcriptional activators direct histone acetyltransferase complexes to nucleosomes.
Nature
394:498-502[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Vidal, M., and R. F. Gaber.
1991.
RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:6317-6327[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Wang, L.,
L. Liu, and S. L. Berger.
1998.
Critical residues for histone acetylation by Gcn5, functioning in Ada and SAGA complexes, are also required for transcriptional function in vivo.
Genes Dev.
12:640-653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Westendorf, J. J.,
C. M. Yamamoto,
N. Lenny,
J. R. Downing,
M. E. Selsted, and S. W. Hiebert.
1998.
The t(8;21) fusion product, AML-1-ETO, associates with C/EBP-alpha, inhibits C/EBP-alpha-dependent transcription, and blocks granulocytic differentiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:322-333[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Wong, C.-W., and M. L. Privalsky.
1998.
Transcriptional repression by the SMRT-mDin3 corepressor: multiple interactions, multiple mechanisms, and a potential role for TFIIB.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5500-5510[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Xue, J.-C.,
E. J. Schwarz,
A. Chawla, and M. A. Lazar.
1996.
Distinct stages in adipogenesis revealed by retinoid inhibition of differentiation after induction of PPAR .
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1567-1575[Abstract].
|
| 67.
|
Yang, W.-M.,
C. Inouye,
Y. Zeng,
D. Bearss, and E. Seto.
1996.
Transcriptional repression by YY1 is mediated by interaction with a mammalian homolog of the yeast global repressor RPD3.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:12845-12850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Yang, W.-M.,
Y.-L. Yao,
J.-M. Sun,
J. R. Davie, and E. Seto.
1997.
Isolation and characterization of cDNAs corresponding to an additional member of the human histone deacetylase gene family.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:28001-28007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Yang, X. J.,
V. V. Ogryzko,
J. Nishikawa,
B. H. Howard, and Y. Nakatani.
1996.
A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A.
Nature
382:319-324[Medline].
|
| 70.
|
Yergeau, D. A.,
C. J. Hetherington,
Q. Wang,
P. Zhang,
A. H. Sharpe,
M. Binder,
M. Marin-Padilla,
D. G. Tenen,
N. A. Speck, and D. E. Zhang.
1997.
Embryonic lethality and impairment of haematopoiesis in mice heterozygous for an AML1-ETO fusion gene.
Nat. Genet.
15:303-306[Medline].
|
| 71.
|
Zamir, I.,
J. Dawson,
R. M. Lavinsky,
C. K. Glass,
M. G. Rosenfeld, and M. A. Lazer.
1997.
Cloning and characterization of a corepressor and potential component of the nuclear hormone receptor repression complex.
Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14400-14495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 72.
|
Zamir, I.,
H. P. Harding,
G. B. Atkins,
A. Hörlein,
C. K. Glass,
M. G. Rosenfeld, and M. A. Lazar.
1996.
A nuclear hormone receptor corepressor mediates transcriptional silencing by receptors with distinct repression domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5458-5465[Abstract].
|
| 73.
|
Zhang, D. E.
1997.
AML1 gene in human leukemias: dominant negative effects of the chimeric proteins over wild-type AML1.
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
88:1234-1235.
|
| 74.
| Zhang, J., and M. A. Lazar. Unpublished data.
|
| 75.
|
Zhang, J.,
I. Zamir, and M. A. Lazar.
1997.
Differential recognition of liganded and unliganded thyroid hormone receptor by retinoid X receptor regulates transcriptional repression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6887-6897[Abstract].
|
| 76.
|
Zhang, Y.,
R. Iratni,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg.
1997.
Histone deacetylases and SAP18, a novel polypeptide, are components of a human Sin3 complex.
Cell
89:357-364[Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Zhang, Y.,
Z. W. Sun,
R. Iratni,
B. H. Erdjument,
P. Tempst,
M. Hampsey, and D. Reinberg.
1998.
SAP30, a novel protein conserved between human and yeast, is a component of a histone deacetylase complex.
Mol. Cell.
1:1021-1031[Medline].
|
| 78.
|
Zhang, Y. W.,
S. C. Bae,
G. Huang,
Y. X. Fu,
J. Lu,
M. Y. Ahn,
Y. Kanno,
T. Kanno, and Y. Ito.
1997.
A novel transcript encoding an N-terminally truncated AML-PEPB2 B protein interferes with transactivation and blocks granulocytic differentiation of 32Dc13 myeloid cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4133-4145[Abstract].
|