Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1998, p. 7235-7242, Vol. 18, No. 12
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Endogenous Fluctuations of DNA Topology in the
Chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Maria L.
Salvador,1
Uwe
Klein,2 and
Lawrence
Bogorad3,*
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia 46100, Spain1;
Department of Biology,
University of Oslo, Blindern, 0316 Oslo,
Norway2; and
The Biological
Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
021383
Received 19 May 1998/Returned for modification 14 July
1998/Accepted 28 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
DNA supercoiling in the chloroplast of the unicellular green alga
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was found to change with a
diurnal rhythm in cells growing in alternating 12-h dark-12-h light
periods. Highest and lowest DNA superhelicities occurred at the
beginning and towards the end of the 12-h light periods, respectively.
The fluctuations in DNA supercoiling occurred concurrently and in the
same direction in two separate parts of the chloroplast genome, one
containing the genes psaB, rbcL, and
atpA and the other containing the atpB gene.
Fluctuations were not confined to transcribed DNA regions, indicating
simultaneous changes in DNA conformation all over the chloroplast
genome. Because the diurnal fluctuations persisted in cells kept in
continuous light, DNA supercoiling is judged to be under endogenous
control. The endogenous fluctuations in chloroplast DNA topology
correlated tightly with the endogenous fluctuations of overall
chloroplast gene transcription and with those of the pool sizes of most
chloroplast transcripts analyzed. This result suggests that DNA
superhelical changes have a role in the regulation of chloroplast gene
expression in Chlamydomonas.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Recurrent diurnal fluctuations of
molecular, biochemical, and physiological processes are common in
organisms living in daily light-dark regimens (6). In many
cases these fluctuations persist, at least for a few cycles, under
constant conditions, suggesting that they are under the control of an
endogenous circadian timing mechanism. The nature of the circadian
pacemaker remains elusive, despite considerable progress in recent
years in pinpointing the components of rhythmicity at the molecular
level in eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms (11).
Various analyses of a number of plant and algal circadian systems
indicate that regulation of transcription can account, at least in
part, for endogenous fluctuations of transcript levels (13, 27,
29, 30, 39). For example, a strong correlation has been found
between variations in pool sizes of individual RNAs and variations in
transcription rates, measured by run-on transcriptional assays or by in
vivo labeling techniques (16, 34). 5' sequences of
genes, whose expression is known to be circadian regulated, imposed
circadian fluctuations on levels of reporter gene transcripts (12,
19, 22, 27-29), and cis-acting sequences have been
delineated upstream of the wheat and Arabidopsis cab-1 and
cab-2 genes that conferred circadian rhythmicity onto levels
of transcripts of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and
-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter genes in transgenic tobacco (12,
27, 29).
In cells of the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii growing in 12-h light-12-h dark cycles, the abundance
of a number of nuclear and chloroplast transcripts has been found to
fluctuate diurnally, including transcripts of the nuclear
cab-2 gene, which encodes a member of the family of
chlorophyll a/b binding proteins (17), and
transcripts of the chloroplast genes psaB, atpB,
atpA, and tufA, encoding a photosystem I reaction center protein, the
and
subunits of the chloroplast ATPase complex, and elongation factor Tu, respectively (16, 23,
34). Expression of the cab, atpA,
atpB, and tufA genes followed an endogenous
rhythm, whereas levels of psaB gene transcripts were found
to be regulated primarily by light (17, 34). A detailed analysis of tufA gene expression showed that levels of
tufA transcripts exhibit robust circadian oscillations in
Chlamydomonas cells grown in daily light-dark cycles
(16).
The molecular mechanisms involved in controlling endogenous
fluctuations of chloroplast transcript levels are not known.
Because changes in DNA conformation have been shown to play a role in the control of bacterial gene expression (4, 26, 31, 33) and
in transcription by maize chloroplast RNA polymerase in vitro (20,
37), we monitored relative DNA supercoiling in the chloroplast of
Chlamydomonas cells grown in light-dark cycles in order to evaluate its importance for endogenous regulation of chloroplast transcript levels. We found fluctuations of DNA superhelicity in two
separate regions of the chloroplast chromosome in cells growing in 12-h
dark-12-h light cycles and 12-h dark-24-h light cycles. The
superhelical changes correlated with changes in rates of chloroplast
gene transcription, suggesting a contribution of DNA conformation to
the control of chloroplast gene expression in Chlamydomonas.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Growth of algae.
C. reinhardtii,
atpB-defective mutant strain CC-373 (ac-uc-2-21),
obtained from the Chlamydomonas Genetics Center at Duke University, Durham, N.C., and photosynthetic transformants of that
mutant were grown on high-salt (HS) minimal medium (38) or
HS minimal medium supplemented with 2.5 g of potassium acetate per
liter (for the mutant) as described previously (21).
Wild-type and transformant cells were grown in 12-h dark-12-h light
cycles (followed in some experiments by a 12-h dark-24-h light cycle) (light intensity, 500 W/m2), with daily dilutions to
approximately 2 × 106 cells/ml at the beginning of
each light period. Cell density was monitored by counting with a hemocytometer.
Cross-linking assay.
Changes in relative superhelicity in
the atpB, psaB, rbcL, and
atpA gene regions of the Chlamydomonas
chloroplast chromosome were measured by in vivo cross-linking of the
two strands of the DNA helix with
4'-hydroxymethyl-4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen (HMT; HRI Associates,
Berkeley, Calif.) or 4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen (trioxsalen; Sigma)
essentially as described previously (42). Cross-linking was
done for 90 s in 20 ml of HS minimal medium with 2 × 107 cells/ml at an HMT or trioxsalen concentration of 6 µg/ml with black UV-A-emitting (366 nm) lightbulbs. The number of
cells per milliliter, the concentration of the psoralen reagent, and
the UV-A dose were adjusted so that cross-linking efficiency was
approximately 50 to 90% (as seen by the Southern analysis described
below) in the atpB 5' region in cells harvested at the end
of the dark period. After cross-linking, DNA was isolated as described
previously (2). For determining the relative degree of
cross-linking in different DNA sequences, 1.5 µg of the isolated DNA
was digested with 15 U each of the restriction enzymes BamHI
and PstI (for the atpB gene 5' region),
SpeI and PvuI (for the psaB gene 5' region), PstI (for the rbcL gene region),
AccI (for the atpA gene region), and
BamHI (for the GUS reporter gene sequence), and after sodium
acetate precipitation and alkali denaturation, the DNA sequences were
separated in a neutral 1% agarose gel at 75 V. DNA was transferred
from the gel onto a nylon membrane (Zetaprobe; Bio-Rad) by alkaline
transfer according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
approximately 700-bp EcoRI-HpaI restriction fragment from the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB
structural gene (atpB gene probe [2]), the
approximately 1.1-kb BamHI 16 fragment from the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast genome (psaB gene
probe), the approximately 890-bp HindIII restriction
fragment from the rbcL structural gene (rbcL
probe [2]), the approximately 740-bp EcoRI-AccI restriction fragment from the 5'
region of the atpA gene (atpA probe
[2]), and the approximately 1.9-kb
BamHI-SacI restriction fragment from pBI221 (GUS
probe [2]), were labeled with 32P-labeled
random primer and hybridized to the DNA blots for 24 h at 65°C
(8). Membranes were washed as described previously (8) and exposed to X-ray film with an intensifying screen at
80°C for 24 h.
Chloroplast transformation.
The chloroplast of the
nonphotosynthetic mutant CC-373 was stably transformed by bombarding
cells spread on agar plates with tungsten particles that were coated
with chimeric DNA constructs essentially as described previously
(1, 5). Photosynthetic transformants were selected for their
ability to grow on HS minimal medium under high-light conditions
(5). Transgenic cell lines were maintained on agar plates
and, when needed for analysis, grown in liquid HS minimal medium.
Transformants were screened repeatedly for the presence of the
introduced reporter gene constructs.
RNA isolation and RNA gel blot analyses.
Total RNA was
isolated from about 1.2 × 108 cells by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-phenol extractions and LiCl purification (2). RNA
gel blots were prepared as described previously (34). Blots were hybridized at 65°C to specific random primer
32P-radiolabeled DNA probes for 24 h and washed
following the protocol of Church and Gilbert (8). The
approximately 700-bp EcoRI-HpaI restriction
fragment from the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB
structural gene (2), the approximately 1.9-kb
BamHI-SacI restriction fragment from plasmid
pBI221, containing the complete GUS coding region (18), and
the 1.1-kb BamHI 16 restriction fragment from
Chlamydomonas chloroplast DNA were used as probes to detect
atpB, GUS, and psaB gene transcripts,
respectively. The washed membranes were exposed overnight at
80°C
to X-ray film with an intensifying screen.
Plasmids.
The basic transformation vector into which all
chimeric GUS reporter genes were cloned for stable introduction into
the chloroplast genome of mutant CC-373 consisted of the 5.3-kb
EcoRI-BamHI Chlamydomonas chloroplast
DNA restriction fragment, originally isolated from the chloroplast
BamHI 10 restriction fragment (47), ligated into
pUC8 as described previously (2, 21). The algal fragment contains the atpB gene and extends to within the inverted
repeat; DNA intended for insertion into the chloroplast genome was
inserted into the first KpnI site beyond the terminus of the
endogenous atpB gene (2) (see Fig. 2 for location
of the chimeric GUS gene on the chloroplast chromosomes).
Plasmid pCrc34, containing the GUS structural gene under
transcriptional control of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast
atpB gene promoter region (224 bp) and terminated by
3'-flanking sequences from the Chlamydomonas chloroplast
rbcL gene, was the starting plasmid for making deletions
from both ends into the atpB promoter region. The
construction of pCrc34 has been described previously (2).
All chimeric atpB promoter:GUS deletion constructs used in
this study were derived from pCrc34 as described earlier (2, 21).
Plasmid rbcL/S promoter:GUS, containing the putative
promoter sequence of the plastidic rbcL/S gene of the brown
alga Ectocarpus siliculosus fused to the coding region of
the GUS gene, was constructed by first cloning the 580-bp
BstBI-EcoRV restriction fragment from the
Ectocarpus rbcL/S gene into the
ClaI/EcoRV sites of pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene)
followed by insertion of the XhoI-EcoRV fragment from the new plasmid into XhoI/SmaI-cut pCrc32
(3).
To construct plasmid psaB:GUS, containing the putative
promoter of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast psaB
gene fused to the GUS structural gene and terminated by the 3' region
of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast rbcL gene, a
618-bp DNA sequence from the 5' region of the psaB gene was
amplified from the Chlamydomonas chloroplast BamHI 8 fragment by the PCR with the 5' and 3' primers
5'-TCGCAGGTTCGAATCCTTC-3' and
5'-TATCTTTCGAAGGGTGTTG-3', respectively, both containing a BstBI restriction enzyme site. The PCR fragment was digested
with BstBI and cloned into the ClaI site of
pBluescript SK+ such that the 5' end of the fragment was adjacent to
the HindIII site of the Bluescript polylinker. A 351-bp
psaB fragment was released by cutting the construct with
NdeI (this site was filled in with the Klenow fragment of
DNA polymerase) and XhoI and subcloned into
EcoRV/XhoI-cut pBluescript SK+. After being cut
with XhoI (the site was filled in with DNA polymerase) and
EcoRI, the resulting fragment was inserted into
EcoRI/SmaI-cut pCrc44 (2).
 |
RESULTS |
Chloroplast DNA conformation changes diurnally in
Chlamydomonas cells growing in light-dark cycles.
It
had been determined previously (42) that the DNA
conformation in at least three different regions of the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosome is more relaxed in
cells growing in light than in cells growing in darkness. To find out
whether the topology of Chlamydomonas chloroplast DNA
actually fluctuates in cells growing in 12-h light-12-h dark cycles,
we determined the relative degree of DNA supercoiling in different
regions of the chloroplast genome at different time points in a 12-h
dark-12-h light cycle (Fig. 1). The four
DNA sequences studied were located in two different regions of the
chloroplast chromosome separated by about 40 kb of DNA (Fig. 1A); one
region contains the genes psaB, rbcL, and atpA, and the other region contains the atpB
gene. Relative superhelicity was measured by the cross-linking assay
developed by Vos and Hanawalt (44), as modified for
Chlamydomonas by Thompson and Mosig (42). In this
assay, the relative degree of superhelicity in a DNA sequence is probed
by cross-linking the two strands of the DNA helix with psoralen in the
presence of UV-A light. Cross-linking efficiency is proportional to the
degree of supercoiling (36) and is visualized on Southern
blots by the ratio of DNA in double- to single-stranded bands (the
higher the ratio, the higher the superhelicity).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Changes in DNA superhelicity around
Chlamydomonas chloroplast genes atpB,
psaB, rbcL, and atpA in cells growing
in a 12-h dark-12-h light regimen, as determined by the cross-linking
assay. (A) Map of the DNA regions and location of the restriction
fragments that were examined for relative changes of superhelicity with
the cross-linking assay (for details of the cross-linking procedure,
see Materials and Methods and reference 42). Genes
are shown as shaded boxes. Arrows within the boxes indicate the
direction of transcription. Restriction sites used in digestion of
genomic DNA for the DNA gel (Southern) blots shown in panel B are
indicated above the gene map, and the approximate sizes and locations
of the probes used are indicated below the gene map. (B) DNA gel blot
(Southern) analyses of cross-linked DNA to detect conformational
changes in the DNA regions around the chloroplast atpB,
psaB, rbcL, and atpA genes. Algae
grown in light-dark cycles were harvested at the time points indicated
below the autoradiograms. DNA was cross-linked in vivo and, after
isolation, digested with BamHI/PstI
(atpB), PvuI/SpeI (psaB),
PstI (rbcL), and AccI
(atpA), alkali denatured, and separated in a 1% agarose gel
as described in Materials and Methods. Blots were hybridized to
double-stranded random primer 32P-labeled DNA probes from
the coding regions of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast genes
(see Materials and Methods) as indicated in panel A. D, dark period
(also indicated by a filled bar); L, light period (also indicated by an
open bar); C, control DNA isolated at time point 6.5 h of the
light period from algae that were not treated with psoralen; DS and SS,
double-stranded and single-stranded restriction fragments,
respectively. Fragment sizes are given in kilobase pairs (kb) for
double-stranded DNA and in kilobases (kb) for single-stranded DNA.
Ratios of double-stranded to single-stranded bands at time points 0.25 and 6.5 h in the light period, as calculated from laser
densitometric readings of autoradiograms, respectively, are as follows:
for atpB, 2.3 and 0.25; for psaB, 21.7 and 4.7; for rbcL, 1.6 and 0.2; for
atpA, 0.6 and 0.06. The higher the ratio of DNA in
double-stranded to single-stranded bands on the autoradiograms, the
higher the degree of DNA supercoiling.
|
|
Relative superhelicity within a 4-kb sequence in the 5' region of the
atpB gene, as visualized by the ratio of double- to single-stranded DNA bands on Southern blots (Fig. 1B), was highest at
time point 0.25 h (double strand/single strand ratio, about 2.3)
near the beginning of the light period and lowest at time point
6.5 h (double strand/single strand ratio, about 0.25) in the
middle of the light period. Similarly, in the region of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosome in which the
psaB, rbcL, and atpA genes are
located, relative superhelicities changed from more supercoiling at the
beginning of the light period to less supercoiling in the middle of the
light period. Superhelicities decreased about 4.6-fold, 8-fold, and
10-fold in the psaB, rbcL, and atpA
gene regions, respectively. Although the magnitude of the
conformational changes was different in the four DNA sequences, which
can be explained by different cross-linking efficiencies (see
Discussion), the results of these analyses show that diurnal alterations in chloroplast DNA topology are not confined to specific regions of the chloroplast chromosome but occur in the same direction at widely separate DNA loci. The diurnal alterations do not seem to be
causally linked to the replication of chloroplast DNA in the course of
daily cell division because, under our growth conditions, chloroplast
DNA replication is synchronized and takes place in a relatively small
2- to 3-h time window at the end of the light period. Thus, it does not
correlate in time with the changes found in DNA supercoiling.
Diurnal changes in chloroplast DNA topology are independent of
transcription.
In bacteria, supercoiling of the circular
chromosome is under the control of several topoisomerases that
cooperate to maintain the DNA conformation at the optimum conformation
for processes like transcription and DNA replication (35).
Chloroplasts contain topoisomerases (40), which presumably
have the same function as those in bacteria. Because transcription is
one of the processes that perturbs DNA supercoiling (movement of RNA
polymerase along the DNA duplex relaxes the torsional tension in front
of and creates negative supercoils behind the transcription complex
[24, 31, 46]), the diurnal changes in superhelicity
measured by the cross-linking assay (Fig. 1) could be due to diurnal
variations of transcriptional activities along the chloroplast genome
instead of to independent control. To be able to assess directly a
potential influence of transcription on the fluctuations in chloroplast
DNA conformation found in Chlamydomonas grown in the
light-dark regimen, we determined the relative superhelicities in
untranscribed regions of the chloroplast genome in cells growing in
12-h dark-12-h light cycles (Fig. 2). Two transgenic cell lines harboring GUS reporter genes fused to nonfunctional promoter sequences were used in these analyses (Fig. 2A
and B). In one chimeric gene construct (designated rbcL/S
promoter:GUS), the GUS coding region was fused to 580 bp of the 5'
region (including the putative promoter) of the plastid
rbcL/S gene from the brown alga E. siliculosus
(Fig. 2A). The other construct (designated pCrc46 [2])
contained extensive 5' deletions of promoter sequences of the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB gene linked to the
GUS coding region (Fig. 2B). Both constructs were inserted into the
chloroplast chromosome near the 3' end of the endogenous
atpB gene (2) (Fig. 2A and B). No GUS transcripts
could be detected by Northern analysis in transgenic
Chlamydomonas cells harboring these constructs, showing that
the two GUS sequences are not transcribed.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Changes in DNA superhelicities in untranscribed regions
of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast genome. (A) Location of the
chimeric rbcL/S promoter:GUS gene on the chromosome of
transgenic Chlamydomonas. The gene is not transcribed,
because the rbcL/S promoter from Ectocarpus does
not function in Chlamydomonas. The ~4.9-kb
BamHI fragment, containing a portion of the inverted repeat
(IR), the 580-bp rbcL/S sequence, and the coding region of
the GUS gene (shaded dark gray), were examined for changes in
superhelicity (shown in panel C). E, EcoRI; B,
BamHI. (B) Location of the chimeric atpB
promoter:GUS gene (pCrc46) with a deletion of the nonfunctional
atpB promoter sequence (2) on the chloroplast
chromosome of transgenic Chlamydomonas. Relative
superhelicity was determined in the ~1.9-kb BamHI fragment
comprising the entire GUS coding region (shaded dark gray).
Abbreviations are as defined for panel A. (C) DNA gel blot analyses of
cross-linked DNA isolated from transgenic cells carrying the
rbcL/S promoter:GUS gene construct (left) or the
atpB promoter:GUS construct (right). Cells growing in 12-h
light-12-h dark cycles were harvested at time points 22 h (dark),
0.25 h (light), and 7 h (light) and treated with
trimethylpsoralen as described in Materials and Methods. Isolated
cross-linked DNA was digested with BamHI and, after
separation onto a 1% agarose gel, was transferred onto a nylon
membrane. Both blots were hybridized to the ~1.9-kb random primer
32P-labeled sequence of the GUS coding region. The double-
and single-stranded DNA bands were visualized by autoradiography.
Abbreviations are as defined in the legend to Fig. 1.
|
|
In chloroplast transformants growing in 12-h dark-12-h light cycles,
the superhelicity within a 4.9-kb BamHI fragment containing the 2.5-kb rbcL/S promoter:GUS construct (Fig. 2A) and
within a 1.9-kb BamHI fragment, the latter containing only
GUS gene coding sequences (Fig. 2B), decreased in the light period
(Fig. 2C), analogous to the decreases in superhelicity measured in the
atpB, psaB, rbcL, and atpA
sequences of the chloroplast chromosome (Fig. 1). Although the extent
of the superhelical changes varied among the DNA sequences examined,
the results show that endogenous changes of DNA topology in the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosome occur in the same
direction and concurrently in transcribed and nontranscribed sequences.
Thus, DNA supercoiling seems to be controlled independently of, but is
not necessarily unaffected by, transcriptional activities along the
DNA double helix.
Superhelicity of Chlamydomonas chloroplast DNA changes
endogenously.
To find out whether the diurnal changes in
chloroplast DNA topology are controlled by the light-dark regimen or
regulated endogenously, the relative degrees of supercoiling in the 5'
regions of the atpB and psaB genes were
determined in cells that were first grown in 12-h dark-12-h light
cycles, followed by one 12-h dark-24-h light cycle. Samples were taken
at time point 10 h dark and points 0.25, 7, 9, 16, and 19 h
light of the latter dark-light cycle (Fig.
3). Time points 16 and 19 h light
correspond to 4 and 7 h darkness in the subjective dark period of
the 12-h dark-12-h light cycles. Over the 24 h of continuous
illumination, the DNA conformation in 4 kb of sequences in the 5'
regions of the atpB and psaB regions fluctuated
(Fig. 3); after being more supercoiled near the beginning of the light
period than after 9 h of illumination, it reverted to a higher
degree of supercoiling at 16 and 19 h in continuous light, i.e.,
in the middle of the subjective dark period, suggesting an endogenous
control of chloroplast DNA topology, at least during the 12 h of
extended illumination. Although the cross-linking assay indicated a
relatively high degree of DNA supercoiling in the psaB 5'
region at all times of the light-dark cycle, there is clearly a
decrease at time points 7 and 9 h light (Fig. 3B and C), showing
that changes in DNA topology are qualitatively similar in the
atpB and psaB regions of the chloroplast
chromosome.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Endogenous changes of DNA conformation in the 5' regions
of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB and
psaB genes in cells grown in a 12-h dark-24-h light cycle,
as determined by the cross-linking assay. (A and B) Cells were first
grown in several 12-h dark-12-h light (D/L) cycles before being
shifted to the 12-h dark-24-h light (D/LL) regimen. Samples were taken
at the time points indicated below the autoradiograms, treated with
psoralen, and processed as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Gel
blot of DNA digested with BamHI/PstI. The DNA
blot was hybridized to a probe specific for the atpB gene
(see Fig. 1A for the locations of the probe and restriction fragment).
(B) Gel blot of DNA digested with PvuI/SpeI and
probed with the 1.1-kb BamHI 16 fragment of the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosome (see Fig. 1A for the
locations of the probe and restriction fragment). All steps of sample
preparation were identical to those described in the legend to Fig. 1.
Abbreviations are as defined in the legend to Fig. 1. (C) Graphic
representation of the changes in superhelicity within the 5' regions of
the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB and
psaB genes. Autoradiograms of the DNA gel blots of panels A
and B were scanned, and relative band intensities were determined with
an image-analyzing computer program (NIH image). Ratios of double- to
single-stranded band intensities are plotted as percent fractions of
total DNA. To better visualize the changes in superhelicity measured
during the time course of the experiments, a line is drawn that
connects the single-stranded portions of the figure bars. For
comparison, the dashed and shaded lines in the atpB panel
show the corresponding changes in levels of atpB transcripts
and in rates of atpB gene transcription, respectively, drawn
with the data in Fig. 4 (transcript levels) and in Hwang et al.
(16) (transcription rates). Abbreviations are as defined for
panels A and B.
|
|
Endogenous changes of DNA superhelicity correlate with changes in
chloroplast gene transcription and changes in transcript pool
sizes.
Because the degree of DNA supercoiling has been shown to be
an important factor in transcription initiation in bacteria
(4) and in chloroplasts (37, 41), we tried to
assess the contribution of the endogenous fluctuations in DNA topology
to the endogenous and circadian fluctuations found previously (16,
34) in chloroplast gene transcription and chloroplast transcript
pool sizes in Chlamydomonas. There is a strong correlation
between fluctuations of transcript levels and transcription rates,
reported earlier (16, 34), and changes in DNA conformation
found in the present study (Fig. 3). In all cases studied,
transcription rates were highest at the beginning of the light period
and lowest near the end of the 12-h light period, when DNA supercoiling
is highest and lowest, respectively.
To evaluate the importance of promoter and cis-acting DNA
sequences for fluctuations of transcript levels (Fig.
4), we analyzed the expression of
chimeric atpB promoter:GUS constructs that had deletions in
the 5' region in the 5'
3' and 3'
5' directions down to the basic
promoter sequence (see Materials and Methods). The starting construct
for these analyses consisted of a 224-bp DNA fragment from the 5'
region of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB gene
(including the promoter) fused 5' to the coding region of the bacterial
uidA (GUS) gene. As were all other GUS constructs described
in this report (see also Fig. 2), the construct was inserted into the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast genome adjacent to the 3' end of
the atpB gene as described previously (2). The DNA conformation in this region alters in the same manner as in the
other regions of the chloroplast genome we analyzed in cells grown in
dark-light cycles (Fig. 2). Levels of GUS transcripts, measured in
transgenic Chlamydomonas cells grown in light-dark cycles,
by RNA gel blot (Northern) analysis, fluctuated in light-dark cycles
with a pattern similar to that of transcripts from the endogenous
atpB gene (Fig. 4A). Fluctuations of GUS transcript levels
persisted in continuous light (Fig. 4B), as did fluctuations of
transcript levels of the endogenous atpB gene, and occurred concurrently with changes in DNA conformation in the atpB
gene region (Fig. 3A), suggesting a causal link between changes in DNA
topology and changes in transcript levels.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
RNA gel blot analyses to determine the abundance of
atpB and atpB-GUS gene transcripts in a
Chlamydomonas chloroplast transformant growing in 12-h
light-12-h dark cycles (A) and in continuous light following growth in
light-dark cycles (B). Total RNA was isolated at the indicated time
points (time point 0 = onset of light = end of dark period)
from a chloroplast transformant (designated 5/3 [21];
see Fig. 5 and Materials and Methods) carrying a chimeric
atpB promoter:GUS:rbcL 3'-end gene. Four
micrograms of total RNA was separated in a 1.3% agarose-formaldehyde
gel, transferred onto a nylon membrane (Zetaprobe; Bio-Rad), and
hybridized to gene-specific probes for the endogenous
Chlamydomonas chloroplast atpB gene or the GUS
gene (see Materials and Methods). Membranes were exposed for 24 h
at 80°C to X-ray film with an intensifying screen. Light (L) and
dark (D) periods are indicated by open and filled bars, respectively,
above the autoradiograms.
|
|
Deletions into the atpB promoter region (5'
3' and
3'
5') leaving a promoter fragment as short as 77 bp, extending from
positions
22 to +55 relative to the start site of transcription, did
not alter the pattern of GUS transcript fluctuations in light-dark cycles (Fig. 5), despite a 95% reduction
in the rate of GUS gene transcription from this deleted atpB
promoter:GUS construct (21). The results show that all
elements required for transcript-level fluctuations lie within the
basic atpB promoter sequence. Levels of transcripts of most
other Chlamydomonas chloroplast genes were found to
fluctuate with the same pattern as transcripts of the atpB
gene (16, 34), and it is likely that in those cases only the
basic promoter sequences are sufficient to direct endogenous fluctuations of transcript levels.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Abundance of GUS transcripts in Chlamydomonas
chloroplast transformants grown in light-dark cycles carrying chimeric
atpB promoter:GUS:rbcL 3'-end genes with 5' 3'-
and 3' 5'-deleted atpB promoter sequences. (A) Schematic
drawings of the constructs used in these analyses. Numbers below the
construct drawings denote the end points of the atpB 5'
sequence deletions relative to the transcription start site
(21). Arrows in the shaded atpB 5' sequences
indicate the start site and the direction of transcription. (B) RNA gel
blot analyses of total RNA isolated during a 12-h light-12-h dark
cycle at the time points (in hours of the 24-h cycle) indicated below
the autoradiograms. Blots were made as described in the legend to Fig.
4 and in Materials and Methods.
|
|
A default pattern of chloroplast gene expression in
Chlamydomonas?
To substantiate the conclusion that
basic promoter sequences alone are sufficient for typical diurnal
fluctuations of chloroplast transcript levels in
Chlamydomonas, we examined in more detail the expression of
the psaB gene. DNA supercoiling in the 5' region of the
psaB gene changes in cells grown in light-dark cycles with the same endogenous pattern as does DNA supercoiling in the 5' region
of the atpB gene (Fig. 3), and changes in DNA supercoiling correlate strongly with changes in rates of psaB gene
transcription determined earlier (34). However, unlike
levels of transcripts of most other Chlamydomonas
chloroplast genes, which peak in the beginning of the light period
(16, 34), psaB transcript levels peak in the
middle of the light period (34). Because the accumulation pattern of psaB gene transcripts in cells growing in
light-dark cycles does not follow the changes in psaB gene
transcription, psaB transcript accumulation appears to be
controlled posttranscriptionally, most likely mediated by sequence
elements in the mRNA outside of the basic psaB promoter
sequences. Thus, transcripts of a chimeric gene construct consisting
only of basic psaB promoter sequences fused to the GUS
reporter gene would be expected to accumulate with a default pattern
typical for the majority of chloroplast transcripts in cells growing in
light-dark cycles. To test this notion, a 336-bp
NdeI-BstI DNA fragment from the 5' region of the
psaB gene (see Materials and Methods), containing the
putative psaB gene promoter, was fused to the GUS coding
sequence and stably inserted into the Chlamydomonas
chloroplast genome by biolistic particle transformation. Total RNA was
isolated from a chloroplast transformant at time points 23 h dark
and 7 h light, and GUS transcript levels were compared to levels
of transcripts of the endogenous psaB gene on RNA gel blots
(Fig. 6). Unlike psaB gene
transcripts, which accumulate to relatively high levels in the middle
of the light period (Fig. 6 [34]), levels of
psaB promoter:GUS transcripts decreased during the light
period (Fig. 6), as has been found for levels of most other chloroplast
transcripts (16, 34). This result supports the idea that
endogenous fluctuations of transcription and transcript accumulation in
the Chlamydomonas chloroplast follow a default pattern that
requires only basic promoter sequences, whereas a different pattern of
gene expression requires additional sequence elements. The fact that
the endogenous fluctuations in chloroplast DNA topology found in this
study correlate tightly with a default pattern of transcription and
transcript level accumulation again suggests a direct causal link
between both processes.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Transcripts of a chimeric psaB
promoter:GUS:rbcL 3'-end gene accumulate differently than
transcripts of the endogenous psaB gene in
Chlamydomonas transformants growing in 12-h dark-12-h light
cycles. Total RNA was isolated at time points 23 h dark and 7 h light from a chloroplast transformant that had the psaB
promoter:GUS:rbcL 3'-end construct inserted near the 3' end
of the endogenous atpB gene (see Materials and Methods), and
RNA gel blots were made as described in Materials and Methods and in
the legend to Fig. 4.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Torsional stress has been shown to play an important role in
initiation of transcription of chloroplast and prokaryotic genes (20, 31, 33, 37), presumably by facilitating promoter element recognition and open complex formation by the RNA polymerase complex. Several topoisomerases have been identified that intricately cooperate to control DNA topology in bacterial cells (10, 35, 45). A number of reports implicate an influence of environmental conditions on DNA conformation and regulation of transcription (15, 26). Chloroplasts contain topoisomerases
(40), and transcription of chloroplast genes has been found
to be affected differentially by changes in DNA topology in vitro
(37) and in vivo (41). Furthermore, it has been
determined previously that the DNA conformation in at least three
separate regions of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosome
is more relaxed in cells kept in light than in cells kept in darkness
(42). These data show that DNA supercoiling in the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast is controlled by topoisomerases
and that it can be influenced by external conditions, e.g., light and dark.
In this study, we found a strong correlation between endogenous
fluctuations of DNA topology in two different distant regions of the
chloroplast chromosome and endogenous fluctuations of overall gene
transcription in Chlamydomonas, suggesting a direct causal link between both processes. Because the conformational changes in
chloroplast DNA also occur in DNA sequences that are not transcribed (Fig. 2), transcription itself can be ruled out as the sole cause for
changes in DNA supercoiling. However, long-distance effects of
conformational changes in actively transcribed regions of the chloroplast chromosome on DNA topology in nontranscribed regions cannot
be totally excluded. The twin-supercoiled-domain model (24),
which is supported by a number of experimental studies (4, 7, 25,
32), predicts the accumulation of positive and negative
supercoils ahead of and behind an RNA polymerase elongation complex,
respectively, provided rotation of the RNA polymerase transcription
ensemble around the template DNA and superhelical diffusion are
prevented, e.g., by anchoring the transcription-translation complex to
a membrane (4, 25). In bacteria, transcription-induced supercoils seem to be restricted to less than 800 bp in the vicinity of
RNA polymerase transcription units (32). The supercoils are removed by DNA topoisomerases, so that they do not build up on DNA
templates in cells with normal topoisomerase I and DNA gyrase activities (7). We do not know how putative
transcription-induced supercoils are dissipated in chloroplasts along
the circular chromosomal DNA. Given the local appearance of
transcription-induced supercoiling around the bacterial RNA polymerase
transcription elongation complex and in view of the special conditions
(high rates of transcription from a very strong promoter,
topoisomerase-deficient mutants, anchoring of the RNA polymerase to a
membrane) required in bacteria for the observation of any effect of
transcription-induced supercoiling on neighboring DNA sequences
(4, 25), it appears unlikely that, under our conditions, a
long-distance effect of transcription on DNA topology in nontranscribed
regions of chloroplast chromosomes can be visualized by the
cross-linking assay. Therefore, the endogenous changes in superhelical
densities seen in this study in nontranscribed regions of the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosomes are most likely
independent of transcription elsewhere on the chromosome and indicative
of overall endogenous changes in chloroplast DNA topology.
The endogenously controlled overall change in DNA topology could
provide a simple mechanism to regulate overall chloroplast transcription simultaneously. It could establish a default pattern of
chloroplast gene transcription (for Chlamydomonas, the
highest and lowest rates of transcription are at the beginning and end of the light period, respectively) on which other mechanisms that regulate the expression of individual genes, e.g., light-dependent mechanisms, could be superimposed. The finding that accumulation of
psaB promoter:GUS gene transcripts differs from accumulation of transcripts of the endogenous psaB gene in
Chlamydomonas cells grown in light-dark cycles (Fig. 6) and
follows the default pattern of most other Chlamydomonas
chloroplast transcripts supports the notion that in the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast only basic promoter sequences are
required for a basic pattern of gene expression (Fig. 5) and that
additional sequences can alter the pattern (Fig. 6). It seems likely
that both specific promoter sequences and fluctuations in the topology
of the region of the chromosome in which a gene is located are
important for gene expression but that timing could result from changes
in DNA topology.
A change in DNA topology might be one, but not the only, mechanism
involved in circadian control of chloroplast gene transcription in
Chlamydomonas. In other systems, other factors have been
found to produce daily changes of transcript levels. In
Synechococcus, for example, circadian expression of the
psbAI gene has been found to be influenced by a
sigma70-like transcription factor (43). The loss
of the factor resulted in a phenotype that was still rhythmic but one
in which transcripts fluctuated with lower amplitudes than in wild-type
cells (43). In our system, binding and dissociation of DNA
binding proteins during the 12-h dark-12-h light cycles may, in
addition to topoisomerases, contribute to changes in DNA
superhelicities. These DNA binding proteins may be involved in control
of transcription, DNA replication, or other processes occurring periodically.
Because psoralens photoreact preferentially with thymidine residues
(9), the efficiency of DNA cross-linking with psoralens depends on the A+T content, the position of the thymidine residues relative to each other, and the size of the DNA sequence studied. The
relatively high superhelicities determined for the 5' region of the
psaB gene (Fig. 3B) compared to the relatively low
superhelicities found, for instance, in the GUS coding region (Fig. 2C)
might in part reflect such differences in cross-linking efficiency in the two DNA segments (the 4-kb psaB gene fragment contains
65% A and T, whereas the A+T content in the 1.9-kb GUS coding region is only 48%). A decrease in cross-linking efficiency in short DNA
sequences makes it difficult to determine relative superhelicities in
DNA fragments smaller than ~1.5 kb and did not permit us to examine
superhelical changes in small segments, e.g., promoter sequences, of
the chloroplast DNA.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
M. L. Salvador and U. Klein contributed equally to this work.
We thank Klaus Valentin, University of Gießen, Germany, for the gift
of the plasmid containing the rbcL/S gene of E. siliculosus and Toril Håkestad, University of Oslo, Norway, for
plasmid psaB:GUS.
The work was supported by grants from DGICYT (PB 95-1075) to M.L.S.,
the Norwegian Research Council (100946/410) to U.K., and the National
Institute of General Medical Sciences of the N.I.H., U.S.P.S., to L.B.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Biological
Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA
02138. Phone: (617) 495-4292. Fax: (617) 495-4292. E-mail:
bogorad{at}biosun.harvard.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Blowers, A. D.,
L. Bogorad,
K. B. Shark, and J. C. Sanford.
1989.
Studies on Chlamydomonas chloroplast transformation: foreign DNA can be stably maintained in the chromosome.
Plant Cell
1:123-132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Blowers, A. D.,
G. S. Ellmore,
U. Klein, and L. Bogorad.
1990.
Transcriptional analysis of endogenous and foreign genes in chloroplast transformants of Chlamydomonas.
Plant Cell
2:1059-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Blowers, A. D.,
U. Klein,
G. S. Ellmore, and L. Bogorad.
1993.
Functional in vivo analyses of the 3' flanking sequences of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast rbcL and psaB genes.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
238:339-349[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bowater, R. P.,
D. Chen, and D. M. J. Lilley.
1994.
Modulation of tyrT promoter activity by template supercoiling in vivo.
EMBO J.
13:5647-5655[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Boynton, J. E.,
N. W. Gillham,
E. H. Harris,
J. P. Hosler,
A. M. Johnson,
A. R. Jones,
B. L. Randolph-Anderson,
D. Robertson,
T. M. Klein,
K. B. Shark, and J. C. Sanford.
1988.
Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles.
Science
240:1534-1538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bünning, E.
1973.
The physiological clock, 3rd ed.
Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Chen, D.,
R. Bowater, and D. M. J. Lilley.
1994.
Topological promoter coupling in Escherichia coli: topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter on a plasmid.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3757-3764[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Church, G., and W. Gilbert.
1984.
Genomic sequencing.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:1991-1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cimino, G. D.,
H. B. Gamper,
S. T. Isaacs, and J. E. Hearst.
1985.
Psoralens as photoactive probes of nucleic acid structure and function: organic chemistry, photochemistry, and biochemistry.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54:1151-1193[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Drlica, K.
1990.
Bacterial topoisomerases and the control of supercoiling.
Trends Genet.
6:433-437[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dunlap, J. C.
1993.
Genetic analysis of circadian clocks.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
55:683-728[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Fejes, E.,
A. Pay,
I. Kanevsky,
M. Szell,
E. Adam,
S. Kay, and F. Nagy.
1990.
A 268 bp upstream sequence mediates the circadian clock-regulated transcription of the wheat Cab-1 gene in transgenic plants.
Plant Mol. Biol.
15:921-932[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Giuliano, G.,
N. E. Hoffman,
K. Ko,
P. A. Scolnik, and A. R. Cashmore.
1988.
A light-entrained circadian clock controls transcription of several plant genes.
EMBO J.
7:3635-3642[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Harris, E. H.
1989.
The Chlamydomonas sourcebook.
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 15.
|
Hulton, C. S. J.,
A. Seirafi,
J. C. D. Hinton,
J. M. Sidebotham,
L. Waddell,
G. D. Pavitt,
T. Owen-Hughes,
A. Spassky,
H. Buc, and C. F. Higgins.
1990.
Histone-like protein H1 (H-NS), DNA supercoiling, and gene expression in bacteria.
Cell
63:631-642[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hwang, S.,
R. Kawazoe, and D. L. Herrin.
1996.
Transcription of tufA and other chloroplast-encoded genes is controlled by a circadian clock in Chlamydomonas.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:996-1000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Jacobshagen, S., and C. H. Johnson.
1994.
Circadian rhythms of gene expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: circadian cycling of mRNA abundances of cabII, and possibly of -tubulin and cytochrome c.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
64:142-152[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Jefferson, R. A.
1987.
Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system.
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.
5:307-405.
|
| 19.
|
Johnson, C. H.,
M. R. Knight,
T. Kondo,
P. Masson,
J. Sedbrook,
A. Haley, and A. Trewavas.
1995.
Circadian oscillations of cytosolic and chloroplastic free calcium in plants.
Science
269:1863-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Jolly, S. O., and L. Bogorad.
1980.
Preferential transcription of cloned chloroplast DNA sequences by maize chloroplast RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:822-826[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Klein, U.,
J. D. De Camp, and L. Bogorad.
1992.
Two types of chloroplast gene promoters in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3453-3457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kondo, T.,
C. A. Strayer,
R. D. Kulkarni,
W. Taylor,
M. Ishiura,
S. S. Golden, and C. H. Johnson.
1993.
Circadian rhythms in prokaryotes: luciferase as a reporter of circadian gene expression in cyanobacteria.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:5672-5676[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Leu, S.,
D. White, and A. Michaels.
1990.
Cell cycle-dependent transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of chloroplast gene expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1049:311-317[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Liu, L. F., and J. C. Wang.
1987.
Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:7024-7027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lynch, A. S., and J. C. Wang.
1993.
Anchoring of DNA to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane through cotranscriptional synthesis of polypeptides encoding membrane proteins or proteins for export: a mechanism of plasmid hypernegative supercoiling in mutants deficient in DNA topoisomerase I.
J. Bacteriol.
175:1645-1655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
McClellan, J. A.,
P. Boublíková,
E. Palecek, and D. M. J. Lilley.
1990.
Superhelical torsion in cellular DNA responds directly to environmental and genetic factors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:8373-8377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Millar, A. J., and S. A. Kay.
1991.
Circadian control of cab gene transcription and mRNA accumulation in Arabidopsis.
Plant Cell
3:541-550[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Millar, A. J.,
S. R. Short,
N.-H. Chua, and S. A. Kay.
1992.
A novel circadian phenotype based on firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants.
Plant Cell
4:1075-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Nagy, F.,
S. A. Kay, and N.-H. Chua.
1988.
A circadian clock regulates transcription of the wheat cab-1 gene.
Genes Dev.
2:376-382[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Paulsen, H., and L. Bogorad.
1988.
Diurnal and circadian rhythms in the accumulation and synthesis of mRNA for the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein in tobacco.
Plant Physiol.
88:1104-1109[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Pruss, G. J., and K. Drlica.
1989.
DNA supercoiling and prokaryotic transcription.
Cell
56:521-523[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Rahmouni, A. R., and R. D. Wells.
1992.
Direct evidence for the effect of transcription on local DNA supercoiling in vivo.
J. Mol. Biol.
223:131-144[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Richet, E., and O. Raibaud.
1991.
Supercoiling is essential for the formation and stability of the initiation complex at the divergent malEp and malKp promoters.
J. Mol. Biol.
218:529-542[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Salvador, M. L.,
U. Klein, and L. Bogorad.
1993.
Light-regulated and endogenous fluctuations of chloroplast transcript levels in Chlamydomonas. Regulation by transcription and RNA degradation.
Plant J.
3:213-219[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Schmid, M. B., and J. A. Sawitzke.
1993.
Multiple bacterial topoisomerases: specialization or redundancy?
Bioessays
15:445-449[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sinden, R. R.,
J. O. Carlson, and D. E. Pettijohn.
1980.
Torsional tension in the DNA double helix measured with trimethylpsoralen in living E. coli cells: analogous measurements in insect and human cells.
Cell
21:773-783[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Stirdivant, S. M.,
L. D. Crossland, and L. Bogorad.
1985.
DNA supercoiling affects in vitro transcription of two maize chloroplast genes differently.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:4886-4890[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Sueoka, N.
1960.
Mitotic replication of deoxyribonucleic acid in Chlamydomonas reinhardi.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
46:83-91[Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Taylor, W. C.
1989.
Transcriptional regulation by a circadian rhythm.
Plant Cell
1:259-264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Thompson, R. J., and G. Mosig.
1985.
An ATP-dependent supercoiling topoisomerase of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii affects accumulation of specific chloroplast transcripts.
Nucleic Acids Res.
13:873-891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Thompson, R. J., and G. Mosig.
1987.
Stimulation of a chloroplast promoter by novobiocin in situ and in E. coli implies regulation by torsional stress in the chloroplast DNA.
Cell
48:281-287[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Thompson, R. J., and G. Mosig.
1990.
Light affects the structure of Chlamydomonas chloroplast chromosomes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:2625-2631[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Tsinoremas, N. F.,
M. Ishiura,
T. Kondo,
C. R. Andersson,
K. Tanaka,
H. Takahashi,
C. H. Johnson, and S. S. Golden.
1996.
A sigma factor that modifies the circadian expression of a subset of genes in cyanobacteria.
EMBO J.
15:2488-2495[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Vos, J.-M. H., and P. C. Hanawalt.
1987.
Processing of psoralen adducts in an active human gene: repair and replication of DNA containing monoadducts and interstrand cross-links.
Cell
50:789-799[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Wang, J. C.
1996.
DNA topoisomerases.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65:635-692[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Wang, J. C., and A. S. Lynch.
1993.
Transcription and DNA supercoiling.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
3:764-768[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Woessner, J. P.,
N. W. Gillham, and J. E. Boynton.
1986.
The sequence of the chloroplast atpB gene and its flanking regions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Gene
44:17-28[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1998, p. 7235-7242, Vol. 18, No. 12
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Onishi, Y., Hanai, S., Ohno, T., Hara, Y., Ishida, N.
(2008). Rhythmic SAF-A Binding Underlies Circadian Transcription of the Bmal1 Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 3477-3488
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Woelfle, M. A., Johnson, C. H.
(2006). No Promoter Left Behind: Global Circadian Gene Expression in Cyanobacteria.. J Biol Rhythms
21: 419-431
[Abstract]
-
Smith, R. M., Williams, S. B.
(2006). Circadian rhythms in gene transcription imparted by chromosome compaction in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 8564-8569
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kucho, K.-i., Okamoto, K., Tsuchiya, Y., Nomura, S., Nango, M., Kanehisa, M., Ishiura, M.
(2005). Global Analysis of Circadian Expression in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803. J. Bacteriol.
187: 2190-2199
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mittag, M., Kiaulehn, S., Johnson, C. H.
(2005). The Circadian Clock in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. What Is It For? What Is It Similar To?. Plant Physiol.
137: 399-409
[Full Text]
-
Iwasaki, H., Kondo, T.
(2004). Circadian Timing Mechanism in the Prokaryotic Clock System of Cyanobacteria. J Biol Rhythms
19: 436-444
[Abstract]
-
Min, H., Liu, Y., Johnson, C. H., Golden, S. S.
(2004). Phase Determination of Circadian Gene Expression in Synechococcus Elongatus PCC 7942. J Biol Rhythms
19: 103-112
[Abstract]
-
Nakahira, Y., Katayama, M., Miyashita, H., Kutsuna, S., Iwasaki, H., Oyama, T., Kondo, T.
(2004). Global gene repression by KaiC as a master process of prokaryotic circadian system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 881-885
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Michael, T. P., McClung, C. R.
(2003). Enhancer Trapping Reveals Widespread Circadian Clock Transcriptional Control in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.
132: 629-639
[Abstract]
[Full Text]